Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:3
[Journal of Argumentation in Context, 9:3] 2020. iii, 120 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
“Well, in the case of my mom…”: Personal stories as negotiable arguments in public forumsEkaterina Lukianova and Timothy Steffensmeier | pp. 315–341
-
“The people want it”: Analysis and evaluation of the populist argument in the context of deliberationHenrike Jansen | pp. 342–367
-
Economic consequences for lawyers: Beyond the jurisprudential prefaceFabrizio Esposito and Giovanni Tuzet | pp. 368–398
-
Deliberating over legislative ends: An inventory of goal-(de)legitimizing argument schemesConstanza Ihnen Jory | pp. 399–427
-
Marcelo Danesi & Sara Greco, Eds. (2016). Case studies in discourse analysisReviewed by Dima Mohammed | pp. 428–432
-
C. Ilie & G. Garzone, Eds. (2017). Argumentation across communities of practice. Multi-disciplinary perspectivesReviewed by Corina Andone | pp. 433–434
Articles
Book reviews
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: HPL – Philosophy: logic
BISAC Subject: LAN015000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Rhetoric