Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 25:2 (2015) ► pp.149–178

Whose side are we on?

Viewers’ reactions to the use of irony in news interviews

This research seeks to identify and analyze the reaction to irony in Israeli political news interviews, in view of the specific nature of this genre, which has been known to allow a certain level of adversarialness (Liebes et al. 2008; Blum-Kulka 1983; Weizman 2008; Clayman &Heritage 2002a and 2002b). Our intention was to examine whether the audience regards the use of irony as over-aggressive, and whether they believe interviewees regard it as such, in order to shed light on the potential consequences the use of indirect discourse patterns has for the interviewer. Based on Goffman’s (1981) notion of footing, and on the concept of positioning as defined by Weizman (2008: 16), we focused on the audience’s capacity to grasp the positioning and repositioning in the interaction as a possible influential factor in their reaction to the employment of irony. The research is based on two conceptual paradigms: Media studies and pragmatic studies of irony. The findings indicate that Israeli audiences tend to regard interviewers’ employment of irony in political interviews as slightly hostile, and as such it is viewed as a possible threat to interviewees’ face (Goffman 1967), but also as a legitimate and comprehensible tool, especially when the irony is accompanied by humor or mitigating non-verbal signs. Hence, the risk for the interviewer is not as great as we assumed. Accordingly, viewers also tended to judge interviewees’ conception of the employment of irony as only slightly adversarial, perhaps because they have assumed the interviewees’ attitude towards the interaction, identified with them and chosen their side.
Keywords: Media, Political news interviews, Irony, Hostility
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.2.02hir
References
Alexander, J. Richard
(1997) Aspects of Verbal Humour in English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag Tübingen.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
(1994) Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1997) The semantic foundation of cognitive theories of humor. Humor 101: 395-420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 793-826. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J.B., A. Black, N. Chovil, and J. Mullet
(1990) Equivocal Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
(1983) The dynamics of political interviews. Text 3.2: 131-153.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Discourse pragmatics. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, pp. 38-64.Google Scholar
(2005) Modes of meaning in making in young children's conversational storytelling. In J. Thornborrow, and J. Coates (eds.), The sociolinguistics of narrative. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 149-170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., G. Kasper, and J. House
(eds.) (1989) Cross-Cultural Pragmatics Requests and Apologies. Norwood: Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., and D. Huck-Taglicht
(2002) The contribution of peer-interaction to the development of literate discourse: Genres and keying. Script – Literacy: Research, Theory and Practice 3-41: 75-111 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., M. Blondheim, and G. Hacohen
(2002) Traditions of dispute: From negotiations of Talmudic texts to the arena of political discourse in the media. Journal of Pragmatics 341.10-11: 1569-1594. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., Z. Kampf, and T. Liebes
(2003) Talking to the Enemy?: Interviews with Palestinians during the Second Intifada. In Y. Shlesinger, and M. Muchnik (eds), Lamed Le ILASH (Studies in Modern Hebrew). Jerusalem: Tzivonim Publishing, (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., and E. Weizman
(2003) Misunderstanding in political interviews. In J. House, G. Kasper, and S. Ross (eds.), Misunderstanding in Social Life: Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk. London: Pearson, pp. 107-128.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., and M. Hamo
(2004) The importance of doing keying: Broadcast talk from a Goffman-inspired perspective. Ross Priory Broadcast Talk Seminar.Google Scholar
Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter
(2000) Equivocation and the rhetoric of modernization: An analysis of televised interviews with Tony Blair in 1997. British Journal of Social Psychology 351: 267-284. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bull, P., J. Elliott, D. Palmer, and L. Walker
(1996) Why politicians are three-faced: The Face Model of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology 35.2: 267-284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton, Deirdre
(1980) Dialogue and Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., and R.J. Gerrig
(1984) On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology/ General 113.1: 121-126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S.E., and J. Heritage
(2002a) The News interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2002b) Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in press conferences of Eisenhower and Regan. Journal of Communication 52.4: 749-775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
(1999) Irony in conversation. Language in Society 281: 523–553. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Colston, L. Herbert
(1997) Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes 231: 25-45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000a) On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. Pragmatics 8.2: 277-324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000b) Dewey defeats Truman: Interpreting ironic restatements. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 19.1: 46-65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dascal, M., and E. Weizman
(1987) Contextual exploitation of interpretation, clues in text understanding: An integrated model. In J. Verschueren, and M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.), The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 31-46.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dews, S., J. Kaplan, and E. Winner
(1995) Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes 191: 347-367. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ettema, J.S., and T.L. Glasser
(1994) The Irony in - and of – journalism: A case study in the moral language of liberal democracy. Journal of Communication 44.2: 5-28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, A., and E. Weizman
(2006) Issues in the study of political discourse: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 381: 143-153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garmendia, Joana
(2010) Irony is critical. Pragmatics & Cognition 18.2: 397-421. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, W. Raymond Jr.
