Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude
Editors
In interactive discourse we not only express propositions, but we also express different attitudes to them. That is, we communicate how our mind entertains those propositions that we express. A speaker is able to express an attitude of belief, desire, hope, doubt, fear, regret or pretence that a given proposition represents a true state of affairs. This collection of papers explores the contribution of particles and other uninflected mood-indicating function words to the expression of propositional attitude in the broad sense. Some languages employ this type of attitude-marking device extensively, even for the expression of basic moods and basic speech act categories, other languages use such markers sparsely and always in interaction with syntactic form. Both types of language are examined in this volume, which includes studies of attitudinal markers in Amharic, English, Gascon, Occitan, German, Greek, Hausa, Hungarian, Japanese, Norwegian and Swahili. The theoretical emphasis is on issues such as interpretive vs. descriptive use of utterances or utterance parts, procedural semantics, linguistic underdetermination of the proposition expressed and the speaker’s communicated attitude to it, higher-level explicatures in the relevance-theoretic sense, the explicit — implicit distinction, as well as processes of grammaticalization and negotiation of propositional attitude in spoken interaction.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 79] 2000. viii, 269 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 28 June 2011
Published online on 28 June 2011
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
IntroductionGisle Andersen and Thorstein Fretheim | p. 1
-
The role of the pragmatic marker like in utterance interpretationGisle Andersen | p. 17
-
Particles, propositional attitude and mutual manifestnessRegina Blass | p. 39
-
Procedural encoding of propositional attitude in Norwegian conditional clausesThorstein Fretheim | p. 53
-
Incipient decategrorization of MONO and grammaticalization of speaker attitude in Japanese discourseSeiko Fujii | p. 85
-
Procedural encoding of explicatures by the Modern Greek particle tahaElly Ifantidou | p. 119
-
Linguistic encoding of the guarantee of relevance: Japanese sentence-final particle YOTomoko Matsui | p. 145
-
Markers of general interpretive use in Amharic and SwahiliSteve Nicolle | p. 173
-
The attitudinal meaning of preverbal markers in Gascon: Insights from the analysis of literary and spoken language dataClaus Dieter Pusch | p. 189
-
Actually and other markers of an apparent discrepancy between propositional attitudes of conversational partnersSara W. Smith and Andreas H. Jucker | p. 207
-
Surprise and animosity: The use of the copula da in quotative sentences in JapaneseSatoko Suzuki | p. 239
-
The interplay of Hungarian de (but) and is (too, either)Ildikó Vaskó | p. 255
-
Index | p. 265
“[...] this volume on particles will [...] be warmly welcomed by relevance-theoretic linguists.”
Mirjana Miskovic in Discourse Studies 4(2)
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Abd Aliwie, Abdullah Najim
Nicolle, Steve
2022. Communicated and non-communicated acts in relevance theory. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 233 ff.
Bootsma, Jael N., Lyn S. Turkstra & Jan Willem Gorter
Ramalle, Teresa M. Rodríguez
2015. A discourse-based approach to some uses of the conjunctionquein Romance languages. Languages in Contrast 15:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler
Amfo, Nana Aba Appiah
2005. Recurrence marking in Akan. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 15:2-3 ► pp. 151 ff.
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
Fretheim, Thorstein
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General