OKAY across Languages

Adegbija, Efurosibina, and Janet Bello

2001 “The Semantics of ‘Okay’ (OK) in Nigerian English.” World Englishes 20 (1): 89–98.

Ainsworth-Vaughn, Nancy

1992 “Topic Transitions in Physician-Patient Interviews: Power, Gender, and Discourse Change.” Language in Society 21: 409–426.

Al-Khalil, Talal

2005 “Discourse Markers in Syrian Arabic: A Study of Halla’, Ya’ni, Tayyeb, and Lakan .” PhD diss., Essex University, Essex, UK.

Al Makoshi, Manal A.

2014 “Discourse Markers and Code-Switching: Academic Medical Lectures in Saudi Arabia Using English as the Medium of Instruction.” PhD diss., Department of English Language and Applied Linguistics, University of Birmingham.

Anderson, Richard J., John A. Hughes, and Wes W. Sharrock

1989 Working for Profit: The Social Organisation of Calculation in an Entrepreneurial Firm. Aldershot: Avebury.

Antaki, Charles, Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, and Mark Rapley

2000 “ ‘Brilliant. Next Question…’: High-Grade Assessment Sequences in the Completion of Interactional Units.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33 (3): 235–262.

Antaki, Charles, and Alexandra Kent

2012 “Telling People What to Do (and, Sometimes, Why): Contingency, Entitlement and Explanation in Staff Requests to Adults with Intellectual Impairments.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (6–7): 876–889.

Argyle, Michael, and Mark Cook

1976 Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Arminen, Ilkka

2006 “Social Functions of Location in Mobile Telephony.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 1 (5): 319–323.

2010 “On Comparative Methodology in Studies of Social Interaction.” In Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso and Jan Lindström, 48–69. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.

Atkinson, J. Maxwell

1984 “Public Speaking and Audience Responses: Some Techniques for Inviting Applause.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage

1984 “Aspects of Response.” Introduction to the section. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 297–298. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Auer, Peter

1990 “Rhythm in Telephone Closings.” Human Studies 13 (4): 361–392.

Auer, Peter, and Yael Maschler

(eds) 2016 NU/NÅ: A Family of Discourse Markers Across the Languages of Europe and Beyond. Berlin: De Gryuter.

Ayash, Maha Ghaleb

2016 Pragmaticalization of Discourse Markers in Lebanese Conversational Arabic. Master’s thesis, American University of Beirut.

Baker, Carolyn, Michael Emmison, and Alan Firth

(eds) 2005 Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bangerter, Adrian, and Herbert H. Clark

2003 “Navigating Joint Projects with Dialogue.” Cognitive Science 27 (2): 195–223.

Bangerter, Adrian, Herbert H. Clark, and Anna R. Katz

2004 “Navigating Joint Projects in Telephone Conversations.” Discourse Processes 37 (1): 1–23.

Bańko, Mirosław

2008, January 4. “Re: Chwila! [Little Moment!]” (Online discussion group). Accessed May 7, 2019. https://sjp.pwn.pl/poradnia/haslo/Chwila;8820.html

Barske, Tobias

2006 “Co-Constructing Social Roles in German Business Meetings: A Conversation Analytic Study.” PhD diss., German Applied Linguistics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

2009 “Same Token, Different Actions: A Conversation Analytic Study of Social Roles, Embodied Actions, and ok in German Business Meetings.” Special issue, Journal for Business Communication 46 (1): 120–149.

Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar

2002 “Weil die Hälfte eben erst die Hälfte ist – zur prosodischen Gestaltung als Projektionsmittel bei konzessiven Konstruktionen im Englischen [Because half is simply only half – prosodic make-up as means of projecting in concessive constructions in English].” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 37: 77–105.

2009 “Contrasting and Turn Transition: Prosodic Projection with Parallel-Opposition Constructions.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (11): 2271–2294.

2011a “Double Sayings of German JA – More Observations on Their Prosodic-Phonetic Make-up and Alignment Function.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (2): 157–185.

2011b “Response Tokens in Interaction – Prosody, Phonetics and a Visual Aspect of German JAJA .” Gesprächsforschung 12: 301–370.

Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Arnulf Deppermann

2020 “Konstruktionsgrammatik und Prosodie: OH in englischer Alltagsinteraktion [Construction Grammar and prosody: OH in English everyday interaction].” In Prosodie und Konstruktionsgrammatik, ed. by Wolfgang Imo, and Jens Lanwer, 35–73. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Bateson, Gregory, and Margaret Mead

1951 Bathing Babies in Three Cultures. New Guinea. Film.

Bauman, Richard

1975 “Verbal Art as Performance.” American Anthropologist 77 (2): 290–311.

Bavelas, Janet Beavin, Linda Coates, and Trudy Johnson

2002 “Listener Responses as a Collaborative Process: The Role of Gaze.” Journal of Communication 52 (3): 566–580.

Beach, Wayne A.

1990a “Language as and in Technology: Facilitating Topic Organization in a Videotex Focus Group Meeting.” In Communication and the Culture of Technology, ed. by Martin J. Medhurst, Alberto Gonzalez, and Tarla Ray Peterson, 197–220. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Press.

1990b “Orienting to the Phenomenon.” In Communication Yearbook 13, ed. by James A. Anderson, 216–244. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

1993 “Transitional Regularities for ’Casual’ ”Okay” Usages.” Journal of Pragmatics 19 (4): 325–352.

1995a “Conversation Analysis: ‘Okay’ as a Clue for Understanding Consequentiality.” In The Consequentiality of Communication, ed. by Stuart J. Sigman, 121–161. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

1995b “Preserving and Constraining Options: ”Okays” and ’Official’ Priorities in Medical Interviews.” In The Talk of the Clinic: Explorations in the Analysis of Medical and Therapeutic Discourse, ed. by G. H. Morris, and Ronald J. Chenail, 259–289. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

2020 “Using prosodically marked ‘Okays’ to display epistemic stances and incongruous actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 169: 15–164.

Benjamin, Trevor

2013 “Signaling Trouble: On the Linguistic Design of Other-Initiation of Repair in English Conversation.” PhD diss., University of Groningen.

Best, Katie, and Jon Hindmarsh

2019 “Embodied Spatial Practices and Everyday Organization: The Work of Tour Guides and Their Audiences.” Human Relations 72 (2): 248–271.

Betz, Emma

2015 “Recipient Design in Reference Choice: Negotiating Knowledge, Access, and Sequential Trajectories.” Gesprächsforschung 16: 137–173.

Betz, Emma, and Andrea Golato

2008 “Remembering Relevant Information and Withholding Relevant Next Actions: The German Token Achja .” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 58–98.

Betz, Emma, Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Veronika Drake, and Andrea Golato

2013 “Third-Position Repeats in German: The Case of Repair- and Request-for-Information Sequences.” Gesprächsforschung 14: 133–166.

Bertils, Klara

2016 “Amning, kunskap och självbestämmande: Språkliga och interaktionella perspektiv på amningsrådgivning [Breastfeeding, Knowledge and Empowerment: A Conversation Analytic Study of a Breastfeeding Helpline].” Master’s thesis, Department of Scandinavian Languages, Uppsala University. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:935650/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie, and Martin Haspelmath

2008 “The Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses.” https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php

Birkner, Karin

2001 Bewerbungsgespräche mit Ost- und Westdeutschen: Eine kommunikative Gattung in Zeiten gesellschaftlichen Wandels [Job interviews with East and West Germans: A communicative genre in times of societal change]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper

(eds) 1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Elite Olshtain

1984 “Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP).” Applied Linguistics 5 (3): 196–213.

Boas, Franz

1889 “On Alternating Sounds.” American Anthropologist 2 (1): 47–54.

Boden, Deidre

1994 The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink

2018 “Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program].” http://www.praat.org/

Bolden, Galina B.

2006 “Little Words that Matter: Discourse Markers ’So’ and ’Oh’ and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Communication 56 (4): 661–688.

Bolden, Galina B.

2008 “’So What’s Up?’: Using the Discourse Marker So to Launch Conversational Business.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (3): 302–337.

2009 “Implementing Incipient Actions: The Discourse Marker ‘So’ in English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5): 974–998.

2017 “Opening up Closings in Russian.” In Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage, 231–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bolinger, Dwight Le Merton

1957 Interrogative Structures of American English: The Direct Question. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.

Bowker, David

2012 “ Okay? Yeah? Right?: Negotiating Understanding and Agreement in Master’s Supervision Meetings with International Students.” PhD diss., Stirling School of Education, University of Stirling.

Broderick, Julie E., and John P. Broderick

2003 “Okay as a Discourse Marker in the Speech of Bilingual Elementary School Teachers in New York City.” In Actas I del VIII Simposio Internacionale de Comunicación Social. Santiago, Chile: Centro de Linguistica Applicada.

Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson

1978 Politeness: Some Universals of Language Use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bruxelles, Sylvie, Luca Greco, and Lorenza Mondada

2009 “Pratiques de transition: ressources multimodales pour la structuration de l’activité [Practices of transition: multimodal resources for structuring the activity].” In Méthodologies d’analyse de situations coopératives de conception: Corpus Mosaic, ed. by Françoise Détienne, and Véronique Traverso, 221–302. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.

Button, Graham

1987 “Moving out of Closings.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 101–151. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

1990 “On Varieties of Closings.” In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 93–148. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

Cassidy, Frederic G.

1981 “OK–is it African?” American Speech 56 (4): 269–273.

Cekaite, Asta

2007 “A Child’s Development of Interactional Competence in a Swedish L2 Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 91 (1): 45–62.

Chaudron, Craig, and Jack C. Richards

1986 “The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Comprehension of Lectures.” Applied Linguistics 7 (2): 113–127.

