Preferred Argument Structure

Grammar as architecture for function

Editors
John W. Du Bois | University of California
Lorraine E. Kumpf | California State University
William J. Ashby | University of California
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027226242 (Eur) | EUR 130.00
ISBN 9781588113696 (USA) | USD 195.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027296139 | EUR 130.00 | USD 195.00
 
Preferred Argument Structure offers a profound insight into the relationship between language use and grammatical structure. In his original publication on Preferred Argument Structure, Du Bois (1987) demonstrated the power of this perspective by using it to explain the origins of ergativity and ergative marking systems. Since this work, the general applicability of Preferred Argument Structure has been demonstrated in studies of language after language. In this collection, the authors move beyond verifying Preferred Argument Structure as a property of a given language. They use the methodology to reveal more subtle aspects of the patterns, for example, to look across languages, diachronically or synchronically, to examine particular grammatical relations, and to examine special populations or particular genres. This volume will appeal to linguists interested in the relationship of pragmatics and grammar generally, in the typology of grammatical relations, and in explanations derived from data- and corpus-based approaches to analysis.
[Studies in Discourse and Grammar, 14]  2003.  ix, 458 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“This volume is an important contribution to the field of discourse-grammar interaction because it adopts a crosslinguistic approach that neglects neither the (potential) universals nor the language-particular differences. [...], it teaches us a lot about how grammar-relevant discourse tendencies can be studied. Those who want to understand the discourse basis of grammar will want to take this line of research as one of their starting points.”
Cited by

Cited by 21 other publications

Ariel, Mira
2009. Discourse, grammar, discourse. Discourse Studies 11:1  pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Ariel, Mira, Elitzur Dattner, John W. Du Bois & Tal Linzen
2015. Pronominal datives. Studies in Language 39:2  pp. 257 ff. Crossref logo
García-Miguel, José M.
2015. Variable coding and object alignment in Spanish: A corpus-based approach. Folia Linguistica 49:1 Crossref logo
Green, Clarence
2015. An analysis of the relationship between cohesion and clause combination in English discourse employing NLP and data mining approaches. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 30:3  pp. 326 ff. Crossref logo
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2020.  In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128],  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Hyams, Nina
2011.  In Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 41],  pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo
Hörberg, Thomas & T. Florian Jaeger
2021. A Rational Model of Incremental Argument Interpretation: The Comprehension of Swedish Transitive Clauses. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Jiang, Xiangyu & Liang Chen
2019. Preferred argument structure in the narratives of Chinese-English bilinguals and their monolingual peers. International Journal of Bilingualism 23:5  pp. 873 ff. Crossref logo
Khanina, Olesya & Andrey Shluinsky
2020. Competing ditransitive constructions in Enets. Functions of Language 27:3  pp. 247 ff. Crossref logo
Kurumada, Chigusa & Inbal Arnon
2014.  In Language in Interaction [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 12],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Levshina, Natalia
2021. Communicative efficiency and differential case marking: a reverse-engineering approach. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s3 Crossref logo
Levshina, Natalia
2022. Corpus-based typology: applications, challenges and some solutions. Linguistic Typology 26:1  pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo
Malyuga, Elena N., Alex Krouglov & Maria V. Ivanova
2020.  In Functional Approach to Professional Discourse Exploration in Linguistics,  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Maschler, Yael
2015.  In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27],  pp. 201 ff. Crossref logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], Crossref logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28],  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
SHIBASAKI, REIJIROU
2006. THE EVOLUTION OF PREFERRED ARGUMENT STRUCTURE IN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 23:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Tersis, Nicole & Shirley Carter‐Thomas
2005. Integrating Syntax and Pragmatics: Word Order and Transitivity Variations in Tunumiisut. International Journal of American Linguistics 71:4  pp. 445 ff. Crossref logo
Torre, Enrico
2011. Grounding Meaning in Everyday Experience in the World: An Embodied Construction Grammar Analysis of Italian Caused-Motion Constructions. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Vihman, Virve-Anneli & Diane Nelson
2019. Effects of Animacy in Grammar and Cognition: Introduction to Special Issue. Open Linguistics 5:1  pp. 260 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Luming, Matthias Schlesewsky, Balthasar Bickel & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2009. Exploring the nature of the ‘subject’-preference: Evidence from the online comprehension of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes 24:7-8  pp. 1180 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 september 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2002033024 | Marc record