Argumentation in Practice

Editors
| University of Amsterdam
| University of Amsterdam
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027218827 (Eur) | EUR 125.00
ISBN 9781588116161 (USA) | USD 188.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027294241 | EUR 125.00 | USD 188.00
 
Since the late 1950s the study of argumentation has developed from a marginal part of logic and rhetoric into a genuine interdisciplinary academic discipline. After having first been primarily concerned with creating an adequate philosophical perspective on argumentation, argumentation theorists have gradually shifted their focus of attention to a more immediate concern with the ins and outs of argumentative praxis. What exactly are the characteristics of situated argumentative discourse in different argumentative ‘action types’? How is the discourse influenced by institutional and contextual constraints? In what way can prominent cases of argumentative discourse be fruitfully analysed? Argumentation in Practice aims to provide insight into some important facets of argumentative praxis and the different ways in which it can be approached. The first part of this volume, ‘Conceptions of problems in argumentative practice’, introduces useful theoretical perspectives. The second part, ‘Empirical studies of argumentative practice’, contains both empirical studies of a general kind and several types of specific case studies.
[Controversies, 2]  2005.  viii, 368 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Ferreira, Maria
2021. A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Memory Politics: Spanish Contemporary Memory Politics, Populism Studies, and Argumentative Dialectics. Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics 15:2  pp. 130 ff. Crossref logo
Hornikx, Jos & Ulrike Hahn
2012. Reasoning and argumentation: Towards an integrated psychology of argumentation. Thinking & Reasoning 18:3  pp. 225 ff. Crossref logo
Kraus, Manfred
2009.  In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 14],  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Lecompte-Van Poucke, Margo
2016. Exploiting the ‘non-dit’ and other discursive tactics in the New Caledonian independence debate: a pragma-functional approach to critical discourse analysis. Functional Linguistics 3:1 Crossref logo
Metsämäki, Maija
2012. Persuasive Discourse in EFL Debate. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2:2 Crossref logo
Richardson, John E. & Albert Atkin
2006. 'You’re Being Unreasonable’: Prior and Passing Theories of Critical Discussion. Argumentation 20:2  pp. 149 ff. Crossref logo
Signorini, Inês
2010. Review of Eemeren & Garssen (2008): Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory. Pragmatics & Cognition 18:1  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata

Communication Studies

Communication Studies

Philosophy

Philosophy
BIC Subject: GTC – Communication studies
BISAC Subject: LAN004000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Communication Studies
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2004062796 | Marc record