Frame-Constructional Verb Classes

Change and Theft verbs in English and German

| Sam Houston State University
HardboundForthcoming
ISBN 9789027207067 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-BookOrdering information
ISBN 9789027261014 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
While verb classes are a mainstay of linguistic research, the field lacks consensus on precisely what constitutes a verb class. This book presents a novel approach to verb classes, employing a bottom-up, corpus-based methodology and combining key insights from Frame Semantics, Construction Grammar, and Valency Grammar.

On this approach, verb classes are formulated at varying granularity levels to adequately capture both the shared semantic and syntactic properties unifying verbs of a class and the idiosyncratic properties unique to individual verbs. In-depth analyses based on this approach shed light on the interrelations between verbs, frame-semantics, and constructions, and on the semantic richness and network organization of grammatical constructions.

This approach is extended to a comparison of Change and Theft verbs, revealing unexpected lexical and syntactic differences across semantically distinct classes. Finally, a range of contrastive (German–English) analyses demonstrate how verb classes can inform the cross-linguistic comparison of verbs and constructions.

[Constructional Approaches to Language, 28]  Expected August 2020.  viii, 318 pp. + index
Publishing status: In production
Table of Contents
This is a provisional table of contents, and subject to changes.
Chapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 2. Approaches to verb classification
Chapter 3. Frame Semantics, Construction Grammar, and Valency Grammar
Chapter 4. English Change verbs
Chapter 5. Comparing Theft verbs to Change verbs
Chapter 6. A contrastive perspective: German Change and Theft Verbs
Chapter 7. Conclusion
Bibliography
References

Bibliography

Ackerman, Farrel & Gert Webelhuth
1998A theory of predicates. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Ackerman, Farrell & John Moore
2001Proto-properties and grammatical encoding: A correspondence theory of argument selection. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Alsina, Alex & Sam Mchombo
1990The syntax of applicatives in Chicheŵa: Problems for a theta theoretic asymmetry. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8(4). 493–506. Crossref link
Aske, Jon
1989Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In Annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14.
Askedal, John Ole
2005Grammatikalisierung und Persistenz im deutschen „Rezipienten-Passiv“ mit bekommen/kriegen/erhalten. In T. Leuschner, T. Mortelmans & S. de Groodt (eds.), Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, 211–228. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Atzler, Judith K.
2011Twist in the list: Frame Semantics as vocabulary teaching and learning tool: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.
Bach, Emmon
1986The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9(1). 5–16.
Baker, Charles F. & Josef Ruppenhofer
2002FrameNet’s frames vs. Levin’s verb classes. In J. Larson & M. Paster (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 27–38. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Baker, Collin F. & Christiane Fellbaum
2009WordNet and FrameNet as complementary resources for annotation. In Proceedings of the third linguistic annotation workshop, 125–129. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Baker, Collin F., Charles J. Fillmore & Beau Cronin
2003The structure of the FrameNet database. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3). 281–296. Crossref link
Baker, Collin F., Charles J. Fillmore & John B. Lowe
1998The Berkeley FrameNet project. In COLING-ACL ‘98: Proceedings of the conference, 86–90.
Baker, Mark C.
1988Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
1997Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Crossref link
Baldinger, Kurt
1980Semantic theory: Towards a modern semantics. New York: St. Martin’s.
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2001The role of thematic roles in constructions? Evidence from the Icelandic inchoative. In A. Holmer, J.-O. Svantesson & Å. Viberg (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics 2000, 127–137. Lund: Department of Linguistics.
2008Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer
(eds.) 2000Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Beavers, John
2010The structure of lexical meaning: Why semantics really matters. Language 86. 821–864. Crossref link
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2012Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3). 331–369. Crossref link
Beavers, John, Beth Levin & Shiao Wei Tham
2010The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46. 331–377. Crossref link
Bertoldi, Anderson, Rove Chishman & Hans C. Boas
2010Verbs of judgment in English and Portuguese: What contrastive analysis can say about Frame Semantics. Calidoscopio 8(3). 210–225. Crossref link
Bierwisch, Manfred
1970Semantics. In J. Lyons (ed.), New horizons in linguistics, 166–184. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
Boas, Hans & Alexander Ziem
. In press. Constructional approaches to argument structure in German. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
Boas, Hans C.
2001Frame Semantics as a framework for describing polysemy and syntactic structures of English and German motion verbs in contrastive computational lexicography. In P. Rayson, A. Wilson, T. McEnery, A. Hardie & S. Khoja (eds.), Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001, 64–73.
2002Bilingual FrameNet dictionaries for machine translation. In M. González Rodríguez & C. P. Suárez Araujo (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, vol. IV, 1364–1371. Las Palmas, Spain.
