Agreement in Language Contact

Gender development in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle

| TU Dortmund University
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027203298 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027262417 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
Gender in English changed dramatically from the elaborate system found in Old English to the very simple he/she/it-alternation in use from (late) Middle English onwards. While either system is well described and understood, the change from one to the other is anything but: more than 120 years of research into the matter provided no prevailing opinion – let alone a consensus – regarding how it proceeded or why it occurred. The present study is the first to address this issue in the context of language contact with Old Norse, assessing this contact influence in relation to both language-formal and semantico-cognitive factors. This empirical, functional account uses rigorous, innovative methodology, interdisciplinary evidence, and well-established models of synchronic variation in diachronic application to draw a fine-grained picture of the variation, change, and loss of gender from Old to Middle English and its underlying mainsprings. The resulting plausible and parsimonious explanations will prove relevant to students and scholars of historical linguistics, morpho-syntax, language variation and change, or language contact, to name but a few.
[Studies in Language Companion Series, 208]  2019.  xxi, 351 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.208
Table of Contents
List of figures
ix–xiii
List of tables
xv
List of examples
xvii–xix
List of abbreviations
xxi
Chapter 1. Introduction
1–3
Chapter 2. Aims and objectives
5–8
Chapter 3. Gender
9–77
Chapter 4. Viking influence in England
79–117
Chapter 5. Methodology
119–161
Chapter 6. Analysis
163–250
Chapter 7. Discussion
251–323
Chapter 8. Conclusion and outlook
325–329
References
331–349
Index
351
References

References

Abrams, Lesley
2000 Conversion and assimilation. In Hadley & Richards (eds), 135–153.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia L.
1995 Case Marking and Reanalysis. Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Arbman, Holger
1969 The Vikings. New York NY: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar
Ashby, Steven P.
2013 Making a good comb: Mercantile identity in 9th- to 11th-Century England. In Hadley & ten Harkel (eds), 193–208.Google Scholar
Audring, Jenny
2009 Reinventing Pronoun Gender. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Ausbüttel, Erich
1904 Das persönliche Geschlecht unpersönlicher Substantiva einschließlich Tiernamen im Mittelenglischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Backhaus, Klaus, Erichson, Bernd, Plinke, Wulff & Weiber, Rolf
2008 Multivariate Analysemethoden, 12th edn. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Janet
2004 Aldred (fl. c.970). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/312​?docPos​=1 (19 August 2013).
Baker, Peter S.
(ed.) 2000 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. A Collaborative Edition, MS F. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P.
2012 Runes: A Handbook. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi S.
1971 A reanalysis of English grammatical gender. Lingua 27: 113–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, G. W. S.
2004 Margaret [St Margaret] (d. 1093). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/18044 (10 June 2011).
Barrow, Julia
2000 Survival and mutation. In Hadley & Richards (eds), 155–176.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Frederic C.
1932[1954] Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bately, Janet
1970 King Alfred and the Old English translation of Orosius. Anglia 88: 433–460.Google Scholar
1980a The Old English Orosius. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1980b The compilation of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 60 BC to AD 890: Vocabulary as evidence. Proceedings of the British Academy 64: 93–129.Google Scholar
1986 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. A Collaborative Edition, MS A. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, Devescovi, Antonella, Hernandez, Arturo & Pizzamiglio, Luigi
1996 Gender priming in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics 58(7): 992–1004. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. & Cable, Thomas
1978 A History of the English Language, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2002 A History of the English Language, 5th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berg, Thomas
1992 Prelexical and postlexical features in language production. Applied Psycholinguistics 13: 199–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 Linguistic Structure and Change. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013 Anglistische Sprachwissenschaft. München: UTB/Fink.Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin & Binsted, Kim
2004 To awaken a sleeping giant. Blending and metaphor in editorial cartoons after September 11. In Language, Culture, and Mind, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Rolf & Nerius, Dieter
1997 Die Entwicklung der Großschreibung im Deutschen von 1500 bis 1700. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Skaffari, Janne
2007 Invitation to the Peterborough Chronicle and its language. In The Language of the Peterborough Chronicle, Alexander Bergs & Janne Skaffari (eds). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
van Berkum, Jos A.
1996 The Psycholinguistics of Grammatical Gender. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Kay, Paul
1969 Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures)
2006 The International System of Units, 8th edn. http://​www​.bipm​.org​/utils​/common​/pdf​/si​_brochure​_8​_en​.pdf (4 June 2012).
Björkman, Erik
1900 Scandinavian Loan-words in Middle English. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Blair, John
2004 Spearhafoc (fl. 1047–1051). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/49416 (20 May 2013).
Blake, Barry J.
1994 Case. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Blake, Norman F.
1992 Introduction. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. II: 1066–1476, Norman F. Blake (ed.). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blinkhorn, Paul
2013 No pots please, we’re Vikings: Pottery in the southern Danelaw, 850–1000. In Hadley & ten Harkel (eds), 157–171.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz
1940 Race, Language and Culture. New York NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Bohn, Robert
2006 Geschichte Schleswig-Holsteins. München: Beck. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, Joseph & Toller, Thomas N.
1898/1921 An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, Based on the Manuscript Collections of the Late Joseph Bosworth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bowden, Georgina R., Balaresque, Patricia, King, Turi E., Hansen, Ziff, Lee, Andrew C., Pergl-Wilson, Giles, Hurley, Emma, Roberts, Stephen J., Waite, Patrick, Jesch, Judith, Jones, Abigail L., Thomas, Mark G., Harding, Stephen E. & Jobling, Mark A.
