Article published In:
Interaction-based studies of languageEdited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 389–426
Edited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 389–426
Intonation and clause combining in discourse
The case of because
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Altenberg, Bengt
(1984) Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica 38.1: 20-69. 
(1987) Causal ordering strategies in English conversation. In J. Monaghan (ed.), Grammar in the construction of texts. London: Pinter, pp. 50-64.
Chafe, Wallace
(1984) How people use adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society 101: 437-449.
(1988) Linking intonation units in spoken English. In J. Haiman and S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-27.
Cohen, Antonie and Johan ‘t Hart
(1965) Perceptual analysis of intonation patterns. Proceedings of the Vth International Congress on Acoustics, Liège 1964 : Paper A 16.
Cohen, Antonie, René Collier & Johan’t Hart
(1982) Declination: Construct or intrinsic feature of speech pitch? Phonetica 391: 254-273.
Cooper, William E. & John M. Sorensen
(1981) Fundamental frequency in sentence production. Berlin: Springer.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
(1996) Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodie perspective on interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation-Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11-56.
Cruttenden, Alan
Du Bois, John W
(1985) Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 343-365.
Ducrot, Oswald, Marie-Claire Barbault
et al. (1975) Car, parce que, puisque. Revue romane 101: 248-280.
Erdmann, Peter
(1990) Discourse and grammar. Focussing and defocussing in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Fillmore, Charles J
(1988) The mechanisms of “construction grammar”. Berkeley Linguistics Society General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization: 35-55.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay
et al. (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone
. Language 64.3: 501-538. BoP
BoPFillmore, Charles J. & Paul Kay
Ford, Cecilia E
(1994) Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: Because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text 14.4: 531-554. BoP
Ford, Cecilia E. & Junko Mori
(1994) Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics 4.1: 31-61. BoP
Fox, Barbara
Givón, Talmy
(1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
Haiman, John & Sandra A Thompson
(1984) ‘Subordination’ in universal grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 101: 510-523.
Halliday, M. A K & Ruqaiya Hasan
Hart, J.t., R. Collier
et al. (1990) A perceptual study of intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinämäki, Orvokki
(1975) Because and since. Linguistica Silesiana 11: 135-143.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
Ladd, D. Robert
(1984) Declination: A review and some hypotheses. In C. Ewen & J. Anderson (eds.), Phonology Yearbook. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtity Press, pp. 53-74.
(1988) Declination “reset” and the hierachical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84.2: 530-544.
Lehmann, Christian
(1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 181-225.
Mann, William C
(1984) Discourse structures for text generation. Information Sciences Institute Research Report 1271: 1-17.
(1992) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
BoPMatthiessen, Christian & Sandra A Thompson
(1988) The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In J. Haiman & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 275-329. BoP
BoPOno, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A Thompson
(1995) What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P.W. Davis (ed.), Descriptive and theoretical modes in the alternative linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schiffrin, Deborah
Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Marian Shapley & Elizabeth G. Weber
(1991) Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses. Language and Speech 341: 207-234.
Schleppegrell, Mary J
(1991) Paratactic because. Journal of Pragmatics 161: 323-337.
Sweetser, Eve
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPThorsen, Nina
(1978) An acoustical investigation of Danish intonation. Journal of Phonetics 61: 151-175.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König
(1991) The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E.C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 189-218.
Willems, Nico
(1982) English intonation from a Dutch point of view. Dordrecht: Foris.
Cited by
Cited by 57 other publications
Alvanoudi, Angeliki
2019. “May I tell you something?”: When questions do not anticipate responses. Text & Talk 39:4 ► pp. 563 ff. 
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2011. Action, prosody and emergent constructions: The case of and. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ► pp. 263 ff.
Basterrechea, María & Regina Weinert
2017. Examining the Concept of Subordination in Spoken L1 and L2 English: The Case of If
-Clauses. TESOL Quarterly 51:4 ► pp. 897 ff.
Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson & Jane Maxim
2007. Grammar without sentence structure: A conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism. Aphasiology 21:3-4 ► pp. 256 ff.
Bolden, Galina
2004. The quote and beyond: defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian. Journal of Pragmatics 36:6 ► pp. 1071 ff.
Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020. Chapter 7. Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous speech. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff.
Burridge, Kate
2014. Cos—A New Discourse Marker for Australian English?. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34:4 ► pp. 524 ff.
Canestrelli, Anneloes R., Willem M. Mak & Ted J. M. Sanders
2013. Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:9 ► pp. 1394 ff.
Caspers, Johanneke
1998. Who's Next? The Melodic Marking of Question vs. Continuation in Dutch. Language and Speech 41:3-4 ► pp. 375 ff.
Caspers, Johanneke
2003. Local speech melody as a limiting factor in the turn-taking system in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 31:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
Catasso, Nicholas
2021. Some notes on central causal clauses in Venetian. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 519 ff.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2012. Turn Continuation and Clause Combinations. Discourse Processes 49:3-4 ► pp. 273 ff.