2003A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
2004You wanna consider a constructional approach to wanna contraction? In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture and mind, 471–491. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
2005aDetermining the productivity of resultatives: A reply to Goldberg and Jackendoff. Language 81(2). 448–464. Crossref link
2005bFrom theory to practice: Frame Semantics and the design of FrameNet. In S. Langer & D. Schnorbusch (eds.), Semantik im lexikon, 129–160. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
2005cSemantic frames as interlingual representations for multilingual lexical databases. International Journal of Lexicography 18(4). 445. Crossref link
2006A frame-semantic approach to identifying syntactically relevant elements of meaning. In P. Steiner, H. C. Boas & S. Schierholz (eds.), Contrastive studies and valency: Studies in honor of Hans Ulrich Boas, 119–149. Frankfurt and New York: Peter Lang.
2008aDetermining the structure of lexical entries and grammatical constructions in Construction Grammar. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6. 113–144. Crossref link
2008bTowards a frame-constructional approach to verb classification. In E. Sosa Acevedo & F. J. Cortés Rodríguez (eds.), Grammar, constructions, and interfaces: Special issue of Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, vol. 57, 17–48.
(ed.) 2009aMultilingual FrameNets in computational lexicography: Methods and applications. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
2009bSemantic frames as interlingual representations for multilingual lexical databases. In H. C. Boas (ed.), Multilingual FrameNets in computational lexicography: Methods and applications, 59–100. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
2010aComparing constructions across languages. In H. C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar, 1–20. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(ed.) 2010bContrastive studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2010cThe syntax-lexicon continuum in Construction Grammar: A case study of English communication verbs. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 24. 54–82. Crossref link
2011aCoercion and leaking argument structures in Construction Grammar. Linguistics 49(6). 1271–1303. Crossref link
2011bA frame-semantic approach to syntactic alternations: The case of Build verbs. In P. Guerrero Medina (ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English, 207–234. London: Equinox.
2011cZum Abstraktionsgrad von Resultativkonstruktionen. In S. Engelberg, A. Holler & K. Proost (eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, 37–69. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
2013aCognitive Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 233–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2013bFrame Semantics and translation. In A. Rojo & I. Ibarretxte-Antunano (eds.), Cognitive linguistics and translation, 125–158. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
2014aLexical and phrasal approaches to argument structure: Two sides of the same coin. Theoretical Linguistics 40(1–2). 89–112.
2014bZur Architektur einer konstruktionsbasierten Grammatik des Deutschen. In A. Lasch & A. Ziem (eds.), Grammatik als Netzwerk von Konstruktionen: Sprachwissen im Fokus der Konstruktionsgrammatik, 37–63. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Boas, Hans C. & Ryan Dux
2013Semantic frames for foreign-language education: Towards a German frame-based dictionary. Veridas On-Line 1/2013 81–100.
Boas, Hans C., Ryan Dux & Alexander Ziem
. Forthcoming. Frames and constructions in a German-English online learner’s dictionary. In S. De Knop & G. Gilquin eds. Constructionist approaches to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boas, Hans C. & Ivan A. Sag
(eds.) 2012Sign-based Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Booij, Gerd
2013Morphology in Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 255–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bresnan, Joan
1982The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina & R. Harald Baayen
2007Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Bouma, I. Krämer & J. Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Brinkmann, Ursula
1997The locative alternation in German: Its structure and acquisition. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Bühler, Karl
1934Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.
Burchardt, Aljoscha, Katrin Erk, Anette Frank, Andrea Kowalski, Sebastian Padó & Manfred Pinkal
2009FrameNet for the semantic analysis of German: Annotation and representation and automation. In H. C. Boas (ed.), Multilingual FrameNets in Computational Lexicography, 209–244. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
Busse, Dietrich
2012Frame-semantik. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Bybee, Joan L.
1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
1988Morphology as lexical organization. In M. Hammond & M. Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology, London and New York: Academic Press.
2001Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733. Crossref link
2007Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
2013Exemplars and constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan L. & Clay Beckner
2009Usage-based theory. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 915–950. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cappelle, Bert
2006Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions 1. 1–28.
Chomsky, Noam A.
1957Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
1965Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
1981Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
1986Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
1993A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
1995The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Colleman, Timothy & Bernard De Clerck
2008Accounting for ditransitive constructions with envy and forgive. Functions of Language 15(2). 187–215. Crossref link
Comrie, Bernard
1978Ergativity. In W. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology, 329–394. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Coseriu, Eugen
1964Pour une sémantique diachronique structurale. In Travaux de linguistique et de littérature, 139–186. Strasbourg: Centre de philologie et de littératures romanes de l’Université de Strasbourg.
Croft, William, Chiaki Taoka & Esther J. Wood
2001Argument linking and the commercial transaction frame in English, Russian and Japanese. Language Sciences 23(4). 579–602. Crossref link
Croft, William A.