2008 Excavating past population structures by surname-based sampling: The genetic legacy of the Vikings in Northwest England. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25(2): 301–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt
1982 Syntaxtypologische Studien zum Germanischen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2000 Semikommunikation in phatischen Dialogen. In Text/Diskurs, Oralität/Literalität unter dem Aspekt mehrsprachiger Kommunikation. Beiträge zum Workshop‚ Methodologie und Datenanalyse‘ [Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit/Working Papers on Multilingualism, Folge B, Nr. 11], Bernd Meyer & Notis Toufexis (eds), 101–114. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.Google Scholar
2001 Semicommunication and accommodation: Observations from the linguistic situation in Scandinavia. In Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit [Working Papers on Multilingualism, Folge B, Nr. 17], Kristin Bührig, Gisella Ferraresi, Natascha Müller, Jochen Rehbein & Sophia Vulgari (eds). Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.Google Scholar
Brett, Martin
1981 John of Worcester and his contemporaries. In The Writing of History in the Middle Ages. Essays Presented to Richard William Southern, Ralph H. C. Davis & John Michael Wallace-Hadrill (eds). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bright, James W.
1912 An Anglo-Saxon Reader and Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Brinegar, John H.
2002 Hagiographic, homiletic, and didactic literature. In A Companion to Old and Middle English Literature, Laura C. Lambdin & Robert T. Lambdin (eds.), 277–298. Westport CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl
1891 Zur Frage der Entstehung des grammatischen Geschlechtes. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 15: 523–531.Google Scholar
Brooks, Nicholas
1984 The Early History of the Church of Canterbury: Studies in the Early History of Britain. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Kenneth
1969 English Place Names. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
1971 Scandinavian settlement in the territory of the Five Boroughs: The place-name evidence Part III, the Grimston Hybrids. In England before the Conquest, Peter Clemoes & Kathleen Hughes (eds), 147–163. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair
1959 Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, James
1993 England, c. 991. In ‘The Battle of Maldon’: Fiction and Fact, Janet Cooper (ed.), 1–17. London: Hambledon Press.Google Scholar
Capelli, Cristian, Redhead, Nicola, Abernethy, Julia K., Gratrix, Fiona, Wilson, James F., Moen, Torolf, Hervig, Tor, Richards, Martin, Stumpf, Michael P. H., Underhill, Peter A., Bradshaw, Paul, Shaha, Alom, Thomas, Mark G., Bradman, Neal & Goldstein, David B.
2003 A Y chromosome census of the British Isles. Current Biology 13: 979–984. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carello, Claudia, Lukatela, Georgije & Turvey, Michael T.
1988 Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax. Memory & Cognition 16(3): 187–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cavill, Paul, Harding, Stephen E. & Jesch, Judith
2000 Wirral and its Viking heritage. Nottingham: English Place-Name Society.Google Scholar
Christen, Helen
1998  Die Mutti oder das Mutti, die Rita oder das Rita? Über Besonderheiten der Genuszuweisung bei Personen- und Verwandtschaftsnamen in schweizerdeutschen Dialekten. In Ist mir getroumet mîn leben? Vom Träumen und vom Anderssein. Festschrift für Karl-Ernst Geith zum 65. Geburtstag [Göppinger Arbeiten zur Germanistik; Bd. 632], André Snyder, Claudia Bartholemy-Teusch, Barbara Fleith & René Wetzel (eds), 267–281. Göppingen: Kümmerle.Google Scholar
Clark, Cecily
1957 Gender in the Peterborough Chronicle. English Studies 38: 109–115.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1970 The Peterborough Chronicle, 1070–1154, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cleasby, Richard & Vigfússon, Guþbrandur
1874 An Icelandic-English Dictionary: Based on the Ms. Collections of the Late Richard Cleasby. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Clemoes, Peter & Hughes, Kathleen
(eds) 1971 England before the Conquest. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981 Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Conner, Patrick W.
1996 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, A Collaborative Edition. The Abingon Chronicle, A.D. 956–1066 (MS. C, With Reference To BDE). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
1979 The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15: 203–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 Gender. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Number. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Agreement: Canonical instances and the extent of the phenomenon. In Topics in Morphology: Selected papers from the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (Barcelona, September 20–22, 2001), Geert Booij, Janet DeCesaris, Angela Ralli & Sergio Scalise (eds), 109–128. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
2005 The canonical approach in typology. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language 83: 8–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Number of genders. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. http://​wals​.info​/feature​/30A (17 May 2012).
Crawford, Barbara E.
2003 The Vikings. In Davies (ed.), 14–71.Google Scholar
Crist, Sean
2005 The Germanic Lexicon Project. http://​lexicon​.ff​.cuni​.cz/ (28 July 2012).
Croft, William
1990 Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2001 Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Typology and Universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cubbin, G. P.
1996 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. A Collaborative Edition, MS D. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne
2003 Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2000 Animacy and the notion of semantic gender. In Gender in Grammar and Cognition, Barbara Unterbeck & Matti Rissanen (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Wendy
(ed.) 2003 From the Vikings to the Normans. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Davis, Craig
1999 Cultural historicity in The Battle of Maldon . Philological Quarterly 78: 151–69.Google Scholar
De Vincenzi, Marcia
1999 Differences between the morphology of gender and number: Evidence from establishing coreferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28(5): 537–553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther
2009 Changing pronominal gender in Dutch: Transmission or diffusion? In Language Variation, European Perspectives II [Studies in Language Variation 5], Stavroula Tsiplakou, Marilena Karyolemou & Pavlos Pavlou (eds), 71–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Vos, Lien & De Vogelaer, Gunther
2011 Dutch gender and the locus of morphological regularization. Folia Linguistica 45(2): 245–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Avital & Bentin, Shlomo
1994 Attention mechanisms mediate the syntactic priming effect in auditory word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20: 595–607.Google Scholar
2001 Syntactic and semantic factors in processing gender agreement in Hebrew: Evidence from ERPs and eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 45: 200–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Avital, Bentin, Shlomo & Katz, Leonard
1999 Semantic influence on processing syntactic rules of agreement: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 515–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
diPaolo Healy, Antonette
(ed.) 2000 Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1979 Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dolberg, Florian
2012 Gender change from Old to Middle English. In English Historical Linguistics 2010: Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 23–27 August 2010 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 325], Irén Hegedüs & Alexandra Fodor (eds), 263–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a Quantifying gender change in Medieval English. In Scribes as Agents of Language Change, Esther-Miriam Wagner, Ben Outhwaite & Bettina Beinhoff (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b Subject to change: Decay and mutation of linguistic memory. In New Approaches to the Study of Linguistic Variability [Language Competence and Language Awareness in Europe 4] Markus Bieswanger & Amei Koll-Stobbe (eds). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Mayerthaler, Willi, Panagl, Oswald & Wurzel, Wolfgang U.
