The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic

Structure, variation, and change

Editors
| University of Amsterdam
| University of Amsterdam
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027255549 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027287298 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
One of the recurrent questions in historical linguistics is to what extent languages can borrow grammar from other languages. It seems for instance hardly likely that each 'average European' language developed a definite article all by itself, without any influence from neighbouring languages. It is, on the other hand, by no means clear what exactly was borrowed, since the way in which definiteness is expressed differs greatly among the various Germanic and Romance languages and dialects. One of the main aims of this volume is to shed some light on the question of what is similar and what is different in the structure of the noun phrase of the various Romance and Germanic languages and dialects, and what causes this similarity or difference.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 171]  2011.  vii, 283 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Foreword
vii–viii
The noun phrase in Germanic and Romance: Common developments and differences
Harry Perridon and Petra Sleeman
1–22
Part I. Variation
Scaling the variation in Romance and Germanic nominalizations
Artemis Alexiadou, Gianina Iordachioaia and Florian Schäfer
25–40
What all happens when a universal quantifier combines with an interrogative DP
Robert Cirillo
41–56
Micro-diversity in Dutch interrogative DPs: A case study on the (dis)continuous wat voor ’n N-construction
Norbert Corver and Marjo van Koppen
57–88
Noun phrase structure and movement: A cross-linguistic comparison of such/sådan/solch and so//so
Johanna L. Wood and Sten Vikner
89–110
A unified structure for Scandinavian DPs
Susanne Lohrmann
111–126
A semantic approach to noun phrase structure and the definite – indefinite distinction in Germanic and Romance
Ulla Stroh-Wollin
127–140
Definite determiners in two English-based creoles: Specificity or definiteness?
Ekaterina Bobyleva
141–156
Part II. Change
Form-function mismatches in (formally) definite English noun phrases: Towards a diachronic account
Christopher Lucas
159–174
The emergence of the definite article in English: A contact-induced change?
Paola Crisma
175–192
On the syntax of Romanian definite phrases: Changes in the patterns of definiteness checking
Alexandra Cornilescu and Alexandru Nicolae
193–222
Coexisting structures and competing functions in genitive word order
Elisabetta Magni
223–240
Anaphoric adjectives becoming determiners: A corpus-based account
Freek Van de Velde
241–256
From N to D: Charting the time course of the internal rise of French n-words
Viviane Déprez
257–280
Index
281–284
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Lander, Eric T. & Liliane Haegeman
2014. Old Norse as an NP Language: With Observations on the Common Norse and Northwest Germanic Runic Inscriptions. Transactions of the Philological Society 112:3  pp. 279 ff. Crossref logo
Roehrs, Dorian
2013. The Inner Makeup of Definite Determiners: The Case of Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25:4  pp. 295 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2010045313 | Marc record