Metonymy in Language and Thought
Editors
| University of Hamburg
| University of Hamburg
Hardbound – Available
ISBN
9789027223562
(Eur) | EUR 125.00
ISBN
9781556192043
(USA) | USD 188.00
e-Book –
Buy from our e-platform

ISBN
9789027299376 | EUR 125.00
| USD 188.00
Metonymy in Language and Thought gives a state-of-the-art account of metonymic research. The contributions have different disciplinary and theoretical backgrounds in linguistics, psycholinguistics, psychology and literary studies. However, they share the assumption that metonymy is a cognitive phenomenon, a “figure of thought,” underlying much of our ordinary conceptualization that may be even more fundamental than metaphor. The use of metonymy in language is a reflection of this conceptual status. The framework within which metonymy is understood in this volume is that of scenes, frames, scenarios, domains or idealized cognitive models.
The chapters are revised papers given at the Metonymy Workshop held in Hamburg, 1996.
The chapters are revised papers given at the Metonymy Workshop held in Hamburg, 1996.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 4]
1999.
vii, 410 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
1
|
|
Part I: Theoretical Aspects of Metonymy
|
|
17–59
|
|
61
|
|
77
|
|
91
|
|
121
|
|
Part II: Historical Aspects of Metonymy
|
|
139
|
|
169
|
|
193
|
|
211
|
|
Part III: Case Studies of Metonymy
|
|
233
|
|
255
|
|
275
|
|
289
|
|
309
|
|
333
|
|
Part IV: Applications of Metonymy
|
|
361
|
|
385
|
|
List of Contributors
|
401
|
Subject index
|
405
|
Author index
|
413
|
Metonymy and metaphor index
|
419
|
“Overall, there is no doubt that the volume under review constitutes a primary resource which will help everyone working in the fields of cognitive linguistics and figurative language. It is well worth reading, and re-reading, because it offers a unique insight into the complexity of the issues underlying metonymix expressions.”
Mario Brdar in Suvremena Lingvistika Vol 27.1-2, 2001
“Seventeen first-rate papers present metonymy within a conceptual framework of scenarios, scenes, frames, domains, and idealized cognitive models (ICMs). The book concludes with a useful index of metonymies and metaphors.”
Kenneth A. McElhanon, Summer Institute of Linguistics, in Language Vol. 78.2, 2002
“[...] an important work in Metonymy research that must be consulted in any study of Metonymy [...]”
Latrin Mutz, Universität Saarland, Germany, in Metaphorik 06/2004
Subjects
Psychology
BIC Subject: JM – Psychology
BISAC Subject: PSY000000 – PSYCHOLOGY / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 99023468
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2015. “Cognitive Linguistics is fun”: An interview with Günter Radden.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 479 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.2.09ben
Akita, Kimi
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2014. Metaphors and metonymies for the (conceptualization and expression of the) state of no emotion in English and Greek.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.1.01ath
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 2 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.56.int
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 152 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.56.06ath
Borbely, Antal F.
2009. The Centrality of Metaphor and Metonymy in Psychoanalytic Theory and Practice.
Psychoanalytic Inquiry 29:1 ► pp. 58 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690802247195
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2014. In search of motivation in language: An interview with Klaus-Uwe Panther.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 223 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.12.1.08brd
Bruce, Anne, Laurene Sheilds & Anita Molzahn
2011. Language and the (Im)possibilities of Articulating Spirituality.
Journal of Holistic Nursing 29:1 ► pp. 44 ff. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010110381116
Caballero, Rosario
2017.
In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59],
► pp. 229 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.10cab
Catalano, Theresa & John W. Creswell
2013. Understanding the Language of the Occupy Movement.
Qualitative Inquiry 19:9 ► pp. 664 ff. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413500931
Cienki, Alan
2013. Bringing concepts from cognitive linguistics into the analysis of policies and the political.
Journal of International Relations and Development 16:2 ► pp. 294 ff. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2012.24
Colston, Herbert L.
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 274 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.56.11col
Crisp, Peter
2012. The Pilgrim’s Progress: Allegory or novel?.
Language and Literature 21:4 ► pp. 328 ff. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947012444953
Emanatian, Michele & David Delaney
2008. What message does 'send a message' send?.
Journal of Language and Politics 7:2 ► pp. 290 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.2.06ema
Eubanks, Philip
2008. An Analysis ofCorporate Rulein Globalization Discourse: Why We Need Rhetoric to Explain Conceptual Figures.
Rhetoric Review 27:3 ► pp. 236 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350190802126151
FALKUM, INGRID L., MARTA RECASENS & EVE V. CLARK
2017. “The moustache sits down first”: on the acquisition of metonymy.