1987 Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology [Studies in Language Companion Series 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duby, Georges
1989 Die Frau ohne Stimme: Liebe und Ehe im Mittelalter. Berlin: Klaus Wagenbach.Google Scholar
Dumville, David N.
1983 Some aspects of annalistic writing at Canterbury in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Peritia 20: 23–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 Wessex and England from Alfred to Edgar: Six Essays on Political, Cultural, and Ecclesiastical Revival. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Dumville, David N. & Keynes, Simon
1983 General Editors’ Foreword. In The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: A Collaborative Edition, MS B., Simon Taylor (ed.). Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
1986 General Editors’ Foreword. In The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: A Collaborative Edition, MS A., Janet Bately (ed.). Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert
1930 How long did the Scandinavian language survive in England? In A Grammatical Miscellany Offered to Otto Jespersen on his Seventieth Birthday, Niels Bøgholm, Aage Brusendorff & C. A. Bodelsen (eds), 17–30. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, Marion
2007 The Synchronic and Diachronic Syntax of the English Verb-Particle Combination. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C.
2017 Salience in language usage, learning and change. In The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives, Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone E. Pfenninger (eds). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Encyclopaedia Britannica
1911 Lanfranc. http://​encyclopedia​.jrank​.org​/KRO​_LAP​/LANFRANC​_d​_1089​_.html (10 May 2011).
Enger, Hans-Olav
2004 Scandinavian pancake sentences as semantic agreement. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 27: 5–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a Scandinavian pancake sentences revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36(3): s 275–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b Inflectional change, ‘sound laws’ and the autonomy of morphology. The case of Scandinavian case and gender reduction. Diachronica 30(1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav & Corbett, Greville G.
2012 Definiteness, gender, and hybrids: Evidence from Norwegian dialects. Journal of Germanic Linguisitcs 24(4): 287–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Green, Melanie
2006 Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Evison, Martin P.
2000 All in the genes? Evaluating the biological evidence of contact and migration. In Hadley & Richards (eds), 277–194.Google Scholar
Ewald, Petra
1992 Konkreta vs. Abstrakta. Zur semantischen Subklassifikation deutscher Substantive. Sprachwissenschaft 17: 259–281.Google Scholar
Falsetti, Anthony B. & Sokal, Robert R.
1993 Genetic structure of human populations in the British Isles. Annals of Human Biology 20(3): 215–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, Gillian
2005 The Anglo-Scandinavian street-names of York. In Anglo-Scandinavian York. A Multi-disciplinary Survey [The Archaeology of York 8/5], R. A. Hall, A. J. Mainman, D. Tweddle, Gillian Fellows-Jensen, D. N. Parsons, H. K. Kenward, A. R. Hall, D. W. Rollason, T. P. O’Connor & M. Blackburn (eds). York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1975 An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123–131. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
1977 Scenes-and-frames semantics. In Linguistic Structures Processing, Antonio Zampolli (ed.), 55–82. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
1982 Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
1985 Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222–54.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles & Atkins, Beryl T.
1992 Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In Frames, Fields and Contrasts, Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay (eds), 75–102. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fischer, Andreas
2001 Lexical borrowing and the history of English: A typology of typologies. In Language Contact in the History of English, Dieter Kastovsky & Arthur Mettinger (eds.), 97–115. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fjalldal, Magnus
2005 Anglo-Saxon England in Icelandic Medieval Texts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Richard
1997 The Conversion of Europe from Paganism to Christianity, 376–1386 AD. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Foot, Sarah
2004 Æthelstan (893/4–939). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/833 (29 June 2011).
Frenda, Alessio S.
2011 Gender in Irish between continuity and change. Folia Linguistica 45(2): 283–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, Angela D. & Jacobsen, Thomas
1999 Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholingistic Research 28(5): 467–484. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Froschauer, Regine
2003 Genus im Althochdeutschen: Eine funktionale Analyse des Mehrfachgenus althochdeutscher Substantive. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Coupland, Nicholas & Coupland, Justine
1991 Accommodation Theory: Communication, Context and Consequence. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard & Smith, Philip
1979 Accommodation Theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In Language and Social Psychology, Howard Giles & Robert St Clair (eds). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gilhooly, Ken J. & Logie, Robert H.
1980 Age of acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behaviour Research Methods & Instrumentation 12(4): 395–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Glahn, Nikolaus
1918 Zur Geschichte des Grammatischen Geschlechts im Mittelenglischen vor dem völligen Erlöschen des aus dem Altenglischen ererbten Zustandes. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Gneuss, Helmut
2008 More Old English from manuscripts. In Studies in Anglo-Saxon Culture Presented to Paul E. Szarmach, Virginia Blanton & Helene Scheck (eds). Tempe AZ: ACMRS.Google Scholar
Godden, Malcolm
2004 Ælfric of Eynsham (c.950–c.1010). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/187 (21 July 2011).
Görlach, Manfred
1986 Middle English – A Creole? In Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries, Vol. I: Linguistic Theory and Historical Linguistics, Dieter Kastovsky & Aleksander Szwedek (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Borrowing as language conflict. In Handbook of Language and Communication: Diversity and Change, Marlis Hellinger & Anne Pauwels (eds), 715–749. Berlin: Mouton de Gryuter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995 A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. & Vrba, Elisabeth
1982 Exaptation – A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8(1): 4–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen J.
1983 Hen’s Teeth and Horse’s Toes. Further Reflections in Natural History. New York NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Gransden, Antonia
2004 Edmund [St Edmund] (d. 869). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/8500 (16 October 2011).
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1978 How does a language acquire gender markers? In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 3: Word Structure, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 47–82. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P.
1975 Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics, Vol 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T.
