Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 23:2 (2013) ► pp.275–299

Evaluation of (im)politeness

A comparative study among Japanese students, Japanese parents and American students on evaluation of attentiveness

This study explores the evaluation of (im)politeness, which is made by a hearer (or a beneficiary). Although discursive researchers advocate the importance of the evaluation of (im)politeness made by a hearer in politeness research, empirical studies on the evaluation of (im)politeness are still limited. The non-linguistic aspect has not been much researched in previous politeness studies. This study tries to fill these gaps in politeness research, by focusing on evaluation of (im)politeness from the non-linguistic perspective. Among many other things, the evaluation of attentiveness (demonstrator’s preemptive response to a beneficiary’s verbal/non-verbal cues or situations surrounding a beneficiary and a demonstrator, which takes the form of offering) is focused on in this study, making cross-cultural (Japanese and American) and cross-generational (university students and their parents’ age groups) comparisons. The data were collected through a questionnaire, which consisted of six situations, and interviews. 298 people (Japanese university students, Japanese parents and American university students) served as the participants. The results of the questionnaire data show that there were significant differences among the participants in the evaluation of attentiveness in two situations, those of the interview data revealing that most participants evaluated attentiveness positively, except in two situations. This study contributes to further understanding of (im)politeness from the perspective of attentiveness with cross-cultural and cross-generational differences as well as similarities.

