Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 7:1 (1997) ► pp.120
References (46)
Arndt, H. and R.W. Janney (1985) Politeness revisited: Cross-modal supportive strategies. IRAL XXIII-4: 281-300.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. and S. Levinson (1987) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caplow, T. (1968) Two against one: Coalitions in triads. Englewood Cliffs (N.J.): Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H. (1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H. and T.B. Carlson (1982) Hearers and speech acts. Language 58(2): 332-373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1981) ‘Poison to your soul’: Thanks and apologies contrastively viewed. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routine. La Haye: Mouton, pp. 69-91.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Craig, R.T., K. Tracy and F. Spisak (1986) The discourse of requests: Assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research 12(4): 437-468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. (1996) Status and power in verbal interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
de Fornel, M. (1986) Catégorisation, identification et référence en analyse de conversation. Lexique 51: 161-195.Google Scholar
. (1989) Actes de langage et théorie du prototype: L’exemple du compliment. Cahiers de Praxématique 21: 37-49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1990) Sémantique du prototype et analyse de conversation. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 111: 159-178.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. and W. Nolen (1981) The association of deference with linguistic forms. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 271: 93-109.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Glover, K.D. (1995) A prototype view of context and linguistic behavior: Context prototypes and talk. Journal of Pragmatics 23(2): 137-156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.  BoPGoogle Scholar
. (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Golopentia, S. (1988) Interaction et histoire conversationnelle. In J. Cosnier et al.. (eds.), Echanges sur la conversation. Paris: CNRS, pp. 69-81.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1981) Conversational organisation: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Held, G. (1989) On the role of maximization in verbal politeness. Multilingua 8(2/3): 167-206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeanneret, Th. (1991) Fabrication du texte conversationnel et conversation pluri-locuteurs. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 121: 83-102.Google Scholar
. (1996) Relatives co-énoncées: Conversation et syntaxe. Scolia 51: 343-360.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1990, 1992, 1994) Les interactions verbales, vol. I-II-III. Paris: A. Colin.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. and C. Plantin (eds.) (1995) Le trilogue. Lyon: PUL.Google Scholar
Labov, W. and D. Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973) The logic of politeness. Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 183-228.  BoP
Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G.H. (1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20(3): 441-458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mao, Lu Ming, R. (1994) Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 451-486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcoccia, M. (1995) Les interviews du couple: Réflexions sur le rôle de porte-parole. In C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni and C. Plantin (eds.), 19951: 80-107.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1988) Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 12(4): 403-426. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Meier, A.J. (1995) Passages of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 24(3): 381-392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penman, R. (1990) Facework & politeness: Multiple goals in courtroom discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9(1/2): 15-38. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pike, K.L. (1975) On kinesic triadic relations in turn-taking. Semiotica 13(4): 389-394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pike, K.L. and I. Lowe (1969) Pronominal reference in English conversation and discourse – A group theoretical treatment. Folia Linguistica 31: 68-106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preisler, B. and H. Haberland (1994) Review of M.Sifianou, Politeness phenomena in England and Greece: A cross-cultural perspective . Journal of Pragmatics 22(2): 227-232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roulet, E. (1995) L’analyse du dialogue dans une apprache modulaire des structures du discours: l’exemple du dialogue romanesque. In F. Hundsnurscher & E. Weigand (eds.), Future perspectives of dialogue analysis. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 1-34.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. et al.. (1985) L’articulation du discours en français contemporain. Berne/Francfort-sur-Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1984) On doing ‘being ordinary’. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structure of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 412-429.Google Scholar