2009 Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, David
2003 Exchange, trade and urbanization. In Davies (ed.), 73–104.Google Scholar
2013 Living in Viking-age towns. In Hadley & ten Harkel (eds), 1–13.Google Scholar
Grosjean, François, Dommergues, Jean-Yves, Cornu, Etienne, Delphine Guillelmon, Delphine & Besson, Carole
1994 The gender-marking effect in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics 56: 590–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gurevich, Olga, Johnson, Matthew A. & Goldberg, Adele
2010 Incidental verbatim memory for language. Language and Cognition 2–1: 45–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gurjanov, M., Lukatela, Georgije, Lukatela, K., Savić, M. & Turvey, Michael T.
1985 Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by the gender of possessive adjectives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2(4): 692–701.Google Scholar
Hadley, Dawn M. & ten Harkel, Letty
2013 Preface. In Hadley & ten Harkel (eds), iv–xi.Google Scholar
(eds) 2013 Everyday Life in Viking-Age Towns: Social Approaches to Towns in Ireland and England c. 800–1100. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Hadley, Dawn M. & Richards, Julian D.
(eds) 2000 Cultures in Contact: Scandinavian Settlement in England in the Ninth and Tenth Centuries [Studies in the Early Middle Ages 2]. Turnhout: Brepols. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. R. Clark
1960 A concise Anglo-Saxon dictionary, 4th edn. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Hammer, Michael F., Karafet, Tatiana M., Redd, Alan J., Jarjanazi, Hamdi, Santachiara-Benerecetti, Silvana, Soodyall, Himla & Zegura, Stephen L.
2001 Hierarchical patterns of global human Y-chromosome diversity. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18(7): 1189–1203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Bente H.
1984 The historical implications of the Scandinavian linguistic element in English: A theoretical evaluation. North-Western European Language Evolution 4: 53–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Stephen E.
2002 Viking Mersey: Scandinavian Wirral, West Lancashire and Chester. Birkenhead: Countyvise.Google Scholar
Hart, Cyril
2004a Edward [St Edward; called Edward the Martyr] (c.962–978). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/8515 (30 December 2011).
2004b Wulfstan (d. 955/6). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/50493 (12 June 2011).
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, John & Bailey, Mark
2001 Modelling the Middle Ages. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Einar
1966 Semicommunication: The language gap in Scandinavia. Sociological Inquiry 36(2): 380–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1986 A Comparative Typology of English and German: Unifying the Contrasts. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Helsinki Corpus
1991 The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Helsinki: Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto
1983 The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb. Turku: Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Hines, John
1991 Scandinavian English: A creole in context. In Proceedings of the Eighths International Symposium on Language Contact in Europe, Douglas, Isle of Man 1988, P. Sture Ureland & George Broderick (eds). Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirt, Hermann
1932 Handbuch des Urgermanischen, Teil II: Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre. Heiderberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans-Heinrich
1986 Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles Francis
1958 A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkin, Robert Howard
1952 A History of the Anglo-Saxons, Vol. II, 3rd edn. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Dietrich
1955 Nordisch-englische Lehnbezeichnungen in der Wikingerzeit. Kopenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Paul
1909 Das grammatische genus in Layamons Brut. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M.
1988 On the impossibility of Old English dialectology. In Luick Revisited, Dieter Kastovsky & Gero Bauer (eds), 183–203 Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1992 Introduction. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066, Richard M. Hogg (ed.). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Home, Malasree
2007 The Peterborough Chronicle in context. In The Language of the Peterborough Chronicle, Alexander Bergs & Janne Skaffari (eds). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hotta, Ryuichi
2012 The order and schedule of nominal plural formation transfer in three Southern dialects of Middle English. In English Historical Linguistics 2010: Selected Papers from the sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 23–27 August 2010 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 325], Irén Hegedüs & Alexandra Fodor (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Humboldt, Wilhelm
1820[1905] Über das vergleichende Sprachstudium in Beziehung auf die verschiedenen Epochen der Sprachentwicklung. In Wilhelm von Humboldts Werke, Vierter Band, Albert Leitzmann (ed.). Berlin: Behr.Google Scholar
Hunt, William & Costambeys, Marios
2004 Siward (d. 1048). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/25651 (1 July 2011).
Hunt, William & Smith, Mary Frances
2004a Æthelgar (d. 990). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/8909 (29 June 2011).
2004b Eadsige (d. 1050). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/8385b (1 June 2011).
Hunter Blair, Peter
1963[1965] Roman Britain and Early England, 55B.C.–A.D. 871. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian S. & Haddon, Alfred C.
1935 We Europeans. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Irvine, Susan
(ed.) 2004 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: A Collaborative Edition, MS E. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Jagodziński, Grzegorz
2002 A Grammar of the Polish Language. http://​grzegorj​.w​.interia​.pl​/gram​/en​/gram00​.html (10 May 2013).
Jakobson, Roman
1960 Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language, Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), 339–377. New York NY: The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology/John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Jescheniak, Jörg D. & Levelt, Willem J. M.
1994 Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 20(4): 824–843.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1905 Growth and Structure of the English Language. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
1927 The ending ‘-ster’. The Modern Language Review 22(2): 129–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1951 The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen Unwin.Google Scholar
Jobin, Bettina
2011 Semantically driven change in German(ic) gender morphology. Folia Linguistica 45(2): 317–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987 The Body in the Mind: The Bodiliy Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles
1967a The functional motivation of linguistic change. English Studies XLVIII: 97–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1967b The grammatical category of gender in early Middle English. English Studies XLVIII: 289–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988 Grammatical Gender in English: 950 to 1250. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Jones, Gwyn
1968 A History of the Vikings. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter
1992 Semantics and vocabulary. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066, Richard M. Hogg (ed.). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Inflectional classes, morphological restructuring, and the dissolution of Old English grammatical gender. In Gender in Grammar and Cognition, Barbara Unterbeck & Matti Rissanen (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi
2003 Sprachwandel: Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache, 3rd edn. Stuttgart: Francke/UTB.Google Scholar
Keller, Wolfgang
1900 Die litterarischen Bestrebungen von Worcester in angelsächsischer Zeit. Quellen und Forschungen zur Sprach- und Culturgeschichte der germanischen Völker 84.Google Scholar
Kelly, Susan E.
