Discourse Description
Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text
Editors
Paperback – Other edition available
ISBN 9789027250315 (Eur)
ISBN 9781556192876 (USA)
Discourse Description presents in one convenient volume a variety of approaches to text description that have been proposed in the linguistic literature in the last decade or so. The book is organized to make it easy to understand and compare the various approaches. Since all of the researchers are analyzing the same text, their differences are readily seen.
The text they analyze is a letter, mailed in bulk by a Washington-based lobbying organization which is supported by contributions from donors. Far from simply informing the readers, the letter seeks to appeal to them on many levels, intellectual, emotional, and financial. It is a fascinating study in how texts do their work.
Discourse Description is expected to serve both as a research document and as a case textbook for graduate and undergraduate courses in discourse and text analysis, as well as a resource for text analysts.
The text they analyze is a letter, mailed in bulk by a Washington-based lobbying organization which is supported by contributions from donors. Far from simply informing the readers, the letter seeks to appeal to them on many levels, intellectual, emotional, and financial. It is a fascinating study in how texts do their work.
Discourse Description is expected to serve both as a research document and as a case textbook for graduate and undergraduate courses in discourse and text analysis, as well as a resource for text analysts.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 16] 1992. xiii, 409 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Introduction | p. vii
-
I. Text Organization
-
Text as Purposive Communication: A Meaning-based AnalysisKathleen Callow and John C. Callow | p. 5
-
Rhetorical Structure Theory and Text AnalysisWilliam C. Mann, Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen and Sandra A. Thompson | p. 39
-
An Analysis of a Plea for MoneyBonnie J.F. Meyer | p. 79
-
The Discourse Strategy of an Appeals LetterRobert E. Longacre | p. 109
-
The Notion of Unspecific versus Specific as one Way of Analysing the Information of a Fund-Raising LetterEugene Winter | p. 131
-
An Integrated Three-Pronged Analysis of a Fund-Raising LetterMichael P. Jordan | p. 171
-
How I Understand a Text — via the Structure of the Happenings and the Telling of ThemEvelyn G. Pike | p. 227
-
II. Lexico-Grammatical Approaches to the Text
-
The Flow of Ideas in a Sample of Written LanguageWallace Chafe | p. 267
-
The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-statusEllen F. Prince | p. 295
-
Some Lexicogrammatical Features of the Zero Population Growth TextM.A.K. Halliday | p. 327
-
Macro-Proposals: Meaning by DegreeJ.R. Martin | p. 359
-
Collocation and Field of DiscourseJames D. Benson and William S. Greaves | p. 397
Cited by
Cited by 36 other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Musical Rhetoric,
► pp. 167 ff. 
Ariel, Mira
2004. Accessibility Marking: Discourse Functions, Discourse Profiles, and Processing Cues.
Discourse Processes 37:2 ► pp. 91 ff.
Bateman, John A. & Klaas Jan Rondhuis
1997. Coherence relations: Towards a general specification.
Discourse Processes 24:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Benwell, Bethan
2022. The organisation of knowledge in British university tutorial discourse.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 535 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019.
In Register, Genre, and Style,
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2022. Intonation and clause combining in discourse.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 389 ff.
Crisp, Peter, John Heywood & Gerard Steen
2002. Metaphor identification and analysis, classification and quantification.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 11:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Cuenca, Maria-Josep
2003. Two ways to reformulate: a contrastive analysis of reformulation markers.
Journal of Pragmatics 35:7 ► pp. 1069 ff.
Fanego, Teresa & Paula Rodríguez-Puente
2019.
In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91],
► pp. 1 ff.
Garcia-Villalba, Maria Paz & Patrick Saint-Dizier
2014.
In Knowledge Discovery, Transfer, and Management in the Information Age [Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management, ],
► pp. 186 ff.
García-Villalba, María Paz & Patrick Saint-Dizier
2012. A Framework to Extract Arguments in Opinion Texts.
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence 6:3 ► pp. 62 ff.
Kaplan, Robert B & William Grabe
2002. A modern history of written discourse analysis.
Journal of Second Language Writing 11:3 ► pp. 191 ff.
Klégr, Aleš
2014. PUBLISHER’S DESCRIPTIONS OF LINGUISTIC BOOKS: COMPARISON OF CZECH AND ENGLISH DISCOURSE STRATEGIES.
Discourse and Interaction 7:2 ► pp. 21 ff.
Koerner, Konrad & Kofi K. Saah
1992. Publications received / Ouvrages reçus / Eingegangene schriften.
Historiographia Linguistica 19:1 ► pp. 199 ff.
Károly, Krisztina
2013. Translating Rhetoric.
The Translator 19:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Lee, Patrick Chi-Wai
2016. A DISCOURSE DESCRIPTION OF FOUR FUNDRAISING TEXTS – LINGUISTS MEET PRACTITIONERS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY.
Discourse and Interaction 9:2 ► pp. 25 ff.
Lenders, Winfried
2003.
In Sprache zwischen Theorie und Technologie / Language between Theory and Technology,
► pp. 149 ff.
MacWhinney, Brian
2010.
In The Handbook of Life-Span Development,
MacWhinney, Brian
2015.
In Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science,
► pp. 1 ff.
Martin, J. R.
2005.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 35 ff.
Mas Manchón, Lluís
2016. Caracterización prosódica del inicio, desarrollo y final de noticia.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 212 ff.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Kazuhiro Teruya
2015. Grammatical realizations of rhetorical relations in different registers.
<i>WORD</i> 61:3 ► pp. 232 ff.
McGee, Iain
2021. The Textual Management of the Solicit Response Move in Newspaper Fundraising Advertisements.
Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 33:3 ► pp. 265 ff.
Meletiadou, Eleni
2022.
In Handbook of Research on Practices for Advancing Diversity and Inclusion in Higher Education [Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, ],
► pp. 20 ff.
Murphy, Elliot
2021. Predicate order and coherence in copredication.
Inquiry ► pp. 1 ff.
Passonneau, Rebecca J. & Diane J. Litman
1996.
In Computational and Conversational Discourse [NATO ASI Series, 151],
► pp. 161 ff.
Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert
2018.
In Introduction to Discourse Studies,
Saint-Dizier, Patrick
2012. Processing natural language arguments with the<TextCoop>platform.
Argument & Computation 3:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Smith, Carlota S.
2003.
In Modes of Discourse,
Sugimoto, Toru, Noriko Ito, Shino Iwashita & Michio Sugeno
2004.
In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2945],
► pp. 383 ff.
Upton, Thomas A. & Mary Ann Cohen
2009. An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example.
Discourse Studies 11:5 ► pp. 585 ff.
Uzêda, Vinícius Rodrigues, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo & Maria das Graças Volpe Nunes
2008.
In 2008 Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications,
► pp. 389 ff.
Uzêda, Vinícius Rodrigues, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo & Maria Das Graças Volpe Nunes
2010. A comprehensive comparative evaluation of RST-based summarization methods.
ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing 6:4 ► pp. 1 ff.
Virbel, Jacques
2015.
In Texts, Textual Acts and the History of Science [Archimedes, 42],
► pp. 221 ff.
Wheatley, John
1996. Flowchart Representations of Genre in Professional Communication.
Javnost - The Public 3:4 ► pp. 27 ff.
Zhang, Hongxin & Haitao Liu
2016. Rhetorical relations revisited across distinct levels of discourse unit granularity.
Discourse Studies 18:4 ► pp. 454 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 september 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General