Re/reading the past
Critical and functional perspectives on time and value
Editors
| University of Sydney
| University of Vienna
Re/reading the Past is concerned with the discourses of history, from the complementary perspectives of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). The papers in the book stress the discursive construction of the past, focussing on the different social narratives which compete for official acknowledgement. Issues of collective and cultural memory are addressed, reflecting the "linguistic turn" in the Social Sciences. The book covers a range of discourses, interpreting texts from popular culture to academic discourse including the construction and evaluation of past events in a variety of places around the world. It is especially timely in its focus on the construction of time and value in a post-colonial world where history discourses are central to on-going processes of reconciliation, debates on war crimes, and the issues of amnesty and restitution. As such the book fills a significant gap in interdisciplinary debates as well as in register and genre analysis, and will be of general interest to historians, political scientists and discourse analysts as well as students and teachers of ESP (English for Specific Purposes) and EAP (English for Academic Purposes).
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 8] 2003. vi, 277 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
1–16
|
|
|
I. Constructing time and value
|
|
|
19–57
|
|
|
II. Recent past
|
|
|
61–89
|
|
|
91–112
|
|
|
III. Distant past
|
|
|
115–138
|
|
|
139–175
|
|
|
177–194
|
|
|
195–216
|
|
|
IV. Yesteryear
|
|
|
219–246
|
|
|
247–271
|
|
|
Index
|
273–275
|
“This volume provides multiple models of approaching historical discourse from a critical perspective, enabling the comparison and evaluation of different approaches to data and frameworks for analysis, as well as encouraging dialogue between CDA and SFL. It is a valuable resource for understanding how texts and contexts interact in the construction of evaluation and interpretation in history.”
Mary J. Schleppegrell, University of California, Davis, USA, in Discourse Studies Vol. 7:3 (2005)
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2015.
In Discourse, Identity and Legitimacy [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 62],
No author info given
2018.
In Words of Crisis as Words of Power [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 77],
Ahonen, Pasi
2009. ‘The World Has Changed’: Discursive Struggles over an Industrial Shutdown in the Media, a Case from the Finnish Pulp and Paper Industry.
Competition & Change 13:3 ► pp. 289 ff.
Amir, Dana & Nehama HaCohen
2020. Screen confessions: The test case of “breaking the silence”.
International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies
Anthonissen, Christine
2006. The language of remembering and forgetting.
Journal of Language and Politics 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bahmani, Mona & Ahlam Alharbi
2019. Interpersonal rhetoric of attitude in news.
Pragmatics and Society 10:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
Blommaert, Jan
2005.
In Discourse,
Bolton, Kingsley & Joseph James Alvaro
2015.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Clary-Lemon, Jennifer
2014. Irish emigration in the 1970s: The ‘problem’ discourse of political elites.
Discourse & Society 25:5 ► pp. 619 ff.
Coutu, Lisa M.
2008. Contested Social Identity and Communication in Text and Talk About the Vietnam War.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 41:4 ► pp. 387 ff.
Davidse, Kristin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2008. Introduction: The realization of interpersonal meaning.
<i>WORD</i> 59:1-2 ► pp. 3 ff.
Dolón, Rosana
2014.
In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23],
► pp. 165 ff.
Fischer, Eva
2019.
In The Cold War in the Classroom,
► pp. 23 ff.
Hall, Geoff & Joanna Gavins
2004. The year’s work in stylistics 2003.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 13:4 ► pp. 349 ff.
Hyatt, David
2005. Time for a change: a critical discoursal analysis of synchronic context with diachronic relevance.
Discourse & Society 16:4 ► pp. 515 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2005.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Leudar, Ivan & Jiří Nekvapil
2011. Practical historians and adversaries: 9/11 revisited.
Discourse & Society 22:1 ► pp. 66 ff.
Li, Tao & Yifan Zhu
2020. How does China appraise self and others? A corpus-based analysis of Chinese political discourse.
Discourse & Society 31:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Liu, Yongbing
2005. The Construction of Pro-Science and Technology Discourse in Chinese Language Textbooks.
Language and Education 19:4 ► pp. 304 ff.
Martin, J. R.
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 61 ff.
Martin, J.R.
2008. Incongruent and proud: de-vilifying 'nominalization'.
Discourse & Society 19:6 ► pp. 801 ff.
Mininni, Giuseppe, Amelia Manuti & Graziana Curigliano
2013. Commemorative acts as discursive resources of historical identity.
Culture & Psychology 19:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Nekvapil, Jiří & Ivan Leudar
2010. 9/11 Revisited: 'Doing history' in political discourse.
Czech Sociological Review 46:4 ► pp. 619 ff.
Oteíza, Teresa, Constanza Dalla Porta & Mabelin Garrido
2014. La evidencialidad en la construcción de la significación histórica por estudiantes de Licenciatura de Historia.
Onomázein Revista de lingüística, filología y traducción :ALSFAL ► pp. 57 ff.
Sawaki, Tomoko
2014. Interactions between ideology, dialogic space construction, and the text-organizing function: A comparative study of traditional and postmodern academic writing corpora.
English Text Construction 7:2 ► pp. 178 ff.
Shi-xu
2012. Understanding contemporary Chinese political communication.
Journal of Language and Politics 11:1 ► pp. 93 ff.
Smith, Laurajane
2005. Comment on “dwelling at the margins, action at the intersection? Feminist and indigenous archaeologies, 2005”.
Archaeologies 1:1 ► pp. 60 ff.
Songqing Li
2007. Book reviews: JAN BLOMMAERT, Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, xiii + 299 pp.
Discourse Studies 9:2 ► pp. 288 ff.
Sowińska, Agnieszka
2013. A critical discourse approach to the analysis of values in political discourse: The example of freedom in President Bush’s State of the Union addresses (2001–2008).
Discourse & Society 24:6 ► pp. 792 ff.
Wang, Danping & Kris Gritter
2016. Learning or becoming: Ideology and national identity in textbooks for international learners of Chinese.
Cogent Education 3:1
Waterton, Emma, Laurajane Smith & Gary Campbell
2006. The Utility of Discourse Analysis to Heritage Studies: The Burra Charter and Social Inclusion.
International Journal of Heritage Studies 12:4 ► pp. 339 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
2005. Editorial.
Journal of Language and Politics 4:3 ► pp. 367 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
2006.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
2006. History in the making/The making of history.
Journal of Language and Politics 5:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
2014.
In The Discourse Studies Reader,
► pp. 401 ff.
Wodak, Ruth & Rudolf de Cillia
2007. Commemorating the past: the discursive construction of official narratives about the `Rebirth of the Second Austrian Republic'.
Discourse & Communication 1:3 ► pp. 337 ff.
Wodak, Ruth & John E. Richardson
2009. On the politics of remembering (or not).
Critical Discourse Studies 6:4 ► pp. 231 ff.
Xiong, Tao & Yamin Qian
2012. Ideologies of English in a Chinese high school EFL textbook: a critical discourse analysis.
Asia Pacific Journal of Education 32:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2003057867