Threatening in English

A mixed method approach

| Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
ISBN 9789027256898 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
ISBN 9789027264633 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
Threatening is among the less pleasant “things we do with words”, but, together with other conflictive speech acts, it seems to play a central role in communication. Yet, little is still known about how and when exactly speakers threaten. The present volume addresses this void by giving an in-depth analysis of the form and function of this speech act. A set of authentic threat utterances is used to probe questions on the linguistic repertoire employed and the different objectives speakers pursue with their threats. Based on the central findings, a classification of two types of threats is proposed, each with distinctive formal and functional properties. The analysis employs a mixed method approach with a two-fold aim; by combining a qualitative discussion of examples with the application of innovative statistical methodology, the findings allow new insights into research on threats and, simultaneously, offer new perspectives on general research methodology.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 284]  2018.  xiv, 246 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
List of tables
List of figures
Chapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 2. Threatening: Basic concepts and issues
Chapter 3. Data & methodology
Chapter 4. The form of threats
Chapter 5. The function of threats
Chapter 6. Conclusion


Aarts, Bas
2008English Syntax and Argumentation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, Svenja
2008Corpus and Context: Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1996Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. Florence: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin, and Christoph Rühlemann
(eds.) 2015Corpus Pragmatics. A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge
1991Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicolas, and Alex Lascarides
2013 “Strategic Conversation.” Semantics and Pragmatics, Linguistic Society of America 6: 1–58.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1971How to do things with words. The William James lectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, Rolf Harald
2008Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baratta, Alex
2014 “Military impoliteness as an (eventually) unmarked form: A comment on Bousfield (2007)”. Journal of Pragmatics 60: 17–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, and Beverly S. Hartford
2005 “Institutional discourse and interlanguage pragmatics research.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics: Exploring Institutional Talk, ed. by Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig and Beverly S. Hartford, 7–36. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barron, Anne, and Klaus P. Schneider
2009Variational pragmatics: Studying the impact of social factors on language use in interaction. In Variational Pragmatics, Special Issue. Intercultural Pragmatics 6(4), ed. by Anne Barron and Klaus P. Schneider, 425–442. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Becker, Richard A., John M. Chambers, and Allan R. Wilks
1988The new S language. Pacific Grove: Wadsworth & Brooks.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2011 “Approaching the Data of Pragmatics.” In Foundations of Pragmatics, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Neal R. Norrick, 537–559. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M.
1995 “Instrumental rudeness as pragmatic competence.” In Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics, ed. by James E. Alatis, Carolyn A. Straehle, Brent Gallenberger and Maggie Ronkin, 154–168. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M., and Martha Clark Cummings
1996 “Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance.” In Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language, ed. by Susan M. Gass and Joyce Neu, 65–86. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M, Hansun Zhang Waring
2004 “The Linguistic Encoding of Pragmatic Tone: Adverbials as Words that Work.” In Studying speaking to inform second language learning 8, ed. by Diana Boxer and Andrew D. Cohen, 228–252. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Beller, Sieghard
2002 “Conditional promises and threats – Cognition and emotion.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. by W D. Gray and C. D. Schunn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Beller, Sieghard, Andrea Bender, and Gregory Kuhnmünch
2005 “Understanding conditional promises and threats.” Thinking & Reasoning 11(3): 209–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Pamela J.
1983 “The use of threats in children’s discourse.” Language and Speech 26(4): 305–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander
2010 “Expressions of futurity in contemporary English: a Construction Grammar perspective.” English Language and Linguistics 14(02): 217–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Stance in spoken and written university registers.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(2): 97–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan
1989 “Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect.” Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 9(1): 93–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Billmyer, Kristine and Manka Varghese
2000 “Investigating instrument-based pragmatic variability: Effects of enhancing discourse completion tests.” Applied Linguistics 21(4): 517–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biscetti, Stefania
2015 “Power, (Im)Politeness and Aggressiveness in Early Modern Master-Servant Relations (1660–1750).” Journal of Early Modern Studies 4: 287–314.Google Scholar
Black, Henry Campbell, and Brian A. Garner
(eds) 2009Law dictionary. St. Paul, Minn: West.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1987 “Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different?Journal of Pragmatics 11(2): 131–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
(eds) 1989Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana and Elite Olshtain
1984 “Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP).” Applied Linguistics 5(3): 196–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, and Kate Burridge
2010Introducing English grammar. London [u.a.]: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2007 “Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics 39(12): 2185–2216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek, and Miriam A. Locher
(eds) 2008Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Breheny, Richard
2011 “Experimental pragmatics.” In Foundations of Pragmatics ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Neal R. Norrick, 561–586. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breiman, Leo
2001 “Random forests.” Machine Learning 45(1), 5–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breiman, Leo, Jerome Friedman, Charles J. Stone, and Richard A. Olshen
1984Classification and regression trees. Florence: CRC press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
1960 “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Ray, Tim Valentine, and Tom Williamson
(eds) 2009Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. Sherlock, and James W. Pennebaker
2003 “The Secret Life of Pronouns: Flexibility in Writing Style and Physical Health.” Psychological Science 14(1): 60–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cantos Gómez, Pascual
2013Statistical methods in language and linguistic research. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Clark, Billy
1993 “Relevance and ‘pseudo-imperatives’.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16(1): 79–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Adrian Bangerter
2004 “Changing ideas about reference.” In Experimental Pragmatics, ed. by Ira A. Noveck and Dan Sperber, 25–49. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collavin, Elena
2011 “Speech acts.” In Foundations of Pragmatics, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Neal R. Norrick, 373–369. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter
2009Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, Michael J.