(ed.) 2000 Anglo-Saxon Charters 7: Charters of Abingdon Abbey/Pt. 1. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ker, Neil R.
1957 Catalogue of Manuscripts Containing Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, Simon
1978 The declining reputation of King Æthelred the Unready. In Æthelred the Unready: Papers from the Millenary Conference, David Hill (ed.), 227–253. Oxford: British Archaeological Records.Google Scholar
2009 Æthelred II (c.966 × 8–1016) In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/8915 (30 November 2011).
King, Edmund
2004 Hugh Candidus [Hugh Albus] (c.1095–c.1160). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/14057 (22 June 2011).
Knowles, David
1949 The Monastic Order in England: A History of its Development from the Times of St Dunstan to the Fourth Lateran Council 943–1216. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kohlheim, Rosa & Kohlheim, Volker
2004 Duden Lexikon der Vornamen. Mannheim: Duden.Google Scholar
Konishi, Tomoshichi
1958 The growth of the verb-adverb combination in English: A brief sketch. In Studies in English Grammar and Linguistics. A Miscellany in Honour of Takanobu Otsuka, Kazuo Araki, Taiichiro Egawa, Toshiko Oyama & Minory Yasui (eds), 117–128. Tokio: Kenyusha.Google Scholar
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael
1982 Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael & Zubin, David
2005 Nominalphrasen ohne lexikalischen Kopf – Zur Bedeutung des Genus für die Organisation des mentalen Lexikons am Beispiel der Autobezeichnungen im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 24: 93–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Genus. In Deutsche Morphologie, Elke Hentschel & Petra M. Vogel (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael, Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Zubin, David
2010 Motivating grammatical and conceptual gender agreement in German. In Cognitive Foundation of Linguistic Usage Patterns, Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susanne Handl (eds), 171–194. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Körner, Karl
1888 Beiträge zur Geschichte des Geschlechtswechsels der englischen Substantiva. Inaugural-Dissertation. Greifswald: Julius Abei.Google Scholar
Körner, Sten
1964 The Battle of Hastings, England, and Europe 1035–1066. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Kornexl, Lucia
2009 Geschlechterdifferenz und ihre sprachliche Markierung: Zur historischen Entwicklung der personalen Wortbildung im Englischen. In Geschlechterdifferenz, und kein Ende? Sozial- und geisteswissenschaftliche Beiträge zur Genderforschung, Hella Ehlers, Heike Kahlert, Gabriele Linke, Dorit Raffel, Beate Rudlof & Heike Trappe (eds). Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1994 Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. I: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Landwehr, Max
1911 Das grammatische Geschlecht in der Ancren Riwle. Heidelberg: Universitäts-Buchdruckerei von J. Hörning.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1999 Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Ulrich
(ed.) 2003 Geschichte Schleswig-Holsteins von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Neumünster: Wachholtz.Google Scholar
Laing, Margaret & Lass, Roger
2007- A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English, 1150–1350. Edinburgh: EUP. www​.lel​.ed​.ac​.uk​/ihd​/laeme1​/laeme1​.html (24 November 2012).
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. http://​www2​.iath​.virginia​.edu​/sixties​/HTML​_docs​/Texts​/Scholarly​/Lakoff​_Gulf​_Metaphor​_1​.html (26 July 2013).
2003 Metaphor and war, again. http://​www​.alternet​.org​/story​/15414​/metaphor​_and​_war,​_again (26 July 2013).
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York NY: Basic.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Turner, Mark
1989 More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger
1990 How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 Phonology and morphology. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. II: 1066–1476, Norman F. Blake (ed.). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Phonology and morphology. In A History of the English Language, Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latter, B. D. H.
1980 Genetic differences within and between populations of the major human subgroups. American Naturalist 116: 220–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, M. K.
2004 Cnut (d. 1035). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/4579 on 2012–07–28>
Leslie, Stephen, Winney, Bruce, Hellenthal, Garrett, Davison, Dan, Boumertit, Abdelhamid, Day, Tammy, Hutnik, Katarzyna, Royrvik, Ellen C., Cunliffe, Bary
, Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium, Lawson, Daniel J., Falush, Daniel, Freeman, Collin, Pirinen, Matti, Myers, Simon, Robinson, Mark, Donnelly, Peter & Bodmer, Walter 2015 The fine-scale genetic structure of the British population. Nature 519: 309–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, Richard Charles
1972 The apportionment of human diversity. Evolutionary Biology 6: 391–398.Google Scholar
Lindelöf, Uno
1893 Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Altnordhumbrischen. In Mémoires de la Société Néo-Philologique a Helsingfors I, Uno Lindelöf (ed.). Helsingfors: Imprimerie centrale de Helsingfors.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele & Paciaroni, Tania
2011 Four-gender systems in Indo-European. Folia Linguistica 45(2): 389–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loyn, Henry R.
1994 The Vikings in Britain. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2011 The origin of the Proto-Indo-European gender system: Typological considerations. Folia Linguistica 45(2): 435–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, Angelika
(ed.) 1981 Die Version G der angelsächsischen Chronik. Rekonstruktion und Edition. München: Fink.Google Scholar
2012 Norse influence on English in the light of general contact linguistics. In English Historical Linguistics 2010: Selected Papers from the sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 23–27 August 2010 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 325], Irén Hegedüs & Alexandra Fodor (eds), 15–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mätzner, Eduard Adolf Ferdinand
1880 Englische Grammatik, Band 1, 3rd edn. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Maier, Georg
2012 The Distribution of Pronoun Case Forms in Subject Predicative Complements in Varieties of English – A Corpus- and Web-based Study of Pronoun Case Variation. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.Google Scholar
Markus, Manfred
1988 Reasons for the loss of gender in English. In Luick Revisited: Papers Read at the Luick Symposium at Schloss Liechtenstein, 15–18.9.1985, Dieter Kastovsky & Gero Bauer (eds). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Mason, Emma
2004 Wulfstan [St Wulfstan] (c.1008–1095). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/30099 (8 June 2011)>
Mastana, Sarabijt S. & Sokol, R. J.