Clark, Herbert H.

1996 Using Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, Herbert H., and Susan E. Brennan

1991 “Grounding in Communication.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley, 222–233. Washington, DC: APA.

Clark White, Anne Elizabeth

2020 “Authority and Camaraderie: The Delivery of Directives Amongst the Ice Floes.” Language in Society 49 (2): 207–230.

Clayman, Steven E., Marc N. Elliott, John Heritage, and Laurie L. McDonald

2006 “Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents, 1953–2000.” Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36 (4): 561–583.

Clift, Rebecca

2016 Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Comrie, Bernard

1989 Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Condon, Sharon L.

1986 “The Discourse Functions of OK.” Semiotica 60 (1–2): 73–101.

2001 “Discourse Ok Revisited: Default Organization in Verbal Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (4): 491–513.

Condon, Sharon L., and Claude G. Cech

2007 “OK, Next One: Discourse Markers of Common Ground.” In Lexical Markers of Common Ground, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Kerstin Fischer, 17–45. New York: Elsevier.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth

2001 “Interactional Prosody: High Onsets in Reason-for-the-Call Turns.” Language in Society 30 (1): 29–53.

2004a “Prosodische Stilisierungen im Gespräch [Prosodic stylizations in conversation].” In Zwischen Literatur und Anthropologie: Diskurse, Medien, Performanzen, ed. by Aleida Assmann, Ulrich Gaier, and Gisela Trommsdorff, 315–337. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

2004b “Prosody and Sequence Organization in English Conversation: The Case of New Beginnings.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic Studies from Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford, 335–376. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2009 “A Sequential Approach to Affect: The Case of ‘Disappointment’.” In Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 94–123. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.

2012a “Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2012b “Some Truths and Untruths about Final Intonation in Conversational Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 123–45. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2014 “Prosody as Dialogic Interaction.” In Prosodie und Phonetik in der Interaktion. Prosody and Phonetics in Interaction, ed. by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, and Beatrice Szczepek Reed, 221–251. Radolfzell: Verlag Gesprächsforschung.

2019a “American English OKAY Over Time: Challenge and Chance for Interactional Linguistics.” Paper presented at the 9th annual meeting of the Language and Social Interaction Working Group (LANSI), New York.

2019b “Comparing Language Use in Social Interaction.” In Studies in Comparative Pragmatics, ed. by Hartmut E. H. Lenk, Juhani Härmä, Begoña Sanromán Vilas, and Elina Suomela-Härmä, 3–18. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Marja Etelämäki

2015 “Nominated Actions and Their Targeted Agents in Finnish Conversational Directives.” Journal of Pragmatics 78: 7–24.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting

2018 Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson

2000 “Concessive Patterns in Conversation.” In Cause, Condition, Concession, and Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Bernd Kortmann, 381–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter

2010 “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 419–442.

Croft, William

2003 Typology and Universals, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cruttenden, Alan

1997 Intonation, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew

2008 “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153.

Davidson, Judy

1984 “Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 102–128. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

1990 “Modifications of Invitations, Offers, and Rejections.” In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 149–179. Lanham: University Press of America.

DeCarlo, Doug, Matthew Stone, Corey Revilla, and Jennifer J. Venditti

2004 “Specifying and Animating Facial Signals for Discourse in Embodied Conversational Agents.” Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 15 (1): 27–38.

Del Corona, Marcia, and Ana Cristina Ostermann

2012 “Formulação de lugar, intersubjetividade e categorias de pertença em chamadas de emergência para o 190 [Place formulation, intersubjectivity, and membership categorization in calls to a Brazilian police emergency service helpline].” Veredas 16 (1): 112–119.

Den Danske Ordbog (DDO) [The Danish Dictionary]

n.d. s.v. okay. Accessed June 16, 2018. https://ordnet.dk/ddo/ordbog?query=okay

Deppermann, Arnulf

2001 Gespräche analysieren [Analyzing Conversations]. Wiesbaden: VS.

2015 “Retrospection and Understanding in Interaction.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 57–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Deppermann, Arnulf, and Elwys De Stefani

2019 “Defining in Talk-in-Interaction: Recipient-Design through Negative Definitional Components.” Journal of Pragmatics 140: 140–155.

Deppermann, Arnulf, and Henrike Helmer

2013 “Zur Grammatik des Verstehens im Gespräch: Inferenzen anzeigen und Handlungskonsequenzen ziehen mit also und dann [On the grammar of understanding in conversation: Displaying inferences and formulating next actions with the connectives also and dann ].” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 32 (1): 1–40.

Deppermann, Arnulf, and Jürgen Streeck

2018 “The Body in Interaction: Its Multiple Modalities and Temporalities.” In Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Jürgen Streeck, 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Deppermann, Arnulf, Reinhold Schmitt, and Lorenza Mondada

2010 “Agenda and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1700–1718.

De Stefani, Elwys

2011 ‘Ah petta ecco, io prendo questi che mi piacciono’. Agire come coppia al supermercato: Un approccio conversazionale e multimodale allo studio dei processi decisionali [‘Oh wait, I take these coz I like them’. Doing being a couple in supermarkets: A conversational and multimodal approach to the study of decision making]. Rome: Aracne.

2013 “The Collaborative Organisation of Next Actions in a Semiotically Rich Environment: Shopping as a Couple.” In Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion, ed. by. Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 123–151. Berlin: De Gruyter.

2018 “Institutional Invitations to a Meeting: Cold Calls to Bank Clients.” Journal of Pragmatics 125: 180–199.

De Stefani, Elwys, and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher

2018 “Mundane Talk at Work: Multiactivity in Interactions between Professionals and Their Clientele.” Discourse Studies 20 (2): 221–245.

De Stefani, Elwys, and Lorenza Mondada

2017 “Who’s the Expert? Negotiating Competence and Authority in Guided Tours.” In Identity Struggles: Evidence from Workplaces Around the World, ed. by Dorien Van De Mieroop, and Stephanie Schnurr, 95–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

DeSouza, Darcey K., Emma Betz, Mary Clinkenbeard, Emi Morita, Natasha Shrikant, and William A. Tuccio

2021 “Taking a detour before answering the question: Turn-initial okay in second position in English interaction.” Language & Communication 76, 47–57.

Dingemanse, Mark, Joe Blythe, and Tyko Dirksmeyer

2018 “Formats for Other-Initiation of Repair Across Languages: An Exercise in Pragmatic Typology.” Linguistic Typology: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, vol. 4, ed. by Irina Nikolaeva, 322–357. London: Routledge.

Dingemanse, Mark, Seán G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Rosa S. Gisladottir, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, and N. J. Enfield

2015 “Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems.” PLOS ONE 10 (9): e0136100.

Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira, and Nick J. Enfield

2013 “Is ‘Huh?’ a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items.” PLoS One 8 (11): e78273.

Dittmann, Allen T., and Lynn G. Llewellyn

1968 “Relationship between Vocalizations and Head Nods as Listener Responses.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 (1): 79–84.

Drew, Paul

1997 “ ‘Open’ Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28 (1): 69–101.

2003 “Comparative Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction in Different Institutional Settings: A Sketch.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper, ed. by Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, and Jenny Mandelbaum, 293–308. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

2012 “What Drives Sequences?” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 61–68.

2013 “Turn Design.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 131–149. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen

2014a “Requesting – from Speech Act to Recruitment.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(eds) 2014b Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Drew, Paul, and John Heritage

1992 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Dudenredaktion

(ed.) 1954 Duden Rechtschreibung mit Berücksichtigung der häufigsten Fremdwörter [Duden Spelling (Dictionary), Reflecting the most Frequent Foreign Words]. 14th ed., first Duden West (Germany) edition. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut AG.

Duranti, Alessandro

1988 “Intentions, Language, and Social Action in a Samoan Context.” Journal of Pragmatics 12 (1): 13–33.

1997 Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Efron, David

1941 Gesture and Environment. New York: King’s Crown Press.

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenäus

1979 “Human Ethology: Concepts and Implications for the Sciences of Man.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1): 1–57.

Ekberg, Katie, Joanne McDermott, Claire Moynihan, Lucy Brindle, Paul Little, and Geraldine M. Leydon

2014 “The Role of Helplines in Cancer Care: Intertwining Emotional Support with Information or Advice-Seeking Needs.” Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 32 (3): 359–381.

Enfield, N. J.

2011 “Sources of Asymmetry in Human Interaction: Enchrony, Status, Knowledge and Agency.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 285–312. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Enfield, N. J., and Tanya Stivers

(eds) 2007 Person Reference in Interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Enfield, N. J., Tanya Stivers, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Katariina Harjunpää, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann et al.

2018 “Polar answers.” Journal of Linguistics 55 (2): 277–304.

Enfield, N. J., Tanya Stivers, Stephen C. Levinson

2010 “Question–Response Sequences in Conversation Across Ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2615–2619.

Ervin-Tripp, Susan

1976 “ ‘Is Sybil There?’ The Structure of Some American English Directives.” Language in Society 5 (1): 25–67.

European Union (EU)

2016 “Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).” Accessed June 17, 2018. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng

Fagan, Drew S.

2012 “ Okay as a Multifunctional Resource for Giving Feedback in Classrooms.” Language & Information Society 16: 9–41.

Filipi, Anna, and Roger Wales

2003 “Differential Uses of Okay, Right, and Alright, and Their Function in Signaling Perspective Shift or Maintenance in a Map Task.” Semiotica 147: 429–455.

Fischer, Kerstin

2006 “Frames, Constructions and Invariant Meanings. The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Particles.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 427–447. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Flores-Ferrán, Nydia

2014 “So pues entonces: An Examination of Bilingual Discourse Markers in Spanish Oral Narratives of Personal Experience of New York City-Born Puerto Ricans.” Sociolinguistic Studies 8 (1): 57–83.

