Article published In:
Interaction-based studies of language
Edited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 389426
References (40)
Altenberg, Bengt
(1984) Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica 38.1: 20-69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987) Causal ordering strategies in English conversation. In J. Monaghan (ed.), Grammar in the construction of texts. London: Pinter, pp. 50-64.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
(1984) How people use adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society 101: 437-449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) Linking intonation units in spoken English. In J. Haiman and S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Antonie and Johan ‘t Hart
(1965) Perceptual analysis of intonation patterns. Proceedings of the Vth International Congress on Acoustics, Liège 1964 : Paper A 16.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonie, René Collier & Johan’t Hart
(1982) Declination: Construct or intrinsic feature of speech pitch? Phonetica 391: 254-273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, William E. & John M. Sorensen
(1981) Fundamental frequency in sentence production. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
(1996) Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodie perspective on interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation-Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11-56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan
(1986) Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W
(1985) Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 343-365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald, Marie-Claire Barbault
et al. (1975) Car, parce que, puisque. Revue romane 101: 248-280.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Peter
(1990) Discourse and grammar. Focussing and defocussing in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J
(1988) The mechanisms of “construction grammar”. Berkeley Linguistics Society General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization: 35-55.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay
et al. (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language 64.3: 501-538. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. & Paul Kay
(1995) Construction grammar. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E
(1993) Grammar in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1994) Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: Because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text 14.4: 531-554.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara
(1987) Discourse structure and anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
(1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John & Sandra A Thompson
(1984) ‘Subordination’ in universal grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 101: 510-523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A K & Ruqaiya Hasan
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman, pp. 226-273.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hart, J.t., R. Collier
et al. (1990) A perceptual study of intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinämäki, Orvokki
(1975) Because and since. Linguistica Silesiana 11: 135-143.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
(1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
(1984) Declination: A review and some hypotheses. In C. Ewen & J. Anderson (eds.), Phonology Yearbook. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtity Press, pp. 53-74.Google Scholar
(1988) Declination “reset” and the hierachical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84.2: 530-544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
(1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 181-225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, William C
(1984) Discourse structures for text generation. Information Sciences Institute Research Report 1271: 1-17.Google Scholar
(1992) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian & Sandra A Thompson
(1988) The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In J. Haiman & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 275-329. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A Thompson
(1995) What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P.W. Davis (ed.), Descriptive and theoretical modes in the alternative linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
(1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Marian Shapley & Elizabeth G. Weber
(1991) Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses. Language and Speech 341: 207-234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary J
(1991) Paratactic because. Journal of Pragmatics 161: 323-337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Thorsen, Nina
(1978) An acoustical investigation of Danish intonation. Journal of Phonetics 61: 151-175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König
(1991) The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E.C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 189-218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willems, Nico
(1982) English intonation from a Dutch point of view. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (56)

Cited by 56 other publications

Field, Margaret
2022. Increments in Navajo conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 637 ff. DOI logo
Kitano, Hiroaki
2022. On interaction and grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
PEKAREK DOEHLER, SIMONA & SØREN W. ESKILDSEN
2022. Emergent L2 Grammars in and for Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Shaheen, Jonathan
2022. How general can theories of ‘why’ and ‘because’ be?. Inquiry 65:8  pp. 1042 ff. DOI logo
Catasso, Nicholas
2021. Some notes on central causal clauses in Venetian. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:4  pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Mushin, Ilana & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Linguistic structures in social interaction. Interactional Linguistics 1:1  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Spagnolli, Anna, Sonia Genovese & Mattia Mori
2021. Similarities and Differences Across Settings: The Case of Turn Continuations in Instant Messaging. In Analysing Digital Interaction,  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020. Chapter 7. Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous speech. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94],  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Fonctionnement macro-syntaxique et dimension anaphorique des relatives produites post hoc  : une analyse interactionnelle et multimodale. Langue française N° 210:2  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Alvanoudi, Angeliki