2005Statistics. An introduction using R. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The R Book. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Crowne, Douglas P, and David Marlowe
1960 “A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.” Journal of consulting psychology 24(4): 349–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 1(1): 35–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield and Anne Wichmann
2003 “Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35(10–11): 1545–1579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, Chris and Jan P. Ruiter
2014 “Computational Approaches to the Pragmatics Problem.” Language and Linguistics Compass 8(4): 133–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Cristian, Moritz Sudhof, Dan Jurafsky & Jure Lesko
2013 “A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors.” Paper presented at the ACL, Sofia, Bulgaria, 4–9 August.
Davies, Mark
2008– The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990–present. Available online at http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/.
Davis, Dennis A.
1997Threats Pending, Fuses Burning: Managing Workplace Violence. Palo Alto: Davies-Black.Google Scholar
Deutschmann, Mats
2003Apologies in British English. Umeå: Institutionen för moderna språk. Umeå Universitet.Google Scholar
Domahs, Ute, Ingo Plag, and Rebecca Carroll
2014 “Word stress assignment in German, English and Dutch: Quantity-sensitivity and extrametricality revisited.” The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17(1): 59–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Downing, Laura Hidalgo, and Begoña Núñez Perucha
2014 “Modality and personal pronouns as indexical markers of stance: Intersubjective positioning and construction of public identity in media interviews.” In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, ed. by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita and Johan van der Auwera, 379–410. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltán
2007Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, Arthur Conan
The adventures of Sherlock Holmes [Elektronische Ressource]. Champaign, Ill: Project Gutenberg, http://​www​.gutenberg​.org​/ebooks​/1661
Dynel, Marta
2012 “Swearing methodologically: the (im)politeness of expletives in anonymous commentaries on Youtube.” Journal of English Studies (10): 25–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino
2001A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Miriam, and Jean W. Bodman
1986 “ ‘I very appreciate’: Expressions of gratitude by native and non-native speakers of American English.” Applied Linguistics 7(2): 167–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
(ed) 2007Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1976 “Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives.” Language in society 5(01): 25–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989Language and power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai
2011 “Conditionals .” In Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science. (January 14, 2011). Retrieved from http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/1721​.1​/95781, last accessed 15 March 2016.
Flöck, Ilka, and Ronald Geluykens
2015 “Speech Acts in Corpus Pragmatics: A Quantitative Contrastive Study of Directives in Spontaneous and Elicited Discourse.” In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015: Current Approaches to Discourse and Translation Studies, ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo, 7–37. Cham: Springer International Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franke, Michael
2010 “Semantic Meaning and Pragmatic Inference in Non-cooperative Conversation.” In Interfaces: Explorations in Logic, Language and Computation, ed. by Thomas Icard and Reinhard Muskens, 13–24. Berlin: Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1975 “Warning and threatening.” Centrum 3(2): 169–180.Google Scholar
1998 “Threatening revisited.” Forensic Linguistics (The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law) 5(2): 159–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Jonathan L.
1965 “Long-term behavioral effects of cognitive dissonance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1(2): 145–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gales, Tammy
2010Ideologies of Violence: A Corpus and Discourse Analytic Approach to Stance in Threatening Communications. University of California, Davis dissertation. Retrieved from http://​linguistics​.ucdavis​.edu​/pics​-and​-pdfs​/Gales%20Dissertation​.pdf
2011 “Identifying interpersonal stance in threatening discourse: An appraisal analysis.” Discourse Studies 13(1): 27–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Linguistic Analysis of Disputed Meanings: Threats.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle, London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gingiss, Peter
1986 “Indirect threats.” Word 37(3): 153–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Golato, Andrea
2003 “Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk.” Applied Linguistics 24(1): 90–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio
2003 “Shall and will in contemporary English: A comparison with past uses.” In Modality in contemporary English, ed. by Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer and Manfred Krug, 267–300. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T.
2013Statistics for linguistics with R: a practical introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane M. V.
