Metonymy in Language and Thought
Editors
| University of Hamburg
| University of Hamburg
Metonymy in Language and Thought gives a state-of-the-art account of metonymic research. The contributions have different disciplinary and theoretical backgrounds in linguistics, psycholinguistics, psychology and literary studies. However, they share the assumption that metonymy is a cognitive phenomenon, a “figure of thought,” underlying much of our ordinary conceptualization that may be even more fundamental than metaphor. The use of metonymy in language is a reflection of this conceptual status. The framework within which metonymy is understood in this volume is that of scenes, frames, scenarios, domains or idealized cognitive models.
The chapters are revised papers given at the Metonymy Workshop held in Hamburg, 1996.
The chapters are revised papers given at the Metonymy Workshop held in Hamburg, 1996.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 4] 1999. vii, 410 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
1
|
|
|
Part I: Theoretical Aspects of Metonymy
|
|
|
17–59
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
Part II: Historical Aspects of Metonymy
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
Part III: Case Studies of Metonymy
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
Part IV: Applications of Metonymy
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
List of Contributors
|
401
|
|
Subject index
|
405
|
|
Author index
|
413
|
|
Metonymy and metaphor index
|
419
|
“Overall, there is no doubt that the volume under review constitutes a primary resource which will help everyone working in the fields of cognitive linguistics and figurative language. It is well worth reading, and re-reading, because it offers a unique insight into the complexity of the issues underlying metonymix expressions.”
Mario Brdar in Suvremena Lingvistika Vol 27.1-2, 2001
“Seventeen first-rate papers present metonymy within a conceptual framework of scenarios, scenes, frames, domains, and idealized cognitive models (ICMs). The book concludes with a useful index of metonymies and metaphors.”
Kenneth A. McElhanon, Summer Institute of Linguistics, in Language Vol. 78.2, 2002
“[...] an important work in Metonymy research that must be consulted in any study of Metonymy [...]”
Latrin Mutz, Universität Saarland, Germany, in Metaphorik 06/2004
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],
No author info given
2014.
In The Spatial Language of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 42],
No author info given
2015. “Cognitive Linguistics is fun”: An interview with Günter Radden.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 479 ff.
No author info given
2017.
In Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising [Figurative Thought and Language, 2],
No author info given
2019.
In Reference Point and Case [Human Cognitive Processing, 68],
No author info given
2019.
In Representing Wine – Sensory Perceptions, Communication and Cultures [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 21],
No author info given
2020.
In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],
Akita, Kimi
2015.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2014. Metaphors and metonymies for the (conceptualization and expression of the) state of no emotion in English and Greek.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 2 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 152 ff.
Barcelona, Antonio
2014. Bogusław Bierwiaczonek, Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox, 2013. Pp. iv + 291..
Journal of Linguistics 50:3 ► pp. 712 ff.
Barcelona, Antonio, Olga Blanco Carrión & Rossella Pannain
2018.
In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60],
► pp. 1 ff.
Borbely, Antal F.
2009. The Centrality of Metaphor and Metonymy in Psychoanalytic Theory and Practice.
Psychoanalytic Inquiry 29:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2014. In search of motivation in language: An interview with Klaus-Uwe Panther.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 223 ff.
Bruce, Anne, Laurene Sheilds & Anita Molzahn
2011. Language and the (Im)possibilities of Articulating Spirituality.
Journal of Holistic Nursing 29:1 ► pp. 44 ff.
Caballero, Rosario
2017.
In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59],
► pp. 229 ff.
Caballero, Rosario
2019.
In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19],
► pp. 127 ff.
Catalano, Theresa & John W. Creswell
2013. Understanding the Language of the Occupy Movement.
Qualitative Inquiry 19:9 ► pp. 664 ff.
Cienki, Alan
2013. Bringing concepts from cognitive linguistics into the analysis of policies and the political.
Journal of International Relations and Development 16:2 ► pp. 294 ff.
Colston, Herbert L.
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 274 ff.
Colston, Herbert L.
2019.
In How Language Makes Meaning,
Crisp, Peter
2012. The Pilgrim’s Progress: Allegory or novel?.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 21:4 ► pp. 328 ff.
Denroche, Charles
2018. Text metaphtonymy.
Metaphor and the Social World 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla
2020.
In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5],
► pp. 39 ff.
Dziedzic-Rawska, Alicja
2017.
In Multiculturalism, Multilingualism and the Self [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 63 ff.
Emanatian, Michele & David Delaney
2008. What message does 'send a message' send?.
Journal of Language and Politics 7:2 ► pp. 290 ff.
Eubanks, Philip
2005. Globalization, "Corporate Rule," and Blended Worlds: A Conceptual-Rhetorical Analysis of Metaphor, Metonymy, and Conceptual Blending.
Metaphor and Symbol 20:3 ► pp. 173 ff.
Eubanks, Philip
2008. An Analysis ofCorporate Rulein Globalization Discourse: Why We Need Rhetoric to Explain Conceptual Figures.
Rhetoric Review 27:3 ► pp. 236 ff.
Feng, William Dezheng
2017. Metonymy and visual representation: towards a social semiotic framework of visual metonymy.
Visual Communication 16:4 ► pp. 441 ff.
Fisher, Harwood
2003. Metonymy as concept: A metaphor for rhetoric, not for thought.
Semiotica 2003:147
Fougner Rydning, Antin
2005. A la recherche d’un modèle explicatif du sens en traduction.
FORUM 3:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Fougner Rydning, Antin
2014. La créativité traductionnelle – résultante d’une aptitude à visualiser.
FORUM 12:1 ► pp. 137 ff.
