Contrastive Rhetoric

• Introduction
  Ulla Connor, Ed Nagelhout and William Rozycki | pp. 1–8
• Section I. Current state of contrastive rhetoric
• From contrastive rhetoric to intercultural rhetoric: A search for collective identity
  Xiaoming Li | pp. 11–24
• The importance of comparable corpora in cross-cultural studies
  Ana I. Moreno | pp. 25–41
• Section II. Contrastive corpus studies in specific genres
• Metadiscourse across three varieties of English: American, British, and advanced learner English
  Annelie Ädel | pp. 45–62
• A genre-based study of research grant proposals in China
  Haiying Feng | pp. 63–86
• Different cultures – different discourses? Rhetorical patterns of business letters by English and Russian speakers
  Maria Loukianenko Wolfe | pp. 87–121
• Spanish language newspaper editorials from Mexico, Spain, and the U.S.
  Chin-Sook Pak and Rebeca Acevedo | pp. 123–145
• The rhetorical structure of academic book reviews of literature: An English-Spanish cross-linguistic approach
  Lorena Suárez and Ana I. Moreno | pp. 147–168
• Newspaper commentaries on terrorism in China and Australia: A contrastive genre study
  Wei Wang | pp. 169–191
• Section III. Contrastive rhetoric and the teaching of ESL/EFL writing
• "Long sentences and floating commas": Mexican students' rhetorical practices and the sociocultural context
  Virginia LoCastro | pp. 195–217
• English web page use in an EFL setting: A contrastive rhetoric view of the development of information literacy
  Kara McBride | pp. 219–240
• From Confucianism to Marxism: A century of theme treatment in Chinese writing instruction
  Xiaoye You | pp. 241–256
• Plagiarism in an intercultural rhetoric context: What we can learn about one from the other
  Joel Bloch | pp. 257–274
• Section IV. Future directions
• A conversation on contrastive rhetoric: Dwight Atkinson and Paul Kei Matsuda talk about issues, conceptualizations, and the future of contrastive rhetoric
  Paul Kei Matsuda and Dwight Atkinson | pp. 277–298
• Mapping multidimensional aspects of research: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric
  Ulla Connor | pp. 299–315
• Notes on contributors | pp. 317–319
• Index | pp. 321–324

Cited by 41 other publications

No author info given

2012.  In Intercultural Rhetoric and Professional Communication, ► pp. 1 ff.

No author info given

2012.  In Intercultural Rhetoric and Professional Communication, ► pp. 75 ff.

Babaii, Esmat & Kambiz Ramazani

2017. Reverse Transfer: Exploring the Effects of Foreign Language Rhetorical Patterns on L1 Writing Performance of Iranian EFL Learners. RELC Journal 48:3 ► pp. 341 ff.

Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad

2019.  In Register, Genre, and Style,

Bowe, Heather, Kylie Martin & Howard Manns

2014.  In Communication across Cultures,

Cao, Feng

2022.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 975 ff.

Chien, Shih-Chieh

2011. Discourse Organization in High School Students' Writing and Their Teachers' Writing Instruction: The Case of Taiwan. Foreign Language Annals 44:2 ► pp. 417 ff.

Chien, Shih-Chieh

2015. College students’ awareness in organizational strategy use in English writing. English Teaching: Practice & Critique 14:2 ► pp. 187 ff.

DeCoursey, Christina A

2019. Metadiscourse, Writer Identity and Reader Construction among Novice Arabic-Speaking ESL Writers. English Studies at NBU 5:2 ► pp. 284 ff.

Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga

2020.  In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses, ► pp. 1 ff.

Esquivel, Johanna

2019. Critical discourse analysis in the bilingual classroom: Uncovering stereotypes in children’s picture books. NABE Journal of Research and Practice 9:3-4 ► pp. 198 ff.

Falahati, Reza & Mahya Shojaei

2021.  In Perspectives on Academic Persian [Language Policy, 25], ► pp. 121 ff.

Feng, Cao

2021.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 1 ff.