Floyd, Simeon, Giovanni Rossi, and N. J. Enfield

2020 Getting Others to Do Things: A Pragmatic Typology of Recruitments. Berlin: Language Sciences Press.

Ford, Cecilia E.

2008 Women Speaking Up: Getting and Using Turns in Workplace Meetings. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ford, Cecilia E., and Barbara Fox

2010 “Multiple Practices for Constructing Laughables.” In Prosody in Interaction, ed. by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, and Margret Selting, 339–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra A. Thompson

1996 “Interactional Units in Conversation. Syntactic, Interactional, and Pragmatic Resources for the Management of Turns.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 134–184. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Forsberg, Julia, and Åsa Abelin

2018 “Intonation and Levels of Agreement in Interactions between Swedish Adolescents.” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody, 55–59. Poznań, Poland.

Fox, Barbara

2014 “On the Notion of Pre-Request.” Discourse Studies 17 (1): 41–63.

Fox, Barbara, Makoto Hayashi, and Robert Jasperson

1996 “Resources and Repair: A Cross-Linguistic Study of the Syntactic Organization of Repair.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 185–237. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Fox, Barbara, and Sandra A. Thompson

2010 “Responses to Wh-Questions in English Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (2): 133–156.

Fox, Barbara, Fay Wouk, Makoto Hayashi, Steven Fincke, Liang Tao, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Minna Laakso, and Wilfridio Flores Hernandez

2009 “A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of the Site of Initiation in Same-Turn Self-Repair.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 60–103. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Frake, Charles O.

1964 “How to Ask for a Drink in Subanun.” American Anthropologist 66 (6, pt. 2): 127–132.

Fung, Loretta, and Ronald Carter

2007 “Discourse Markers and Spoken English: Native and Learner Use in Pedagogic Settings.” Applied Linguistics 28 (3): 185–208.

Gaines, Philip

2011 “The Multifunctionality of Discourse Operator Okay: Evidence from a Police Interview.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3291–3315.

Gardner, Rod

1997 “The Listener and Minimal Responses in Conversational Interaction.” Prospect 12 (2): 12–32.

1998 “Between Speaking and Listening: The Vocalisation of Understandings.” Applied Linguistics 19 (2): 204–24.

2001 “When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance.” Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2007 “The Right Connections: Acknowledging Epistemic Progression in Talk.” Language in Society 36 (3): 319–341.

Garfinkel, Harold

2002 Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Goffman, Erving

1974 Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.

[1976] 1981 “Replies and Responses.” In Forms of Talk, by Erving Goffman, 5–77. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Citations refer to the University of Pennsylvania version. Previously published in Language in Society 5 (3): 257–313 1976.

Golato, Andrea

2010 “Marking Understanding Versus Receipting Information in Talk: Achso. and Ach in German Interaction.” Discourse Studies 12 (2): 147–176.

2012 “Impersonal Quotatives and Hypothetical Discourse.” In Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 3–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Golato, Andrea, and Emma Betz

2008 “German Ach and Achso in Repair Uptake: Resources to Sustain or Remove Epistemic Asymmetry.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27 (1): 7–37.

Golato, Andrea, and Zsuzsanna Fagyal

2008 “Comparing Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Token Ja and the Role of Prosody: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (3): 241–270.

Goodwin, Charles

1980 “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning.” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 272–302.

1981 Conversational Organization. New York: Academic.

1986 “Between and Within: Alternative Sequential Treatments of Continuers and Assessments.” Human Studies 9 (2–3): 205–217.

2000 “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1489–1522.

2017 Co-operative Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, Marjorie H.

1990 He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

2006 “Participation, Affect, and Trajectory in Family Directive/Response Sequences.” Text & Talk 26 (4–5): 515–543.

Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin

1986 “Gesture and Coparticipation in the Activity of Searching for a Word.” Semiotica 62 (1–2): 51–75.

Gravano, Agustín, Štefan Beňuš, Julia Hirschberg, Shira Mitchell, and Ilia Vovsha

2007 “Classification of Discourse Functions of Affirmative Words in Spoken Dialogue.” In Proceedings of Interspeech 2007, 1613–1616. Antwerp, Belgium.

Gravano, Agustín, Julia Hirschberg, and Štefan Beňuš

2012 “Affirmative Cue Words in Task-Oriented Dialogue.” Computational Linguistics 38 (1): 1–39.

Greco, Frank A., and Mary Degges

1975 “The Etymology of OK Again.” American Speech 50 (3/4): 333–335.

Greenberg, Joseph H.

1963 Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Grosz, Barbara J.

1977 “The Representation and Use of Focus in Dialogue Understanding.” Technical Note 151, Artificial Intelligence Center, SRI International.

1982 “Discourse Analysis.” In Sublanguage: Studies of Language in Restricted Semantic Domains, ed. by Richard Kittredge, and John Lehrberger, 138–174. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Gumperz, John J.

1982 Discourse Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Günthner, Susanne

2016 “Praktiken erhöhter Dialogizität: onymische Anredeformen als Gesten personifizierter Zuwendung [Practices of Increased Dialogism: Onymic Forms of Address as Gestures of Personified Other-Orientation].” ZGL 44 (3): 406–436.

Guthrie, Anna M.

1997 On the Systematic Deployment of Okay and Mmhmm in Academic Advising Sessions. Pragmatics 7: 397–415.

Haddington, Pentti

2006 “The Organization of Gaze and Assessments as Resources for Stance Taking.” Text & Talk 26 (3): 281–328.

Hadar, Uri, Timothy Steiner, and Frank Clifford Rose

1985 “Head Movement during Listening Turns in Conversation.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 9 (4): 214–228.

Haiman, John

1980 “The Iconicity of Grammar: Isomorphism and Motivation.” Language 56 (3): 515–540.

Hakulinen, Auli, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen

2012 “Being Equivocal: Affective Responses Left Unspecified.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 147–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hall, Edward T.

1966 The Hidden Dimension. Garden City NY: Doubleday.

Hamann, Magnus

2018 Memory in Interaction: A Case Study of Memory, Engagement and Interaction after Traumatic Brain Injury. PhD diss., Aarhus University.

Handke, Kwiryna

2011 “Polszczyzna codzienna geneza i czynniki stabilizujące [The language of everyday Polish communication: Genesis and the control factors].” In Rozprawy Komisji Językowej, Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe LVII, 57–67. Łódź: Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe.

Harren, Inga, and Mia Raitaniemi

2008 “The Sequential Structure of Closings in Private German Phone Calls.” Gesprächsforschung 9: 198–223.

Haspelmath, Martin

2010 “Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies.” Language 86 (3): 663–687.

Have, Paul ten

1998 Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.

Hayashi, Fumiko

1954 Meshi [Meals]. Tokyo: Shincho-sha.

Hayashi, Makoto, and Kyung-eun Yoon

2009 “Negotiating Boundaries in Talk.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 250–278. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Heath, Christian, and Lorenza Mondada

2019 “Transparency and Embodied Action: Turn Organisation and Fairness in Complex Institutional Environments.” Social Psychology Quarterly 82 (3): 274–302.

Heinemann, Trine

2005 “Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: The Preference for Matched Polarity in Responsive Turns in Danish.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 375–402. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2006 “ ‘Will You or Can’t You?’ Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (7): 1081–1104.

2009 “Two Answers to Inapposite Inquiries.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 159–186. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2010 “The Question-Response System in Danish.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2703–2725.

2016a “From ‘Looking’ to ‘Seeing’: Indexing Delayed Intelligibility of an Object with the Danish Change-of-State Token n↑å↓: .” Journal of Pragmatics 104: 108–132.

2016b “Registering Revision: The Reduplicated Danish Change-of-state Token Nå .” Discourse Studies 18 (1): 44–63.

2017a “Receipting Answers That Are Counter to Expectations: The Polar Question-Answer-Nå Sequence in Danish.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 50 (3): 249–267.

2017b “Transitioning Between Activities with the Danish Change-of-State Token Nå .” Journal of Pragmatics 118: 1–21.

Heinemann, Trine, and Aino Koivisto

2016a “Indicating a Change-of-State in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic Explorations.” Editorial, Journal of Pragmatics 104: 83–88.

(eds) 2016b “Indicating a Change-of-State in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic Explorations.” Special section, Journal of Pragmatics 104: 83–210.

Heinemann, Trine, and Jakob Steensig

2017 “Three Imperative Action Formats in Danish Talk-in-Interaction”. In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Liisa Raevaara, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 139–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Heisler, Troy

1996 “OK – a Dynamic Marker in Montréal French.” In Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis, ed. by Jennifer Arnold, Renée Blake, Brad Davidson, Scott Schwenter, and Julie Solomon, 293–312. Stanford: CSLI.

Hellermann, John

2005 “Syntactic and Prosodic Practices for Cohesion in Series of Three-Part Sequences in Classroom Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (1): 105–130.

Helmer, Henrike, and Jörg Zinken

2019 “ Das Heißt (‘That Means’) for Formulations and Du Meinst (‘You Mean’) for Repair? Interpretations of Prior Speakers’ Turns in German.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 52 (2): 159–176.

Hennoste, Tiit

2000 “Sissejuhatus suulisesse eesti keelde IV. Suulise kõne erisõnavara 3. Partiklid [Introduction to spoken Estonian IV. Special vocabulary 3. Particles].” Akadeemia 8: 1773–1806.

Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina B. Bolden

2013 “The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Oxford: Blackwell.

