Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse

Paul Bayley | University of Bologna
ISBN 9789027227003 (Eur) | EUR 105.00
ISBN 9781588114778 (USA) | USD 158.00
ISBN 9789027295811 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
The activity of parliaments is largely linguistic activity: they produce talk and they produce texts. Broadly speaking, the objectives that this discourse aims to satisfy are similar all over the world: to legitimate or contest legislation, to represent diverse interests, to scrutinise the activity of government, to influence opinion and to recruit and promote political actors. But the discourse of different national parliaments is subject to variation, at all linguistic levels, on the basis of history, cultural specificity, and political culture in particular. Through the use of various analytical tools of functional linguistics, this volume seeks to provide explanatory analyses of parliamentary discourse in different countries – Britain, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Spain, Sweden and the United States – and to explore its peculiarities. Each chapter outlines a particular methodological framework and its application to instances of parliamentary discourse on important issues such as war, European integration, impeachment and immigration.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Cited by

Cited by 51 other publications

No author info given
2015.  In Israeli Peace Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 59], Crossref logo
No author info given
2017.  In Discourse and Identity Formation [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 73], Crossref logo
No author info given
2017.  In Jüdische Identitäten und antisemitische Politiken im österreichischen Parlament 1861-1933,  pp. 301 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In The Politics of Person Reference [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 320], Crossref logo
Alexandre-Collier, Agnès
2022. Brexit and Anti-Parliament Discourses among Conservative MPs (2016–2019). Parliamentary Affairs 75:2  pp. 239 ff. Crossref logo
Almutairi, Bandar Alhumaidi A.
2022. Diachronic changes of least delicate appraisal in parliamentary and congressional language. Functions of Language 29:2  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo
Baker, Olja
2021. Parliamentary directives in New Zealand and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Languages in Contrast 21:1  pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Berrocal, Martina & Aleksandra Salamurović
2019.  In Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 84],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Bischof, Karin & Cornelia Ilie
2018. Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 17:5  pp. 585 ff. Crossref logo
Brzozowska, Dorota & Władysław Chłopicki
2021. Interventions of Speakers of Polish and British Parliaments in the light of politeness theory. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:1  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Burroughs, Elaine
2015. The Discourse of Controlling “Illegal Immigration” in Irish Parliamentary Texts. Journal of Language and Politics 14:4  pp. 479 ff. Crossref logo
Calzada Pérez, Maria
2017. Five turns of the screw. Journal of Language and Politics 16:3  pp. 412 ff. Crossref logo
Calzada Pérez, María
2018. What is kept and what is lost without translation? A corpus-assisted discourse study of the European Parliament’s original and translated English. Perspectives 26:2  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Calzada-Pérez, María
2017. Researching the European Parliament with Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:2  pp. 465 ff. Crossref logo
Cuenca, Maria-Josep
2014. The use of demonstratives and context activation in Catalan parliamentary debate. Discourse Studies 16:6  pp. 729 ff. Crossref logo
Domeradzka, Magdalena
2018. “It's Not the Whole Truth”. The Notions of Truth and Falsehood as Persuasive Devices in Polish and Swedish Parliamentary Talk. Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia 25:1  pp. 59 ff. Crossref logo
Fenton-Smith, Ben
2008. Discourse structure and political performance in adversarial parliamentary questioning. Journal of Language and Politics 7:1  pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Fuentes-Rodríguez, Catalina
2016.  In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68],  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Fuentes-Rodríguez, Catalina
2022.  In Adversarial Political Interviewing,  pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2014. ‘TALKING PEACE – GOING TO WAR’. Critical Discourse Studies 11:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Gibbins, Justin
2022.  Little Englanders or Big Britainers? The UK and EU role conceptions during the Brexit bill debate . Politics & Policy 50:2  pp. 298 ff. Crossref logo
Gruber, Helmut
