Strategies in Academic Discourse
Editors
This book focuses on theoretical and descriptive issues and techniques in the study of text and discourse. Drawing on a large number of corpora containing academic language, from spoken language to published research papers, the authors approach their subject from multiple angles: The academic language of biology, literature, philosophy, economics, agriculture, linguistics and applied linguistics. The analysis of intertextual features these papers show leads to penetrating results.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 19] 2005. xii, 212 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 1 July 2008
Published online on 1 July 2008
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
IntroductionElena Tognini-Bonelli | pp. vii–xi
-
Conflict and consensus: Construing opposition in Applied LinguisticsSusan Hunston | pp. 1–15
-
Subjective or objective evaluation? Prediction in academic lecturesJulia Bamford | pp. 17–29
-
Aspects of identification and position in intertextual reference in PhD thesesPaul Thompson | pp. 31–50
-
Authorial presence in academic genresCéline Poudat and Sylvain Loiseau | pp. 51–68
-
Pragmatic force in biology papers written by British and Japanese scientistsAkiko Okamura | pp. 69–82
-
Evaluation and pragmatic markersKarin Aijmer | pp. 83–96
-
“This seems somewhat counterintuitive, though…”: Negative evaluation in linguistic book reviews by male and female authorsUte Römer | pp. 97–115
-
Is evaluation structure-bound? An English-Spanish contrastive study of book reviewsLorena Suárez-Tejerina | pp. 117–132
-
From corpus to register: The construction of evaluation and argumentation in linguistics textbooksMaria Freddi | pp. 133–151
-
On the boundaries between evaluation and metadiscourseAnnelie Ädel | pp. 153–162
-
Language as a string of beads: Discourse and the M-wordJohn McH. Sinclair | pp. 163–168
-
Academic vocabulary in academic discourse: The phraseological behaviour of EVALUATION in Economics research articlesDavid Oakey | pp. 169–183
-
Evaluation and its discontentsWolfgang Teubert | pp. 185–204
-
Notes on contributors | pp. 205–207
-
Index | pp. 209–212
“English General Nouns has greatly contributed to the endeavour of describing meaning through an analysis of noun forms. Since the corpus-driven methodology in this study is followed by a theoretical approach to the analysis of the data, the human researcher becomes an integral part of the equation highlighting language use in its social context. The choices that were made regarding data selection and analysis could arguably be relevant to the purpose of this study. English General Nouns is, therefore, a refreshing presentation of an alternative methodology within corpus linguistics which offers insights into additional research methods.”
Erik Voss, Iowa State University, in Corpora 3(2): 237-230, 2008
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Charles, Maggie
Rinck, Fanny
Touati, Paul
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General