(1984) Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science 81: 275-304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986) On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology/ General 115.1: 3-15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel
(1995) On irony and negation. Discourse Processes 191: 239-264. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Glasser, T.L., and J.S. Ettema
(1993) When the facts don't speak for themselves: A study of the use of irony in daily journalism. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 101: 322-338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1978) Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (ed.), Pragmatics 9. New York: Academic Press, pp. 113-127.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamo, M., Z. Kampf, and L. Shifman
(2010) Surviving the "Mock Interview": Challenges to political communicative competence in contemporary televised discourse. Media, Culture and Society 32.2: 247-266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, Henk
(1990) A speech act analysis of irony. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 77-109. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Galia
(4100a) Redundancy, irony and humor. Language Sciences 331: 316-329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b) Between irony and humor: A pragmatic model. Pragmatics and Cognition 19.31: 530-561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, G., and S. Blum-Kulka
(4102) Identifying irony in news interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 701: 31-51.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell
(1989/1972) Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz, and D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, pp. 35-72.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jeffers, Jennifer
(1995) Beyond Irony: The Unnamable’s appropriation of its critics in a humorous reading of the text. The Journal of Narrative Technique 25.1: 47-66.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Julia
(1996) The functions of sarcastic irony in speech. Journal of Pragmatics 261: 613-634. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jucker, H Andreas
(1986) News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: Gieben. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Z., and E. Daskal
(2011) When the watchdog bites: Insulting politicians on air. In M. Ekström, and M. Patrona (eds.), Talking Politics in the Broadcast Media: Cross-cultural perspectives on political interviewing, journalism and accountability (Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.177 – 198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Too hostile, too deferential: Processes of media answerability in the wake of political interviews. Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism. 14.4: 522-540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
(2003) Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1387-1411. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., S. Glucksberg, and M. Brown
(1995) How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology/ General 124.1: 3-21.  MetBib DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroon, L.A., and G. Eriksson
(2010) Interviews as communicative resources in news and current affairs broadcasts. Journalism Studies 11.1: 20-35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., and D. Fanshel, D
(1977) Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Liebes, T., Z. Kampf, and S. Blum-Kulka
(2008) Saddam on CBS and Arafat on IBA: Addressing the enemy on television. Political Communication 25.3: 311-329. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Martin
(2007) The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, R. Neil
(1994) Involvement and joking in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 221: 409-430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oring, Elliot
(1989) Between jokes and tales: On the nature of punch lines. Humor 2.4: 349-364. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Raskin, Victor
(1985) Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Raskin, V., and S. Attardo
(1994) Non-literalness and non-bona-fide in language: An approach to formal and computational treatments of humor. Pragmatics & Cognition 2.1: 31-69. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Reich, Zvi
(2011) User comments: The translation of participatory space. Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scannell, Patrick
(1991) Introduction: The relevance of talk. Broadcast talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., and D. Wilson
(1981) Irony and the Use-Mention distinction. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 295-318.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992) On verbal irony. Lingua 871: 53-76. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Vaisman, C.L., and I. Gonen
(2011) Hebrew Online. Jerusalem: Keter Publishing (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Weizman, E., and M. Dascal
(1991) On clues and cues: Strategies of text understanding. Journal of Literary Semantics XX/1: 18-30. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda
(2001) Addresser, addressee and target. In E. Weingand, and M. Dascal (eds.), Negotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 125-137.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) News interviews on Israeli television: Normative expectations and discourse norms. In S. Stati, and M. Bondi (eds.), Dialogue Analysis 2000. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 384-94 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, E.
., and M. Dascal (2005) Interpreting speaker's meanings in literary dialogue. In A. Bethen, and M. Dannerer (eds.), Dialogue Analysis IX: Dialogue in Literature and the Media. Part 1: Literature. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 61-72 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda
(2006) Roles and identities in news interviews: The Israeli context. Pragmatic aspects of political discourse in the media, Journal of Pragmatics 381: 154-179. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2008) Positioning in Media Dialogue. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2013) News interviews. Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics (EHLL) 21: 825-828.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
(2006) The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua 1161: 1722-1743. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Weizman, Elda & Gonen Dori-Hacohen
2017. On-line commenting on opinion editorials: A cross-cultural examination of face work in the Washington Post (USA) and NRG (Israel). Discourse, Context & Media 19 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.