Studies in Interactional Linguistics
Editors
| Universität Potsdam
| University of Konstanz
Current interactional linguistic research appears to be crystallizing around systematic themes, which are all represented in this collection of papers. In the first section, where the relation between language and interaction is viewed from the perspective of language structure, several articles deal with the potential of a single structure for both turn and sequence construction, revealing a play-off between planned and occasioned syntax with potentially far-reaching consequences for language development. Other articles deal with lexical expressions as resources for the conduct of interaction, showing how they are heavily dependent on turn position and sequential context for their meaning potential. In the second section, with a view from the perspective of the interactional order, a systematic focus of interest lies on three different conversational tasks: projecting turn and turn-unit completion, starting up turns with ‘non-beginnings’ and self-repairing. The cross-linguistic studies here all agree that common interactional tasks may well be carried out by quite different linguistic practices and that these practices are dependent to a certain extent on language features which are typologically distinct.
[Studies in Discourse and Grammar, 10] 2001. viii, 438 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
vii
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Part I. Language structure in interaction
|
23
|
|
25
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
Part II. Interactional order and linguistic practice
|
227
|
|
229
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
List of contributors
|
433
|
|
Index
|
435
|
“The publication of the volume marks the introduction of a comparatively new domain of linguistics research with wider scope for future analysis and investigation.”
Niladri Sekhar Dash, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India
“Studies in interactional linguistics represents a novel and important effort to explain linguistic phenomena in the specific contexts in which they occur. This collection of papers has convincingly demonstrated that language use is dynamic and should be accounted for in the interaction where it is employed.”
Bingyun Li, Fujian Teachers University in Language, Vol 79:4 (2003)
“The volume brings forth numerous interesting topics that deserve further investigation [...]”
Hanna Pishwa in Anglia, Band 121:4 (2003)
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2005.
In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology,
► pp. 518 ff. 
No author info given
2014.
In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],
No author info given
2016.
In Displaying Recipiency [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 6],
No author info given
2016.
In Intonation Units Revisited [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 29],
No author info given
2020. Talking about intercultural experiences.
International Journal of Language and Culture 7:1
BERT, MICHEL, SYLVIE BRUXELLES, CAROLE ETIENNE, LORENZA MONDADA & VÉRONIQUE TRAVERSO
2008. Tool-assisted analysis of interactional corpora: voilà in the CLAPI database.
Journal of French Language Studies 18:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Buchholz, Michael B.
2016.
In Austauschprozesse: Psychoanalyse und andere Humanwissenschaften,
► pp. 252 ff.
Buchholz, Michael B.
2019. Szenisches Verstehen und Konversationsanalyse.
PSYCHE 73:06 ► pp. 414 ff.
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, Katie Drager & Paul Foulkes
2018. Editors’ Introduction and Review: Sociolinguistic Variation and Cognitive Science.
Topics in Cognitive Science 10:4 ► pp. 679 ff.
Clayman, Steven E. & John C. Heritage
2014.
In Requesting in Social Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 26],
► pp. 55 ff.
De Stefani, Elwys
2020.
In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32],
► pp. 25 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E.
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Ford, Cecilia E. & Barbara A. Fox
2015.
In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27],
► pp. 95 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E. & Trini Stickle
2012. Securing recipiency in workplace meetings: Multimodal practices.
Discourse Studies 14:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Froholdt, Lisa Loloma
2016. ‘I See You on My Radar’: Displays of the Confirmatory Form in Maritime Technologically Mediated Interaction.
The Sociological Review 64:3 ► pp. 468 ff.
Gao, Hua
2018. Review of Fang, Mei, ed. (2016)《互动语言学与汉语研究（第一辑）》.
Chinese Language and Discourse 9:1 ► pp. 96 ff.
Gilmore, Alex
2012. Materials evaluation and design in language teaching - Ian McGrath, Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (2002). Pp. ix + 310. ISBN 0-7486-1330-7 (paperback). - Brian Tomlinson (ed.), Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum Press (2003). Pp. x + 534. ISBN 0-8264-5917-X (paperback). - Nigel Harwood (ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2010). Pp. xi + 436. ISBN 978-0-521-12158-3 (paperback). - Freda Mishan & Angela Chambers (eds.), Perspectives on language learning materials development. Oxford: Peter Lang (2010). Pp. viii + 286. ISBN 978-3-03911-863-2 (paperback)..
Language Teaching 45:2 ► pp. 250 ff.
Gras, Pedro
2016.
In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115],
► pp. 113 ff.
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2015. An interactional account of discourse-connective que-constructions in Spanish.
Text & Talk 35:4
Greene, Rebecca D. & Kenji Hakuta
2015.
In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences,
► pp. 1 ff.
Haugh, Michael & Anthony J. Liddicoat
2009. Examining Conceptualizations of Communication.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hayashi, Makoto
2003. Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 36:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Hayashi, Makoto, Yuri Hosoda & Ikuyo Morimoto
2019. Tte Yuu Ka as a Repair Preface in Japanese.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:2 ► pp. 104 ff.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2003.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2019. Free NPs as units in Finnish.
Studies in Language 43:2 ► pp. 301 ff.
Hellermann, John
2009. Looking for Evidence of Language Learning in Practices for Repair: A Case Study of Self‐Initiated Self‐Repair by an Adult Learner of English.