2017 Transcribing for Social Research. London: Sage.

Hepburn, Alexa, and Jonathan Potter

2011 “Threats: Power, Family Mealtimes and Social Influence.” British Journal of Social Psychology 50 (1): 99–120.

Heritage, John

1984a “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

1984b Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

1985 “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 95–119. London: Academic Press.

1998 “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 27 (3): 291–334.

2002 “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox and Sandra Thompson, 196–224. New York: Oxford University Press.

2006 “Cognition in Discourse.” In Conversation and Cognition, ed. by Hedwig Te Molder, and Jonathan Potter, 184–202. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2010 “Conversation Analysis: Practices and Methods.” In Qualitative Sociology, 3rd ed., ed. by David Silverman, 208–230. London: Sage.

2011 “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2012a “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52.

2012b “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29.

2013 “Epistemics in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

2015 “ Well-Prefaced Turns in English Conversation: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 88: 89–104.

2018a “Turn-Initial Particles in English: The Cases of Oh and Well .” In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages, ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 155–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2018b “The Ubiquity of Epistemics: A Rebuttal to the ‘Epistemics of Epistemics’ Group.” Discourse Studies 20 (1): 14–56.

Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman

2010 Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond

2012 “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiesence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Heritage, John, and Andrew Roth

1995 “Grammar and Institution: Questions and Questioning in the Broadcast News Interview.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 1–60.

Heritage, John, and Sue Sefi

1992 “Dilemmas of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions Between Health Visitors and First Time Mothers.” In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 359–419. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen

1994 “Constituting and Maintaining Activities Across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23 (1): 1–29.

Heritage, John, and D. Rod Watson

1979 “Formulations as Conversational Objects.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington.

Hockey, Beth Ann

1993 “Prosody and the Role of Okay and Uh-Huh in Discourse.” In ESCOL ’92: Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, ed. by Michael Bernstein, 128–136. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.

Honeman, Diane E.

1995 “Simultaneous Functions of the Discourse Marker Ok in Daytime Television Talk Shows.” PhD diss., Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Hotten, John Camden

(ed.) 1864 The Slang Dictionary; or, The Vulgar Words, Street Phrases, and “Fast” Expressions of High and Low Society: Many with their Etymology, and a Few with their History Traced. London: John Camden Hotten, Piccadilly.

(ed.) 1874 The Slang Dictionary: Etymological, Historical, and Anecdotal. London: Chatto and Windus Publishers.

House, Juliane

2013 “Developing Pragmatic Competence in English as a Lingua Franca: Using Discourse Markers to Express (Inter)subjectivity and Connectivity.” Journal of Pragmatics 59 (Part A): 57–67.

Huddlestone, Kate, and Melanie Fairhurst

2013 “The Pragmatic Markers anyway, okay, and shame: A South African English Corpus Study.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 42: 93–110.

Humboldt, Wilhelm von

1836 Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften. Trans. by Hans Aarsleff as On Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1988).

Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt

1998 Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Hymes, Dell

1972 “Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by John J. Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Imo, Wolfgang

2009 “Konstruktion oder Funktion? Erkenntnisprozessmarker (‘change-of-state-tokens’) im Deutschen [Construction or function? Change-of-state-tokens in German].” In Grammatik im Gespräch, ed. by Susanne Günthner, and Jörg Bücker, 57–86. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Jacknis, Ira

1988 “Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson in Bali: Their Use of Photography and Film.” Cultural Anthropology 3 (2): 160–177.

Jefferson, Gail

1978 “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic Press.

1980 “On ‘Trouble-Premonitory’ Response to Inquiry.” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 153–185.

1981a The Abominable ‘Ne?’: A Working Paper Exploring the Phenomenon of Post-Response Pursuit of Response. Occasional Paper No. 6, Department of Sociology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

1981b “Caveat Speaker: A Preliminary Exploration of Shift Implicative Recipiency in the Articulation of Topic.” Final report to the British Social Science Research Council.

[1983a] 1993 “Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on Recipient Topic-Shift Implicature.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 16 (l): l–30. Previously published in Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 30 1983

[1983b] 1984 “Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgement Tokens ‘Yeah’ and ‘Mm Hm’.” Paper in Linguistics 17 (2): 197–216. Previously published in Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 30 1983

1984a “Notes on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap Onset.” In Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric, ed. by Valentina D’Urso, 11–38. Padua: Cleup.

1984b “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

1984c “On the Organization of Laughter in Talk about Troubles.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

1988 “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35 (4): 418–442.

2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Jefferson, Gail, and John R. E. Lee

1981 “The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles Telling’ and a ‘Service Encounter’.” Journal of Pragmatics 5 (5): 399–422.

Jensen, N. M.

1987 “Topic Management in Doctor-Patient Conversations: An Exploratory Analysis of the Use of the Speech Particle ‘OK’.” Master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin.

Johansson, Maria

2016 “Positive assessments as resources for affiliation and learning during handicraft meetings.” Master’s thesis, Department of Scandinavian Languages, Uppsala University, Sweden.

Johnson, Sharon E.

2016 “Book Clubs in the ESL Classroom: A Microinteractional Analysis of Literacy Development in Adult ESL Students.” Master’s thesis, Department of English, University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Jones, Charlotte M.

2001 “Missing Assessments: Lay and Professional Orientations in Medical Interviews.” Text 21 (1–2): 113–150.

Kaiser, Julia

2011 “Okay in ärztlichen Gesprächen – eine linguistische Gesprächsanalyse [Okay in doctor-patient conversations – a linguistic conversation analysis].” Master’s thesis, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.

Karlina, Yeni

2015 “The Little Words that Matter: Discourse Markers in Teacher Talk.” Journal Paedagogia 18 (2): 81–89.

Kastari, Anna

2006 “Dialogipartikkelien aha(a) ja ai jaa tehtävistä keskustelussa [Usages of the dialogue particles aha(a) and ai jaa in conversation].” Master’s thesis, University of Helsinki.

Kato, Michio

2001 Nijusseeki no kotoba no nenpyo [The history of Japanese language in the 20th century]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.

Kaukomaa, Timo, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori

2015 “How Listeners Use Facial Expression to Shift the Emotional Stance of the Speaker’s Utterance.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (3): 319–341.

Keevallik, Leelo

2003 “Terminally Rising Pitch Contours of Response Tokens in Estonian.” Crossroads of Language, Interaction, and Culture 5: 49–65.

2006 “Pragmaatiliste partiklite laenutüübid rootsieesti keeles [Types of borrowed pragmatic particles in Swedish Estonian].” In Mitmekeelsus ja keelevahetus läänemeresoome piirkonnas, ed. by Helen Koks, and Jand Rahman, 116–133. Võro: Võro Instituudi toimõndusõq 18.

2010a “Marking Boundaries Between Activities: The Particle nii in Estonian.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (2): 157–182.

2010b “Pro-adverbs of Manner as Markers of Activity Transition.” Studies in Language 34 (2): 350–381.

2010c “Social Action of Syntactic Reduplication.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3): 800–824.

2012 “Pragmatics of the Estonian Heritage Speakers in Sweden.” Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen 35: 1–22.

2013 “Mundane Reaction Words in Swedish Estonian.” In Keelemees Raimo Raag 60, ed. by T. Söderman, 50–65. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.

2017 “Negotiating Deontic Rights in Second Position: Young Adult Daughters’ Imperatively Formatted Responses to Mothers’ Offers in Estonian.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 271–295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2018a “Making up One’s Mind in Second Position: Estonian No-preface in Action Plans.” In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages, ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 309–331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2018b “The Temporal Organization of Conversation While Mucking out a Sheep Stable.” In Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Jürgen Streeck, 97–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Keisanen, Tiina, Mirka Rauniomaa, and Pentti Haddington

2014 “Suspending Action: From Simultaneous to Consecutive Ordering of Multiple Courses of Action.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 109–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Keisanen, Tiina, Mirka Rauniomaa, and Pauliina Siitonen

2017 “Transitions as Sites of Socialization in Family Interaction Outdoors.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 14: 24–37.

Kelly, Ann

2010 “Explicating Literacy Activities at Work: The Use of ‘Okay’ as an Effective Topic-Changing Device in Service Request Calls.” Literacy & Numeracy Studies 18 (1): 19–34.

Kendon, Adam

1967 “Some Functions of Gaze-Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63.

1990 Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kendrick, Kobin H.

2010 “Epistemics and Action Formation in Mandarin Chinese.” PhD diss., University of California.

Kendrick, Kobin H., and Francisco Torreira

2015 “The Timing and Construction of Preference: A Quantitative Study.” Discourse Processes 52 (4): 255–289.

Kent, Alexandra

2012a “Responding to Directives: What Can Children Do When a Parent Tells Them What to Do?” In Disputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People, ed. by Maryanne Theobald, and Susan Danby, 57–84. Bingley, England: Emerald Books.

2012b “Compliance, Resistance and Incipient Compliance when Responding to Directives.” Discourse Studies 14 (6): 711–730.

Kessler, Christine

2010 “Okay – Die Bedeutung eines Wortes zwischen Schriftlichkeit und Mündlichkeit [The meaning of a word between writing and speaking].” In Semantische Unbestimmtheit im Lexikon, ed. by Inge Pohl, 151–166. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.

Kielitoimiston sanakirja

[New dictionary of modern Finnish] 2012 Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus. Accessed May 30, 2018. https://www.kielitoimistonsanakirja.fi/#/okei

Kim, Kyu-hyun, and Kyung-Hee Suh

1996 “Dealing with Prior Talk: Discourse Connectives in Korean Conversation.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 5, ed. by Noriko Akatsuka, Shoichi Iwasaki, and Susan Strauss, 83–99. Stanford, CA: SCLI.