2019. “May I tell you something?”: When questions do not anticipate responses. Text & Talk 39:4  pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Gipper, Sonja & Foong Ha Yap
2019. Chapter 9. Life of =ti: Use and grammaticalization of a clausal nominalizer in Yurakaré. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124],  pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Sanders, Ted J.M. & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2019. Chapter 10. Subjectivity and Causality in discourse and cognition. In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 305],  pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2018. Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, DOI logo
Basterrechea, María & Regina Weinert
2017. Examining the Concept of Subordination in Spoken L1 and L2 English: The Case of If‐Clauses. TESOL Quarterly 51:4  pp. 897 ff. DOI logo
Li, Fang, Willem M. Mak, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J. M. Sanders
2017. On the online effects of subjectivity encoded in causal connectives. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Čermáková, Anna, Zuzana Komrsková, Marie Kopřivová & Petra Poukarová
2017. Between Syntax and Pragmatics: The Causal Conjunction Protože in Spoken and Written Czech. Corpus Pragmatics 1:4  pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Cristofaro, Sonia
2016. Chapter 15. Routes to insubordination. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115],  pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie
2016. Toward a global approach to discourse uses of conjunctions in spoken French. Language Sciences 58  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Detges, Ulrich & Thomas Weidhaas
2016. Coherence and interaction. The French causal connectors comme and car. Language Sciences 58  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Ehmer, Oliver & Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
2016. Adverbial patterns in interaction. Language Sciences 58  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2016. On the grammatical status of insubordinate if-clauses. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],  pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Gonen, Einat, Zohar Livnat & Noam Amir
2015. The discourse marker axshav (‘now’) in spontaneous spoken Hebrew: Discursive and prosodic features. Journal of Pragmatics 89  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2015. Managing the Boundary Between “Yes” and “But”: Two Ways of Disaffiliating With Germanja aberandjaber. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:1  pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Burridge, Kate
2014. Cos—A New Discourse Marker for Australian English?. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34:4  pp. 524 ff. DOI logo
van Veen, Rosie, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, Ted Sanders & Huub van den Bergh
Canestrelli, Anneloes R., Willem M. Mak & Ted J. M. Sanders
2013. Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:9  pp. 1394 ff. DOI logo
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2011. Action, prosody and emergent constructions: The case of and. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent,  pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Diessel, Holger & Katja Hetterle
2011. Causal clauses: a cross-linguistic investigation of their structure, meaning, and use. In Linguistic Universals and Language Variation,  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson & Jane Maxim
2007. Grammar without sentence structure: A conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism. Aphasiology 21:3-4  pp. 256 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2007. Multimodal resources for turn-taking. Discourse Studies 9:2  pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Pander Maat, H. & T. Sanders
2006. Connectives in Text. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Unternbäumen, Enrique Huelva
2005. Sprechaktbezogene kausale Satzverknüpfung mitporqueim gesprochenen Spanisch. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP) 121:1  pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Bolden, Galina
2004. The quote and beyond: defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian. Journal of Pragmatics 36:6  pp. 1071 ff. DOI logo
Hayashi, Makoto
2004. Projection and grammar: notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 36:8  pp. 1337 ff. DOI logo
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2002. Prosody. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2012. Turn Continuation and Clause Combinations. Discourse Processes 49:3-4  pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2002. The functional value of non-integration in clause combining: Interpersonal versus discursive independence. <i>WORD</i> 53:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2005. Two types of coordination in clause combining. Lingua 115:4  pp. 611 ff. DOI logo
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2006. The role of mood marking in complex sentences A case study of Australian languages. <i>WORD</i> 57:2-3  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Caspers, Johanneke
1998. Who's Next? The Melodic Marking of Question vs. Continuation in Dutch. Language and Speech 41:3-4  pp. 375 ff. DOI logo
Caspers, Johanneke
2003. Local speech melody as a limiting factor in the turn-taking system in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 31:2  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 6. Interplay of syntax, prosody, body movements and pragmatic resources in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Glossing conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 7. Conclusion. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 2. Preliminaries and methodology. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 4. Prosody in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 3. Syntax in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 5. Body movements in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Transcription conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2015. Références bibliographiques. In La dislocation à droite revisitée [Champs linguistiques, ],  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.