1998 Genetic variation in the East Midlands. Annals of Human Biology 25(1): 43–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayerthaler, Willi
1981 Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar
McColl Millar, Robert
2000 System Collapse, System Rebirth. Oxford: Lang.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus, Samuels, M. L. & Benskin, Michael
1986 A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English, 4 Vols. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
McLeod, Shane
2011 Warriors and women: The sex ratio of Norse migrants to eastern England up to 900 AD. Early Medieval Europe 19(3): 332–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John H.
2002 What happened to English? Diachronica 19(2): 217–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Defining Creole. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Meillet, A.
1931 Essai de chronologie des langues indo-européennes: La theorie du feminin. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 32:1–28.Google Scholar
Metcalf, David Michael
1978 Large Danegelds in relation to war and kingship: Their implications for monetary history, and some numismatic evidence. In Weapons and Warfare in Anglo-Saxons England, Sonia Chadwick Hawkes (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology.Google Scholar
Miller, Sean
2004 Edward [Edward the Elder] (870s?–924). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/8514 on 2011–06–08>
Mills, Anne E.
1986 The Acquisition of Gender. A Study of English and German. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley
1991 Authority in Language, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce
1985 Old English Syntax, Vol. I: Concord, the Parts of Speech, and the Sentence, Vol. II: Subordination, Independent Elements and Element Order. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mogk, Eugen
(ed.) 1886 Gunnlaugsaga Ormstungu. Mit einleitung und glossar. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Morsbach, Lorenz
1913[1926] Grammatisches und psychologisches Geschlecht im Englischen. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Mossé, Ferdinand
1952 A Handbook of Middle English. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Moulton, William
1988 Mutual intelligibility among speakers of early Germanic dialects. In Germania: Comparative Studies in the Old Germanic Languages and Literatures, Daniel G. Calder & T. Craig Christy (eds). Woodbridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F.
1960 A Middle English Syntax, Part I [Memoires de la Societe Neophilologique de Helsinki 23]. Helsinki: Societe Neophilologique.Google Scholar
Nei, Masatoshi & Roychoudhury, Arun K.
1974 Genic variation within and between the three major races of man, Caucasoids, Negroids, and Mongoloids. American Journal of Human Genetics 26: 421–443.Google Scholar
Nesset, Tore
2001 How pervasive are sexist ideologies in grammar? In Language and Ideology, Vol. 1: Theoretical Cognitive Approaches [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 204], René Dirven, Bruce Hawkins & Esra Sandikcioglu (eds), 197–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
2006 An Introduction to Early Modern English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac
1676[1959] Letter to Robert Hooke, February 5, 1676. In The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, Vol. 1, Herbert W. Turnbull (ed.). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1998 The origin and dispersal of languages: Linguistic evidence. In The Origin and Diversification of Language [Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 24], Nina Jablonski & Leslie C. Aiello (eds). San Francisco CA: California Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Van de Velde, Freek
(eds) 2016 Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nübling, Damaris
2012 Auf dem Weg zu Nicht-Flektierbaren: Die Deflexion der deutschen Eigennamen diachron und synchron. In Nicht-flektierende Wortarten [Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 47], Björn Rothstein (ed.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014a Die Kaiser Wilhelm – der Peterle – das Merkel. Genus als Endstadium einer Grammatikalisierung – und als Quelle von Re- und Degrammatikalisierungen. In Jahrbuch 2013 der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur. Mainz: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
2014b  Das Merkel – Das Neutrum bei weiblichen Familiennamen als derogatives Genus? In Linguistik der Familiennamen, Friedhelm Debus, Rita Heuser & Damaris Nübling (eds). Heidelberg: Olms.Google Scholar
Nübling, Damaris, Busley, Simone & Drenda, Juliane
2014  Dat Anna und s Eva – Neutrale Frauenrufnamen in deutschen Dialekten und im Luxemburgischen zwischen pragmatischer und semantischer Genuszuweisung. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 81.Google Scholar
O’Brien O’Keeffe, Katherine
(ed.) 2001 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: A Collaborative Edition: MS C. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Obst, Wolfgang & Schleburg, Florian
2004 Lehrbuch des Altenglischen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Odenstedt, Bengt
1994 Who was Wulfstan? A new theory of ‘Ohthere’s and Wulfstan’s voyages. Studia Neophilologica 66: 147–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Page, Raymond Ian
1971 How long did the Scandinavian language survive in England? The epigraphical evidence. In England before the Conquest, Peter Clemoes & Kathleen Hughes (eds.), 165–181. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1999 An Introduction to English Runes. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Pampel, Fred C.
2000 Logistic Regression: A Primer. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe
2009 Grammatische versus konzeptuelle Kongruenz. Oder: Wann siegt das natürliche Geschlecht? In An der Grenze zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, Rita Brdar-Szabó, Elisabeth Knipf-Komlósi & Attila Péteri (eds), 67–86. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Paraschkewoff, Boris
1974 Zur Entwicklung des qualitativen Adverbs Im Deutschen. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 11(5): 288–291.Google Scholar
Parkes, Malcolm B.
1976 The palaeography of the Parker manuscript of the Chronicle, laws and Sedulius, and historiography at Winchester in the late ninth and tenth centuries. Anglo-Saxon England 5: 149–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Hans
1981 Zum Skandinavischen Lehngut im Altenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 6: 85–124.Google Scholar
Pfeifer, Wolfgang
(ed.) No year. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. http://​www​.dwds​.de​/?qu​=welsch (18 September 2013).
Philippsen, Max
1911 Die Deklination in den „Vices and Virtues”. Erlangen: Junge & Sohn.Google Scholar
Platzer, Hans
2001 ‘No sex, please, we’re Anglo-Saxon?’ On grammatical gender in Old English. Vienna English Working Papers 10: 34–47.Google Scholar
Plummer, Charles
1892[1952] Two of the Saxon Chronicles Parallel, Vol. I: Text, Appendices and Glossary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1899[1952] Two of the Saxon Chronicles Parallel, Vol. II: Introduction, Notes and Index. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, A. M., Ditchfield, P., Piva, E., Wallis, S., Falys, C. & Ford, S.