1991Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
2009Connecting frames and constructions: A case study of eat and feed. Constructions and Frames 1(1). 7–28. Crossref link
2012Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
2013Radical Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 211–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cruse, D. A.
1973Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics 9. 11–23. Crossref link
1986Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Östen
1985Tense and aspect systems. Oxford and New York: Blackwell.
Davies, Mark
2008The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 450 million words, 1990–present. Web database. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/
De Clerck, Bernard, Annelies Bloem & Timothy Colleman
2012Transfer verbs with prepositional themes in English and Dutch and French: A contrastive analysis. In M. van Peteghem (ed.), Le verbe en verve: réflexions sur la syntaxe et la sémantique verbales: En hommage à Dominique Willems à l’occasion de son éméritat, 5–24. Ghent: Academia Press.
DeLancey, Scott
1984Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in Language 8. 181–213. Crossref link
2000The universal basis of case. Logos and Language 1(2). 1–15.
Delorge, Martin & Timothy Colleman
2006Constructions with verbs of dispossession in Dutch. Papers of the Linguistic Society of Belgium 1. 1–15.
Dewell, Robert B.
2011The meaning of particle/prefix constructions in German. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Dixon, Robert M.
1991A new approach to English grammar: On semantic principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dowty, David R.
1979Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Crossref link
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. Crossref link
2000‘The garden swarms with bees’ and the fallacy of ‘argument alternation’. In Y. Ravin & C. Leacock (eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches, 111–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dux, Ryan
2011A frame-semantic analysis of five English verbs evoking the Theft frame. University of Texas at Austin M.A. Thesis.
. In press. Frames, verbs and constructions: German constructions with verbs of stealing. In A. Ziem & H. C. Boas eds. Constructional approaches to argument structure in German. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Dux, Ryan & Hans C. Boas
2011aOn categorizing semantic roles and frame elements: What is the proper level of granularity? Conference presentation at Role Complexes: (New) Approaches to Defining Semantic Roles. The University of Zurich.
2011bOn categorizing semantic roles and frame elements: What is the proper level of granularity? Conference presentation at Role Complexes: (New) Approaches to Defining Semantic Roles. Zurich: The University of Zurich.
Engelberg, Stefan
2000Verben, Ereignisse und das Lexikon. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref link
2009Blätter knistern über den Beton: Zwischenbericht aus einer korpuslinguistischen Studie zur Bewegungsinterpretation bei Geräuschverben. In E. Winkler (ed.), Konstruktionelle Varianz bei Verben (OPAL Sonderheft 4/2009), 75–97. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.
. In press. The argument structure of psych-verbs: A quantitative corpus study on cognitive entrenchment. In H. C. Boas & A. Ziem eds. Constructional approaches to argument structure in German, Boston and Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Crossref link
Engelberg, Stefan, Anke Holler & Kristel Proost
(eds.) 2011Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Engelberg, Stefan, Alexander Koplenig, Kristel Proost & Edeltraud Winkler
2012Argument structure and text genre: Cross-corpus evaluation of the distributional characteristics of argument structure realizations. Lexicographica 28. 13–48. Crossref link
Engelberg, Stefan, Meike Meliss, Christel Proost & Edeltraut Winkler
(eds.) 2015Argumentstruktur zwischen Valenz und Konstruktion. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Fauconnier, Gilles
1994Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Faulhaber, Susen
2011Verb valency patterns: A challenge for semantics-based accounts. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Feldman, Jerome, Ellen Dodge & John Bryant
2009Embodied Construction Grammar. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 111–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fellbaum, Christiane
(ed.) 1988WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2005WordNet and WordNets. In K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edition, 665–670. Oxford: Elsevier.
Fernández Méndez, Manuel
2015Argumentstrukturmuster und valenzgrammatisch orientierte Information im deutsch-spanischen Kontrast: Exemplarische Analyse der Lexikalisierungsmöglichkeiten des Konzepts “entführen”. In S. Engelberg, M. Meliss, C. Proost & E. Winkler (eds.), Argumentstruktur zwischen Valenz und Konstruktion, 353–364. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
1970The grammar of hitting and breaking. In R. A. Jacobs & P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 120–133. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
1971Types of lexical information. In D. D. Steinberg & L. A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
1975An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In C. Cogen, H. Thompson, G. Thurgood, K. Whistler & J. Wright (eds.), Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123–131. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
1977aThe case for case reopened. In P. Cole & J. M. Sadock (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical relations, 59–81. London and New York: Academic Press. Crossref link
1977bScenes-and-frames semantics. Linguistic Structures Processing 59. 55–88.
1982Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–138. Seoul: Hanshin.
1985Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni Di Semantica 6(2). 222–254.