1983The Semantics of will in Present Day British English: a Unified Account. Brussels: Paleis d. Acad.Google Scholar
1989 “Be going to and will – A Pragmatic Account.” Journal of Linguistics 25(2): 291–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1979Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra
1984 “The form and function of threats in court.” Language & Communication 4(4): 247–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartford, Beverly S, and Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig
1992 “Experimental and Observational Data in the Study of Interlanguage Pragmatics.” Pragmatics and language learning 3: 33–52.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2012 “Epilogue: The first-second order distinction in face and politeness research.” Journal of Politeness Research 8(1): 111–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order.” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 52–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, and Jonathan Potter
Threats: Power, family mealtimes, and social influence.” British Journal of Social Psychology 50(1): 99–120. Crossref
Holmes, Janet
1988 “Paying compliments: A sex-preferential politeness strategy.” Journal of Pragmatics 12(4): 445–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas, and Joong-nam Yang
1990 “Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(4): 719–729. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik, and Achim Zeileis
2006 “Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework.” Journal of Computational and Graphical statistics 15(3): 651–674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
1988English Grammar: An Outline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Thom
1990 “The discourse of advice giving in English:‘I wouldn’t feed until spring no matter what you do’.” Language & Communication 10(4): 285–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jautz, Sabine
2013Thanking formulae in English: explorations across varieties and genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jay, Timothy
1992Cursing in America: a Psycholinguistic Study of Dirty Language in the Courts, in the Movies, in the Schoolyards and on the Streets. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “The utility and ubiquity of taboo words.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 4(2): 153–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jay, Timothy, and Kristin Janschewitz
2008 “The pragmatics of swearing.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 4(2): 267–288.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1954A modern English Grammar on historical principles. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
2009 “Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory. The case of compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(8): 1611–1635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Gerold Schneider, Irma Taavitsainen, I. & Barb Breustedt
2008 “Fishing for compliments.” In Speech acts in the history of English., ed. by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 273–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
1990 “Linguistic politeness: Current research issues.” Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 193–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Data collection in pragmatics research.” In Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness, ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 279–303. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. & Rose, K. R.
2002Pragmatic development in a second language. Language Learning 52(1), 1–352.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Magdalena
2012Interpreting imperatives. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kent, George
1967The Effects of Threats. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred
1997 “Varieties of rudeness: types and functions of impolite utterances.” Functions of language 4(2): 251–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Dawn, and Svenja Adolphs
2008 “Multi-modal corpus pragmatics: The case of active listenership.” In Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. A Mutualistic Entente, ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo, 175–190. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Kunter, Gero
2011Compound Stress in English. The Phonetics and Phonology of Prosodic Prominence. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lachenicht, Lance G.
1980 “Aggravating language. A study of abusive and insulting language.” Paper in Linguistics 13(4): 607–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T.
1989 “The limits of politeness: therapeutic and courtroom discourse.” Multilingua – Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 8(2–3): 101–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, James J. and Steven Pinker
2010 “Rationales for indirect speech: the theory of the strategic speaker.” Psychological review 117(3): 785–807. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1981Semantics: the study of meaning. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
2004Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations: a preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia
2015How to do linguistics with R: data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Limberg, Holger
2008 “Threats in conflict talk: Impoliteness and manipulation.” In Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 155–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2009 “Impoliteness and threat responses.” Journal of Pragmatics (41): 1376–1394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
2013Understanding Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A, and Derek Bousfield
2008 “Introduction: impoliteness and power in language.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 1–13. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A.
2004Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Polite behavior within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness.” Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 25(3): 249–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A, and Richard J. Watts
2008 “Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maimon, Oded and Lior Rokach
2008Data mining with decision trees: theory and applications. New Jersey: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Manes, Joan, and Nessa Wolfson
1981 “The compliment formula.” In Conversational routine. Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 115–132. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. and Peter R. R. White
2005The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Anthony, Paul Baker, and Andrew Hardie
2000 “Swearing and Abuse in Modern British English.” In PALC’99: Practical Applications in Language Corpora, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and P. Melia, 37–48. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McEnery, Anthony and Zhonghua Xiao
2004 “Swearing in Modern British English: The Case of Fuck in the BNC.” Language and Literature 13(3): 235–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milburn, Thomas W.
1977 “The nature of threat.” Journal of Social Issues 33(1): 126–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milburn, Thomas W. and Kenneth H. Watman
1981On the nature of threat: a social psychological analysis. Santa Barbara: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Keith
2003 “Had better and might as well: On the margins of modality?” In Modality in contemporary English, ed. by Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank Palmer, 129–150. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nehls, Dietrich
1975 “The system of tense and aspect in English.” IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 13(1–4): 275–292.Google Scholar
von Neumann, John and Oskar Morgenstern
1944Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Noveck, Ira A, and Anne Reboul
2008 “Experimental pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(11): 425–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noveck, Ira A, Dan Sperber, Kent Bach, Anne Bezuidenhout, Richard Breheny, Sam Glucksberg and Deirdre Wilson
2004Experimental pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne, Brian Clancy and Svenja Adolphs
2011Introducing Pragmatics in Use. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert
1986Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1990Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2014The English Verb. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven, Martin A. Nowak, and James J. Lee
2008 “The logic of indirect speech.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(3): 833–838. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Police code
2016, March 14. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved March 15, 2016, from https://​en​.wikipedia​.org​/w​/index​.php​?title​=Police​_code​&oldid​=710099350
Polzehl, Tim, Alexander Schmitt, Florian Metze, and Michael Wagner
2011 „Anger recognition in speech using acoustic and linguistic cues .” Speech Communication 53(9): 1198–1209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2015R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://​www​.R​-project​.org/.
