Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing
Editors
| University of Hamburg
| University of Hamburg
In recent years, conceptual metonymy has been recognized as a cognitive phenomenon that is as fundamental as metaphor for reasoning and the construction of meaning. The thoroughly revised chapters in the present volume originated as presentations in a workshop organized by the editors for the 7th International Pragmatics Conference held in Budapest in 2000. They constitute, according to an anonymous reviewer, "an interesting contribution to both cognitive linguistics and pragmatics." The contributions aim to bridge the gap, and encourage discussion, between cognitive linguists and scholars working in a pragmatic framework. Topics include the metonymic basis of explicature and implicature, the role of metonymically-based inferences in speech act and discourse interpretation, the pragmatic meaning of grammatical constructions, the impact of metonymic mappings on and their interaction with grammatical structure, the role of metonymic inferencing and implicature in linguistic change, and the comparison of metonymic principles across languages and different cultural settings.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 113] 2003. xi, 280 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
List of contributors
|
ix
|
|
Acknowledgments
|
xi
|
|
1–20
|
|
|
Part I. The place of metonymy in cognition and pragmatics
|
|
|
23–49
|
|
|
51–79
|
|
|
81–102
|
|
|
Part II. Metonymic inferencing and grammatical structure
|
|
|
105–126
|
|
|
127–147
|
|
|
149–166
|
|
|
Part III. Metonymic inferencing and linguistic change
|
|
|
169–203
|
|
|
205–220
|
|
|
Part IV. Metonymic inferencing across languages
|
|
|
223–239
|
|
|
241–266
|
|
|
Name index
|
267–269
|
|
Metonymy and metaphor index
|
271–273
|
|
Subject index
|
275–280
|
“[...] this book reaches its goal of establishing the significance of the topic of metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. As such, it belongs in the library of all serious scholars interested in metonymy.”
Salvatore Attardo, Youngstown State University, in Pragmatics & Cognition, Vol. 13:2 (2005)
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],
No author info given
2014.
In Fictive Interaction [Human Cognitive Processing, 47],
No author info given
2017.
In Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising [Figurative Thought and Language, 2],
No author info given
2019.
In Representing Wine – Sensory Perceptions, Communication and Cultures [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 21],
Baicchi, Annalisa
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 76 ff.
Barcelona, Antonio
2014. Bogusław Bierwiaczonek, Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox, 2013. Pp. iv + 291..
Journal of Linguistics 50:3 ► pp. 712 ff.
Barcelona, Antonio, Olga Blanco Carrión & Rossella Pannain
2018.
In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60],
► pp. 1 ff.
Blanco Carrión, Olga
2018.
In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60],
► pp. 55 ff.
Caballero, Rosario
2017.
In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59],
► pp. 229 ff.
Caballero, Rosario
2019.
In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19],
► pp. 127 ff.
Catalano, Theresa & Linda R. Waugh
2013. The ideologies behind newspaper crime reports of Latinos and Wall Street/CEOs: a critical analysis of metonymy in text and image.
Critical Discourse Studies 10:4 ► pp. 406 ff.
Colston, Herbert L.
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 274 ff.
Colston, Herbert L.
2019.
In How Language Makes Meaning,
Crisp, Peter
2012. The Pilgrim’s Progress: Allegory or novel?.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 21:4 ► pp. 328 ff.
Denroche, Charles
2018. Text metaphtonymy.
Metaphor and the Social World 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Eubanks, Philip
2008. An Analysis ofCorporate Rulein Globalization Discourse: Why We Need Rhetoric to Explain Conceptual Figures.
Rhetoric Review 27:3 ► pp. 236 ff.
Fougner Rydning, Antin
2005. A la recherche d’un modèle explicatif du sens en traduction.
FORUM 3:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Fougner Rydning, Antin
2014. La créativité traductionnelle – résultante d’une aptitude à visualiser.
FORUM 12:1 ► pp. 137 ff.
Fricke, Ellen & Irene Mittelberg
2018.