1986Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In V. Nikiforidou, M. VanClay, M. Niepokuj & D. Feder (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 95–107. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
2003Valency and semantic roles: The concept of deep structure case. In V. Agel, L. M. Eichinger, H.-W. Eroms, P. Hellwig, H. J. Heringer & H. Lobin (eds.), Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research, 457–475. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
2007Valency issues in FrameNet. In T. Herbst & K. Götz-Vetteler (eds.), Valency: Theoretical, descriptive, and cognitive issues, 129–160. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
2008Border conflicts: FrameNet meets Construction Grammar. In E. Bernal & J. De Cesaris (eds.), Proceedings of the XIII EURALEX International Congress, 49–68. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
2009A valency dictionary of English. International Journal of Lexicography 22(1). 55–85. Crossref link
Fillmore, Charles J. & B. T. S. Atkins
1992Towards a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts, 75–102. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2000Describing polysemy: The case of Crawl. In Y. Ravin & C. Laecock (eds.), Polysemy, 91–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fillmore, Charles J. & Collin F. Baker
2000FrameNet: Frame Semantics meets the corpus. In Proceedings of the 74th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.
2010A frames approach to semantic analysis. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 313–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fillmore, Charles J., Christopher R. Johnson & Miriam Petruck
2003Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3). 235–250. Crossref link
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary O’Connor
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64. 501–538. Crossref link
Fillmore, Charles J., Russell Lee-Goldman & Russell Rhomieux
2012The FrameNet-Constructicon. In H. C. Boas & I. Sag (eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar, 283–299. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Fillmore, Charles J., Josef Ruppenhofer & Collin F. Baker
2004FrameNet and representing the link between semantic and syntactic relations. Frontiers in Linguistics 1. 19–59.
Flickinger, Daniel, Carl Pollard & Thomas Wasow
1985Structure-sharing in lexical representation. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 262–267. Chicago: Association for Computational Linguistics. Crossref link
Fodor, Janet D.
1977Semantics: Theories of meaning in generative grammar. New York: Crowell.
Frege, Gottlob
1892Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100. 25–50.
Frense, Juta & Paul Bennett
1996Verb alternations and semantic classes in English and German. Language Sciences 18(1). 305–317. Crossref link
Fried, Mirjam & Hans C. Boas
2005Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Fried, Mirjam & Jan-Ola Östman
2004aConstruction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J.-O. Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective, 11–86. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(eds.) 2004bConstruction Grammar in a cross-language perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Fujita, Koji
1996Double objects, causatives, and derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry 27(1). 146–173.
Gärtner, Hans-Martin
(ed.) 2014Theoretical linguistics 40(1–2): Lexical approaches to argument structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geeraerts, Dirk
2009Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Geyken, Alexander
2007The DWDS corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20th century. In C. Fellbaum (ed.), Collocations and idioms: Linguistic, lexicographic, and computational aspects, 23–41.
Givón, Talmy
1979On understanding grammar. London and New York: Academic Press.
Glynn, Dylan
2004Constructions at the crossroads: The place of Construction Grammar between field and frame. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2. 197–233. Crossref link
Goddard, Cliff
1998Semantic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2008Cross-linguistic semantics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka
1994Semantic and lexical universals: Theory and empirical findings (Studies in Langauge 25). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Goldberg, Adele
1995Constructions: A construction approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
1997The relationships between verbs and constructions. In M. Vespoor, K. D. Lee & E. Sweetser (eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning, 383–397. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2000Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted: The role of information structure in argument distribution. Language Sciences 34. 503–524.
2002Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics 13. 327–356. Crossref link
2006Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2013Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, Adele, Devin M. Casenhiser & Nitya Sethuraman
2004Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 15(3). 289–316. Crossref link
Goldberg, Adele & Ray Jackendoff
2004The resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80. 532–568. Crossref link
Goodenough, Ward H.
1956Componential analysis and the study of meaning. Language 32. 195–216. Crossref link
Gotsoulia, Voula
2012Formalization of linking information in the FrameNet lexicon: The case of ‘notion’ verbs. Constructions and Frames 4(2). 103–151. Crossref link
Grice, H. P.
1975Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. London and New York: Academic Press.
Gries, Stefan Th
2003Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 1. 1–27. Crossref link
2011Corpus data in usage-based linguistics: What’s the right degree of granularity for the analysis of argument structure constructions? In M. Brdar, S. Th. Gries & M. Žic Fuchs (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion, 237–256. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2013Data in Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 93–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch
2004Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1). 97–129. Crossref link
(eds.) 2006Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 172). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Grimshaw, Jane
1993Semantic structure and semantic content. Unpublished manuscript.
Gropen, Jess, Steven Pinker, Michelle Hollander & Richard Goldberg
1991Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure. Cognition 41. 153–195. Crossref link
Gross, Maurice
1994Constructing lexicon grammars. In B. T. S. Atkins & A. Zampolli (eds.), Computational approaches to the lexicon, 213–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gruber, Jeffrey S.