Helal, Fethi

2014. Genres, styles and discourse communities in global communicative competition: The case of the Franco–American ‘AIDS War’ (1983–1987). Discourse Studies 16:1 ► pp. 47 ff.

House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár

2021.  In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics,

Jürine, Anni, Djuddah Leijen, Helen Hint, Diāna Laiveniece, Jolanta Sinkuniene, Christer Johansson & Nicholas Groom

2021. Academic Writing in the Baltic States. Educare - vetenskapliga skrifter :1 ► pp. 27 ff.

Khartite, Brahim & Badia Zerhouni

2016. Second Language Writing from an Intercultural Rhetoric Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal

Kraus, Manfred

2014.  In Let's talk politics [Argumentation in Context, 6], ► pp. 45 ff.

Lee, Sook Hee

2014. Argument structure as an interactive resource by undergraduate students. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 9:3

Limbu, Marohang

2014.  In Digital Rhetoric and Global Literacies [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 131 ff.

Limbu, Marohang

2018.  In Information and Technology Literacy, ► pp. 1665 ff.

Liu, Xinghua & Clare Furneaux

2015. Argument structures in Chinese university students’ argumentative writing. English Text Construction 8:1 ► pp. 65 ff.

Maxwell-Reid, Corinne

2011. The Challenges of Contrastive Discourse Analysis. Written Communication 28:4 ► pp. 417 ff.

McCambridge, Laura

2021.  In Academic Literacy Development, ► pp. 59 ff.

Mu, Congjun

2020.  In Understanding Chinese Multilingual Scholars’ Experiences of Writing and Publishing in English, ► pp. 23 ff.

Paiz, Joshua M. & James E. Coda

2021.  In Intersectional Perspectives on LGBTQ+ Issues in Modern Language Teaching and Learning, ► pp. 261 ff.

Paltridge, Brian

2012.  In The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes, ► pp. 347 ff.

Pecorari, Diane & Bojana Petrić

2014. Plagiarism in second-language writing. Language Teaching 47:3 ► pp. 269 ff.

Pérez-Llantada, Carmen

2013. ‘Glocal’ Rhetorical Practices in Academic Writing. European Journal of English Studies 17:3 ► pp. 251 ff.

Pérez-Sabater, Carmen

2015. The rhetoric of online support groups. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 465 ff.

SHLEYKINA, GALINA

2020. USING ACTFL CAN-DO STATEMENTS IN SIMULATION-BASED ESL CLASSES. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 10:3 ► pp. 12 ff.

Sibarani, Berlin & Betharia Pandia

2020. Variations in Reasoning in Javanese and Bataknese Students’ Argumentative Writing: A Study on the Relation between Ethnicity and Reasoning. European Journal of Educational Research 9:1 ► pp. 385 ff.

Skorczynska Sznajder, Hanna Teresa

2016. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KEYWORDS IN ENGLISH-LANGUAGE CORPORATE PRESS RELEASES FROM EUROPEAN COMPANIES: INSIGHTS INTO DISCURSIVE PRACTICES. Discourse and Interaction 9:1 ► pp. 49 ff.

Tardy, Christine M.

2012.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,

Tardy, Christine M.

2012.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,

Tarrayo, Veronico Nogales

2011. Metatext in results-and-discussion sections of ESL/EFL research: A contrastive analysis of Philippine English,Taiwanese English, and Iranian English.. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 1:3 ► pp. 39 ff.

Verschueren, Jef

2016.  In Handbook of Pragmatics,

Verschueren, Jef

2022.  In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 349 ff.

Walková, Milada

2018. AUTHOR’S SELF-REPRESENTATION IN RESEARCH ARTICLES BY ANGLOPHONE AND SLOVAK LINGUISTS. Discourse and Interaction 11:1 ► pp. 86 ff.

Walková, Milada

2020. ERPP provision in the UK. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 1:2 ► pp. 143 ff.

Yigitoglu, Nur & Melinda Reichelt

2014. Using a genre-based approach for writing instruction in a less-commonly-taught language. Language Awareness 23:3 ► pp. 187 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 november 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.