Article published in:Relational work in Facebook and discussion boards/fora
Edited by Miriam A. Locher, Brook Bolander and Nicole Höhn
[Pragmatics 25:1] 2015
► pp. 1–21
Introducing relational work in Facebook and discussion boards
This paper functions as the introduction to the special issue on ‘relational work in Facebook and discussion boards’. We position our research endeavors within interpersonal pragmatics (see Locher and Graham 2010), by reviewing literature on politeness, impoliteness and relational work in the context of computer-mediated communication. Foregrounding the relational aspect of language, we are particularly interested in establishing the connections between politeness, face and linguistic identity construction. We then position the four papers that form this special issue within this field of research. Two papers contribute to the study of relational work on discussion boards (Kleinke and Boes; Haugh, Chang and Kádár) and two deal with practices on Facebook (Theodoropoulou; Bolander and Locher).
Keywords: Computer-mediated communication, Interpersonal pragmatics, Relational work, Politeness, Impoliteness, Linguistic identity construction, Facebook, Discussion fora
This article is available under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 March 2015
Aarsand, Pal A.
(2008) Frame switches and identity performances: Alternating between online and offline. Text & Talk: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 28: 147–165. BoP
(2007) Style online: Doing hip-hop on the German-speaking web. In P. Auer (ed.), Style and Social Identities: Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 279–318.
(2008) Potentials and limitations of discourse-centered online ethnography. LanguageInternet, 5, article 8. Retrieved June 6, 2013, from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1610.
Angouri, Jo, and Theodora Tseliga
(2010) "you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!" From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 57–82. BoP
Arundale, Robert B.
(2010) Relating. In M.A. Locher, and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 137–167.
Baym, Nancy K.
(1995) The performance of humor in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1.2. Retrieved June 6, 2013, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol1/issue2/baym.html.
(1996) Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29: 315–346. BoP
(2012) Disagreements and agreements in personal/diary blogs: A closer look at responsiveness. Journal of Pragmatics 44.12: 1607–1622. BoP
Bolander, Brook, and Miriam A. Locher
(2010) Constructing identity on Facebook: Pilot on a pilot study. In K. Junod, and D. Maillat (eds.), Performing the Self. Tübingen: Narr Francke, pp. 165–185.
(2008) Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
(2010) Researching impoliteness and rudeness: Issues and definitions. In M.A. Locher, and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 101–134.
Bousfield, Derek, and Miriam A. Locher
(eds.) (2008) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. BoP
boyd, Danah M., and Nicole B. Ellison
(2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13.1: article 11. Retrieved June 6, 2013, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html.
Brown, Penelope, and Steven C. Levinson
(1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–289.
(1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
(2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7.4–5: 584–614. BoP
(2009) The discursive construction of interpersonal relations in an online community of practice. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2333–2344. BoP
Cotrău, Diana R.
(2005) Online identity of a local young community. Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai – Philologia 3: 109–116.
(1996) Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25.3: 349–367. BoP
(2010) Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3232–3245. BoP
Danet, Brenda, and Susan C. Herring
(eds.) (2007) The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online. New York: Oxford University Press. BoP
(2010) Politeness in computer-mediated discourse of a virtual team. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 129–150. BoP
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré
De Fina, Anna
(2010) The negotiation of identities. In M.A. Locher, and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 205–224.
DuVal Smith, Anna
(1999) Problems of conflict management in virtual communities. In M. Smith, and P. Kollock (eds.), Communities in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge, pp. 134–163.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
(1992) Communities of practice: Where language, gender, and power all live. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, and B. Moonwomon (eds.), Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: Women and Language Group, pp. 89–99.
(2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing. BoP
Fayard, Anne-Laure, and Gerardine DeSanctis
(2005) Evolution of an online forum for knowledge management professionals: A language game analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10.4: article 2. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/fayard.html.
(1990) Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14.2: 219–236. BoP
(2011) "On for drinkies?": Email cues of participant alignments. LanguageInternet, 8, article 4. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2011/Georgakopoulou.
(ed.) (1967) Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
(2005) The interaction of generic structure and interpersonal relations in two-party e- chat discourse. LanguageInternet, 2: article 3. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2005/188.
Graham, Sage L.
(2007) Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer- mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39.4: 742–759. BoP
(2008) A manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in electronic communities of practice. In D. Bousfield, and M.A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 281–304.
Grice, H. Paul
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3 Speech Acts). New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.
Halliday, Michael A.K.
(1978) Language as a social semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
(2010) Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research 6: 215–242. BoP
(2000) Maintaining the virtual community: Use of politeness strategies in an e-mail discussion group. In L. Pemperton, and S. Shurville (eds.), Words on the Web: Computer Mediated Communication. Exeter, UK: Intellect, pp. 69–78.
(2010) When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 7–31. BoP
Herring, Susan C.
(1993) Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication 3: 1–17. Retrieved August 22, 2012, from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/003/2/00328.HTML.
(1994) Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In M. Bucholtz, A.C. Liang, L.A. Sutton, and C. Hines (eds.), Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group, pp. 278–294.
(2000) Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Journal 18.1: Retrieved August 22, 2012, from http://cpsr.org/issues/womenintech/herring/.
(2007) A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. LanguageInternet, 4: article 1. Retrieved September 08, 2010, from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761.
Hongladarom, Krisadawan, and Soraj Hongladarom
Hübler, Mike T., and Diana C. Bell
(1974) Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP
Jones, Graham, and Bambi B. Schieffelin
(2009) Talking text and talking back: "My bff Jill?" from boob tube to YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communiction 14.4: Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01481.x/pdf.