2004 “An Analysis of Korean Sentence-ending Suffixes in Caregiver-child Interaction.” Language Research 40 (4): 923–950.

Knudsen, Anette Dahl

2003 “Prosodi som resurse til at udføre positiv vurderingsaktivitet – Et studie af okay2-respons” [Prosody as a resource for performing positive assessment activities: A study of okay2 responses]. Unpublished. Aarhus: Institut for Lingvistik.

2015 “’O(↑)kay(?), ↑Ohkay’ – En Prosodiafhængig ytringspartikel? [“O(↑)kay(?), ↑Ohkay” – A prosody dependent discourse particle?].” Skrifter om Samtalegrammatik 2 (1). https://samtalegrammatik.dk/tidsskrift/aargang-2/

Knutsen, Dominique, Gilles Col, and Ludovic Le Bigot

2018 “An Investigation of the Determinants of Dialogue Navigation in Joint Activities.” Applied Psycholinguistics 39 (6): 1345–1371.

Koiso, Hanae, Yasuharu Den, Yuriko Iseki, Wakako Kashino, Yoshiko Kawabata, Ken’ya Nishikawa, Yayoi Tanaka, and Yasuyuki Usuda

2018 “Construction of the Corpus of Everyday Japanese Conversation: An Interim Report.” Proceedings of the 11th Edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 4259–4264.

Koivisto, Aino

2013 “On the Preference for Remembering: Acknowledging an Answer With Finnish Ai Nii(n) (‘Oh That’s Right’)”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (3): 277–297.

2015a “Dealing with Ambiguities in Informings: Finnish Aijaa as a “Neutral” News Receipt.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (4): 365–387.

2015b “Displaying Now-Understanding: The Finnish Change-of-State Token Aa .” Discourse Processes 52 (2): 111–148.

2016 “Receipting Information as Newsworthy vs. Responding to Redirection: Finnish News Particles Aijaa and Aha(a) .” Journal of Pragmatics 104: 163–179.

2019 “Repair Receipts: On their Motivation and Interactional Import.” Discourse Studies 21 (4): 398–420.

Kovarsky, Dana

1989 “On the Occurrence of Okay in Therapy.” Child Language Teaching and Therapy 5 (2): 137–145.

Kubozono, Haruo

1996 “Syllable and Accent in Japanese: Evidence from Loanword Accentuation.” The Bulletin (Phonetic Society of Japan) 211: 71–82.

2006 “Where Does Loanword Prosody Come From?: A Case Study of Japanese Loanword Accent.” Lingua 116 (7): 1140–1170.

Kunnari, Miia

2011 “Kahdentunut dialogipartikkeli joojoo keskustelussa [The reduplicated dialogue particle joojoo in conversation].” Master’s thesis, Finnish language, University of Helsinki. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/37879

Kyratzis, Amy, and Ervin-Tripp, Susan

1999 “The Development of Discourse Markers in Peer Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (10): 1321–1338.

Labov, William, and David Fanshel

1977 Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.

Laforest, Marty

1992 “Le back-channel en situation d’entrevue sociolinguistique [Backchannels in sociolinguistic interview situations].” PhD diss., Faculté des Lettres, L’Université Laval.

Landmann-Szwarcwald, Celia, and James Macinko

2016 “A Panorama of Health Inequalities in Brazil.” International Journal for Equity in Health 15: 174.

Landqvist, Håkan

2005 “Constructing and Negotiating Advice in Calls to a Poison Information Center.” In Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines, ed. by Carolyn Baker, Michael Emmison, and Alan Firth, 207–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Laurier, Eric

2001 “Why People Say Where They Are During Mobile Phone Calls.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19 (4): 485–504.

Lee, Jong Kuk

1937 The New Dictionary of Foreign Words in Modern Korean. Kyungsung: Hansung Publisher.

Lee, Jong-Mi

2017 “The Multifunctional Use of a Discourse Marker Okay by Korean EFL teachers.” Foreign Language Education Research 21: 41–65.

Lee, Mwu Yeong

1932 Cichwukul tollinun salamtul [The people who spin Earth on its axis]. Donga Newspaper.

Lee, Seung-Hee

2011 “Responding at a Higher Level: Activity Progressivity in Calls for Service.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (3): 904–917.

Lehmann, Christian

1982 “Directions for Interlinear Morphemic Translations.” Folia Linguistica 16 (1–4): 199–224.

Leskelä, Satu

1999 “Koripalloharjoitusten kielestä ja vuorovaikutuksesta [On language and interaction in basketball practice].” Master’s thesis, Finnish language, University of Helsinki.

Levin, Harry, and Deborah Gray

1983 “The Lecturer’s OK .” American Speech 58 (3): 195–200.

Levinson, Stephen C.

1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Leydon, Geraldine M., Katie Ekberg, Moira Kelly, and Paul Drew

2013 “Improving Ethnic Monitoring for Telephone-Based Healthcare: A Conversation Analytic Study.” BMJ Open 28;3(6): e002676.

Liao, Silvie

2009 “Variation in the Use of Discourse Markers by Chinese Teaching Assistants in the US.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (7): 1313–1328.

Lindström, Anna

1997 “Designing Social Actions: Grammar, Prosody, and Interaction in Swedish Conversation.” PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).

1999 “Language as Social Action: Grammar, Prosody, and Interaction in Swedish Conversation.” PhD diss., Department of Scandinavian languages, Uppsala University.

2017 “Accepting Remote Proposals.” In Enabling Human Conduct: Naturalistic Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage, 125–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2018 “Calibrating an Agnostic Epistemic Stance in Swedish Conversation: The Case of Okej-Prefacing in Calls to the Swedish Board for Study Support.” In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles across Languages, ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 339–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Local, John

1996 “Conversational Phonetics: Some Aspects of News Receipts in Everyday Conversation.” In Prosody in Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 177–230. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Looney, Stephen Daniel, Dingding Jia, and Daisuke Kimura

2017 “Self-Directed Okay in Mathematics Lectures.” Journal of Pragmatics 107: 46–59.

Lopriore, Stefanie, Amanda LeCouteur, Stuart Ekberg, and Katie Ekberg

2017 “Delivering Healthcare at a Distance: Exploring the Organisation of Calls to a Health Helpline.” International Journal of Medical Informatics 104: 45–55.

Lucy, John A.

1997 “Linguistic Relativity.” Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 291–312.

MacWhinney, Brian

2007 “The Talkbank Project.” In Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora: Synchronic Database, vol. 1, ed. by Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, Hermann L. Moisl, 163–180. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.

MacWhinney, Brian, and Johannes Wagner

2010 “Transcribing, Searching and Data Sharing: The CLAN Software and the TalkBank Data Repository.” Gesprächsforschung 11: 154–173.

Malaska, Jonna

2017 “Välitöntä toimintaa vaativat direktiivit teatteriharjoituksissa [Directives requiring immediate action in theatre rehearsals].” Master’s thesis, Finnish language, University of Helsinki. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/173502

Mańczak-Wohlfeld, Elżbieta

2006 Angielsko-polskie kontakty językowe [English-Polish Language Contacts]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Margutti, Piera, Liisa Tainio, Paul Drew, and Véronique Traverso

(eds) 2018 “Inviting in Telephone Calls: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Social Actions in Interaction.” Special section, Journal of Pragmatics 125: 52–199.

Martini, Leonardo F.

2020 “Grammar in Interaction: Polar Interrogative Sequences in Syrian Arabic Talk-in-Interaction.” Doctoral diss., University of Essex.

Maschler, Yael

2002 ”The Role of Discourse Markers in the Construction of Multivocality in Israeli Hebrew Talk in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (1): 1–38.

Maynard, Douglas W.

1997 “The News Delivery Sequence: Bad News and Good News in Conversational Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 (2): 93–130.

2003 Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McCarthy, Michael

2003 “Talking Back. ‘Small’ Interactional Response Tokens in Everyday Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36 (1): 33–63.

McClave, Evelyn Z.

2000 “Linguistic Functions of Head Movements in the Context of Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (7): 855–878.

Mead, George H.

1934 Mind, Self, and Society. Works of George Herbert Mead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mehan, Hugh

1979 Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Meier, Christoph

2002 Arbeitsbesprechungen: Interaktionsstruktur, Interaktionsdynamik und Konsequenzen einer sozialen Form [Work meetings: Interactional structure, interactional dynamics, and consequences of a social form]. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung. http://www.verlag-gespraechsforschung.de/2002/pdf/arbeitsbesprechungen.pdf

Meillet, Alphonse

1903 Introduction a l’Étude comparative des langues Indo-Européennes [Introduction to the comparative study of Indo-European languages]. Paris: Hachette.

Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, s.v. OK

Accessed April 4, 2020. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/OK

Merritt, Marilyn

1976 “On Questions Following Questions in Service Encounters.” Language in Society 5 (3): 315–357.

1978 “On the Use of ‘O.K.’ in Service Encounters.” Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 42: 6–17. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, Austin, TX. Reprinted in Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics, ed. by John Baugh, and Joel Sherzer 1984, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

1980 “On the Use of OK in Service Encounters.” In Language Use and Uses of Language, ed. by Roger W. Shuy, and Anna Shnukal, 162–172. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Metcalf, Allan

2010 OK: The Improbable Story of America’s Greatest Word. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ministério da Saúde

2014 Manual das Ouvidorias do SUS [Manual for the Unified Health System Ombudsman Departments]. Brasília, DF: Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa, Departamento de Ouvidoria-Geral do SUS. bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manual_ouvidoria_sus.pdf

Modaff, Daniel P.

2003 “Body Movement in the Transition from Opening to Task in Doctor-Patient Interviews.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, and Jenny Mandelbaum, 411–422. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Moerman, Michael

1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in a Tai Conversational Corpus.” Language 53 (4): 872–882.