RadioLabs International Inc.
Police Scanner Codes. http://​www​.radiolabs​.com​/police​-codes​.html, last accessed March 15, 2016.
van Rooij, Robert, and Michael Franke
2012 “Promises and Threats with Conditionals and Disjunctions.” In Discourse and Grammar. From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, ed. by Günther Grewendorf and Thomas Ede Zimmermann, 69–90. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph
2007Conversation in Context. A Corpus-driven Approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer
2015 “Corpus pragmatics: Laying the foundations.” In Corpus Pragmatics. A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salgueiro, Antonio Blanco
2010 “Promises, threats, and the foundations of Speech Act Theory.” Pragmatics 20(2): 213–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Gila A, and Svenja Adolphs
2006 “Expressions of gratitude in corpus and DCT data: Vocabulary, formulaic sequences, and pedagogy.” System 34(1): 119–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C.
1960The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Barry A, Thomas Bonoma, and James T. Tedeschi
1970 “Compliance to threats as a function of the wording of the threat and the exploitativeness of the threatener.” Sociometry 33: 394–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P.
2010 “Variational Pragmatics.” In Variation and Change: Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. by Mirjam Fried, Jan-Ola Östman and Jeff Verschueren, 239–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Appropriate behaviour across varieties of English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44(9): 1022–1037. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P., and Anne Barron
2008 “Where pragmatics and dialectology meet. Introducing variational pragmatics.” In Variational Pragmatics. A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider and Anne Barron, 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976 “A classification of illocutionary acts.” Language in society 5(01): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sherblom, John C.
1990 “Organizational Involvement Expressed Through Pronoun Use In Computer Mediated Communication.” Communication Research Reports 7(1): 45–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shon, Phillip C. H.
2005 “ ‘I’d grab the SOB by his hair and yank him out the window’: The fraternal order of warnings and threats in police-citizen encounters.” Discourse & Society 16(6): 829–845. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shuy, Roger W.
2005Creating language crimes: how law enforcement uses (and misuses) language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Fighting over words: language and civil law cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The language of defamation cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence M, and Peter M. Tiersma
2005Speaking of crime. The language of Criminal Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
1996 “Reconsidering power and distance.” Journal of Pragmatics 26(1): 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “(Im)Politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 1(1): 95–119.Google Scholar
2011 “Conceptualising ‘the relational’ in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im)politeness comments.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3565–3578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Vladimir Žegarac
2017 “Power, Solidarity and (Im)politeness.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár, 119–141. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, Stefanie Alexa
2011 “Coding speech acts for their degree of explicitness.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(1): 36–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2003 “A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts.” In Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing, ed. by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda Thornburg, 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storey, Kate
1995 “The language of threats.” Forensic Linguistics (The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law) 2(1): 74–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strasser, Helmut, and Christian Weber
1999 “On the Asymptotic Theory of Permutation Statistics.” Mathematical Methods of Statistics 8: 220–250.Google Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Thomas Kneib, Thomas Augustin, and Achim Zeileis
2008 “Conditional variable importance for random forests.” BMC Bioinformatics 9(1): 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Achim Zeileis, and Thorsten Hothorn
2007 “Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution.” BMC Bioinformatics 8(1): 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, James Malley, and Gerhard Tutz
2009 “An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning: Rationale, Application, and Characteristics of Classification and Regression Trees, Bagging, and Radom Forests.” Psychological Methods 14(4): 323–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sally A, and Rolf Harald Baayen
2012 “Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice.” Language Variation and Change 24(02): 135–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2005 “Beyond the mircro-level in politeness research.” Journal of Politeness Research 1(2): 237–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Toward a universal notion of face for a universal notion of cooperation.” In Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects, ed. by Ivan Kecskés, 313–344. Berlin: De Gruyter MoutonGoogle Scholar
2011a “The puzzle of indirect speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(11): 2861–2865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b “Why direct speech is not a natural default: Rejoinder to Steven Pinker’s “Indirect Speech, Politeness, Deniability, and Relationship Negotiation”.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(11): 2869–2871. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merriam​-Webster​.com. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 15 Mar. 2016.
Merriam​-Webster​.com. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 15 Mar. 2016.
Threat, v.
OED Online. Oxford University Press, March 2016 Web. 15 March 2016.Google Scholar
Threat, n.
OED Online. Oxford University Press, March 2016. Web. 15 March 2016.
Tiersma, Peter M, and Lawrence M. Solan
2012 “The Language of Crime.” In The Oxford handbook of language and law, ed. by Peter M. Tiersma and Lawrence M. Solan, 340–353. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2009Why we cooperate. Based on the 2008 Tanner Lectures on Human Values at Stanford. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen, and Sarah J. Tracy
1998 “Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing Face and Face Attack.” Human Communication Research 25(2): 225–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, James T, and Michael Gelles
2003Threat assessment: A risk management approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ward, Joe H.