Keywords: Attentiveness, (Im)politeness, Evaluation, Generation, Americans, Japanese
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.2.04fuk
References
Arundale, Robert
(2008) Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 5.2: 231-260. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Azuma, Shoji
(2009) Shakai Gengogaku Nyumon [Introduction to Sociolinguistics]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
(2007a) Impoliteness, preference organization and conductivity. Multilingua 261: 1-33. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2007b) Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics 391: 2185-2216. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek, and Miriam Locher
(eds.) (2008) Impoliteness in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
(2009) Metapragmatics. In Jacob L. Mey (ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 625-630.Google Scholar
Chang, Wei-Lin Melody, and Michael Haugh
(2011) Evaluation of im/politeness of an intercultural apology. Intercultural Pragmatics 8.3: 411-442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
(1996) Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 251: 349-367. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2003) Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1545-1579. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2005) Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: ‘The Weakest Link’. Journal of Politeness Research 1.1: 35-72.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darics, Erika
(2010) Politeness in computer-mediated discourse of a virtual team. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 129-150.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino
(2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fukushima, Saeko
(2000) Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese. Bern: Peter Lang.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2004) Evaluation of politeness: The case of attentiveness. Multilingua 23.4: 365-387. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2010) Hearer’s aspect in politeness: The case of requests. In Dingfang Shu, and Ken Turner (eds.), Contrasting Meaning in Languages of the East and West. Oxford: Peter Lang, pp. 103-135.Google Scholar
(2011) A cross-generational and cross-cultural study on demonstration of attentiveness. Pragmatics 21.4: 549-571.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Patricia Bou-Franch
(2010) A genre approach to impoliteness in a Spanish television talk show: Evidence from corpus-based analysis, questionnaires and focus groups. Intercultural Pragmatics 7.4: 689-723.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
(2007a) The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 391: 84-110. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2007b) The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research 31: 295-317.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010a) When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 7-31.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b) The metapragmatics of im/politeness. Plenary talk presented at the 5th International Symposium on Politeness. University of Basel. 30 June, 2010.
(2010c) Intercultural im/politeness and the micro-macro issue. In Anna Trosborg (ed.), Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 139-166.Google Scholar
(2011) Epilogue: Culture and norms in politeness research. In Dániel Z. Kádár, and Sara Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 252-264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himeno, Tomoko
(2003) Hairyo hyogen kara mita nihongo [The Japanese language from the perspective of expressions of consideration]. Gekkan Nihongo 16.4: 66-69.Google Scholar
Hirschon, Renée
(2001) Freedom, solidarity and obligation: The socio-cultural context of Geek politeness. In Arin Bayraktaroğlu, and Maria Sifianou (eds.), Linguistic Politeness across Boundaries: The Case of Greek and Turkish.Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 17-42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert
(1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
House, Juliane
(2010) Impoiteness in Germany: Intercultural encounters in everyday and institutional talk. Intercultural Pragmatics 7.4: 561-595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z
(2010) Reflections on the critical turn: A research report. [URL]. (accessed on 4 May, 2011)
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Sara Mills
(2011) Introduction. In Dániel Z. Kádár, and Sara Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
(2012) Sociopragmatics, cross-cultural and intercultural studies. In Keith Allan, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 599-616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred
(2008) Impoliteness and emotional arguments. Journal of Politeness Research 4.2: 243-265.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
(1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A
(2004) Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2006) Polite behavior within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua 25.3: 249-267. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
(2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1.1: 9-33.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam, and Derek Bousfield
(2008) Impoliteness in Power in Language. In Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-13.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara
(2003) Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2009) Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1047-1060. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Miyake, Kazuko
(2011) Nihongo no Taijinkankei Haaku to Hairyo Gengokoudou [A proper understanding of interpersonal relationships in Japanese and linguistic behavior of consideration]. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Google Scholar
Murphy, Brona
(2010) Corpus and Sociolinguistics: Investigating Age and Gender in Female Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, Yukiko
(2010) Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online communities. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 33-55.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
(2010) Metapragmatics. In Louise Cummings (ed.), The Pragmatics Encyclopedia. London: Routledge, pp. 266-268.Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár
(2011) Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pinto, Derrin
(2011) Are Americans insincere? Interactional style and politeness in everyday America. Journal of Politeness Research 7.2: 215-238.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riley, Philip
(2007) Language, Culture and Identity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
(1993) Off-record indirectness and the notion of imposition. Multilingua 12.1: 69-80. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2012) Personal communication (An e-mail message to Saeko Fukushima 14 February 2012).
Sifianou, Maria, and Angeliki Tzanne
(2010) Conceptualizations of politeness and impoliteness in Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics 7.4: 661-687. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
(2000) Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures.London: Continuum, pp. 11-46.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2002) Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 34.5: 529-545. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2005) (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1.1: 95-119.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory.London: Continuum, pp. 11-47.Google Scholar
(2011) Conceptualising ‘the relational’ in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im)politeness comments. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3565-3578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Peter Franklin
(2009) Intercultural Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Intercultural Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugito, Seijyu
(2005) Nihonjin no gengo koudou: Kikubari no kouzou [Linguistic behavior by the Japanese people: The structure of attentiveness]. In Akira Nakamura, Masaaki Nomura, Mayumi Sakuma, and Chizuko Komiya (eds.), Hyogen to Buntai [Expressions and styles]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin, pp. 362-371.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
(2008) Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness and rudeness. In Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness and Power: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 45-74.Google Scholar
(2011) From Politeness1 to Politeness2: Tracking norms of im/politeness across time and space. Journal of Politenss Research 7.2: 159-185.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2012) Politeness and pragmatics. In Keith Allan, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 617-637.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella
(2009) Facework collision in intercultural communication. In Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Michael Haugh (eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction.London: Equinox, pp. 227-249.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen
(2008) Reasonable hostility: Situation-appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research 4.2: 169-191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
(1999) Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2000) Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness. Pragmatics 10.4: 439-456.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J
(2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2005) Linguistic politeness research: Quo vadis? In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. xi-xlvii. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Rudeness, conceptual blending theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 4.2: 289-317.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich
(eds.) (1992) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, Susumu
(1994) Collectivism among the Japanese: A perspective from the self. In Uichol Kim, Harry C. Triandis, Çığdem Kâğitçibaşı, Sang-Chin Choi, and Gene Yoon (eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 175-188.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Allan, Keith
2016. A Benchmark for Politeness. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Fukushima, Saeko
2015. In search of another understanding of politeness: From the perspective of attentiveness. Journal of Politeness Research 11:2 DOI logo
Fukushima, Saeko
2019. A Metapragmatic Aspect of Politeness: With a Special Emphasis on Attentiveness in Japanese. In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness, ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Fukushima, Saeko
2024. Japanese politeness revisited: from the perspective of attentiveness on Twitter. Journal of Politeness Research 0:0 DOI logo
Fukushima, Saeko & Michael Haugh
2014. The role of emic understandings in theorizing im/politeness: The metapragmatics of attentiveness, empathy and anticipatory inference in Japanese and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 74 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Fukushima, Saeko & Maria Sifianou
2017. Conceptualizing politeness in Japanese and Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics 14:4 DOI logo
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar & Maria Sifianou
2017. (Im)politeness and Identity. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Hodeib, Christina
2023. Conceptualizations and evaluations of (im)politeness in Syrian Arabic. Journal of Politeness Research 0:0 DOI logo
Ran, Yongping & Linsen Zhao
2019. Impoliteness Revisited: Evidence fromQingmianThreats in Chinese Interpersonal Conflicts. Journal of Politeness Research 15:2 ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Sifianou, Maria & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2017. (Im)politeness and Cultural Variation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 571 ff. DOI logo
Verschueren, Jef
2021. Reflexivity and Meta-awareness. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Linsen
2020. Mock Impoliteness and Co-Construction of Hudui Rituals in Chinese Online Interaction. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 43:1 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.