Jones, Graham, Bambi B. Schieffelin, and Rachel Smith
Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen
(1997) Varieties of rudeness. Functions of Language 4: 251–287. BoP
Kiesler, Sara, Jane Siegel, and Timothy McGuire
Kollock, Peter, and Mark A. Smith
Korenman, Joan, and Nancy Wyatt
(2010) The pragmatics of peer advice in a LiveJournal community. LanguageInternet 7: article 1. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2464.
Lachenicht, Lance G.
Lakoff, Robin T.
(1973) The logic of politeness, or minding your p’s and q’s. Chicago Linguistics Society 9: 292–305. BoP
Langlotz, Andreas, and Miriam A. Locher
(2012) Ways of communicating emotional stance in online disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics 44.12: 1591–1606. BoP
Lee, Carmen K.M.
Leech, Geoffrey N.
(1983) Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman. BoP
Locher, Miriam A.
(2006) Polite behavior within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua 25.3: 249–267. BoP
(2008) Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In G. Antos, E. Ventola, and T. Weber (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (Vol. 6 Handbooks of Applied Linguistics). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 509–540.
(2011) Situated impoliteness: The interface between relational work and identity construction. In B. Davies, M. Haugh, and A.J. Merrison (eds.), Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, pp. 187–208.
Locher, Miriam A., and Brook Bolander
(2014) Relational work and the display of multilingualism in two Facebook groups. In K. Bedijs, C. Maaß, and G. Held (eds.), Facework & Social Media. Münster: Lit- Verlag, pp. 157-191.
Locher, Miriam A., and Sage L. Graham
Locher, Miriam A., and Sebastian Hoffmann
(2006) The emergence of the identity of a fictional expert advice-giver in an American Internet advice column. Text and Talk 26: 67–104. BoP
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
(2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 9–33. BoP
(2008) Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In D. Bousfield, and M.A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 77–99. BoP
Luchjenbroers, June, and Michelle Aldridge-Waddon
(2011) Paedophiles and politeness in email communications: Community of practice needs that define face-threat. Journal of Politeness Research 7: 21–42. BoP
(2005) Face in Cyberspace: Facework, (Im)politeness and Conflict in English Discussion Groups. Växjö: Växjö University Press.
(2002) Language and identity. In J.K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, and N. Schilling- Estes (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford, England: Blackwell, pp. 475–499.
(2013) Impoliteness in Cyberspace: Personally Abusive Reader Responses in Online News Media. Ph.D. thesis, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Available at: http://opac.nebis.ch/ediss/20131752.pdf.
(2010) Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online communities. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 33–55. BoP
(2010) Politeness in East Asia. In M.A. Locher, and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 71–100.
(2011) Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. London: Routledge.
(ed.) (2011) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge.
(2008) The concept of 'identity formation' within online professional learning communities. In M. Solly (ed.), Verbal/visual Narrative Texts in Higher Education. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 203–228.
(1999) Hierarchy and power: Social control in cyberspace. In M. Smith, and P. Kollock (eds.), Communities in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge, pp. 107–133.
(1993) The Virtual Community. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
(1994) Approaches to Discourse. Malden: Blackwell. BoP
Schneider, Klaus Peter, and Anne Barron
(2008) Where pragmatics and dialectology meet: Introducing variational pragmatics. In K.P. Schneider, and A. Barron (eds.), Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–32. BoP
(2010) Linguistic politeness: Laying the foundations. In M.A. Locher, and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 17–41.
Simmons, Thomas L.
(1994) Politeness Theory in Computer-Mediated Communication: Face-threatening Acts in a "Faceless" Medium (Unpublished master’s thesis, Ashton University, Birmingham, England 1994) Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED381005.
Smith, Christine B., Margaret L. McLaughlin, and Kerry K. Osborne
(1997) Conduct control on Usenet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2.4: 1–11. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue4/smith.html.
(2005) (Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1.1: 95–119. BoP
(2007a) Identity, face and (im)politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 39.4: 635–638. BoP
(2007b) Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39.4: 639–656. BoP
(2008) Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. LanguageInternet 5: article 5. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1537.
Stommel, Wyke, and Tom Koole
(2010) The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies 12: 357–378. BoP
Sweetser, Eve E.
Tannen, Deborah, and Anna Marie Trester
(2013) Discourse 2.0. Language and New Media. Georgetown University Press: Georgetown.
Thurlow, Crispin, and Kristine Mroczek
(1995) Life on the screen. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Upadhyay, Shiv R.
(2010) Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 105–127. BoP
(1999) Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold. BoP
Walther, Joseph B.
Watts, Richard J.
(2010) Linguistic politeness theory and its aftermath: Recent research trails. In M.A. Locher, and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics (Vol. 6 Handbooks of Pragmatics). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 43–70.
Watzlawick, Paul, Janet H. Beavin, and Don D. Jackson
(1967) Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. New York: Norton. BoP
(2011) Missed cues: How disputes can socialize virtual newcomers. LanguageInternet 8: article 5. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2011/Weber.
(2011) Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
(2012) Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.
Cited by other publications
No author info given
Eslami, Zohreh R., Nasser Jabbari & Li-Jen Kuo
Feng, Wenjing & Xinren Chen
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar & Maria Sifianou
Graham, Sage L. & Claire Hardaker
Haugh, Michael & Dániel Z. Kádár
Jin, Yingzhe & Xinren Chen
Koteyko, Nelya & Daniel Hunt
Li, Cheng-Tuan & Yong-Ping Ran
Rieger, Caroline L.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.