1963 “Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(301): 236–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Dominic, Sarah Kelly, and Carmen Llamas
2013 “Inference of Threat from Neutrally-worded Utterances in Familiar and Unfamiliar Languages.” York Papers in Linguistics Series 2: 99–120.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
1991Power in family discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich
1992 “Introduction.” In Politeness in Language. Studies in its history, theory and practice, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich, 1–17. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Weizmann, Elda
1989 “Requestive Hints.” In Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper, 71–95. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi & Andrew Kelly
2010 “Perception of anger and happiness from resynthesized speech with size-related manipulations .” Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody (SP2010). Chicago, 11–14 May.
Yamanaka, Nobuhiko
1995 “On indirect threats.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 8(1): 37–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Yi
2001 “An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data-gathering methods: Written DCTs, oral DCTs, field notes, and natural conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 33(2): 271–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra
2013 “On the generic argument for the modality of will .” In English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, ed. by Juana Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita and Johan van der Auwera, 221–251. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zumel, Nina, and John Mount
2014Practical data science with R. Shelter Island: Manning.Google Scholar

Case Citations

Ragansky v. U.S.
, 253 F. 643 (1918)Google Scholar
Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire
, 315 U.S. 568 (1942)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Prochaska
, 222 F.2d 1 (1955)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Dutsch
, 357 F.2d 331 (1966)Google Scholar
Roy v. U.S.
, 416 F.2d 874 (1969)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Tropiano
, 418 F.2d 1069 (1969)Google Scholar
Watts v. U.S.
, 394 U.S. 705 (1969)Google Scholar
State v. Lizotte
, 256 A.2d 439 (1969)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Patillo
, 431 F.2d 293 (1970)Google Scholar
In re Price
, 4 Cal.App.3d 941 (1970)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Barcley
, 452 F.2d 930 (1971)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Patillo
, 438 F.2d 13 (1971)Google Scholar
Gooding v. Wilson
, 405 U.S. 518 (1972)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Maisonet
, 484 F.2d 1356 (1973)Google Scholar
State v. Hotham
, 307 A.2d 185 (1973)Google Scholar
State v. Scherck
, 9 Wash.App. 792 (1973)Google Scholar
U.S. v. De Stefano
, 476 F.2d 324 (1973)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Bowdach
, 501 F.2d 220 (1974)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Kirk
, 528 F.2d 1057 (1976)Google Scholar
State v. Howe
, 247 N.W.2d 647 (1976)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Kelner
, 534 F.2d 1020 (1976)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Frederickson
, 601 F.2d 1358 (1979)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Lincoln
, 589 F.2d 379 (1979)Google Scholar
State v. Milano
, 167 N.J.Super. 318 (1979)Google Scholar
People v. Mirmirani
, 30 Cal.3d 375 (1981)Google Scholar
Martin v. U.S.
, 691 F.2d 1235 (1982)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Carrier
, 672 F.2d 300 (1982)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Callahan
, 702 F.2d 964 (1983)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Dysart
, 705 F.2d 1247 (1983)Google Scholar
People v. Ford
, 145 Cal.App.3d 985 (1983)Google Scholar
State v. Frustino
, 142 Ariz. 288 (1984)Google Scholar
State v. Abu-Isba
, 235 Kan. 851 (1984)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Velasquez
, 772 F.2d 1348 (1985)Google Scholar
Com. v. Ditsch
, 19 Mass.App.Ct. 1005 (1985)Google Scholar
Williams v. Com.
, 721 S.W.2d 710 (1986)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Hoffman
, 806 F.2d 703 (1986)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Crews
, 781 F.2d 826 (1986)Google Scholar
Long v. State
, 492 N.E.2d 700 (1986)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Leaverton
, 835 F.2d 254 (1987)Google Scholar
People v. Zendejas
, 196 Cal.App.3d 367 (1987)Google Scholar
Rankin v. McPherson
, 483 U.S. 378 (1987)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Higdon
, 832 F.2d 312 (1987)Google Scholar
Hyde v. State
, 525 N.E.2d 627 (1988)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Gilbert
, 884 F.2d 454 (1989)Google Scholar
People v. Hines
, 780 P.2d 556 (1989)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Schneider
, 910 F.2d 1569 (1990)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Shoulberg
, 895 F.2d 882 (1990)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Roberts
, 915 F.2d 889 (1990)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Orozco-Santillan
, 903 F.2d 1262 (1990)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Buffey
, 899 F.2d 1402 (1990)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Calvert
, Not Reported in F.Supp. (1990)Google Scholar
State v. Rempel
, 114 Wash.2d 77 (1990)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Capps
, 952 F.2d 1026 (1991)Google Scholar
Shackelford v. Shirley
, 948 F.2d 935 (1991)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Manning
, 923 F.2d 83 (1991)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Maxton
, 940 F.2d 103 (1991)Google Scholar
In re David L.