Fougner Rydning, Atin
2005. The Return of Sense on the Scene of Translation Studies in the Light of the Cognitive Blending Theory.
Meta 50:2 ► pp. 392 ff.
Halverson, Sandra L. & Jan Oskar Engene
2010. Domains and Dimensions in Metonymy: A Corpus-Based Study ofSchengenandMaastricht.
Metaphor and Symbol 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide & Brigitte Nerlich
2000. Metáfora y Conocimiento.
Metaphor and Symbol 15:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Jurewicz, Joanna
2015.
In Orientalistyka. Rozważania o nauce,
Koch, Peter
2001. Bedeutungswandel und Bezeichnungswandel.
Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 31:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Lu, Wei-lun
2020.
In Language, Culture and Identity – Signs of Life [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 13],
► pp. 141 ff.
Markert, Katja & Malvina Nissim
2003. Corpus-Based Metonymy Analysis.
Metaphor and Symbol 18:3 ► pp. 175 ff.
Martin, Paul & Pam Papadelos
2017. Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language.
Social Semiotics 27:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Massoussi, Taoufik & Salah Mejri
2009. Traitement automatique des métonymies.
Revue française de linguistique appliquée XIV:2 ► pp. 43 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2017. Embodied frames and scenes.
Gesture 16:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2019. Visuo-Kinetic Signs Are Inherently Metonymic: How Embodied Metonymy Motivates Forms, Functions, and Schematic Patterns in Gesture.
Frontiers in Psychology 10
Musolff, Andreas
2012. The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis.
Critical Discourse Studies 9:3 ► pp. 301 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
2005.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Paradis, Carita
2004. Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets, and Active Zones.
Metaphor and Symbol 19:4 ► pp. 245 ff.
Peña Cervel, M Sandra
2010. MacbethRevisited: A Cognitive Analysis.
Metaphor and Symbol 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Piquer-Píriz, Ana María & Rafael Alejo-González
2016. Applying Cognitive Linguistics.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
PIQUER-PÍRIZ, ANA Mª
2017.
Jeannette Littlemore. Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. 240. ISBN 978-1-107-04362-6
.
Language and Cognition 9:3 ► pp. 568 ff.
PONTEROTTO, DIANE
2017. Motion for emotion: an empirical cross-linguistic study of conceptual construals.
Language and Cognition 9:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Rania, Nadia, Laura Migliorini, Stefania Rebora & Paola Cardinali
2015. Photovoice and Interpretation of Pictures in a Group Discussion: A Community Psychology Approach.
Qualitative Research in Psychology 12:4 ► pp. 382 ff.
Rapp, Alexander M. & Barbara Wild
2011. Nonliteral Language in Alzheimer Dementia: A Review.
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 17:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
Rasulic, Katarina
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 200 ff.
Rasulić, Katarina
2020.
In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87],
► pp. 111 ff.
Reda, Ghsoon
2016. A Review of the Cognitive Linguistics Approach to Teaching the EFL/EIL Vocabulary.
SSRN Electronic Journal
Riad, Sally & Eero Vaara
2011. Varieties of National Metonymy in Media Accounts of International Mergers and Acquisitions.
Journal of Management Studies 48:4 ► pp. 737 ff.
Riemer, Nick
2002. Verb Polysemy and the Vocabulary of Percussion and Impact in Central Australia.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Rydning, Antin Fougner
2005. Le défi du procédé synecdoquien en traduction.
Meta 49:4 ► pp. 856 ff.
Rydning, Antin Fougner
2009. La démarche de l’expert-traducteur face à un problème de reformulation.
Meta 53:4 ► pp. 748 ff.
Schmidt, Peter
2010. The Play of Tropes in Archaeology.
Ethnoarchaeology 2:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
Sigrell, Anders
2012. ‘Whenever I put a black jacket on, I get dandruff ’.
Education Inquiry 3:4 ► pp. 535 ff.
Steen, Gerard
2004. Introduction: Metaphor across languages.
Journal of Pragmatics 36:7 ► pp. 1183 ff.
Trousdale, Graeme
2018.
In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series, 204],
► pp. 311 ff.
Tyler, Andrea & Vyvyan Evans
2003.
In The Semantics of English Prepositions,
VALERA, SALVADOR & ALBA E. RUZ
2020. Conversion in English: homonymy, polysemy and paronymy.
English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.
Veloudis, Ioannis
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 253 ff.
Verdonk, Peter
2005. Painting, poetry, parallelism: ekphrasis, stylistics and cognitive poetics.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 14:3 ► pp. 231 ff.
Villacañas, Beatriz & Michael White
2013. Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in “Purificación García” advertising campaigns.
Metaphor and the Social World 3:2 ► pp. 220 ff.
WEISS, DAVID
2005. Metonymy in Black and White: Shelby Steele's Revelatory Racial Tropes.
Howard Journal of Communications 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Wengeler, Martin & Alexander Ziem
2010.
In Diskursiver Wandel,
► pp. 335 ff.
Yang, Ada Ya-ying & Shelley Ching-yu Depner
2016.
In Embodiment in Language (II),
► pp. 75 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Psychology
BIC Subject: JM – Psychology
BISAC Subject: PSY000000 – PSYCHOLOGY / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 99023468