1965Studies in lexical relations. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
1967Look and see. Language 43. 937–947. Crossref link
Guerrero Medina, Pilar
(ed.) 2012Morphosyntactic alternations in English. London: Equinox.
Guerssel, Mohamed, Kenneth Hale, Mary Laughren, Beth Levin & Josie White Eagle
1985A cross-linguistic study of transitivity alternations. In W. H. Eilfort, P. D. Kroeber & K. L. Peterson (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity, 48–63. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser
1986Some transitivity alternations in English. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo”: International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 20(3). 605–638.
2002Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Crossref link
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel Jay Keyser
1993On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hanks, Patrick & James Pustejovsky
2005A pattern dictionary for natural language processing. Revue Française de linguistique appliquée 10(2). 63–82. Crossref link
Hasegawa, Yoko, Russell Lee-Goldman & Charles J. Fillmore
2014On the universality of frames: Evidence from English-to-Japanese translation. Constructions and Frames 6(2). 170–201. Crossref link
Hasegawa, Yoko, Russell Lee-Goldman, Albert Kong & Kimi Akita
2011FrameNet as a resource for paraphrase research. Constructions and Frames 3(1). 104–127. Crossref link
Haspelmath, Martin
1993More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. Causatives and Transitivity 23. 87–121. Crossref link
Heine, Bernd & Heiko Narrog
(eds.) 2015The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Helbig, Gerhard
1992Probleme der Valenz- und Kasustheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref link
Helbig, Gerhard & Wolfgang Schenkel
1969Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.
Herbst, Thomas
1983Untersuchungen zur Valenz englischer Adjektive und ihrer Nominalisierungen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
2011The status of generalizations: Valency and argument structure constructions. In T. Herbst & A. Stefanowitsch (eds.), Argument structure: Valency and/or construction? Special issue of Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4). 347–367.
2014The valency approach to argument structure constructions. In T. Herbst, H.-J. Schmid & S. Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – collocations – patterns, 167–216. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Herbst, Thomas & Katrin Götz-Votteler
(eds.) 2007Valency: Theoretical, descriptive and cognitive issues. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Herbst, Thomas, David Heath, Ian Roe & Dieter Götz
2004A valency dictionary of English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Herbst, Thomas, Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber
(eds.) 2014Constructions – collocations – patterns. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. Crossref link
Herbst, Thomas & Susen Schüller
2008Introduction to syntactic analysis: A valency approach. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Herbst, Thomas & Anatol Stefanowitsch
(eds.) 2011Argument structure: Valency and/or construction? Special issue of Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4).
Hoffmann, Thomas
2013Abstract phrasal and clausal constructions. In T. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 307–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
2013aConstruction Grammar: Introduction. In T. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 1–14. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(eds.) 2013bThe Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
von Humboldt, Wilhelm
1823Über das Entstehen der grammatischen Formen, und Ihren Einfluss auf die Ideenentwicklung. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wisseschaften zu Berlin, 401–430. Berlin: Realschul-Buchhandlung.
Hunston, Susan, Gill Francis & Elizabeth Manning
1996Verbs (Cobuild Grammar Patterns 1). London: Harper Collins.
Iwata, Seizi
2008Locative alternation: A lexical-constructional approach (Constructional Approaches to Language Series 6). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Jackendoff, Ray
1972Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
1975Semantic and morphological regularities in the lexicon. Language 51. 639–671. Crossref link
1990aOn Larson’s treatment of the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 21(3). 427–456.
1990bSemantic structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
1997Twistin’ the night away. Language 73. 534–559. Crossref link
2002Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Jacobs, Joachim
2009Valenzbindung oder Konstruktionsbindung? Eine Grundfrage der Grammatiktheorie. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 37. 490–513. Crossref link
Jarvis, Scott & Aneta Pavlenko
2008Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York and London: Routledge. Crossref link
Johnson, Christopher R., Charles J. Fillmore, Miriam R. L. Petruck, Collin F. Baker, Michael Ellsworth, Josef Ruppenhofer & Esther J. Wood
2003FrameNet: Theory and practice. Berkeley: International Computer Science Institute. Technical report.
Jurafsky, Daniel
1992An on-line computational model of human sentence interpretation. In American Association for Artificial Intelligence (ed.), Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-92), 302–308. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Katz, Jerrold J. & Jerry A. Fodor
1963The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39(2). 170–210. Crossref link
Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul Postal
1964An integrated theory of linguistic description. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kay, Paul
1996Argument structure: Causative ABC constructions. Unpublished manuscript.
2005Argument structure constructions and the argument-adjunct distinction. In M. Fried & H. C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots, 71–100. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Kay, Paul & Charles J. Fillmore
1999Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? Construction. Language 75. 1–33. Crossref link
Kilgarriff, Adam
1999Generative lexicon meets corpus data: The case of nonstandard word uses. Unpublished manuscript.