, 234 Cal.App.3d 1655 (1991)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Kosma
, 951 F.2d 549 (1991)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Davis
, 943 F.2d 53 (1991)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Gordon
, 974 F.2d 1110 (1992)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Cox
, 957 F.2d 264 (1992)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Rivera
, 971 F.2d 876 (1992)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Somes
, 968 F.2d 1222 (1992)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Taylor
, 972 F.2d 1247 (1992)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Tuck
, 964 F.2d 1079 (1992)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Bachiero
, 969 F.2d 733 (1992)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Johnson
, 968 F.2d 208 (1992)Google Scholar
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, Minn.
, 505 U.S. 377 (1992)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Bellrichard
, 994 F.2d 1318 (1993)Google Scholar
People v. Brown
, 20 Cal.App.4th 1251 (1993)Google Scholar
State v. Chung
, 75 Haw. 398 (1993)Google Scholar
People v. Maldonado
, 247 Ill.App.3d 149 (1993)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Canzater
, 994 F.2d 773 (1993)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Moore
, 6 F.3d 715 (1993)Google Scholar
State v. Wilcox
, 160 Vt. 271 (1993)Google Scholar
U.S. v. McDermott
, 822 F.Supp. 582 (1993)Google Scholar
People v. Fisher
, 12 Cal.App.4th 1556 (1993)Google Scholar
People v. Brooks
, 26 Cal.App.4th 142 (1994)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Whitfield
, 31 F.3d 747 (1994)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Darby
, 37 F.3d 1059 (1994)Google Scholar
People v. Garrett
, 30 Cal.App.4th 962 (1994)Google Scholar
People v. Gudger
, 29 Cal.App.4th 310 (1994)Google Scholar
People v. Janousek
, 871 P.2d 1189 (1994)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Aman
, 31 F.3d 550 (1994)Google Scholar
Pendergast v. State
, 99 Md.App. 141 (1994)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Malik
, 16 F.3d 45 (1994)Google Scholar
People v. Verkruysse
, 261 Ill.App.3d 972 (1994)Google Scholar
U.S. v. J.H.H.
, 22 F.3d 821 (1994)Google Scholar
People v. Stanfield
, 32 Cal.App.4th 1152 (1995)Google Scholar
Dayton v. Dunnigan
, 103 Ohio App.3d 67 (1995)Google Scholar
In re M.S.
, 10 Cal.4th 698 (1995)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Daughenbaugh
, 49 F.3d 171 (1995)Google Scholar
Com. v. Matsos
, 421 Mass. 391 (1995)Google Scholar
People v. Allen
, 33 Cal.App.4th 1149 (1995)Google Scholar
U.S. v. France
, 57 F.3d 865 (1995)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Cadotte
, 57 F.3d 661 (1995)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Dinwiddie
, 76 F.3d 913 (1996)Google Scholar
Lucero v. Trosch
, 928 F.Supp. 1124 (1996)Google Scholar
Lovell By and Through Lovell v. Poway Unified School Dist.
, 90 F.3d 367 (1996)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Poe
, 96 F.3d 333 (1996)Google Scholar
State v. Jimerson
, Not Reported in P.2d (1996)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Aragon
, 947 F.Supp. 426 (1996)Google Scholar
People v. Byrd
, 285 Ill.App.3d 641 (1996)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Robinson
, 86 F.3d 1197 (1996)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Jones
, 83 F.3d 927 (1996)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Fulmer
, 108 F.3d 1486 (1997)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Spruill
, 118 F.3d 221 (1997)Google Scholar
People v. Martinez
, 53 Cal.App.4th 1212 (1997)Google Scholar
People v. McCray
, 58 Cal.App.4th 159 (1997)Google Scholar
People v. Dias
, 52 Cal.App.4th 46 (1997)Google Scholar
People v. Mendoza
, 59 Cal.App.4th 1333 (1997)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Sovie
, 122 F.3d 122 (1997)Google Scholar
State v. Milner
, 571 N.W.2d 7 (1997)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Whiffen
, 121 F.3d 18 (1997)Google Scholar
State v. Fixel
, 945 P.2d 149 (1997)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Patrick
, 117 F.3d 375 (1997)Google Scholar
State v. Warsop
, 124 N.M. 683 (1997)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Alkhabaz
, 104 F.3d 1492 (1997)Google Scholar
People v. Bolin
, 18 Cal.4th 297 (1998)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Fenton
, 30 F.Supp.2d 520 (1998)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Schiefen
, 139 F.3d 638 (1998)Google Scholar
People v. Teal
, 61 Cal.App.4th 277 (1998)Google Scholar
People v. Jones
, 67 Cal.App.4th 724 (1998)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Carbaugh
, 141 F.3d 791 (1998)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Gibson
, 155 F.3d 844 (1998)Google Scholar
State v. Collins
, 580 N.W.2d 36 (1998)Google Scholar
State v. Hall
, 327 Or. 568 (1998)Google Scholar
Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette, Inc. v....