Journal of Child Language 44:01 ► pp. 87 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000720
Feng, William Dezheng
2017. Metonymy and visual representation: towards a social semiotic framework of visual metonymy.
Visual Communication 16:4 ► pp. 441 ff. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357217717142
Fougner Rydning, Antin
2005. A la recherche d’un modèle explicatif du sens en traduction.
FORUM 3:1 ► pp. 103 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.3.1.05fou
Fougner Rydning, Antin
2014. La créativité traductionnelle – résultante d’une aptitude à visualiser.
FORUM 12:1 ► pp. 137 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.12.1.07ryd
Fougner Rydning, Atin
2005. The Return of Sense on the Scene of Translation Studies in the Light of the Cognitive Blending Theory.
Meta: Journal des traducteurs 50:2 ► pp. 392 ff. https://doi.org/10.7202/010989ar
Halverson, Sandra L. & Jan Oskar Engene
2010. Domains and Dimensions in Metonymy: A Corpus-Based Study ofSchengenandMaastricht.
Metaphor and Symbol 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480903538456
Martin, Paul & Pam Papadelos
2017. Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language.
Social Semiotics 27:1 ► pp. 39 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2016.1145371
Mittelberg, Irene
2018. Embodied frames and scenes.
Gesture 16:2 ► pp. 203 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.03mit
Moore, Kevin Ezra
2014.
In The Spatial Language of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 42],
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.42
Musolff, Andreas
2012. The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis.
Critical Discourse Studies 9:3 ► pp. 301 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688300
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
Peña Cervel, M Sandra
2010. MacbethRevisited: A Cognitive Analysis.
Metaphor and Symbol 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2011.535412
Piquer-Píriz, Ana María & Rafael Alejo-González
2016. Applying Cognitive Linguistics.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.14.1.01piq
Pérez Sobrino, Paula
2017.
In Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising [Figurative Thought and Language, 2],
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.2
Rania, Nadia, Laura Migliorini, Stefania Rebora & Paola Cardinali
2015. Photovoice and Interpretation of Pictures in a Group Discussion: A Community Psychology Approach.
Qualitative Research in Psychology 12:4 ► pp. 382 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1019597
Rapp, Alexander M. & Barbara Wild
2011. Nonliteral Language in Alzheimer Dementia: A Review.
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 17:02 ► pp. 207 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617710001682
Rasulic, Katarina
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 200 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.56.08ras
Riad, Sally & Eero Vaara
2011. Varieties of National Metonymy in Media Accounts of International Mergers and Acquisitions.
Journal of Management Studies 48:4 ► pp. 737 ff. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00940.x
Riemer, Nick
2002. Verb Polysemy and the Vocabulary of Percussion and Impact in Central Australia.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 45 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600120122562
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Alicia Galera Masegosa
Rydning, Antin Fougner
2004. Le défi du procédé synecdoquien en traduction.
Meta: Journal des traducteurs 49:4 ► pp. 856 ff. https://doi.org/10.7202/009786ar
Rydning, Antin Fougner
2008. La démarche de l’expert-traducteur face à un problème de reformulation.
Meta: Journal des traducteurs 53:4 ► pp. 748 ff. https://doi.org/10.7202/019645ar
Schmidt, Peter
2010. The Play of Tropes in Archaeology.
Ethnoarchaeology 2:2 ► pp. 131 ff. https://doi.org/10.1179/eth.2010.2.2.131
Sigrell, Anders
2012. ‘Whenever I put a black jacket on, I get dandruff ’.
Education Inquiry 3:4 ► pp. 535 ff. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v3i4.22052
Veloudis, Ioannis
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 253 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.56.10vel
Verdonk, Peter
2005. Painting, poetry, parallelism: ekphrasis, stylistics and cognitive poetics.
Language and Literature 14:3 ► pp. 231 ff. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005054479
Villacañas, Beatriz & Michael White
2014. Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in “Purificación García” advertising campaigns.
Metaphor and the Social World 3:2 ► pp. 220 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.2.06vil
Yang, Ada Ya-ying & Shelley Ching-yu Depner
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2018. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.