2007Googleology is bad science. Computational linguistics 33(1). 147–151. Crossref link
Kupietz, Marc, Cyril Belica, Holger Keibel & Andreas Witt
2010The German reference corpus DeReKo: A primordial sample for linguistic research. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, M. Rosner, D. Tapias (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), 1848–1854. Valletta, Malta: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
Kupietz, Marc & Holger Keibel
2009The Mannheim German Reference Corpus (DeReKo) as a basis for empirical linguistic research. In M. Minegishi & Y. Kawaguchi (eds.), Working papers in corpus-based linguistics and language education 3, 53–59. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies (TUFS).
Lakoff, George
1987aCognitive models and prototype theory. In U. Neisser (ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization, 63–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1987bWomen, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Crossref link
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
1999Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2000A dynamic usage-based model. In S. Kemmer & M. Barlow (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Lapata, Maria
1999Acquiring lexical generalizations from corpora: A case study for diathesis alternations. In R. Dale & K. Church (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-seventh Annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 397–404. College Park, MA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Lappin, Shalom & Chris Fox
(eds.) 1996The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Larson, Richard K.
1988On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 335–391.
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
1999Objecthood: An event structure perspective. In S. J. Billings, J. P. Boyle & A. M. Griffith (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society 35–1: Papers from the main session, 223–247.
2006English object alternations: A unified account. Unpublished manuscript.
2009Where do verb classes come from? Conference handout for Verb Typologies Revisited: A Cross-linguistic Reflection on Verbs and Verb Classes. Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University.
. In press. Verb classes within and across languages. In B. Comrie & A. Malchukov eds. Valency classes: A comparative handbook. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. Crossref link
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
1991Wiping the slate clean. Cognition 41. 123–151. Crossref link
1998Building verb meanings. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 97–134. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
1999Two structures for compositionally derived events. In T. Matthews & D. Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 9), 199–223. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
2005aArgument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
2005bArgument structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2013Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke & R. Marín (eds.), Studies in the composition and decomposition of event predicates, 49–70. Dordrecht: Springer. Crossref link
Levinson, Stephen C.
1995Three levels of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Lounsbury, Floyd G.
1956A semantic analysis of the Pawnee kinship usage. Language 32. 158–194. Crossref link
Lowe, John B., Collin F. Baker & Charles J. Fillmore
1997A frame-semantic approach to semantic annotation. SIGLEX97: Tagging text with lexical semantics: Why, what, and how?, 18–24.
Lüdeling, Anke
2001On particle verbs and similar constructions in German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Lüdeling, Anke & Merja Kytö
(eds.) 2009Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 2. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Lyngfelt, Benjamin
2012Rethinking FNI: On null instantiation and control in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 4(1). 1–23. Crossref link
Lyons, John
1963Structural semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meliss, Meike
2015Argumentstrukturen, Valenz und Konstruktionen: Eine korpusbasierte Studie deutscher und spanischer “Geruchsverben” im Kontrast. In S. Engelberg, M. Meliss, C. Proost & E. Winkler (eds.), Argumentstruktur zwischen valenz und konstruktion, 317–340. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Michaelis, Laura
2004Construction Grammar: Entity and event coercion in a symbolic theory of syntax. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 45–88. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2012Making the case for construction grammar. In H. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Michaelis, Laura & Josef Ruppenhofer
2001Beyond alternations: A constructional account of the applicative pattern in German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Miller, George A.
1995WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38(11). 39–41. Crossref link
Moens, Marc & Mark Steedman
1988Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14(2). 15–28.
Motsch, Wolfgang
1999Deutsche Wortbildung in Grundzügen. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
Mourelatos, Alexander P. D.
1981Events, processes, and states. In P. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (eds.), Tense and aspect (Syntax and Semantics 14), 191–212. London and New York: Academic Press. Crossref link
Müller, Stefan
2006Resultativkonstruktionen, Partikelverben und syntaktische vs. lexikonbasierte Konstruktionen. In K. Fischer & A. Stefanowitsch (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik: Von der Anwendung zur Theorie, 177–202. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Müller, Stefan & Stephen Wechsler
2014Lexical approaches to argument structure. Theoretical Linguistics 40(1–2). 1–76. Crossref link
Nemoto, Noriko
1998On the polysemy of ditransitive save. English Linguistics 15. 219–242. Crossref link
2005Verbal polysemy and Frame Semantics in Construction Grammar. In M. Fried & H. C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Nida, Eugene A.
1951A system for the description of semantic elements. Word 7(1). 1–14. Crossref link
1975Componential analysis of meaning: An introduction to semantic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Nilsen, Don L. F.
1973The instrumental case in English: Syntactic and semantic considerations. The Hague: Mouton. Crossref link
Nogle, Lawrence Elwayne
1970Method and theory in the semantics and cognition of kinship terminology. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign dissertation.