1988 Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversational Analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Mortensen, Janus, and Sune Sønderberg Mortensen

2009 “ Okay i engelsk og dansk” [ Okay in English and Danish]. In Dramatikken i grammatikken. Festskrift til Lars Heltoft, ed. by Rita Therkelsen, and Eva Skafte Jensen, 281–304. Roskilde: Institut for Kultur og Identitet, Roskilde Universitet.

Mondada, Lorenza

2005 “L’analyse de corpus en linguistique interactionnelle: de l’étude de cas singuliers à l’étude de collections [The analysis of corpora in interactional linguistics: From single-case analysis to the study of collections].” In Sémantique et corpus, ed. by Anne Condamines, 97–108. Paris: Hermès.

2007 “Multimodal Resources for Turn-Taking: Pointing and the Emergence of Possible Next Speakers.” Discourse Studies 9 (2): 194–225.

2008 “Using Video for a Sequential and Multimodal Analysis of Social Interaction: Videotaping Institutional Telephone Calls.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9 (3), Art. 39.

http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1161/2571

2011 “Understanding as an Embodied, Situated and Sequential Achievement in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 542–552.

2013 “Embodied and Spatial Resources for Turn-Taking in Institutional Multi-party Interactions: The Example of Participatory Democracy Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 46: 39–68.

2014a “The Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156.

2014b “The Temporal Orders of Multiactivity: Operating and Demonstrating in the Surgical Theatre.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 33–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2015 “Multimodal Completions.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 267–308. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

2016 “Challenges of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social Interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 20 (3): 336–366.

2018a “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106.

2018b “Turn-Initial Voilà in Closings in French: Reaffirming Authority and Responsibility over the Sequence. In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages, ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 371–411. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Mondada, Lorenza, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen

2016 “Making Multiple Requests in French and Finnish Convenience Stores.” Language in Society 45 (5): 733–765.

Müller, Cornelia

2004 “Forms and Uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A Case of a Gesture Family?” In The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures, ed. by Cornelia Müller, and Roland Posner, 233–256. Berlin: Weidler.

Murdoch, Jamie, Rebecca Barnes, Jillian Pooler, Valerie Lattimer, Emily Fletcher, and John L. Campbell

2015 “The Impact of Using Computer Decision-Support Software in Primary Care Nurse-Led Telephone Triage: Interactional Dilemmas and Conversational Consequences.” Social Science & Medicine 126: 36–47.

Näslund, Shirley

2016 “Tacit Tango: The Social Framework of Screen-Focused Silence in Institutional Telephone Calls.” Journal of Pragmatics 91: 60–79.

Nattrass, Rhona, Jennifer Watermeyer, Catherine Robson, and Claire Penn

2017 “Local Expertise and Landmarks in Place Reformulations During Emergency Medical Calls.” Journal of Pragmatics 120: 73–87.

Nevile, Maurice

2004 Beyond the Black Box: Talk-in-Interaction in the Airline Cockpit. Ashgate: Aldershot.

2007 “Action in Time: Ensuring Timeliness for Collaborative Work in the Airline Cockpit.” Language in Society 36 (2): 233–257.

Ogden, Richard

2001 “Turn Transition, Creak and Glottal Stop in Finnish Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43 (3): 299–320.

Ogden, Richard, Auli Hakulinen, and Liisa Tainio

2004 “Indexing ’No News’ with Stylization in Finnish.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Cecilia Ford, 299–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Oh, Sun-Young, and Yong-Yae Park

2017 “Interactional Uses of Acknowledgment Tokens: ‘ung’ and ‘e’ as Responses to Multi-Unit Turns in Korean Conversation.” In Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage, 145–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Oloff, Florence

2018 “Emploi du marqueur OK en allemand et en tchèque parlés [Use of the marker OK in spoken German and Czech].” Paper presented at ‘OK’ Workshop, research group Discourse and Cognition, theme ‘OK’ (June 21–22, 2018, Salerno, Italy).

2019 “ Okay as a Neutral Acceptance Token in German Conversation.” Lexique 25: 197–225.

Onysko, Alexander, and Esme Winter-Froemel

2011 “Necessary Loans – Luxury Loans? Exploring the Pragmatic Dimension of Borrowing.” Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (6): 1550–1567.

Ordbog over Dansk Talesprog (ODT) [Dictionary of Spoken Danish]

n.d. s.v. okay. Accessed June 16, 2018. https://odt.hum.ku.dk/form/okay/

Ordbog over det danske Sprog

Dictionary of the Danish Language]. n.d. s.v. okay. Accessed June 16, 2018. https://ordnet.dk/ods/ordbog?query=okay

Ostermann, Ana Cristina

2005 Gênero, sexualidade e violência: uma investigação sociolinguística interacional de atendimentos à saúde da mulher [Gender, sexuality, and violence: an interactional sociolinguistic investigation of women's health care]. Projeto 0000001036. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações.

Othman, Zarina

2010 “The Use of Okay, Right and Yeah in Academic Lectures by Native Speaker Lecturers: Their ‘Anticipated’ and ‘Real’ Meanings.” Discourse Studies 12 (5): 665–681.

Oxford English Dictionary Online, s.v. OK

adj., int.1, n.2, and adv. Oxford University Press. Accessed April 4, 2020. https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/130925

Panzini, Alfredo

1931 Dizionario moderno [Modern Dictionary], 6th ed. Torino: Hoepli.

Pak, Maria, Richard Sprott, and Elena Escalera

1996 “Little Words, Big Deal: The Development of Discourse and Syntax in Child Language.” In Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp, ed. by Dan Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzis and Jiansheng Guo, 287–308. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pärnu Postimees

2019 “Ajakirjanikud otse-eetris: kas ’olgu’ või ’okei’? [Journalists in the studio: is it ‘olgu’ (approx. let it be like that) or ‘okay’?]”. March 15 2019 https://parnu.postimees.ee/6546187/ajakirjanikud-otse-eetris-kas-olgu-voi-okei

Paunonen, Heikki, and Marjatta Paunonen

2000 Tsennaaks stadii, bonjaaks slangii – Stadin slangin suursanakirja [Dictionary of Helsinki slang]. Helsinki: WSOY.

Pavlidou, Theodossia

1998 “Greek and German Telephone Closings: Patterns of Confirmation and Agreement.” Pragmatics 8 (1): 79–94.

Pedersen, Henriette Folkmann

2015 “ Jamen som svarindleder efter hv-spørgsmål [ Jamen as a response-initiator after wh-questions].” Skrifter om Samtalegrammatik 2 (2). https://samtalegrammatik.dk/tidsskrift/aargang-2/

Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Johannes Wagner, and Esther Gonzalez-Martinez

(eds) 2018 Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pekkanen, Niina

2017 “ Okei-dialogipartikkelin käyttötavoista keskustelussa [On usages of the dialogue particle okei in conversation].” Master’s thesis, University of Helsinki.

Persson, Rasmus

2015 “Indexing One’s Own Previous Action as Inadequate: On ah-Prefaced Repeats as Receipt Tokens in French Talk-in-Interaction.” Language in Society 44 (4): 497–524.

Pfeifer, Wolfgang et al.

1993 Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen, digitalisierte und von Wolfgang Pfeifer überarbeitete Version im Digitalen Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache [Etymological Dictionary of German, Wolfgang Pfeifer’s digitized and revised version in the Digital Dictionary of the German Language], s.v. okay. Accessed November 22, 2019. https://www.dwds.de/wb/okay

Pillet-Shore, Danielle

2003 “Doing Okay: On the Multiple Metrics of an Assessment.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36 (3): 285–319.

Polanyi, Livia, and R. J. H. Scha

1983 “The Syntax of Discourse.” Text 3 (3): 261–270.

Pomerantz, Anita

1986 “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9 (2–3): 219–229.

Pulkkinen, Paavo

1984 Lokarista sponsoriin: Englantilaisia lainoja suomen kielessä [From lokari to sponsori: English loanwords in the Finnish language]. Keuruu: Otava.

Querol-Julián, Mercedes, and Begoña Bellés-Fortuño

2010 “The Use of Pragmatic Discourse Markers And, So, and Okay in Academic Conference Presentations.” Language Forum 36 (1–2): 81–94.

Råman, Joonas

2018 “The Organization of Transitions between Observing and Teaching the Budo Class.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 19 (1): Art. 5.

Rauniomaa, Mirka, and Tiina Keisanen

2012 “Two Multimodal Formats for Responding to Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (6–7): 829–842.

Raymond, Geoffrey

2004 “Prompting Action: The Stand-Alone so in Ordinary Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37: 185–218.

Read, Allen Walker

1963a “The First Stage in the History of ‘O.K.’.” American Speech 38 (1): 5–27.

1963b “The Second Stage in the History of ‘O.K.’.” American Speech 38 (2): 83–102.

1964a “The Folklore of O.K .” American Speech 39 (1): 5–25.

1964b “Later Stages in the Development of O.K .” American Speech 39 (2): 83–101.

1964c “Successive Revisions in the Explanation of O.K .” American Speech 39 (4): 243–267.

Reichert, Tetyana, and Grit Liebscher

2018 “Transitions with “Okay”: Managing Language Alternation in Role-Play Preparations.” In Conversation Analysis and Language Alternation: Capturing Transitions in the Classroom, ed. by Anna Filipi and Numa Markee, 129–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Rendle-Short, Johanna

2000 “When ‘Okay’ is Okay in Computer Science Seminar Talk.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 22 (2): 19–33.

Robinson, Jeffrey D.