. (1992) Lectures on conversation, vol. I-II. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff and G. Jefferson (1978) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization on conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 7-55. [earlier version 1974, Language 50: 696-735] . DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70(4): 1075-1095. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
. (1995) Parties and talking together: Two ways in which numbers are significant for talk-in-interaction. In P.T. Haves & G. Psathas (eds.), Situated order. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America, pp. 31-42.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. and R.M. Coulthard (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse. The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Speier, M. (1972) Some conversational problems for interactional analysis. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: The Free Press, pp. 397-427.Google Scholar
Traverso, V. (1995) Gestion des échanges dans la conversation à trois participants. In C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni & C. Plantin (eds.) 19951: 29-53.Google Scholar
Vincent, D. (1995) Du dialogue au soliloque: Des interactions plus ou moins conversationnelles. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 161: 53-68.Google Scholar
Zamouri, S. (1995) La formation de coalitions dans les conversations triadiques. In C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni & C. Plantin (eds.) 19951: 54-79.Google Scholar
Cited by (57)

Cited by 57 other publications

Agovino, Massimiliano, Massimiliano Cerciello & Michele Bevilacqua
2024. The Language of Politeness. Theoretical Considerations and Practical Implications. In Linguistic Discrimination of LGBTQ+ People as a Deterrent to Economic Performance [Diversity and Inclusion Research, ],  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Saleem, Aisha & Musarat Yasmin
2024. Celebratory expressions and linguistic diversity: investigating congratulation patterns among Pakistani Facebook users commenting in English and Urdu. Cogent Arts & Humanities 11:1 DOI logo
Thaler, Verena
2024. Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion: Sind virtuelle Agenten zu sozialem Verhalten fähig?. In Technik sozialisieren? / Technology Socialisation? [Techno:Phil – Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Technikphilosophie, 10],  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Lacroix, René
2023. Two phenomena behind the terminology of face. Journal of Politeness Research 19:2  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Bravo, Diana
2022. The implications of studying politeness in Spanish-speaking contexts. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 577 ff. DOI logo
Breeze, Ruth
2022. Performing right-wing political identities on reader comments pages. Pragmatics and Society 13:1  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Contreras Fernández, Josefa
2022. Conversational silence and face in two sociocultural contexts. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 707 ff. DOI logo
Ferenčík, Milan
2022. Exercising politeness. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Jensen, Torben Juel & Frans Gregersen
2022. What do(es) you mean? the pragmatics of generic second person pronouns in modern spoken Danish. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Roulet, Eddy
2022. A modular approach to discourse structures. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2021. Conceptual blending and (im)politeness in political cartooning. Multimodal Communication 10:3  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Evnitskaya, Natalia
2021. Does a Positive Atmosphere Matter? Insights and Pedagogical Implications for Peer Interaction in CLIL Classrooms. In Classroom-based Conversation Analytic Research [Educational Linguistics, 46],  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Hancil, Sylvie
2021. Chapter 8. The final particle like in Northern English. In Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series, 219],  pp. 230 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Ling Zhou
2021.  Self-Denigration in 21st Century Chinese . Journal of Politeness Research 17:2  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Gonzalez Rodriguez, Milton Fernando
2020. Compliment responses in Icelandic. Language and Dialogue 10:2  pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Grossen, Michèle & Nathalie Muller Mirza
2020. Talking about cultural diversity at school: dialogical tensions and obstacles to secondarisation. European Journal of Psychology of Education 35:2  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Lower, Amanda
2020. Chapter 2. “Gracias pana”. In Complimenting Behavior and (Self-)Praise across Social Media [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 313],  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Sampietro, Agnese
2019. Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats. Journal of Pragmatics 143  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Vázquez Laslop, María Eugenia
Xia, Dengshan & Chun Lan
2019. (Im)politeness at a Chinese dinner table: A discursive approach to (im)politeness in multi-party communication . Journal of Politeness Research 15:2  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Aakhus, Mark & Marcin Lewiński
2017. Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy. Argumentation 31:1  pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
O’DRISCOLL, Jim
2017. An interpersonal pragmatic perspective on seductive discourse. E-rea :15.1 DOI logo
O’Driscoll, Jim