Ohara, Kyoko Hirose
2009Frame-based contrastive lexical semantics in Japanese FrameNet: The case of risk and kakeru. In H. C. Boas (ed.), Multilingual FrameNets in computational lexicography. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
Osswald, R. & R. D. Van Valin Jr.
2014Framenet, frame structure and the syntax-semantics interface. In R. Osswald, T. Gamerschlag, D. Gerland & W. Petersen (eds.), Frames and concept types: Applications in language and philosophy, 125–156. Heidelberg: Springer. Crossref link
Östman, Jan-Ola & Mirjam Fried
(eds.) 2005Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Paul, Hermann
1920Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemayer.
Perlmutter, David M. & Paul Postal
1983Some proposed laws of basic clause structure. In D. M. Perlmutter (ed.), Studies in Relational Grammar 1, 81–128. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Petruck, Miriam R. L., Charles J. Fillmore, Collin F. Baker, Michael Ellsworth & Josef Ruppenhofer
2004Reframing FrameNet data. In G. Williams & S. Vessier (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh EURALEX International Congress (EURALEX 2004). Lorient: Université de Bretagne-Sud.
Pinker, Steven
1989Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Pollard, Carl & Ivan Sag
1994Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Primus, Beatrice
1999Case and thematic roles: Ergative, accusative and active. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref link
Princeton University
2010 “About WordNet”. http://​wordnet​.princeton​.edu
Proost, Kristel
2009Warum man nach Schnäppchen jagen, aber nicht nach Klamotten bummeln kann: Die nach-Konstruktion zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik. In E. Winkler (ed.), Konstruktionelle Varianz bei Verben, 10–41. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.
Quine, Willard V. O.
1951Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60. 20–43. Crossref link
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
1998Building verb meanings. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments, 97–134. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
2002Change of state verbs: Implications for theories of argument projection. In N. Erteschik-Shir & T. Rapoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect, 274–286. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2008The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 44(1). 129–167. Crossref link
2010Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 269–280. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Reichling, Anton
1935Het woord. Nijmegen: Berkhaut.
Resnik, Philip S.
1993Selection and information: A class-based approach to lexical relationships. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
1996Selectional constraints: An information-theoretic model and its computational realization. Cognition 61. 127–159. Crossref link
Rodríguez, Francisco José Cortés & Eulalia Sosa Acevedo
(eds.) 2008Grammar, constructions, and interfaces. Special issue of Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57. San Cristóbal de la Laguna: Universidad de la Laguna.
Rosch, Eleanor
1973Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4. 328–350. Crossref link
1978Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization, 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ruppenhofer, Josef
. Forthcoming. Argument omissions in multiple German corpora. In H. C. Boas & A. Ziem eds. Constructional approaches to argument structure in German. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Johnson & Jan Scheffczyk
2010FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley: International Computer Science Institute. Technical report available at http://​framenet​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Johnson, Collin Baker & Jan Scheffczyk
2016FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley: International Computer Science Institute. Technical report available at https://​framenet2​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu​/docs​/r1​.7​/book​.pdf
Ruppenhofer, Josef & Laura A. Michaelis
2010A constructional account of genre-based argument omissions. Constructions and Frames 2. 158–184. Crossref link
2014Frames and the interpretation of omitted arguments. In S. Katz Bourns & L. Myers (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on structure and context: Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht, 57–86. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Sag, Ivan A., Thomas Wasow & Emily M. Bender
2003Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Salkoff, Morris
1983Bees are swarming in the garden. Language 59. 288–346. Crossref link
de Saussure, Ferdinand
1916Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
Schmidt, Thomas
2008The kicktionary: Combining corpus linguistics and lexical semantics for a multilingual football dictionary. In E. Lavric, G. Pisek, A. Skinner & W. Stadler (eds.), The linguistics of football (Language in Performance 38), 11–23. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
2009The kicktionary – a multilingual lexical resource of football language. In H. C. Boas (ed.), Multilingual FrameNets in computational lexicography, 101–132. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
Schuler, Karin Kipper
2005VerbNet: A broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
Schulte im Walde, Sabine
2003Experiments on the automatic induction of German semantic verb classes. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart dissertation.
2009The induction of verb frames and verb classes from corpora. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 2, 952–971. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
Schumacher, Helmut
2007Valenzforschung am IDS. In H. Kämper & L. M. Eichinger (eds.), Sprachperspektiven: Germanistische Linguistik und das Institut für Deutsche Sprache, 243–282. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Schumacher, Helmut, Jacqueline Kubczak, Renate Schmidt & Vera de Ruiter
2004VALBU – Valenzwörterbuch deutscher Verben. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Sinclair, John
(ed.) 1987Looking up: An account of the COBUILD project in lexical computing. London: Harper Collins.
