Vocabulary Knowledge

Human ratings and automated measures

Scott Jarvis | Ohio University
ORCID logoMichael Daller | Swansea University, Wales, UK
ISBN 9789027241887 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00
ISBN 9789027271679 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00
Google Play logo
Language researchers and practitioners often adopt tools and techniques without testing whether they really work as they should. This is understandable because most scholars do not have the time or expertise to properly evaluate the usefulness of all instruments, measures, and methods they need. It is therefore critical to have problem solvers in the field who gain the necessary expertise and take the time to scrutinize existing methods, identify problems, and offer new solutions. This volume represents the work of scholars who have done this; it is a collection of the latest advances, developments, and innovations regarding the modeling and measurement of learners’ vocabulary growth curves, current levels of vocabulary knowledge and lexical proficiency, and the patterns of lexical diversity found in their language production. Several of the contributors also address the complex but important relationship between automated indices and human judgments of learners’ lexical patterns and abilities.
[Studies in Bilingualism, 47] 2013.  viii, 220 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“The book marks an important milestone for research into the development and validation of useful vocabulary indices and models by adopting a problem-centering approach and addressing human cognitions in its conceptualization of lexical aspects.”
“Vocabulary Knowledge provides an interesting look into the back office of a variety of indices and measures that have been made widely available in recent years via Coh-metrix. It problematizes the construct of lexical diversity and demonstrates the strengths and weaknesses of several indices that have been very popular in assessing learner's language products. As such, it presents an important caveat to the end user of both construct and indices.”
Cited byCited by 17 other publicationsAlsubaei, Faisal S.2023. Detection of Inappropriate Tweets Linked to Fake Accounts on Twitter. Applied Sciences 13:5 ► pp. 3013 ff. Appel, Randy, Pavel Trofimovich, Kazuya Saito, Talia Isaacs & Stuart Webb2019. Lexical aspects of comprehensibility and nativeness from the perspective of native-speaking English raters. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 170:1 ► pp. 24 ff. Ben-Ahmaida, Manal & Fatma Suliman2018. Creating Multimodal Texts in Language Classes: Advantages and Disadvantages with Reference to EFL Libyan Situation. (Faculty of Arts Journal) مجلة كلية الآداب - جامعة مصراتة :11 ► pp. 57 ff. De Clercq, Bastien2015. The development of lexical complexity in second language acquisition. EUROSLA Yearbook 15 ► pp. 69 ff. De Clercq, Bastien, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost2016. Le développement de la complexité syntaxique en français langue seconde : complexité structurelle et diversité. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 07006 ff. Juffs, Alan2019. Chapter 9. Lexical development in the writing of intensive English program students. In Doing SLA Research with Implications for the Classroom [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 52], ► pp. 179 ff. Kyle, Kristopher2020. Lexis. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora, ► pp. 332 ff. Liszka, Sarah Ann2015. Chapter 3. The L2 acquisition of the English present simple – present progressive distinction. In The Acquisition of the Present, ► pp. 57 ff. Ntelitheos, Dimitrios & Ali Idrissi2017. Chapter 9. Language growth in child Emirati Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIX [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 229 ff. Paquot, Magali2019. The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research. Second Language Research 35:1 ► pp. 121 ff. Pathak, Abhishek, Carlos Velasco, Olivia Petit & Gemma Anne Calvert2019. Going to great lengths in the pursuit of luxury: How longer brand names can enhance the luxury perception of a brand. Psychology & Marketing 36:10 ► pp. 951 ff. Robles‐García, Pablo2022. Receptive vocabulary knowledge in L2 learners of Spanish: The role of high‐frequency words. Foreign Language Annals 55:4 ► pp. 963 ff. Révész, Andrea, Nektaria-Efstathia Kourtali & Diana Mazgutova2017. Effects of Task Complexity on L2 Writing Behaviors and Linguistic Complexity. Language Learning 67:1 ► pp. 208 ff. SCHMID, MONIKA S. & SCOTT JARVIS2014. Lexical access and lexical diversity in first language attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17:4 ► pp. 729 ff. Schmitt, Diane2020. Chapter 15. Can writing facilitate the development of a richer vocabulary?. In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56], ► pp. 357 ff. Szabo, Csaba Z., Ursula Stickler & Lina Adinolfi2021. Predicting the academic achievement of multilingual students of English through vocabulary testing. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 24:10 ► pp. 1531 ff. Zhang, Jian & Michael Daller2020. Lexical richness of Chinese candidates in the graded oral English examinations . Applied Linguistics Review 11:3 ► pp. 511 ff. This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Main BIC Subject

CFDM: Bilingualism & multilingualism

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2013019635 | Marc record