23 F.Supp.2d 1182...
U.S. v. Geisler
, 143 F.3d 1070 (1998)Google Scholar
State v. Cardell
, 318 N.J.Super. 175 (1999)Google Scholar
U.S. v. McMillan
, 53 F.Supp.2d 895 (1999)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Viefhaus
, 168 F.3d 392 (1999)Google Scholar
People v. Baer
, 973 P.2d 1225 (1999)Google Scholar
People v. Hickman
, 988 P.2d 628 (1999)Google Scholar
People v. Peterson
, 306 Ill.App.3d 1091 (1999)Google Scholar
People v. Andrews
, 75 Cal.App.4th 1173 (1999)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Summers
, 176 F.3d 1328 (1999)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Freeman
, 176 F.3d 575 (1999)Google Scholar
State v. McGirk
, 999 S.W.2d 298 (1999)Google Scholar
State v. Spainhower
, 988 P.2d 452 (1999)Google Scholar
People v. Butler
, 85 Cal.App.4th 745 (2000)Google Scholar
State v. Gill
, 103 Wash.App. 435 (2000)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Hart
, 212 F.3d 1067 (2000)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Siegler
, 272 F.3d 975 (2001)Google Scholar
In re Ricky T.
, 87 Cal.App.4th 1132 (2001)Google Scholar
People v. Solis
, 90 Cal.App.4th 1002 (2001)Google Scholar
People v. Toledo
, 26 Cal.4th 221 (2001)Google Scholar
People v. Franz
, 88 Cal.App.4th 1426 (2001)Google Scholar
People v. Felix
, 92 Cal.App.4th 905 (2001)Google Scholar
State v. Williams
, 144 Wash.2d 197 (2001)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Landham
, 251 F.3d 1072 (2001)Google Scholar
In re Kyle M.
, 200 Ariz. 447 (2001)Google Scholar
New York ex rel. Spitzer v. Operation Rescue National
, 273 F.3d 184 (2001)Google Scholar
State v. Perkins
, 243 Wis.2d 141 (2001)Google Scholar
Com. v. Meier
, 56 Mass.App.Ct. 278 (2002)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Hanna
, 293 F.3d 1080 (2002)Google Scholar
People v. Gaut
, 95 Cal.App.4th 1425 (2002)Google Scholar
Jones v. State
, 347 Ark. 409 (2002)Google Scholar
People v. Anchondo
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.2d (2002)Google Scholar
People v. Padilla
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.2d (2002)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Bell
, 207 F.Supp.2d 940 (2002)Google Scholar
State v. Anderson
, 111 Wash.App. 317 (2002)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Patzlaff
, 44 Fed.Appx. 58 (2002)Google Scholar
Doe v. Pulaski County Special School Dist.
, 306 F.3d 616 (2002)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Gilmore
, 282 F.3d 398 (2002)Google Scholar
In re Ryan D.
, 100 Cal.App.4th 854 (2002)Google Scholar
Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Willamette, Inc. v. American
, 290 F.3d 1058 (2002)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Spring
, 305 F.3d 276 (2002)Google Scholar
USS-Posco Industries v. Edwards
, 111 Cal.App.4th 436 (2003)Google Scholar
In re Jerry B.
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.2d (2003)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Alaboud
, 347 F.3d 1293 (2003)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Chase
, 340 F.3d 978 (2003)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Nishnianidze
, 342 F.3d 6 (2003)Google Scholar
In re Troy S.
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.2d (2003)Google Scholar
People v. Figueroa
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.2d (2003)Google Scholar
People v. Stutzman
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.2d (2003)Google Scholar
People v. Pina
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.2d (2003)Google Scholar
In re Jasmine H.
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.2d (2003)Google Scholar
State v. C.G.
, 150 Wash.2d 604 (2003)Google Scholar
State v. Thompson
, 157 N.C.App. 638 (2003)Google Scholar
Virginia v. Black
, 538 U.S. 343 (2003)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Bush
, 94 Fed.Appx. 101 (2004)Google Scholar
In re Ernesto H.
, 125 Cal.App.4th 298 (2004)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Fuller
, 387 F.3d 643 (2004)Google Scholar
People v. Zichko
, 118 Cal.App.4th 1055 (2004)Google Scholar
In re George T.
, 33 Cal.4th 620 (2004)Google Scholar
State v. Grant
, Not Reported in P.3d (2004)Google Scholar
State v. Kilburn
, 151 Wash.2d 36 (2004)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Williams
, 376 F.3d 1048 (2004)Google Scholar
Porter v. Ascension Parish School Bd.
, 393 F.3d 608 (2004)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Zavrel
, 384 F.3d 130 (2004)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Lincoln
, 403 F.3d 703 (2005)Google Scholar
People v. McIntier
, 134 P.3d 467 (2005)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Stewart
, 420 F.3d 1007 (2005)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Koski
, 424 F.3d 812 (2005)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Matthews
, 431 F.3d 1296 (2005)Google Scholar
State v. Gould
, Not Reported in P.3d (2005)Google Scholar
People v. Young
, 34 Cal.4th 1149 (2005)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Cassel
, 408 F.3d 622 (2005)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Magleby
, 420 F.3d 1136 (2005)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Jennings
, 439 F.3d 604 (2006)Google Scholar
New York ex rel. Spitzer v. Cain
, 418 F.Supp.2d 457 (2006)Google Scholar
People v. Clark
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2006)Google Scholar
In re Vincent V.
