Cover not available
Article published In:
Ideologies of politeness
Edited by Manfred Kienpointner
[Pragmatics 9:1] 1999
► pp. 97–117

Frames for politeness

A case study

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 March 1999
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.10ter
References (33)
Aijmer, K. (1996) Conversational routines in English. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Babiniotis, G. (1969) 0 dia syntheseos ypokorismos is tin Ellinikin (Derivational diminution via compounding in Greek). Athens: Sofia N. Saripolos Library.Google Scholar
Bach, K. & Harnish, R.M. (1980) Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo DOI logo DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H. (1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daltas, P. (1985) Some patterns of variability in the use of diminutive and augmentative suffixes in spoken Modern Greek Koine (MGK). Glossologia 41: 63–88.Google Scholar
Dressier, W.U. & Merlini Barbaresi, L. (1994) Morphopragmatics: diminutives and intensifies in Italian, German and other languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1976) The elementary forms of the religious life. London: George Allen & Unwin. [First edition: 1915]Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, V. (1996) Towards a cognitive approach to politeness. In: Jaszczolt, K. & Turner, K. (eds.) Contrastive semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 629–50.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J. (1977) Scenes-and-frames semantics. In: Zampolli, A. (ed.) Linguistic structures processing. Amsterdam: North Holland, 55–81.Google Scholar
George, S. (1990) Getting things done in Naples: action, language and context in discourse description. Bologna: Bologna Editrice.Google Scholar
Glick, D.J. (1996) A reappraisal of Brown and Levinson’s Politeness: some universals in language use eighteen years later . Semiotica 1091: 141–171.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction ritual: essays in face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
(1971) Relations in public: microstudies in the public order. London: Penguin Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1976) Replies and responses. Language in society 51: 257–313. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B. & Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1987) Modern Greek. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D. (1996) Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 721: 533–78. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mackridge, P. (1985) The Modern Greek language: A descriptive analysis of Standard Modern Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mao, L.M. (1994) Beyond politeness theory: ‘face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 211: 451–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, J. (1993) Pragmatics: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M. (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston, P. (ed.) The psychology of computer vision. New York: MacGraw-Hill, 211–277.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1992) Eisagogi sti theoritiki glossologia (An introduction to theoretical linguistics). Athens: Nefeli.Google Scholar
Schank, R.C. & Abelson, R.P. (1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S.W. (1995) Inter cultural communication: a discourse approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1992) The use of diminutives in expressing politeness: Modern Greek versus English. Journal of Pragmatics 171: 155–73. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995) Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. (ed.) (1993) Framing in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1994) Gender and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Triantafyllides, M. (1963) I geniki ton ypokoristikon se -aki kai to Neoelliniko klitiko systima (The genitive of diminutives in -aki and the Modern Greek system of inflections). In: Apanta Manoli Triantafyllidi (The complete works ofManolis Triantafyllides). Vol. II1. Thessaloniki: Institute of Modem Greek Studies, 141–171.Google Scholar
Turner, K. (1996) The principal principles of pragmatic inference: politeness. Language teaching 291: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werkhofer, K.T. (1992) Traditional and modern views: the social constitution and the power of politeness. In: Watts, R.J., Ide, S. & Ehlich, K. (eds.) Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 155–199.Google Scholar
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Nicolle, Steve
2022. Communicated and non-communicated acts in relevance theory. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2021. Sacred civility? An alternative conceptual architecture informed by cultural sociology. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Blana, Maria-Nikoleta
2020. Mask and face. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 6:1 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Ridealgh, Kim & L. Unceta Gómez
2020. Potestas and the language of power: Conceptualising an approach to Power and Discernment politeness in ancient languages. Journal of Pragmatics 170 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Válková, Silvie & Jana Kořínková
2020. Strategies of positive evaluation in computer-mediated communication. Brno studies in English :2 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Armostis, Spyros & Marina Terkourafi
2019. Not All Positive: On the Landscape of Thanking Items in Cypriot Greek. In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness, ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Kienpointner, Manfred & Maria Stopfner
2017. Ideology and (Im)politeness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Klaus P. & María Elena Placencia
2017. (Im)politeness and Regional Variation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 539 ff. DOI logo
Allan, Keith
2016. A Benchmark for Politeness. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Terkourafi, Marina
2011. From Politeness1 to Politeness2: Tracking norms of im/politeness across time and space. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 7:2 DOI logo
Terkourafi, Marina
2011. The pragmatic variable: Toward a procedural interpretation. Language in Society 40:3 ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Terkourafi, Marina
2024. Reconfiguring the strategic/non-strategic binary in im/politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 20:1 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Badarneh, Muhammad A.
2010. The pragmatics of diminutives in colloquial Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics 42:1 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Goutsos, Dionysis & Marilena Karyolemou
2004. Introduction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2004:168 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lagorgette, Dominique & Pierre Larrivée
2004. Interprétation des insultes et relations de solidarité. Langue française n° 144:4 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca
2003. Face and politeness: new (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics 35:10-11 ► pp. 1453 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun
2003. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Journal of Pragmatics 35:5 ► pp. 811 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.