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53:2 ► pp. 113 ff.
Hilmisdóttir, Helga
2016. Responding to informings in Icelandic talk-in-interaction: A comparison of nú and er það.
Journal of Pragmatics 104 ► pp. 133 ff.
Hopper, Paul J.
2007. Linguistics and Micro-Rhetoric.
Journal of English Linguistics 35:3 ► pp. 236 ff.
Hsieh, Chen-Yu Chester & Lily I-Wen Su
2019. Construction in conversation.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Imo, Wolfgang
2015.
In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27],
► pp. 147 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2015. A multiple-grammar model of speakers’ linguistic knowledge.
Cognitive Linguistics 26:2
Izre'el, Shlomo, Heliana Mello, Alessandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso
2020.
In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94],
► pp. 1 ff.
Karlsson, Susanna
2020.
In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication,
► pp. 223 ff.
Keating, Elizabeth & Maria Egbert
2005.
In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology,
► pp. 167 ff.
Keevallik, Leelo
2018. What Does Embodied Interaction Tell Us About Grammar?.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Keevallik, Leelo
2020.
In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33],
► pp. 147 ff.
Kim, Stephanie Hyeri & Kyu-hyun Kim
2015.
In The Handbook of Korean Linguistics,
► pp. 269 ff.
Kirkham, Deak
2017.
In Student Culture and Identity in Higher Education [Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, ],
► pp. 293 ff.
Kirkham, Deak
2019.
In Computer-Assisted Language Learning,
► pp. 411 ff.
LaPolla, Randy J.
2016. Evans, Vyvyan. 2014.The language myth: Why language is not an instinct..
Studies in Language 40:1 ► pp. 235 ff.
Laury, Ritva, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2014. Introduction.
Pragmatics 24:3 ► pp. 435 ff.
Lindström, Jan K.
2006.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Martin, James R.
2019. Once more with feeling.
Language, Context and Text 1:2 ► pp. 234 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2015.
In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27],
► pp. 201 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinate she- (‘that/which/who’) clauses.
Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 669 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2020.
In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32],
► pp. 87 ff.
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 189 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2007. Multimodal resources for turn-taking.
Discourse Studies 9:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Mori, Junko
2014.
In Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 156],
► pp. 193 ff.
Morof, Julia
2018. Patterns of Construction in spoken French.
Revue Romane 53:1 ► pp. 159 ff.
Nevile, Maurice
2006. Making sequentiality salient:and-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots.
Discourse Studies 8:2 ► pp. 279 ff.
Nevile, Maurice & Johanna Rendle-Short
2009. A Conversation Analysis View of Communication as Jointly Accomplished Social Interaction: An Unsuccessful Proposal for a Social Visit.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Oloff, Florence & Martin Havlík
2018. An initial description of syntactic extensions in spoken Czech.
Pragmatics 28:3 ► pp. 361 ff.
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
2017. Negative scope, temporality, fixedness, and right- and left-branching.
Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 543 ff.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Yael Maschler, Leelo Keevallik & Jan Lindström
2020.
In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32],
► pp. 1 ff.
Raclaw, Joshua
2015. Book review: Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki (eds), Subordination in Conversation: A Cross-linguistic Perspective.
Discourse & Society 26:3 ► pp. 391 ff.
Reed, Beatrice Szczepek
2012.
In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching [Educational Linguistics, 15],
► pp. 147 ff.
Saxton, Matthew
2005. ‘Recast’ in a new light: insights for practice from typical language studies.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy 21:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Shinzato, Rumiko
2014.
In Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 156],
► pp. 85 ff.
Spronck, Stef
2020.
In Language, Culture and Identity – Signs of Life [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 13],
► pp. 75 ff.
STOCKMAN, IDA J.
2010. Listener reliability in assigning utterance boundaries in children's spontaneous speech.
Applied Psycholinguistics 31:3 ► pp. 363 ff.
Svennevig, Jan
2010. Pre-empting reference problems in conversation.
Language in Society 39:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2012. Beyond the Particular: Prosody and the Coordination of Actions.
Language and Speech 55:1 ► pp. 13 ff.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2015. Managing the Boundary Between “Yes” and “But”: Two Ways of Disaffiliating With Germanja aberandjaber.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
TANAKA, HIROKO
2008. Delaying dispreferred responses in English: From a Japanese perspective.
Language in Society 37:4 ► pp. 487 ff.
Tanaka, Hiroko & Mihoko Fukushima
2002. Gender orientations to outward appearance in Japanese conversation: a study in grammar and interaction.
Discourse & Society 13:6 ► pp. 749 ff.
Thompson, Sandra A.
2019. Understanding ‘clause’ as an emergent ‘unit’ in everyday conversation.
Studies in Language 43:2 ► pp. 254 ff.
Vetter, Eva
2007.
In Qualitative Marktforschung,
► pp. 331 ff.
Vetter, Eva
2009.
In Qualitative Marktforschung,
► pp. 331 ff.
Wright, Melissa
2011. On clicks in English talk-in-interaction.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
Zinken, Jörg & Eva Ogiermann
2011. How to Propose an Action as Objectively Necessary: The Case of PolishTrzeba x(“One Needs tox”).
Research on Language & Social Interaction 44:3 ► pp. 263 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2001043028