Landscape in Language
Transdisciplinary perspectives
Editors
| University at Buffalo (SUNY)
| Murdoch University
| Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen and Lund University
| Texas State University
Landscape is fundamental to human experience. Yet until recently, the study of landscape has been fragmented among the disciplines. This volume focuses on how landscape is represented in language and thought, and what this reveals about the relationships of people to place and to land. Scientists of various disciplines such as anthropologists, geographers, information scientists, linguists, and philosophers address several questions, including: Are there cross-cultural and cross-linguistic variations in the delimitation, classification, and naming of geographic features? Can alternative world-views and conceptualizations of landscape be used to produce culturally-appropriate Geographic Information Systems (GIS)? Topics included: ontology of landscape; landscape terms and concepts; toponyms; spiritual aspects of land and landscape terms; research methods; ethical dimensions of the research; and its potential value to indigenous communities involved in this type of research.
[Culture and Language Use, 4] 2011. xiii, 449 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Foreword
|
ix–x
|
|
Preface
|
xi–xiii
|
|
1–24
|
|
|
25–45
|
|
|
47–72
|
|
|
73–100
|
|
|
101–119
|
|
|
121–141
|
|
|
143–166
|
|
|
167–186
|
|
|
187–223
|
|
|
225–237
|
|
|
239–260
|
|
|
261–274
|
|
|
275–289
|
|
|
291–326
|
|
|
327–342
|
|
|
343–351
|
|
|
353–368
|
|
|
369–379
|
|
|
381–393
|
|
|
395–409
|
|
|
411–434
|
|
|
Notes on contributors
|
435–441
|
|
Index
|
443–449
|
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2011. Books and Films Received.
Current Anthropology 52:6 ► pp. 923 ff. 
No author info given
2017.
In Imdeduya [Culture and Language Use, 20],
No author info given
2018.
In Landscape and Culture – Cross-linguistic Perspectives [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 9],
Apple, Jude, Judy Lemus & Steven Semken
2014. Teaching Geoscience in the Context of Culture and Place.
Journal of Geoscience Education 62:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Burenhult, Niclas, Clair Hill, Juliette Huber, Saskia van Putten, Konrad Rybka & Lila San Roque
2017. Forests: the cross-linguistic perspective.
Geographica Helvetica 72:4 ► pp. 455 ff.
Chesnokova, Olga, Joanna E. Taylor, Ian N. Gregory & Ross S. Purves
2019. Hearing the silence: finding the middle ground in the spatial humanities? Extracting and comparing perceived silence and tranquillity in the English Lake District.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 33:12 ► pp. 2430 ff.
Hu, Yingjie
2018. Geo-text data and data-driven geospatial semantics.
Geography Compass 12:11 ► pp. e12404 ff.
Kemp, Charles, Yang Xu & Terry Regier
2018. Semantic Typology and Efficient Communication.
Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Kharusi, Nafla S. & Amel Salman
2015. In Search of Water: Hydrological Terms in Oman’s Toponyms.
Names 63:1 ► pp. 16 ff.
León Villalobos, José María, Verónica Vázquez García, Enrique Ojeda Trejo, Michael K. McCall, Juan Hernández Hernández & Gaurav Sinha
2019. Mapping from spatial meaning: bridging Hñahñu (Otomi) ecological knowledge and geo-information tools.
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 15:1
Mackenzie, Kierin, John Pirker & Femke Reitsma
2020. Towards a SpatioTemporal Data Model for Traditional Ecological Knowledge/Indigenous Knowledge.
Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 55:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Malt, Barbara C. & Asifa Majid
2013. How thought is mapped into words.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 4:6 ► pp. 583 ff.
Medby, Ingrid A.
2020. Political geography and language: A reappraisal for a diverse discipline.
Area 52:1 ► pp. 148 ff.
Montello, Daniel R. & David M. Mark
2018. The world, the computer, and the mind: how Andrew Frank helped make human language and cognition cornerstones of geographic information science.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 32:12 ► pp. 2535 ff.
Nash, Joshua
2013. Landscape Underwater, Underwater Landscapes: Kangaroo Island Diving Site Names as Elements of the Linguistic Landscape.
Landscape Research 38:3 ► pp. 394 ff.
Nash, Joshua
2015. Is toponymy necessary?.
Studies in Language 39:1 ► pp. 230 ff.
Nash, Joshua
2016. Is linguistic landscape necessary?.
Landscape Research 41:3 ► pp. 380 ff.
O’Meara, Carolyn, Niclas Burenhult, Mikael Rothstein & Peter Sercombe
2020. Representing space and place: hunter-gatherer perspectives.
Hunter Gatherer Research 4:3 ► pp. 287 ff.
Si, Aung
2016.
In The Traditional Ecological Knowledge of the Solega [Ethnobiology, ],
► pp. 135 ff.
Thiering, Martin
2014.
In Multilingual Cognition and Language Use [Human Cognitive Processing, 44],
► pp. 151 ff.
Turk, Andrew & David Stea
2014. David Mark’s contribution to ethnophysiography research.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28:6 ► pp. 1246 ff.
Villette, Julia & Ross S. Purves
2020. From Microtoponyms to Landscape Using Semantics, Location, and Topography: The Case of Wald, Holz, Riet, and Moos in St. Gallen, Switzerland.
The Professional Geographer 72:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Wartmann, Flurina M., Elise Acheson & Ross S. Purves
2018. Describing and comparing landscapes using tags, texts, and free lists: an interdisciplinary approach.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 32:8 ► pp. 1572 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 july 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2011003203