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2006)Google Scholar
People v. Muro
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2006)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Floyd
, 458 F.3d 844 (2006)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Hankins
, 195 Fed.Appx. 295 (2006)Google Scholar
U.S. v. D'Amario
, 461 F.Supp.2d 298 (2006)Google Scholar
Olivas v. State
, 203 S.W.3d 341 (2006)Google Scholar
People v. Ramirez
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2006)Google Scholar
People v. Pilette
, Not Reported in N.W.2d (2006)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Davila
, 461 F.3d 298 (2006)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Robinson
, 188 Fed.Appx. 97 (2006)Google Scholar
Duan v. State
, 970 So.2d 903 (2007)Google Scholar
People v. Allen
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2007)Google Scholar
People v. Canela
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2007)Google Scholar
People v. Mosley
, 155 Cal.App.4th 313 (2007)Google Scholar
U.S. v. England
, 507 F.3d 581 (2007)Google Scholar
State v. Tellez
, 141 Wash.App. 479 (2007)Google Scholar
State v. Ditko
, Not Reported in P.3d (2007)Google Scholar
People v. Roque
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2007)Google Scholar
STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellant, v. Stephen Paul DITKO,...
2007 WL 3047436...
Fogel v. Collins
, 531 F.3d 824 (2008)Google Scholar
People v. Rivers
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2008)Google Scholar
People v. Reynolds
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2008)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Li
, 537 F.Supp.2d 431 (2008)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Parr
, 545 F.3d 491 (2008)Google Scholar
People v. Jackson
, 178 Cal.App.4th 590 (2009)Google Scholar
State v. Ware
, 196 N.C.App. 518 (2009)Google Scholar
In re C.C.
, 178 Cal.App.4th 915 (2009)Google Scholar
People v. Kirk
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2009)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Armel
, 585 F.3d 182 (2009)Google Scholar
Nielander v. Board of County Com'rs of County of Republic, Kan.
, 582 F.3d 1155 (2009)Google Scholar
People v. Shah
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2009)Google Scholar
People v. Smith
, 178 Cal.App.4th 475 (2009)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Jongewaard
, 567 F.3d 336 (2009)Google Scholar
Abbott v. State
, 190 Md.App. 595 (2010)Google Scholar
Jackson v. Thurmer
, 748 F.Supp.2d 990 (2010)Google Scholar
City of San Jose v. Garbett
, 190 Cal.App.4th 526 (2010)Google Scholar
People v. Goodlow
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2010)Google Scholar
People v. Hattam
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2010)Google Scholar
State v. Wise
, Not Reported in P.3d (2010)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Wolff
, 370 Fed.Appx. 888 (2010)Google Scholar
People v. Fierro
, 180 Cal.App.4th 1342 (2010)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Archer
, 671 F.3d 149 (2011)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Dillard
, 835 F.Supp.2d 1120 (2011)Google Scholar
U.S. v. McDonald
, 444 Fed.Appx. 710 (2011)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Bagdasarian
, 652 F.3d 1113 (2011)Google Scholar
In re Jason D.
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2011)Google Scholar
Birdsong v. Com.
, 347 S.W.3d 47 (2011)Google Scholar
Eberle v. State
, 942 N.E.2d 848 (2011)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Walker
, 665 F.3d 212 (2011)Google Scholar
People v. Powers
, 193 Cal.App.4th 158 (2011)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Mabie
, 663 F.3d 322 (2011)Google Scholar
State v. Krijger
, 130 Conn.App. 470 (2011)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Wooten
, 689 F.3d 570 (2012)Google Scholar
King v. U.S.
, --- A.3d ---- (2012)Google Scholar
Pavey v. Com.
, Not Reported in S.W.3d (2012)Google Scholar
People v. Hubbard
, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (2012)Google Scholar
U.S. v. White
, 670 F.3d 498 (2012)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Jeffries
, 692 F.3d 473 (2012)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Havelock
, 664 F.3d 1284 (2012)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Elonis
, 730 F.3d 321 (2013)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Stock
, 728 F.3d 287 (2013)Google Scholar
State v. Locke
, 175 Wash.App. 779 (2013)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Turner
, 720 F.3d 411 (2013)Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Belova, Lyudmila Valerievna
2021. Verbal Markers of Utterances Containing Threat in the English-Language Internet Discourse (by the Example of the Social Network Twitter). Filologičeskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki :6  pp. 1818 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Jinshi
2021. “You are in Trouble!”: A Discursive Psychological Analysis of Threatening Language in Chinese Cellphone Fraud Interactions. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34:4  pp. 1065 ff. Crossref logo
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
2021. Identity, ideology and threatening communication. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict Crossref logo
Nick, I. M.
2018. In the wake of hate: A mixed-method analysis of anonymous threatening communications sent during the 2016 US presidential election. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41:2  pp. 183 ff. Crossref logo
Peters, Arne & Marije van Hattum
2021. Pseudonyms as carriers of contextualised threat in 19th-century Irish English threatening notices. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 42:1  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009030 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Pragmatics
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2017045527 | Marc record