Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 13:3 (2003) ► pp. 423–450

Reanalysis of contrastive -wa in Japanese

Perspectives from newspaper articles

This paper examines the behavior of contrastive –wa in Japanese written discourse. While supporting its local nature (Clancy and Downing 1987), the paper argues, based on a survey of newspapers, that localness alone is not sufficient to understand the nature of contrast. It proposes that the use of contrastive –wa is motivated by how the writer perceives the world, or what Chafe (1994) calls ‘conscious experience’. We propose literal opposition, evaluation, association, and conflict as its main components. In the final part, the paper relates the results to the recent study on Contrastive Topic (Lee 1999, 2000, 2003), stating that the CT-approach is still unable to account for the entire range of phenomena discovered. The paper suggests that the discrepancies arise because of the fact that natural data integrates the writer’s context-specific intentions, to which priority is not given in formalistic approaches.
Keywords: Written discourse, Conscious experience, Contrastive –wa, Speaker/writer, Contrastive Topic
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 September 2003
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.13.3.04yam

Full-text

Reanalysis of contrastive -wa in Japanese
References
Caenepeel, Mimo
(1995) Aspect and text structure. Linguistics 33: 213-253. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
(1994) Metapragmatics. In R.E. Asher (ed.), The Enchyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 4.Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 2461-2466.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C.N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25-55.Google Scholar
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., and Pamela Downing
(1987) The use of wa as a cohesion marker in Japanese oral narratives. In J. Hinds, et al.. (eds.), Perspectives on topicalization. The case of Japanese ‘wa’. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins, pp. 3-56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cotter, Collen
(2001) Discourse and media. In D. Schiffirn, et al.. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 416-36.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
(1985) Structures of news in the press. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse and communication. New approaches to the analyses of mass media discourse and communication. Berlin/New York: W. de Gruyter, pp. 69-93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dooley, Robert, and Stephen H. Levinsohn
(2001) Analyzing Discourse. A Manual of Basic Concepts. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics International.Google Scholar
Francis, Gill
(1989) Thematic selection and distribution in written discourse. Word 40.1-2: 201-21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
(1983) Topic Continuity in Discourse: An Introduction. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-language study. John Benjamins. Amsterdam/New York, pp. 3-41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1984) Syntax: A functional typological introduction, vol 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, K. Jeanette
(1985) ‘Shared knowledge’ and topicality. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 83-107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, John
(1987) Thematization, assumed familiarity, staging, and syntactic binding in Japanese. In Hinds et al. 1987, pp. Perspectives on Topicalization. The Case of Japanese ‘wa’, 83-106. Crossref
Hinds, John, Senko K. Maynard, Shoichi Iwasaki
(eds.) (1987) Perspectives on Topicalization. The Case of Japanese ‘wa’. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
① ② ③
Hobbs, Jerry R.
(1990) Topic Drift. Conversational Organization and its Development. In B. Doral (ed.), Conversational Organization and its Development. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, pp. 3-22.Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress
(1993) Language as Ideology [second edition]. London: Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Kazuko
(1979) Furui jouhou atarasii jouhou [Old information and new information]. Gengo 8.10: 22-34.Google Scholar
(1982) An interface of syntax, semantics, and discourse structures. Lingua 57: 259-300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi
(2002) Japanese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther
(1983) Linguistic processes and the mediation of ‘reality’: The politics of newspaper language. International Journal of Sociology of Language 40: 43-57.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
(1973) The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Shigeyuki
(1972-73) The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of Language 9: 153-85.Google Scholar
(1987) A study of the so-called topic wa in passages from Tolstoi, Lawrence, and Faulkner. In Hinds, et al.. (eds.), Perspectives on Topicalization. The Case of Japanese ‘wa’.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 143-61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) The categorical and the thetic judgment reconsidered. In Mulligan, Kevin (ed.), Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics. The Philosophy and Theory of Language of Anton Marty. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 77-88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Ewald
(2000) Adversative connectors on distinct levels of discourse: A re-examination of Eve Sweetser’s three-level approach. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. and B. Kortmann (eds.), Cause Condition Concession Contrast. Cognitive and discourse perspective.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 235-256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chungmin
(1999) Contrastive Topic: A locus of the interface. Evidence from Korean and English. In K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics interface from different points of view, Elsevier, pp. 317-342.Google Scholar
(2000a) Contrastive predicates and conventional scales. In A. Okrent & J. Boyle (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society 36: 243-257.Google Scholar
(2000b) Topic, Contrastive Topic and Focus: What’s on our minds. Journal of Cognitive Science 1: 21-38.Google Scholar
(2003) Contrastive Topic and proposition structure. In A.M. Di Schiullo (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45-371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per, and Natascha Korolija
(1997) Coherence in Multi-Party Conversation. Episodes and Contexts in Interaction. T. Givón (ed.), Conversation. cognitive, communicative and social perspectives.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 167-205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longacre, Robert E.
(1996) The Grammar of discourse [second edition]. New York/London: Plenum Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Christopher
(1999) Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko
(1987) Thematization as a staging device in the Japanese narrative. In Hinds, et al. (1987), pp. Perspectives on Topicalization. The Case of Japanese ‘wa’, 57-82. Crossref
(2002) In the name of a vessel: Emotive perspectives in the reporting of the Ehime Maru-Greeneville collision in a Japanese newspaper. Linguistics 40.5: 1047-1086. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob
(2001) Pragmatics. An introduction. [second Edition]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru
(1987) Wa and the wh phrase. In Hinds, et al.., pp. Perspectives on Topicalization. The Case of Japanese ‘wa’, 185-217. Crossref
Nagano, Masaru
(1972) Bunshouron sousetsu [Introduction to the sentence structure]. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.Google Scholar
Nariyama, Shigeko
(2002) The WA/GA distinction and switch-reference for ellipted subject identification in Japanese complex sentences. Studies in Language 26.2: 369-431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noda, Naofumi
(1996) Wa to ga [Wa and ga]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
(1992) Aspects of a cognitive-pragmatic theory of language. On cognition, functionalism, and grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott. A.
(2000) Viewpoints and polysemy: linking adversative and causal meanings of discourse markers. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (eds.), Cause Condition Concession Contrast. Cognitive and discourse perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 257-281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
(1985) Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse. In D.R. Olson, N. Torrance, A. Hildyard (eds.), Literacy, language, and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich
(1997) Emotions and emotional language in English and German news stories. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.), The Language of emotions, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 307-328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Fukuda, Chie
2006. Resistance against being formulated as cultural other. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 16:4 ► pp. 429 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.