Passivization and Typology

Form and function

Editors
| University of Vienna
| University of Helsinki
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027229809 | EUR 145.00 | USD 218.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027293251 | EUR 145.00 | USD 218.00
 
Is the passive a unified universal phenomenon? The claim derived from this volume is that the passive, if not universal, has become unified according to function. Language as a means of communication needs the passive, or passive-like constructions, and sooner or later develops them based on other voices (impersonal active, middle, reflexive), specific semantic meanings such as adversativity, or tense-aspect categories (stative,perfect, preterit). Certain contributors review the passives in various languages and language groups, including languages rarely discussed. Another group of contributors takes a novel theoretical approach toward passivization within a broad typological perspective. Among the languages discussed are Vedic, Irish, Mandarin Chinese, Thai, Lithuanian, Mordvin, and Nganasan, next to almost all European languages. Various theoretical frameworks such as Optimality Theory, Modern Structuralist Approaches, Role and Reference Grammar, Cognitive Semantics, Distributed Morphology, and Case Grammar have been applied by the different authors.
[Typological Studies in Language, 68]  2006.  x, 553 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Contributor's addresses
vii–viii
Abbreviations
ix–x
Introduction: Passivization and typology: Form vs. function - a confined survey into the research status quo
Werner Abraham
1–27
Active–passive and reflexives
Passives in Lithuanian (in comparison with Russian)
Emma Š. Geniušienė
29–61
Passive and middle in Indo-European: Reconstructing the early Vedic passive paradigm
Leonid Kulikov
62–81
Triggers — aspectual, semantic, and discourse-pragmatic: case studies
Pragmatic nature of Mandarin passive-like constructions
Marja Peltomaa
83–114
Development of thùuk passive marker in Thai
Amara Prasithrathsint
115–131
The passives of Modern Irish
Brian Nolan
132–164
The passive in Erzya-Mordvin folklore
Merja Salo
165–190
Grammatical voice and tense-aspect in Slavic
Jun-ichi Toyota and Melisa Mustafović
191–212
Passive in Nganasan
Larisa Leisiö
213–230
Actor demotion
'Agent defocusing' revisited: Passive and impersonal constructions in some European languages
Andrea Sansó
232–273
Relations between Actor-demoting devices in Lithuanian: Dedicated to Emma Geniusiene
Björn Wiemer
274–309
Grammaticalization in long-term diachrony
The rise and grammaticalization paths of Latin fieri and facere as passive auxiliaries
Michela Cennamo
311–336
Grammatical relations in passive clauses: A diachronic perspective
T. Givón
337–350
Argument structure and case
Two types of detransitive constructions in the dialects of Japanese
Kan Sasaki and Akie Yamazaki
352–372
Passive and argument structure
Tor A. Åfarli
373–382
Case-driven agree, EPP, and passive in Turkish
Balkız Öztürk
383–402
A unique feature of the direct passive in Japanese
Kenichi Ariji
403–440
Actor demotion
Passive as a feature-suppression operation
Dalina Kallulli
442–460
Event semantics — Aspectual and semantic triggers
The compositional nature of the passive: Syntactic vs. event semantic triggers. "Argument Hypothesis" vs. "Aspect Hypothesis"
Werner Abraham
462–501
The impersonal passive: voice suspended under aspectual conditions
Werner Abraham and Elisabeth Leiss
502–517
Simple preterit and composite perfect tense: The role of the adjectival passive
Monika Rathert
518–543
Author index
544–547
Subject index
548–553
“Der Band wird linguistisch gut Eingearbeitete und vor allem Typologen ansprechen. Die vertretenen Sprachen ergeben, soweit wie überseebar ist, ein viel vollständigeres Bild zur Passivkonstruktion als in bisher erschienenen Werken zum Thema. Bemerkenswert is auch, dass die Einleitung (aus der hand Abrahams) sich nicht mit der Aufzählung der einzelne Beiträge und ihrer Kurzwiedergabe begnügt, sondern ein sehr weites Spektrum an Beobachtungen und theoretisch dimensionierten Lösungen zum Thema bestreicht – gewiss originell und zu Nachahmung emfehlbar.”
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Chandra, Pritha & Richa Srishti
2014.  In The Lexicon–Syntax Interface [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 209],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Heaton, Raina
2018. Intransitivizing morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:12  pp. e12305 ff. Crossref logo
Houser, Michael J., Line Mikkelsen & Maziar Toosarvandani
2011. A Defective Auxiliary in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 23:3  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.  In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Crossref logo
RAVID, DORIT & LIZZY VERED
2017. Hebrew verbal passives in Later Language Development: the interface of register and verb morphology. Journal of Child Language 44:6  pp. 1309 ff. Crossref logo
Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä
2019.  In Grammatical Voice, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2006045890