Slobin, Dan I.
1987Thinking for speaking. In J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis, H. Filip (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Grammar and Cognition, 435–445. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
1997Mind, code, and text. In J. L. Bybee, J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón, 437–467. Amsterdam and Philadelpha: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2000Verbalized events. In. S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 195), 107–138. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2003Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, 157–191. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Smith, Carlota S.
1997The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Snell-Hornby, M.
1983Verb-descriptivity in English and German. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Song, Grace
1996Adicity, causation, and lexical aspect. In L. Veselinova (ed.), Proceedings of ESCOL 95, 299–307. CLC Publications.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
2003Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243. Crossref link
Stringer, David
2003Acquisitional evidence for a universal syntax of directional PPs. ACL SIGSEM workshop: The linguistic dimensions of prepositions and their use in computational linguistics formalisms and applications, 44–55. Toulouse: IRIT.
2006Typological tendencies and Universal Grammar in the acquisition of adpositions. In P. Saint-Dizier (ed.), Syntax and semantics of prepositions, 57–68. Dordrecht: Springer. Crossref link
Talmy, Leonard
1975Semantics and syntax of motion. In J. P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics 4, 181–238. London and New York: Academic Press.
1976aSemantic causative types. In M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and semantics 6: The grammar of causative constructions, 43–116. London and New York: Academic Press. Crossref link
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description 3, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1988Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1). 49–100. Crossref link
2000Towards a cognitive semantics II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Taylor, John R.
1996On running and jogging. Cognitive Linguistics 7(1). 21–34. Crossref link
Tenny, Carol L.
1994Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Crossref link
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trier, Jost
1931Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. Heidelberg: Winter.
Urban, Margaret & Josef Ruppenhofer
2001Shouting and screaming: Manner and noise verbs in communication. Literary and Linguistic Computing 16. 77–97. Crossref link
Van Hout, Angelique
1996Event semantics of verb frame alternations. Tilburg: Tilburg University dissertation.
Van Valin, Robert & Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Van Valin, Robert D.
1990Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66. 221–260. Crossref link
1993A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In R. D. Van Valin (ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar, 1–164. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
1999Generalized semantic roles and the syntax-semantics interface. In F. Corblin, C. Dobrovie-Sorin & J.-M. Marandin (eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 2, 373–389. The Hague: Thesus.
2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Van Valin, Robert D. & David P. Wilkins
1996The case for ‘effector’: Case roles, agents, and agency revisited. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 289–322. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vendler, Zeno
1957Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160. Crossref link
Verkuyl, Henk J.
1972The compositional nature of the aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel. Crossref link
1993A theory of aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Verspoor, Marjolijn, Kee Dong Lee & Eve Sweetser
(eds.) 1997Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Weinreich, Uriel
1966Explorations in semantic theory. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics 3, 295–477. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
Weisgerber, Leo
1927Die Bedeutungslehre: Ein Irrweg der Sprachwissenschaft? Heidelberg: Winter.
Welke, Klaus
2009Valenztheorie und Konstruktionsgrammatik. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 37. 81–124. Crossref link
2011Valenzgrammatik des Deutschen. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Wierzbicka, Anna
1972Semantic primitives. Bonn: Athenäum-Verl.
2006English: Meaning and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
2007NSM semantics versus conceptual semantics: Goals and standards (A response to Jackendoff). Intercultural Pragmatics 4(4). 521–529. Crossref link
Winkler, Edeltraud
2015Die beiden Varianten der Material-Produkt-Alternanz im Deutschen. In S. Engelberg, M. Meliss, C. Proost & E. Winkler (eds.), Argumentstruktur zwischen Valenz und Konstruktion, 201–216. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Wood, Mary McGee
1993Categorial grammars. London: Routledge.
Wotjak, G.
1971Untersuchungen zur Struktur der Bedeutung. Munich: Hueber.
Wulff, Stefanie
2006Go-V vs. go-and-V in English: A case of constructional synonymy? In S. Th. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 101–125. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
2008Rethinking idiomaticity: A usage-based approach. London and New York: Continuum Press.
Wulff, Stefanie, Stefan Th. Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch
2005Brutal Brits and argumentative Americans: What collostructional analysis can tell us about lectal variation. Conference paper at the Ninth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC 9). Seoul: Yonsei University.
Wunderlich, Dieter
1991How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics? Linguistics 29. 591–621. Crossref link
Ziem, Alexander
2008Frame-Semantik und Diskursanalyse: Skizze einer kognitionswissenschaftlich inspirierten Methode zur Analyse gesellschaftlichen Wissens. In I. Warnke & J. Spitzmüller (eds.), Methoden der Diskurslinguistik: Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zur transtextuellen Ebene, 89–116. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
2014Frames of understanding in text and discourse: Theoretical foundations and descriptive applications. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2020013603