Cristofaro, Sonia
2016. Chapter 15. Routes to insubordination. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 393 ff.
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie
2016. Toward a global approach to discourse uses of conjunctions in spoken French. Language Sciences 58 ► pp. 79 ff.
Detges, Ulrich & Thomas Weidhaas
2016. Coherence and interaction. The French causal connectors comme and car. Language Sciences 58 ► pp. 111 ff.
Diessel, Holger & Katja Hetterle
2011. Causal clauses: a cross-linguistic investigation of their structure, meaning, and use. In Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, ► pp. 23 ff.
Duvallon, Outi & Rea Peltola
2012. Prises de distance en finnois : le mode jussif et le marqueur discursif –hAn. Linx :66-67 ► pp. 101 ff.
Ehmer, Oliver & Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
2016. Adverbial patterns in interaction. Language Sciences 58 ► pp. 1 ff.
Field, Margaret
2022. Increments in Navajo conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 637 ff.
Gipper, Sonja & Foong Ha Yap
2019. Chapter 9. Life of =ti: Use and grammaticalization of a clausal nominalizer in Yurakaré. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 363 ff.
Gonen, Einat, Zohar Livnat & Noam Amir
2015. The discourse marker axshav (‘now’) in spontaneous spoken Hebrew: Discursive and prosodic features. Journal of Pragmatics 89 ► pp. 69 ff.
Hayashi, Makoto
2004. Projection and grammar: notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 36:8 ► pp. 1337 ff.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization,
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2016. On the grammatical status of insubordinate if-clauses. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 341 ff.
Kitano, Hiroaki
2022. On interaction and grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 383 ff.
Levis, John M.
2018. Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
Li, Fang, Willem M. Mak, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J. M. Sanders
2017. On the online effects of subjectivity encoded in causal connectives. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 34 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2007. Multimodal resources for turn-taking. Discourse Studies 9:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Mushin, Ilana & Simona Pekarek Doehler
Pander Maat, H. & T. Sanders
2006. Connectives in Text. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 33 ff.
PEKAREK DOEHLER, SIMONA & SØREN W. ESKILDSEN
2022. Emergent L2 Grammars in and for Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Sanders, Ted J.M. & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2019. Chapter 10. Subjectivity and Causality in discourse and cognition. In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 305], ► pp. 273 ff.
Shaheen, Jonathan
2022. How general can theories of ‘why’ and ‘because’ be?. Inquiry 65:8 ► pp. 1042 ff.
Spagnolli, Anna, Sonia Genovese & Mattia Mori
2021. Similarities and Differences Across Settings: The Case of Turn Continuations in Instant Messaging. In Analysing Digital Interaction, ► pp. 133 ff.
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2020. Chapter 11. Relative-clause increments and the management of reference. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 303 ff.
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Fonctionnement macro-syntaxique et dimension anaphorique des relatives produites post hoc : une analyse interactionnelle et multimodale. Langue française N° 210:2 ► pp. 101 ff.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2015. Managing the Boundary Between “Yes” and “But”: Two Ways of Disaffiliating With Germanja aberandjaber. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
Unternbäumen, Enrique Huelva
2005. Sprechaktbezogene kausale Satzverknüpfung mitporqueim gesprochenen Spanisch. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP) 121:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
van Veen, Rosie, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, Ted Sanders & Huub van den Bergh
2014. “Why? Because I’m talking to you!” Parental input and cognitive complexity as determinants of children’s connective acquisition. In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254], ► pp. 209 ff.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2002. The functional value of non-integration in clause combining: Interpersonal versus discursive independence. <i>WORD</i> 53:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2005. Two types of coordination in clause combining. Lingua 115:4 ► pp. 611 ff.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2006. The role of mood marking in complex sentences A case study of Australian languages. <i>WORD</i> 57:2-3 ► pp. 195 ff.
Čermáková, Anna, Zuzana Komrsková, Marie Kopřivová & Petra Poukarová
2017. Between Syntax and Pragmatics: The Causal Conjunction Protože in Spoken and Written Czech. Corpus Pragmatics 1:4 ► pp. 393 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 6. Interplay of syntax, prosody, body movements and pragmatic resources in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 195 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Glossing conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 7. Conclusion. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 241 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 2. Preliminaries and methodology. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 23 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 247 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 4. Prosody in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 71 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 3. Syntax in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 33 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 5. Body movements in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 139 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Transcription conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. ix ff.
[no author supplied]
2015. Références bibliographiques. In La dislocation à droite revisitée [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 261 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.