Reanalysis of contrastive -wa in Japanese
Perspectives from newspaper articles
This paper examines the behavior of contrastive –wa in Japanese written discourse. While supporting its local nature (Clancy and Downing 1987), the paper argues, based on a survey of newspapers, that localness alone is not sufficient to understand the nature of contrast. It proposes that the use of contrastive –wa is motivated by how the writer perceives the world, or what Chafe (1994) calls ‘conscious experience’. We propose literal opposition, evaluation, association, and conflict as its main components. In the final part, the paper relates the results to the recent study on Contrastive Topic (Lee 1999, 2000, 2003), stating that the CT-approach is still unable to account for the entire range of phenomena discovered. The paper suggests that the discrepancies arise because of the fact that natural data integrates the writer’s context-specific intentions, to which priority is not given in formalistic approaches.
Keywords: Written discourse, Conscious experience, Contrastive –wa, Speaker/writer, Contrastive Topic
This article is available under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 September 2003
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.13.3.04yam
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.13.3.04yam
Full-text
Reanalysis of contrastive -wa in JapaneseReferences
Caenepeel, Mimo
Caffi, Claudia
(1994) Metapragmatics. In R.E. Asher (ed.), The Enchyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 4.Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 2461-2466.
Chafe, Wallace
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C.N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25-55.
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. BoP
Clancy, Patricia M., and Pamela Downing
(1987) The use of wa as a cohesion marker in Japanese oral narratives. In J. Hinds, et al.. (eds.), Perspectives on topicalization. The case of Japanese ‘wa’. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins, pp. 3-56. 
Cotter, Collen
(2001) Discourse and media. In D. Schiffirn, et al.. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 416-36.
van Dijk, Teun A.
(1985) Structures of news in the press. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse and communication. New approaches to the analyses of mass media discourse and communication. Berlin/New York: W. de Gruyter, pp. 69-93.
Dooley, Robert, and Stephen H. Levinsohn
(2001) Analyzing Discourse. A Manual of Basic Concepts. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics International.
Francis, Gill
(1989) Thematic selection and distribution in written discourse. Word 40.1-2: 201-21.
Givón, Talmy
(1983) Topic Continuity in Discourse: An Introduction. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-language study. John Benjamins. Amsterdam/New York, pp. 3-41.
(1984) Syntax: A functional typological introduction, vol 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gundel, K. Jeanette
(1985) ‘Shared knowledge’ and topicality. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 83-107.
Hinds, John
(1987) Thematization, assumed familiarity, staging, and syntactic binding in Japanese. In Hinds et al. 1987, pp. Perspectives on Topicalization. The Case of Japanese ‘wa’, 83-106.
Hinds, John, Senko K. Maynard, Shoichi Iwasaki
Hobbs, Jerry R.
(1990) Topic Drift. Conversational Organization and its Development. In B. Doral (ed.), Conversational Organization and its Development. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, pp. 3-22.
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress
Inoue, Kazuko
(1979) Furui jouhou atarasii jouhou [Old information and new information]. Gengo 8.10: 22-34.
(1982) An interface of syntax, semantics, and discourse structures. Lingua 57: 259-300.
Iwasaki, Shoichi
(2002) Japanese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kress, Gunther
(1983) Linguistic processes and the mediation of ‘reality’: The politics of newspaper language. International Journal of Sociology of Language 40: 43-57.
Kuno, Susumu
(1973) The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Kuroda, Shigeyuki
(1972-73) The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of Language 9: 153-85.
(1987) A study of the so-called topic wa in passages from Tolstoi, Lawrence, and Faulkner. In Hinds, et al.. (eds.), Perspectives on Topicalization. The Case of Japanese ‘wa’.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 143-61.
(1990) The categorical and the thetic judgment reconsidered. In Mulligan, Kevin (ed.), Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics. The Philosophy and Theory of Language of Anton Marty. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 77-88.
Lang, Ewald
(2000) Adversative connectors on distinct levels of discourse: A re-examination of Eve Sweetser’s three-level approach. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. and B. Kortmann (eds.), Cause Condition Concession Contrast. Cognitive and discourse perspective.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 235-256.
Lee, Chungmin
(1999) Contrastive Topic: A locus of the interface. Evidence from Korean and English. In K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics interface from different points of view, Elsevier, pp. 317-342.
(2000a) Contrastive predicates and conventional scales. In A. Okrent & J. Boyle (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society 36: 243-257.
(2000b) Topic, Contrastive Topic and Focus: What’s on our minds. Journal of Cognitive Science 1: 21-38.
(2003) Contrastive Topic and proposition structure. In A.M. Di Schiullo (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45-371.
Linell, Per, and Natascha Korolija
(1997) Coherence in Multi-Party Conversation. Episodes and Contexts in Interaction. T. Givón (ed.), Conversation. cognitive, communicative and social perspectives.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 167-205.
Longacre, Robert E.
Lyons, Christopher
Maynard, Senko
(1987) Thematization as a staging device in the Japanese narrative. In Hinds, et al. (1987), pp. Perspectives on Topicalization. The Case of Japanese ‘wa’, 57-82.
(2002) In the name of a vessel: Emotive perspectives in the reporting of the Ehime Maru-Greeneville collision in a Japanese newspaper. Linguistics 40.5: 1047-1086. BoP
BoPMey, Jacob
(2001) Pragmatics. An introduction. [second Edition]. Oxford: Blackwell.
Miyagawa, Shigeru
(1987) Wa and the wh phrase. In Hinds, et al.., pp. Perspectives on Topicalization. The Case of Japanese ‘wa’, 185-217.
Nagano, Masaru
(1972) Bunshouron sousetsu [Introduction to the sentence structure]. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.
Nariyama, Shigeko
(2002) The WA/GA distinction and switch-reference for ellipted subject identification in Japanese complex sentences. Studies in Language 26.2: 369-431.
Noda, Naofumi
(1996) Wa to ga [Wa and ga]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.
Nuyts, Jan
(1992) Aspects of a cognitive-pragmatic theory of language. On cognition, functionalism, and grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. BoP
Schwenter, Scott. A.
(2000) Viewpoints and polysemy: linking adversative and causal meanings of discourse markers. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (eds.), Cause Condition Concession Contrast. Cognitive and discourse perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 257-281.
Sweetser, Eve E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPTannen, Deborah
(1985) Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse. In D.R. Olson, N. Torrance, A. Hildyard (eds.), Literacy, language, and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ungerer, Friedrich
(1997) Emotions and emotional language in English and German news stories. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.), The Language of emotions, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 307-328.
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Fukuda, Chie
2006. Resistance against being formulated as cultural other.
Pragmatics 16:4 ► pp. 429 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.