2009 “Managing Counterinformings: An Interactional Practice for Soliciting Information that Facilitates Reconciliation of Speakers’ Incompatible Positions.” Human Communication Research 35 (4): 561–587.

2013 “Overall Structural Organization.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 257–280. West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.

2014 “What ‘What?’ Tells us About How Conversationalists Manage Intersubjectivity.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 47 (2): 109–129.

Robinson, Jeffrey D., and John Heritage

2005 “The Structure of Patients’ Presenting Concerns: The Completion Relevance of Current Symptoms.” Social Science and Medicine 61 (2): 481–493.

Robinson, Jeffrey D., and Tanya Stivers

2001 “Achieving Activity Transitions in Primary-Care Encounters: From History Taking to Physical Examination.” Human Communication Research 27 (2): 253–298.

Rosaldo, Michelle Z.

1982 “The Things We Do with Words: Ilongot Speech Acts and Speech Act Theory in Philosophy.” Language in Society 11 (2): 203–37.

Rossano, Federico

2012 “Gaze Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction.” PhD diss., Radboud University Nijmegen.

2013 “Gaze in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 308–329. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

Rossano, Federico, Penelope Brown, and Stephen C. Levinson

2009 “Gaze, Questioning, and Culture.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 187–249. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Rossi, Giovanni

2012 “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49 (5): 426–458.

(ed) 2020 “Other-Repetition in Conversation Across Languages: Bringing Prosody into Pragmatic Typology.” Special issue, Language in Society 49 (4): 495–687.

Sacks, Harvey

1967 “The Search for Help: No One to Turn to.” In Essays in Self-Destruction, ed. by Edwin S. Shneidman, 203–223. New York: Science House.

1992 Lectures on Conversation, vols. 1–2, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff

2002 “Home Position.” Gesture 2 (2): 133–146. Originally presented orally at the American Anthropological Association 1975

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson

1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.

Samtalegrammatik.dk

2018 “Data.” Accessed June 17, 2018. http://samtalegrammatik.au.dk/om-samtalegrammatikdk/vores-metode/data/

2019a “Nå (stigende kontur) [Oh (rising intonation)].” Accessed May 31, 2019. http://samtalegrammatik.dk/opslag/artikel/naa-stigende-kontur/

2019b “Nå (jævn kontur) [Oh (level intonation)].” Accessed May 31, 2019. http://samtalegrammatik.dk/opslag/artikel/naa-jaevn-kontur/

Schegloff, Emanuel A.

1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70 (6): 1075–1095.

1979 “Identification and Recognition in Telephone Conversation Openings.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodoiogy, ed. by George Psathas, 23–78. New York: Irvington.

Schegloff, Emanuel

1982 “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh Huh’ and Other Things that Come between Sentences.” In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 71–93. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Schegloff, Emanuel A.

1984 “On Some Gestures’ Relation to Talk.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 266–296. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

1986 “The Routine as Achievement.” Human Studies 9 (2–3): 111–151.

1987 “Some Sources of Misunderstanding in Talk-in-Interaction.” Linguistics 25 (1): 201–218.

1989 “Reflections on Language, Development, and the Interactional Character of Talk-in-Interaction.” In Interaction in Human Development, ed. by Marc H. Bornstein, and Jerome S. Bruner, 139–152. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

1990 “On the Organization of Sequence as a Source of ‘Coherence’ in Talk-in-Interaction.” In Conversational Organization and Its Development, ed. by Bruce Dorval, 51–77. Norwood: Ablex.

1991 “Conversation Analysis and Socially Shared Cognition.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley, 150–171. Washington, DC: APA.

1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, Emanuel A.

1997 “Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-Initiated Repair.” Discourse Processes 23: 499–545.

Schegloff, Emanuel A.

1998 “Body Torque.” Social Research 65 (3): 535–596.

2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2009 “One Perspective on Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 357–406. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Gene H. Lerner

2009 “Beginning to Respond: Well-Prefaced Responses to Wh-Questions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (2): 91–115.

Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks

1973 “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 8 (4): 289–327.

Schleef, Erik

2005 “Navigating Joint Activities in English and German Academic Discourse: Forms, Functions, and Sociolinguistic Distribution of Discourse Markers and Question Tags.” PhD diss., University of Michigan.

2008 “The ‘Lecturer’s OK’ Revisited: Changing Discourse Conventions and the Influence of Academic Division.” American Speech 83 (1): 62–84.

Schubert, Christoph

2019 “ ‘OK, Well, First of All, Let Me Say …’: Discursive Uses of Response Initiators in US Presidential Primary Debates.” Discourse Studies 21 (4): 438–457.

Selting, Margret

1987 “Reparaturen und lokale Verstehensprobleme, oder: Zur Binnenstruktur von Reparatursequenzen. [Repair and local problems in understanding, or: On the internal structure of repair sequences.]” Linguistische Berichte 108, 128–149.

1988 “The Role of Intonation in the Organization of Repair and Problem-Handling Sequences in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 12 (3): 293–323.

1996 “Prosody as an Activity-Type Distinctive Cue in Conversation: The Case of So-Called ‘Astonished’ Questions in Repair Initiation.” In Prosody in Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 231–270. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2016 “Praktiken des Sprechens und Interagierens im Gespräch aus der Sicht von Konversationsanalyse und Interaktionaler Linguistik [Practices of speaking and interacting in conversation from the prespective of conversation analysis and interactional linguistics].” In Sprachliche und kommunikative Praktiken, Jahrbuch 2015 des IDS, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, Helmuth Feilke and Angelika Linke, 27–56. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen et al.

2009 “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2) [Conversation analytic transcription system 2].” Gesprächsforschung 10: 353–402. http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2009/px-gat2.pdf

2011 “A System for Transcribing Talk-in-Interaction: GAT 2; Translated and Adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten.” Gesprächsforschung 12: 1–51. http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2011/px-gat2-englisch.pdf. Translation and adaptation of “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)” by Margret Selting et al., Gesprächsforschung 10: 353–402 2009.

Seuren, Lucas M.

2018 “Assessing Answers: Action Ascription in Third Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 33–51.

Seuren, Lucas, Mike Huiskes, and Tom Koole

2016 “Remembering and Understanding with Oh-prefaced Yes/No Declaratives in Dutch.” Journal of Pragmatics 104: 180–192.

2018 “Resolving Knowledge Discrepancies in Informing Sequences.” Language in Society 47 (3): 409–434.

Sharp, Harriet

2001 English in Spoken Swedish. A Corpus Study of Two Discourse Domains. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis: Stockholm Studies in English XCV.

Shaw, Rebecca, and Celia Kitzinger

2007 “Memory in Interaction: An Analysis of Repeat Calls to a Home Birth Helpline. Research on Language and Social Interaction 40 (1): 117–144.

Sidnell, Jack

2009 “Comparative Perspectives in Conversation Analysis.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 3–28. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2010 “Conversation Analysis: An Introduction.” Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

2013 “Basic Conversation Analytic Methods.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 77–99. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

2014 “The Architecture of Intersubjectivity Revisited.” In Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Nick J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman, and Jack Sidnell, 364–399. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2016 “A Conversation Analytic Approach to Research on Early Childhood”. In SAGE Handbook of Early Childhood Research, ed. by Ann Farrell, Sharon Lynn Kagan, and E. Kay, M. Tisdall, 255–276. London: Sage.

Sidnell, Jack, and N. J. Enfield

2012 “Language Diversity and Social Action: A Third Locus of Linguistic Relativity.” Current Anthropology 53 (3): 302–333.

Sinclair, John M., and Malcolm Coulthard

1975 Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.

Sorjonen, Marja-Leena

2001 Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2002 “Recipient Activities: The Particle “no” as a Go-Ahead Response in Finnish Conversations.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 165–195. New York: Oxford University Press.

2017 “Imperatives and Responsiveness in Finnish Conversation.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Liisa Raevaara, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 241–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2018 “Reformulating Prior Speaker’s Turn in Finnish: Turn-Initial siis, eli(kkä) and nii(n) et(tä) .” In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages, ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 251–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen

(eds) 2017 Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Steensig, Jakob, and Birte Asmuß

2005 “Notes on Disaligning ‘Yes But’-Initiated Utterances in Danish and German Conversations: Two Construction Types for Dispreferred Responses.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 349–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Steensig, Jakob, and Paul Drew

(eds) 2008 “Questioning and Affiliation/Disaffiliation in Interaction.” Special issue, Discourse Studies 10 (1).

Steensig, Jakob, and Trine Heinemann

2013 “When ‘Yes’ Is Not Enough – as an Answer to a Yes/No Question.” In Units of Talk – Units of Action, ed. by Beatrice Szczepek Reed, and Geoffrey Raymond, 207–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Stenström, Anna-Brita

1994 An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London: Longman.

2014 Teenage Talk: From General Characteristics to the Use of Pragmatic Markers in a Contrastive Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Stevanovic, Melisa

2011 “Participants’ Deontic Rights and Action Formation: The Case of Declarative Requests for Action.” Interaction and Linguistic Structures 52.

Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä

2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321.

Stivers, Tanya

2004 “’No no no’ and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction.” Human Communication Research 30 (2): 260–293.

2006 “Treatment Decisions: Negotiations Between Doctors and Parents in Acute Care Encounters.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. by John Heritage, and Doug W. Maynard, 279–312. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2007 Prescribing under Pressure. Parent-Physician Conversations and Antibiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.

2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (5): 31–57.

2010 “An Overview of the Question-Response System in American English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2772–2781.

2018 “How We Manage Social Relationships Through Answers to Questions: The Case of Interjections.” Discourse Processes 56 (3): 191–209.

Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann et al.

2009 “Universals and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (26), 10587–10592.

Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi

2010 “Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s Constraints.” Language in Society 39 (1): 1–25.

Stivers, Tanya and John Heritage

2001 “Breaking the Sequential Mold: Answering ‘More Than the Question’ during Comprehensive History Taking.” Text 21 (1–2): 151–185.

Stivers, Tanya, John Heritage, Rebecca K. Barnes, Rose McCabe, Laura Thompson, and Merran Toerien

2017 “Treatment Recommendations as Actions.” Health Communication 33 (11): 1335–1344.

Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig

2011 “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 3–24. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson

2006 “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 35 (3): 367–392.

Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano

2010 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31.

Stivers, Tanya, Jack Sidnell, and Clara Bergen

2018 “Children’s Responses to Questions in Peer Interaction: A Window into the Ontogenesis of Interactional Competence.” Journal of Pragmatics 124: 14–30.

Streeck, Jürgen

2008 “Gesture in Political Communication. A Case Study of the Democratic Presidential Candidates during the 2004 Primary Campaign.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 154–186.

Svennevig, Jan

2004 “Other-Repetition as Display of Hearing, Understanding and Emotional Stance.” Discourse Studies 6 (4): 589–516.

2018 “Decomposing Turns to Enhance Understanding by L2 Speakers. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (4): 398–416.

Svensk ordbok (NE’s ordbok) [Dictionary of Swedish]

n.d. s.v. okay. Accessed August 1, 2020. https://www.ne.se/ordböcker/#/search/ne-ordbok-sv-sv?q=okej

Svinhufvud, Kimmo

2016 “Nodding and Note-Taking. Multimodal Analysis of Writing and Nodding in Student Counseling Interaction.” Language and Dialogue 6 (1): 81–109.

Swales, John M., and Bonnie Malczewski

2001 “Discourse Management and New-Episode Flags in MICASE.” In Corpus Linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 Symposium, ed. by Rita C. Simpson, and John M. Swales, 145–164. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Szatrowski, Polly

2000 “Relation between Gaze, Head Nodding and aizuti ‘Back Channel’ at a Japanese Company Meeting.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 26: 283–294.

Szczepek Reed, Beatrice

2006 Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

2011 Analyzing Conversation: An Introduction to Prosody. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Talkbank

2018 “SamtaleBank.” Accessed June 16, 2018. https://samtalebank.talkbank.org/

Tekin, Burak S.

2019 “Bodies at Play: Exploring Participation, Spectatorship, and Morality in Videogaming Activities.” PhD diss., University of Basel.

Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen

2015 Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Turner, Kimberley

1999 Functional Variation of Okay/Alright Usage in Spoken Discourse. MA Special Project. UNSW, Sydney.

Turner, Roy

1972 “Some Formal Properties of Therapy Talk.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 367–396. New York, NY: Free Press.

Tyagunova, Tanya, and Christian Greiffenhagen

2017 “Closing Seminars and Lectures: The Work That Lecturers and Students Do.” Discourse Studies 19 (3): 314–340.

Urbaani Sanakirja

Urban dictionary]. Accessed August 9, 2018. https://urbaanisanakirja.com/

Urbandictionary.com, s.v. Rules, OK?

Accessed April 4, 2020. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rules%2C%20OK%3F

van Zyl, Marianne, and Johan J. Hanekom

2013 “When ‘Okay’ is not Okay: Acoustic Characteristics of Single-Word Prosody Conveying Reluctance.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (1): EL13.

Vepsäläinen, Heidi

2019 ”Suomen no-partikkeli ja kysymyksiin vastaaminen keskustelussa [The Finnish particle no and answering questions].” PhD diss., University of Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-5189-6

Verby, J. E.

1991 “OK is Sometimes Not Ok.” Learning Resources Journal/University of Minnesota Health Sciences.

Vilkuna, Maria

1993 “Finnish Juuri and Just: Varieties of Contextual Uniqueness.” In Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland 6, ed. by Maria Vilkuna, and Susanna Shore, 97–122.

Wait, William Bell

1941 “Richardson’s ‘O. K.’ of 1815.” American Speech 16 (2): 85–86, 136.

Walker, Gareth

2017 “Visual Representations of Acoustic Data: A Survey and Suggestions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 50 (4): 363–387.

Wang, Yu-Fang, Pi-Hua Tsai, David Goodman, and Meng-Ying Lin

2010 “Agreement, Acknowledgment, and Alignment: The Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of Hao and Dui in Taiwan Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Studies 12 (2): 241–267.

Waring, Hansun J.

2008 “Using Explicit Positive Assessment in the Language Classroom: IRF, Feedback, and Learning Opportunities.” The Modern Language Journal 92 (4): 577–594.

Waris, Tuula

2006 “ Just keskustelussa [ Just in conversation].” Master’s thesis, Finnish language, University of Helsinki.

Weidner, Matylda

2016 “The Particle no in Polish Talk-in-Interaction.” In NU / NÅ: A Family of Discourse Markers Across the Languages of Europe and Beyond, ed. by Yael Maschler, and Peter Auer, 104–131. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Weilenmann, Alexandra

2003 “’I Can’t Talk Now, I’m in a Fitting Room’: Formulating Availability and Location in Mobile-Phone Conversations.” Environment and Planning A 35 (9): 1589–1605.

Wennerstrom, Ann, and Andrew F. Siegel

2003 “Keeping the Floor in Multiparty Conversations: Intonation, Syntax, and Pause.” Discourse Processes 36 (2): 77–107.

Werlen, Iwar

1984 Ritual und Sprache. Zum Verhältnis von Sprechen und Handeln in Ritualen [Ritual and language. On the relationship of language and action in rituals]. Tübingen: Narr.

Werth, Alexander

2016 “Artikel bei Rufnamen [Articles used with first names].” In SyHD-atlas. Accessed February 2, 2019. http://www.syhd.info/apps/atlas/#artikel-bei-rufnamen

Whitehead, Kevin A.

2011 “Some Uses of Head Nods in ‘Third Position’ in Talk-in-Interaction.” Gesture 11 (2): 103–122.

Whorf, Benjamin Lee

1956 Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, ed. by John B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wierzbicka, Anna

2003 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, s.v. OK

Accessed April 5, 2020. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=OK&oldid=989332360

Woods, Catherine J., Paul Drew, and Geraldine M. Leydon

2015 “Closing Calls to a Cancer Helpline: Expressions of Caller Satisfaction.” Patient Education and Counseling 98 (8): 943–953.

Wootton, Anthony J.

1981 “Two Request Forms for Four Year Olds.” Journal of Pragmatics 5 (6): 511–523.

1997 Interaction and the Development of Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

World Health Organization (WHO)

2006 “Health Inequities in Brazil: Our most serious disease.” http://www.who.int/social_determinants/country_action/health_inequalities_bz.pdf

Wright, Melissa

2011 “The Phonetics–Interaction Interface in the Initiation of Closings in Everyday English Telephone Calls.” Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (4): 1080–1099.

Xian, Li-Xia

2007 “A Pragmatic Analysis of the Marker Hao .” Journal of Xichang College 19 (3): 1–5.

Yeh, Kanyu, and Chiung-chih Huang

2016 “Mandarin-Speaking Children’s Use of the Discourse Markers Hao ‘Okay’ and Dui ‘Right’ in Peer Interaction. Language Sciences 57: 1–20.

Yngve, Victor

1970 “On Getting a Word in Edgewise.” In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 567–577. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Zimmerman, Don H.

1992 “The Interactional Organization of Calls for Emergency Assistance.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 418–469. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Zinken, Jörg

2016 Requesting Responsibility. The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zinken, Jörg, and Arnulf Deppermann

2017 “A Cline of Visible Commitment in the Situated Design of Imperative Turns: Evidence from German and Polish.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 27–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Acknowledgements
Chapter 1. Introduction: OKAY emerging as a cross-linguistic object of study in prior research Emma Betz and Marja-Leena Sorjonen	2–28
Chapter 2. Data and methods used in the study of OKAY across languages Arnulf Deppermann and Lorenza Mondada	30–51
Generic sequential uses of OKAY across languages
Chapter 3. OKAY in responding and claiming understanding Emma Betz and Arnulf Deppermann	56–92
Chapter 4. OKAY in closings and transitions Lorenza Mondada and Marja-Leena Sorjonen	94–127
OKAY in specific languages
Chapter 5. The prosody and phonetics of OKAY in American English Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen	132–173
Chapter 6. Rising OKAY in third position in Danish talk-in-interaction Søren Sandager Sørensen and Jakob Steensig	176–204
Chapter 7. OKAY as a response to informings in Finnish Aino Koivisto and Marja-Leena Sorjonen	206–233
Chapter 8. When OKAY is repeated: Closing the talk so far in Korean and Japanese conversations Satomi Kuroshima, Stephanie Hyeri Kim, Kaoru Hayano, Mary Shin Kim and Seung-Hee Lee	236–265
OKAY in specific activities and settings
Chapter 9. OKAY in health helpline calls in Brazil: Managing alignment and progressivity Ana Cristina Ostermann and Katariina Harjunpää	270–299
Chapter 10. A resource for action transition: OKAY and its embodied and material habitat Elwys De Stefani and Lorenza Mondada	302–336
Chapter 11. OKAY projecting embodied compliance to directives Leelo Keevallik and Matylda Weidner	338–362
Chapter 12. Coordination of OKAY, nods, and gaze in claiming understanding and closing topics Henrike Helmer, Emma Betz and Arnulf Deppermann	363–393
Appendix. Transcription conventions and glossing symbols	396–400
Bibliography
Name index	433
Subject index

OKAY across Languages

Toward a comparative approach to its use in talk-in-interaction

Bibliography

Cited by 1 other publications

Linguistics