2018. Debating or displaying political positions?. Pragmatics and Society 9:4  pp. 571 ff. Crossref logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2015.  In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2021. Discussion, dispute or controversy?. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2  pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo
Inya, Onwu
2021. ‘The legislature is the engine room of democracy’: Constructing ideological worldviews through proximisation strategies in Nigerian Senate debates. Discourse & Society 32:2  pp. 196 ff. Crossref logo
Jakaza, Ernest
2013. Gricean implicature and election predictions: A case of the Zimbabwean 2008 election campaign. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 31:3  pp. 311 ff. Crossref logo
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M.
2006.  In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Keremidchieva, Zornitsa
2014. The U.S. Congressional Record as a technology of representation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:1  pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo
Kitaeva, Elena & Olga Ozerova
2019.  In Language, Power, and Ideology in Political Writing [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ],  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
2021. A Dynamic Model of Speech for the Social Sciences. American Political Science Review 115:2  pp. 649 ff. Crossref logo
Lesch, Harold & Karen Grové
2018. Interpreting services in the Western Cape Legislature. Translation and Interpreting Studies 13:2  pp. 250 ff. Crossref logo
Miller, Donna R. & Monica Turci
2008. Construing the ‘social gospel’ of Martin Luther King Jr.: a corpus-assisted study of free*. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 2:3 Crossref logo
Mollin, Sandra
2007. The Hansard hazard: gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora 2:2  pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo
Müftüler-Baç, Meltem & Rahime Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm
2015. Deliberations in the Turkish parliament. Journal of Language and Politics 14:2  pp. 258 ff. Crossref logo
Müller, Marcus & Ruth M. Mell
2022. ‘Risk’ in political discourse. A corpus approach to semantic change in German Bundestag debates. Journal of Risk Research 25:3  pp. 347 ff. Crossref logo
Norén, Coco & Jérôme Josserand
2015. Intervention et compte rendu du débat parlementaire européen – une question de diamésie ?. Studia Neophilologica 87:1  pp. 84 ff. Crossref logo
Och, Malliga
2020. Manterrupting in the German Bundestag: Gendered Opposition to Female Members of Parliament?. Politics & Gender 16:2  pp. 388 ff. Crossref logo
Partington, Alan & Jane Helen Johnson
2020.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Philips, Lisa & Allan K. McDougall
2007. Le pouvoir et l’appropriation des discours dans les constructions parlementaires au Canada. Anthropologie et Sociétés 31:1  pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Pietsch, Juliet
2017. Explaining the political under-representation of Asian Australians: geographical concentration and voting patterns. Political Science 69:2  pp. 161 ff. Crossref logo
Poulos, Elenie
2020. The power of belief: religious freedom in Australian parliamentary debates on same-sex marriage. Australian Journal of Political Science 55:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Qadir, Ali & Jukka Syväterä
2021. The moral authority of science: Evidence from parliamentary debates in seven countries. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 8:3  pp. 265 ff. Crossref logo
Sarfo-Kantankah, Kwabena Sarfo & Ben Kudus Yussif
2019. The use of actually in a non-native English parliamentary context: a corpus study. <i>WORD</i> 65:4  pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo
Schäfer, Sophie
2018.  In Soziologie der Parlamente,  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
Sivenkova, Maria
2008. Expressing Commitment When Asking Multiunit Questions in Parliamentary Debates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27:4  pp. 359 ff. Crossref logo
Tanasoca, Ana & Jensen Sass
2019. Ritual Deliberation. Journal of Political Philosophy 27:2  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Truan, Naomi
2021. Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 20:4  pp. 563 ff. Crossref logo
van Dijk, Teun A.
2005. War rhetoric of a little ally. Journal of Language and Politics 4:1  pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo
Weiss, Daniel
2016. Types and functions of intertextual references in the Russian State Duma. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61:1  pp. 184 ff. Crossref logo
Wilson, John & Karyn Stapleton
2012. Discourse in the shadows: Discursive construction and the Northern Ireland Assembly. Discourse & Society 23:1  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Hazel R. Wright & Marianne Høyen
2020.  In Discourses We Live By, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata

Communication Studies

Communication Studies
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2003069658 | Marc record