Contrastive Rhetoric
Reaching to intercultural rhetoric
Editors
| Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
| University of Nevada, Las Vegas
| Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
This volume explores contrastive rhetoric for audiences in both ESL contexts and international EFL contexts, exposing the newest developments in theories of culture and discourse and pushing the boundaries beyond any previously staked ground. The book presents a comprehensive set of empirical investigations involving a number of first languages; 13 of the 17 authors are English-as-a-second-language speakers, many working in non-US contexts. This work develops a coherent agenda for contrastive rhetoric researchers, studying genres such as school writing, grant proposals, business letters, newspaper editorials, book reviews, and newspaper commentaries. Four chapters provide ethnographies and observations about contrastive rhetoric and the teaching of EFL and ESL. The book ends with a look to the future, suggesting it is more accurate to use the term ‘intercultural rhetoric’ to account for the richness of rhetoric variation of written texts and the varying contexts in which they are constructed.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 169] 2008. viii, 324 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
1–8
|
|
|
Section I. Current state of contrastive rhetoric
|
9
|
|
11–24
|
|
|
25–41
|
|
|
Section II. Contrastive corpus studies in specific genres
|
43
|
|
45–62
|
|
|
63–86
|
|
|
87–121
|
|
|
123–145
|
|
|
147–168
|
|
|
169–191
|
|
|
Section III. Contrastive rhetoric and the teaching of ESL/EFL writing
|
193
|
|
195–217
|
|
|
219–240
|
|
|
241–256
|
|
|
257–274
|
|
|
Section IV. Future directions
|
275
|
|
277–298
|
|
|
299–315
|
|
|
Notes on contributors
|
317–319
|
|
Index
|
321–324
|
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2012.
In Intercultural Rhetoric and Professional Communication,
► pp. 1 ff. 
No author info given
2012.
In Intercultural Rhetoric and Professional Communication,
► pp. 75 ff.
Babaii, Esmat & Kambiz Ramazani
2017. Reverse Transfer: Exploring the Effects of Foreign Language Rhetorical Patterns on L1 Writing Performance of Iranian EFL Learners.
RELC Journal 48:3 ► pp. 341 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019.
In Register, Genre, and Style,
Bowe, Heather, Kylie Martin & Howard Manns
2014.
In Communication across Cultures,
Chien, Shih-Chieh
2011. Discourse Organization in High School Students' Writing and Their Teachers' Writing Instruction: The Case of Taiwan.
Foreign Language Annals 44:2 ► pp. 417 ff.
DeCoursey, Christina A
2019. Metadiscourse, Writer Identity and Reader Construction among Novice Arabic-Speaking ESL Writers.
English Studies at NBU 5:2 ► pp. 284 ff.
Esquivel, Johanna
2019. Critical discourse analysis in the bilingual classroom: Uncovering stereotypes in children’s picture books.
NABE Journal of Research and Practice 9:3-4 ► pp. 198 ff.
Helal, Fethi
2014. Genres, styles and discourse communities in global communicative competition: The case of the Franco–American ‘AIDS War’ (1983–1987).
Discourse Studies 16:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
Khartite, Brahim & Badia Zerhouni
2016. Second Language Writing from an Intercultural Rhetoric Perspective.
SSRN Electronic Journal
Kraus, Manfred
2014.
In Let's talk politics [Argumentation in Context, 6],
► pp. 45 ff.
Lee, Sook Hee
2014. Argument structure as an interactive resource by undergraduate students.
Linguistics and the Human Sciences 9:3
Limbu, Marohang
2014.
In Digital Rhetoric and Global Literacies [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ],
► pp. 131 ff.
Limbu, Marohang
2018.
In Information and Technology Literacy,
► pp. 1665 ff.
Liu, Xinghua & Clare Furneaux
2015. Argument structures in Chinese university students’ argumentative writing.
English Text Construction 8:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Maxwell-Reid, Corinne
2011. The Challenges of Contrastive Discourse Analysis.
Written Communication 28:4 ► pp. 417 ff.
Mu, Congjun
2020.
In Understanding Chinese Multilingual Scholars’ Experiences of Writing and Publishing in English,
► pp. 23 ff.
Pecorari, Diane & Bojana Petrić
2014. Plagiarism in second-language writing.
Language Teaching 47:3 ► pp. 269 ff.
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
2013. ‘Glocal’ Rhetorical Practices in Academic Writing.
European Journal of English Studies 17:3 ► pp. 251 ff.
Pérez-Sabater, Carmen
2015. The rhetoric of online support groups.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 465 ff.
Skorczynska Sznajder, Hanna Teresa
2016. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KEYWORDS IN ENGLISH-LANGUAGE CORPORATE PRESS RELEASES FROM EUROPEAN COMPANIES: INSIGHTS INTO DISCURSIVE PRACTICES.
Discourse and Interaction 9:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Tardy, Christine M.
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Tardy, Christine M.
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Tarrayo, Veronico Nogales
2011. Metatext in results-and-discussion sections of ESL/EFL research: A contrastive analysis of Philippine English,Taiwanese English, and Iranian English..
i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 1:3 ► pp. 39 ff.
Verschueren, Jef
2016.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
Walková, Milada
2018. AUTHOR’S SELF-REPRESENTATION IN RESEARCH ARTICLES BY ANGLOPHONE AND SLOVAK LINGUISTS.
Discourse and Interaction 11:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Walková, Milada
2020. ERPP provision in the UK.
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 1:2
Yigitoglu, Nur & Melinda Reichelt
2014. Using a genre-based approach for writing instruction in a less-commonly-taught language.
Language Awareness 23:3 ► pp. 187 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General