Preferred Argument Structure

Grammar as architecture for function

Editors
| University of California
| California State University
| University of California
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027226242 (Eur) | EUR 130.00
ISBN 9781588113696 (USA) | USD 195.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027296139 | EUR 130.00 | USD 195.00
 
Preferred Argument Structure offers a profound insight into the relationship between language use and grammatical structure. In his original publication on Preferred Argument Structure, Du Bois (1987) demonstrated the power of this perspective by using it to explain the origins of ergativity and ergative marking systems. Since this work, the general applicability of Preferred Argument Structure has been demonstrated in studies of language after language. In this collection, the authors move beyond verifying Preferred Argument Structure as a property of a given language. They use the methodology to reveal more subtle aspects of the patterns, for example, to look across languages, diachronically or synchronically, to examine particular grammatical relations, and to examine special populations or particular genres. This volume will appeal to linguists interested in the relationship of pragmatics and grammar generally, in the typology of grammatical relations, and in explanations derived from data- and corpus-based approaches to analysis.
[Studies in Discourse and Grammar, 14]  2003.  ix, 458 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Preface
vii
Abbreviations
ix
Introduction
John W. Du Bois, Lorraine E. Kumpf and William J. Ashby
1–10
Argument structure: Grammar in use
John W. Du Bois
11–60
Preferred Argument Structure across time and space: A comparative diachronic analysis of French and Spanish
William J. Ashby and Paola Bentivoglio
61–80
The lexicon in interaction: Developmental origins of Preferred Argument Structure in Korean
Patricia M. Clancy
81–108
Genre and Preferred Argument Structure: Sources of argument structure in classroom discourse
Lorraine E. Kumpf
109–130
Issues in the comparative argument structure analysis in Mayan narratives
Nora C. England and Laura Martin
131–157
New light on information pressure: Information conduits, “escape valves”, and role alignment stretching
Mark Durie
159–196
Beyond Preferred Argument Structure: Sentences, pronouns, and given referents in Nepali
Carol Genetti and Laura D. Crain
197–223
Multiple constraints on reference form: Null, pronominal, and full reference in Mapudungun
Jennifer E. Arnold
225–245
Argument splits in Finnish grammar and discourse
Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
247–272
Core arguments and the inversion of the nominal hierarchy in Roviana
Simon H. Corston-Oliver
273–300
Preferred Argument Structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data
Shanley E.M. Allen and Heike Schröder
301–338
The role of Preferred Argument Structure for understanding aphasic sentence planning
Susan E. Kohn and Ana Cragnolino
339–351
Nominal information flow in the talk of two boys with autism
Elizabeth G. Weber
353–383
Tracking the deer: Nominal reference, parallelism and Preferred Argument Structure in Itzaj Maya narrative genres
Charles Andrew Hofling
385–410
Narrator virtuosity and the strategic exploitation of Preferred Argument Structure in Mocho: Repetition and constructed speech in Mocho narrative
Laura Martin
411–435
Preferred Argument Structure Bibliography
437–445
Name index
447–448
Language index
449–450
Subject index
451–458
“This volume is an important contribution to the field of discourse-grammar interaction because it adopts a crosslinguistic approach that neglects neither the (potential) universals nor the language-particular differences. [...], it teaches us a lot about how grammar-relevant discourse tendencies can be studied. Those who want to understand the discourse basis of grammar will want to take this line of research as one of their starting points.”
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Ariel, Mira, Elitzur Dattner, John W. Du Bois & Tal Linzen
2015. Pronominal datives. Studies in Language 39:2  pp. 257 ff. Crossref logo
García-Miguel, José M.
2015. Variable coding and object alignment in Spanish: A corpus-based approach. Folia Linguistica 49:1 Crossref logo
Green, Clarence
2015. An analysis of the relationship between cohesion and clause combination in English discourse employing NLP and data mining approaches. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 30:3  pp. 326 ff. Crossref logo
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2020.  In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128],  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Hyams, Nina
2011.  In Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 41],  pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo
Jiang, Xiangyu & Liang Chen
2019. Preferred argument structure in the narratives of Chinese-English bilinguals and their monolingual peers. International Journal of Bilingualism 23:5  pp. 873 ff. Crossref logo
Khanina, Olesya & Andrey Shluinsky
2020. Competing ditransitive constructions in Enets. Functions of Language Crossref logo
Kurumada, Chigusa & Inbal Arnon
2014.  In Language in Interaction [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 12],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Malyuga, Elena N., Alex Krouglov & Maria V. Ivanova
2020.  In Functional Approach to Professional Discourse Exploration in Linguistics,  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Maschler, Yael
2015.  In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27],  pp. 201 ff. Crossref logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021.  In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], Crossref logo
SHIBASAKI, REIJIROU
2006. THE EVOLUTION OF PREFERRED ARGUMENT STRUCTURE IN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 23:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Tersis, Nicole & Shirley Carter‐Thomas
2005. Integrating Syntax and Pragmatics: Word Order and Transitivity Variations in Tunumiisut. International Journal of American Linguistics 71:4  pp. 445 ff. Crossref logo
Torre, Enrico
2011. Grounding Meaning in Everyday Experience in the World: An Embodied Construction Grammar Analysis of Italian Caused-Motion Constructions. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Wang, Luming, Matthias Schlesewsky, Balthasar Bickel & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2009. Exploring the nature of the ‘subject’-preference: Evidence from the online comprehension of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes 24:7-8  pp. 1180 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2002033024 | Marc record