2012 ‘Sprouting like cockle amongst the wheat’: The St Brice’s Day Massacre and the isotopic analysis of human bones from St John’s College, Oxford. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 31(1): 83–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pons-Sanz, Sara M.
2007 Norse-derived Vocabulary in Late Old English Texts: Wulfstan’s Works, a Case Study, 3rd edn [NOWELE Supplement Series 22]. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Norse-derived terms and structures in the Battle of Maldon. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 107(4): 421–444.Google Scholar
2010 Norse-derived vocabulary in the Anglo-Saxon chronicle. In Reading the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: Language, Literature, History [Studies in the Early Middle Ages 23], Alice Jorgensen (ed.), 275–304. Brepols: Turnhout. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 The lexical effects of Anglo-Scandinavian linguistic contact on old English. (Studies in the Early Middle Ages). Brepols: Turnhout. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Kristopher
2013 More than just meat: Animals in Viking-age towns. In Hadley & ten Harkel (eds), 144–156.Google Scholar
Pryce, Huw
2003 The christianization of society. In Davies (ed.), 139–167.Google Scholar
Pyles, Thomas
1964 The Origins and Development of the English Language. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Wrenn, Christopher L.
1957 An Old English grammar. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, Günter & Dirven, Réne
2007 Cognitive English Grammar [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radin, Paul
1934 The Racial Myth. New York NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Reuschel, Helga
(ed.) 1957 Gunnlaugs saga Ormstungu. Mit Einleitung, Anmerkungen, Glossar und zwei Kartenskizzen. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Richards, Julian D.
1991 Viking Age England. London: BCA.Google Scholar
Risse, Ursula
1980 Untersuchungen zum Gebrauch der Majuskel in deutschsprachigen Bibeln des 16. Jahrhunderts. Ein historischer Beitrag zur Diskussion um die Substantivgrossschreibung. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Roberts, Derek F.
1985 Genetic structure in Orkney. Man 20: 131–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Orrin W.
1992 Old English and its Closest Relatives: A survey of the Earliest Germanic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, Derek F.
1986 Who are the Orcadians? Anthropologischer Anzeiger 44(2): 93–104.Google Scholar
1990 Genetic affinities of the Shetland Islanders. Annals of Human Biology 17(2): 121–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Derek F., Mitchell, R. J., Creen, C. K. & Jorde, L. B.
1981 Genetic variation in Cumbrians. Annals of Human Biology 8(2): 135–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Stephen J.
2002 A History of Wirral. Chichester: Philimore.Google Scholar
Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke
1994 Konservative Nominalflexion und “klammerndes Verfahren” im Deutschen. In Funktionale Untersuchungen zur deutschen Nominal- und Verbalmorphologie, Klaus-Michael Köpcke (ed.), 115–130. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Der Numerus – das Genus – die Klammer. Die Entstehung der deutschen Nominalklammer im innergermanischen Vergleich. In Kontrastive Germanistische Linguistik, Teilband 2, Antje Dammel, Sebastian Kürschner & Damaris Nübling (eds), 719–748. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Rositzke, Harry August
(ed.) 1940 The C-Text of the Old English Chronicles. Bochum-Langendreer: Heinrich Pöppinghaus.Google Scholar
Ross, Alan S. C.
1936 Sex and gender in the Lindisfarne Gospels. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 35: 321–30.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jaques
1762[2010] Emile, or on Education. http://​www​.ilt​.columbia​.edu​/pedagogies​/rousseau​/index​.html (23 September 2010).
Rubenstein, J. C.
2004 Eadmer of Canterbury (b. c.1060, d. in or after 1126). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/8383 (1 June 2011).
Russell, Bertrand
1952[1997] Is there a God?. In The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 11: Last Philosophical Testament, 1943–68, John C. Slater & Peter Kollner (eds). London: Routledge. http://​www​.cfpf​.org​.uk​/articles​/religion​/br​/br​_god​.htm (25 May 2011).
Sachs, Jacqueline S.
1967 Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics 2(9): 437–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Michael L.
1963 Some applications of Middle English dialectology. English Studies 44: 81–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1972 Linguistic Evolution: With Special Reference to English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1993 Syntactic categories and subcategories. In Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung/An International Handbook of Contemporary Research [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication, 9], Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 646–686. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Peter Hayes
1962 The Age of the Vikings. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1969 The two Viking ages of Britain – A discussion. Mediaeval Scandinavia 2: 163–207.Google Scholar
Sayles, George Osborne
1966 The Medieval Foundations of England. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Scheler, Manfred
1977 Der Englische Wortschatz. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Rainer
1986 Was weiß der Artikel vom Hauptwort? Ein Beitrag zur Verarbeitung syntaktischer Beziehungen beim Lesen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 23(1): 150–163.Google Scholar
Schriefers, Herbert
1993 Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19: 841–850.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seebold, Elmar
1992 Kentish and Old English texts from Kent. In Words, Texts and Manuscripts, Michael Korhammer, Karl Reichl & Hans Sauer (eds), 409–434. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Sidebottom, Phil
2000 Viking age stone monuments and social identity in Derbyshire. In Hadley & Richards (eds), 213–235.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2008 Pronominal Gender in English: A Study of English Varieties from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter & Dolberg, Florian
2011 From lexical to referential gender: An analysis of gender change in medieval English based on two historical documents. Folia Linguistica 45(2): 489–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sievers, Eduard
1882 Angelsächsische Grammatik. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages [Linguistic Series 22], Robert M.W. Dixon (ed), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam
1790[2014] The Theory of Moral Sentiments, 6th edn. http://​www​.ibiblio​.org​/ml​/libri​/s​/SmithA​_MoralSentiments​_p​.pdf (13 April 2014).
Smith, Jeremy J.
2007 Sound Change and the History of English. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Old English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Alfred P.