2017. Face and (Im)politeness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Radu, Carmen-Ioana
2017. Verbal Impoliteness, Strategies and Typology. IJOHMN (International Journal online of Humanities) 3:4  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Dumitrescu, Domnita
2016. Seamos pragmáticos: introducción a la pragmática española. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 3:2  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Dumitrescu, Domnita
2022. Interrogative allo-repetitions in Mexican Spanish. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 659 ff. DOI logo
Fant, Lars & Annika Denke
2016. Negotiating with the Boss. Pragmatics and Society 7:4  pp. 540 ff. DOI logo
APOTHÉLOZ, DENIS
2015. La notion d’oubli associée aux questions: étude de ‘déjà’ mémoriel. Journal of French Language Studies 25:3  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Barros García, María Jesús & Marina Terkourafi
2015. First-order politeness in rapprochement and distancing cultures. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nobarany, Syavash & Kellogg S. Booth
2015. Use of politeness strategies in signed open peer review. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66:5  pp. 1048 ff. DOI logo
Hernández Toribio, María Isabel & Luis Deltell Escolar
Karafoti, Eleni
2014. Book review: Marcel Bax and Dániel Z Kádár (eds), Understanding Historical (Im)Politeness: Relational Linguistic Practice over Time and across Cultures. Discourse & Society 25:3  pp. 405 ff. DOI logo
Lewiński, Marcin & Mark Aakhus
2014. Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 28:2  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2012. Review of Dumitrescu (2011): Aspects of Spanish Pragmatics. Language and Dialogue 2:2  pp. 306 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2011. Stranger than Fiction? A Few Methodological Notes on Linguistic Research in Film Discourse. Brno Studies in English 37:1 DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2011. Two communicative levels and twofold illocutionary force in televised political debates. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47 DOI logo
Nuessel, Frank
2011. Book review. Lingua 121:15  pp. 2187 ff. DOI logo
Payne‐Woolridge, Ruth
2010. Classroom behaviour and facework: balancing threats and enhancements. Classroom Discourse 1:2  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Chanseawrassamee, Supamit & Sarah J. Shin
2009. An exploratory study of the use of a Thai politeness marker by Thai-English bilingual adolescents. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 158  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Kharraki, Abdennour
2008. Gender, Politeness and Pragmatic Particles in French, by Kate Beeching. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 4:2 DOI logo
O'Driscoll, Jim
2007. What's in an FTA? Reflections on a chance meeting with Claudine. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 3:2 DOI logo
Arnáiz, Carmen
2006. Politeness in the portrayal of workplace relationships: Second person address forms in Peninsular Spanish and the translation of humour.. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 2:1 DOI logo
Beeching, Kate
2005. Politeness-induced semantic change: The case of quand même. Language Variation and Change 17:02 DOI logo
Beeching, Kate
2006. Politeness markers in French: post-posed quoi in the Tourist Office. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 2:1 DOI logo
Beeching, Kate
2016. MarinaTerkourafi (ed.). Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness (AILA Applied Linguistics Series 14). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins Publishing. 2015. xi + 279 pp. Hb (9789027205322) €95.00/US$143.00 / eBook (9789027268525) €95.00/US$143.00.. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20:2  pp. 254 ff. DOI logo
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2004. Introducing polylogue. Journal of Pragmatics 36:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2010. L’impolitesse en interaction. Lexis Special issue 2 DOI logo
SREETHARAN, CINDI STURTZ
2004. Students, sarariiman (pl.), and seniors: Japanese men's use of ′manly′ speech register. Language in Society 33:01 DOI logo
Bou-Franch, Patricia & Pilar Garcés-Conejos
2003. Teaching linguistic politeness: A methodological proposal. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 41:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kienpointner, Manfred
2003. Linguistic Politeness across Boundaries. The Case of Greek and Turkish. Journal of Pragmatics 35:5  pp. 803 ff. DOI logo
Kienpointner, Manfred
2021. The pen is mightier than the sword. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Kienpointner, Manfred
2022. Ideologies of politeness. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pizziconi, Barbara
2003. Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language. Journal of Pragmatics 35:10-11  pp. 1471 ff. DOI logo
Forget, Danielle
2001. Figures, politesse et organisation textuelle. Journal of Pragmatics 33:7  pp. 1157 ff. DOI logo
Pérez de Ayala, Soledad
2001. FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting needs?—Politeness in question time. Journal of Pragmatics 33:2  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Manno, Giuseppe
1999. Savoir refuser à l'écrit: analyse d'un enchaînement non préféré de macro-actes de discours. Journal of French Language Studies 9:01  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Bibliographie. In La perception des personnes,  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.