In Handbuch Pragmatik,
► pp. 312 ff.
Fuertes Olivera, Pedro A.
2014. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. & Valenzuela, J. (Eds.). (2012).Lingüística Cognitiva. Barcelona: Anthropos. 444 pp..
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 243 ff.
Gorzhaya, Alesya Aleksandrovna & Galina Ivanovna Marinina
2018. SPACE-STRUCTURED MODEL WITHIN THE COMIC EFFECT ANALYSIS: COGNITIVE AND DISCURSIVE ASPECT.
Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice :11-2 ► pp. 321 ff.
Halverson, Sandra L. & Jan Oskar Engene
2010. Domains and Dimensions in Metonymy: A Corpus-Based Study ofSchengenandMaastricht.
Metaphor and Symbol 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Joue, Gina, Linda Boven, Klaus Willmes, Vito Evola, Liliana R. Demenescu, Julius Hassemer, Irene Mittelberg, Klaus Mathiak, Frank Schneider & Ute Habel
2018. Handling or being the concept: An fMRI study on metonymy representations in coverbal gestures.
Neuropsychologia 109 ► pp. 232 ff.
Jódar-Sánchez, José Antonio
2017. Metonymy in human interaction.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
Luodonpää-Manni, Milla & Johanna Viimaranta
2010. Metaphoric Expressions on Vertical Axis Revisited: An Empirical Study of Russian and French Material.
Metaphor and Symbol 25:2 ► pp. 74 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2017. Embodied frames and scenes.
Gesture 16:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2019. Visuo-Kinetic Signs Are Inherently Metonymic: How Embodied Metonymy Motivates Forms, Functions, and Schematic Patterns in Gesture.
Frontiers in Psychology 10
Neels, Jakob & Stefan Hartmann
2018.
In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],
► pp. 137 ff.
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2009.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Paradis, Carita
2004. Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets, and Active Zones.
Metaphor and Symbol 19:4 ► pp. 245 ff.
PARADIS, CARITA
2008. Configurations, construals and change: expressions of DEGREE.
English Language and Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 317 ff.
Peña Cervel, M Sandra
2010. MacbethRevisited: A Cognitive Analysis.
Metaphor and Symbol 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
PIQUER-PÍRIZ, ANA Mª
2017.
Jeannette Littlemore. Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. 240. ISBN 978-1-107-04362-6
.
Language and Cognition 9:3 ► pp. 568 ff.
Rasulic, Katarina
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 200 ff.
Rojo López, Ana
2009. A cognitive approach to the translation of metonymy-based humor.
Across Languages and Cultures 10:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2017.
In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1],
► pp. 179 ff.
Rydning, Antin Fougner
2009. La démarche de l’expert-traducteur face à un problème de reformulation.
Meta 53:4 ► pp. 748 ff.
Sansiñena, María Sol, Hendrik De Smet & Bert Cornillie
2015. Displaced directives: Subjunctive free-standing que-clauses vs. imperatives in Spanish.
Folia Linguistica 49:1
Slabakova, Roumyana, Jennifer Cabrelli Amaro & Sang Kyun Kang
2013. Regular and Novel Metonymy in Native Korean, Spanish, and English: Experimental Evidence for Various Acceptability.
Metaphor and Symbol 28:4 ► pp. 275 ff.
Slabakova, Roumyana, Jennifer Cabrelli Amaro & Sang Kyun Kang
2016. Regular and Novel Metonymy: Can You Curl up with a Good Agatha Christie in Your Second Language?.
Applied Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Steen, Gerard
2009.
In Metaphor and Discourse,
► pp. 25 ff.
Vicente, Agustin
2012. On Travis cases.
Linguistics and Philosophy 35:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Warner, Chantelle
2019.
In Pragmatics and Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 35],
► pp. 166 ff.
Weiland-Breckle, Hanna & Petra B. Schumacher
2018. A direct comparison of metonymic and metaphoric relations in adjective–noun pairs.
Acta Linguistica Academica 65:2-3 ► pp. 443 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2003050290