1975 Scandinavian York and Dublin. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stenroos, Merja
2008 Order out of chaos? The English gender change in the Southwest Midlands as a process of semantically based reorganization. English Language and Linguistics 12(3): 445–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stenton, Doris Mary
(ed.) 1970 Preparatory to Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stenton, Frank Merry
1942 The historical bearing of place-name studies: the Danish settlement of eastern England. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 42: 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1925[1970] The South-western element in the Old English Chronicle. In Preparatory to Anglo-Saxon England, Doris Mary Stenton (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1943[1989] Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Stevens, Stanley S.
1946 On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103: 677–680. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, David
2000 Monuments and merchants: Irregularities in the distribution of stone sculpture in Lincolnshire and Derbyshire in the tenth century. In Hadley & Richards (eds), 179–212.Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara M. H.
1970 A History of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Sundermann, Werner
1989 Mittelpersisch. In Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum, Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), 138–164. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1909 First Middle English Primer. Oxford: Clarendon press.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald
1996 Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Simon
(ed.) 1983 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. A Collaborative Edition, MS B. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Thim, Stefan
2008 The rise of the phrasal verb in English: A case of Scandinavian influence? In Anglistentag 2007, Münster: Proceedings, Klaus Stiersdorfer (ed.). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
2012 Phrasal Verbs: The English Particle Construction and its History. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Gabor
2000 Anglo-Scandinavian metalwork from the Danelaw. In Hadley & Richards (eds), 237–255.Google Scholar
Thomas, Hugh M.
2003a The significance and fate of the native English landowners of 1086. The English Historical Review 118: 303–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003b The English and the Normans. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terrence
1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey
2001 Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Tichý, Ondřej
2010 Bosworth-Toller Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. http://​www​.bosworthtoller​.com/ (21 August 2013).
Timberlake, Alan
1977 Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed), 169–183. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Töpf, A. L., Gilbert, M. T. P., Dumbacher, J. P. & Hölzel, A. R.
2006 Tracing the phylogeography of human populations in Britain based on 4th–11th century mtDNA genotypes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(1): 152–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Townend, Matthew
2000 Viking age England as a bilingual society. In Hadley & Richards (eds), 89–105.Google Scholar
2002 Language and History of Viking Age England: Linguistic Relations between Speakers of Old Norse and Old English. Turnhout: Brepols. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trafford, Simon
2000 Ethnicity, migration theory, and the historiography of the Scandinavian settlement in England. In Hadley & Richards (eds), 17–39.Google Scholar
Trask, Robert Laurence
1996 Historical Linguistics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth C.
2017 Low salience as an enabling factor in morphosyntactic change. In The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives, Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone E. Pfenninger (eds), 93–110. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1986 Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tummers, Jose, Heylen, Kris & Geeraerts, Dirk
2005 Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1–2: 225–261.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, Gabriella, Vinson, David P., Paganelli, Federica & Dworzynski, Katharina
2005 Grammatical gender effects on cognition: Inplications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134: 501–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S.
1934[1962] Thought and Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Ian & Hulme, Charles
1999 Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words – Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 25(5): 1256–1271.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1953 Languages in Contact. Findings and Problems [Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York 1]. New York NY: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Weiss, Sabine & Rappelsberger, Peter
1996 EEG coherence within the 13–18 Hz band as a correlate of a distinct lexical organisation of concrete and abstract nouns in humans. Neuroscience Letters 209: 17–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitelock, Dorothy
1945a Scandinavian personal names in the Liber Vitae of Thorney Abbey. Saga-Book of the Viking Society 12: 127–153.Google Scholar
1945b The conversion of the eastern Danelaw. Saga-Book of the Viking Society 12: 159–176.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1954 The Peterborough Chronicle [The Bodleian Manuscript Laud Misc. 636]. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde & Bagger.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1979 English Historical Documents, c. 500–1042. London: Eyre Methuen & OUP.Google Scholar
Whitelock, Dorothy, Douglas, David C. & Tucker, Susie I.
(eds) 1961 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. A Revised Translation. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L.
1956 Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. New York NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Williams, Ann
2003 Æthelred the Unready: The Ill-Counselled King. London: Hambledon & London.Google Scholar
2004a Godwine, earl of Wessex (d. 1053). In: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/10887 (31 May 2011).
2004b Hygeberht (d. in or after 803). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/13223 (8 December 2011).
2004c Edgar (943/4–975). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/8463 (30 December 2011).
Williams, Gareth
2013 Towns and identities in Viking England. In Hadley & ten Harkel (eds), 14–34.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald
2003 An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1921[1984] Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wormald, Patrick
1999 The Making of English Law: King Alfred to the Twelfth Century. Vol. I: Legislation and its Limits. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2004 Wulfstan (d. 1023). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/30098 (12 June 2011).
2006 Alfred (848/9–899). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oxforddnb​.com​/view​/article​/183 on 2011–06–13>
Wrenn, Charles Leslie
1933 “Standard” Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 32(1): 65–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xueqin, Li, Harbottle, Garman, Zhang, Juzhong & Wang, Changsui
2003 The earliest writing? Sign use in the seventh millennium BC at Jiahu, Henan Province, China. Antiquity 77(295): 31–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Carlette, Jean, Garretson, Gregory, Bresnan, Joan, Koontz-Garboden, Andrew, Nikitina, Tatiana, O’Connor, M. Catherine & Wasow, Tom
2004 Animacy encoding in English: Why and how. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation Barcelona, July 2004, Donna Byron & Bonnie Webber (eds), 118–25. Stroudsburg PA: ACL. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zoëga, Geir T.
1910 A Concise Dictionary of Old Icelandic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Zubin, David & Köpcke, Klaus-Michael
1981 Gender: A less than arbitrary grammatical category. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 17, Robert A. Hendrick, Carrie S. Masek & Mary Frances Miller (eds). Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
1986 Gender and folk taxonomy. In Noun Classes and Categorization [Typological Studies in Language 7], Colette G. Craig (ed.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subjects

Linguistics

Historical linguistics
Germanic linguistics
Syntax
English linguistics
Contact Linguistics
Theoretical linguistics
BIC Subject: CFF – Historical & comparative linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009010 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Historical & Comparative
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2019007612 | Marc record