Diachronic Construction Grammar
Editors
| Ghent University
| Leibniz University Hanover
| University of Vienna
| University of Oregon
Construction Grammar as a framework offers a new perspective on traditional historical questions in diachronic linguistics and language change: how do new constructions arise, how should competition in diachronic variation be accounted for, how do constructions fall into disuse, and how do constructions change in general, formally and/or semantically, and with what implications for the language system as a whole? This volume offers a broad introduction to the confluence of Construction Grammar and historical syntax, and also detailed case studies of various instances of syntactic change modeled within Construction Grammar. The volume demonstrates that Construction Grammar as a theory is particularly well suited for modeling historical changes in morphosyntax, and it also documents challenging new phenomena that require a theoretical account within any competing framework of syntactic change.
[Constructional Approaches to Language, 18] 2015. xi, 263 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
|
ix–xii
|
|
|
1–50
|
|
|
51–80
|
|
|
81–106
|
|
|
107–138
|
|
|
139–172
|
|
|
173–212
|
|
|
213–256
|
|
|
Index Terms
|
257–260
|
|
Languages Index
|
261–262
|
|
Constructions Index
|
263–264
|
“Diachronic Construction Grammar is an exciting new area of cognitive-functional linguistics that connects ideas from grammaticalization theory, cognitive linguistics, and constructional approaches to grammar. This collection of articles, all written by well-known experts from the field, charts this new territory with case studies from Czech, Dutch, English, German, Brazilian Portuguese, and other languages. The book thus provides a much-needed overview and leads the way towards further investigations into the diachrony of constructions.”
Martin Hilpert, Université de Neuchâtel
“The volume provides a state-of-the-art overview of constructional approaches to diachrony. Uniting papers of a more theoretical stance with indepth case studies, its focus is on typical examples of grammaticalizating changes and theoretical questions pertaining to this type of language change. The introduction surveys the development of constructional diachronic approaches and positions the contributions of the volume in this rapidly diversifying field. The book is an excellent read for everybody interested in modern diachronic lingustics in general and grammaticalization and construction grammar in particular.”
Gabriele Diewald, University of Hannover
“This is a really valuable book for researchers interested in usage-based approaches to language change. Each contribution combines theoretical insights with diverse empirical data, and the collection as a whole provides a rich source of material for understanding how construction grammar can account for fundamental issues in historical linguistics. The volume identifies both areas of common ground, and points of difference, which will hopefully lead to new research trajectories. All in all, it provides a state-of-the-art account of principles of diachronic construction grammar.”
Graeme Trousdale, University of Edinburgh
“The volume adds interesting and important insights to the emerging field of studying language change from a constructionist’s point of view. The book is a good mix of theoretical discussion and empirical evidence and offers a range of different approaches and methods.”
Meike Pentrel, Osnabrück University, in Language Dynamics and Change 7 (2017) pp. 141–146
Cited by
Cited by 51 other publications
No author info given
2017.
In Pivotal Constructions in Chinese [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 8],
No author info given
2019.
In Typology of Pluractional Constructions in the Languages of the World [Typological Studies in Language, 125],
Alba-Salas, Josep
2020. Construccionalización y obsolescencia en las colocaciones tipo <em>caerle/venirle/entrarle en N</em><sub>‘agrado’</sub>.
Revista de Filología Española 100:1 ► pp. 9 ff.
Andersson, Peter & Kristian Blensenius
2018. Matches and mismatches in Swedish [gå och V] ‘go/walk and V’.
Constructions and Frames 10:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
Ariel, Mira
2019.
Or constructions.
Constructions and Frames 11:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Beuls, Katrien & Remi van Trijp
2016. Computational construction grammar and constructional change.
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 1 ff.
Boas, Hans C. & Steffen Höder
2021.
In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30],
► pp. 2 ff.
Budts, Sara & Peter Petré
2020.
In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],
► pp. 318 ff.
Cloutier, Robert, Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Radosław Święciński, Gea Dreschler, Sune Gregersen, Beáta Gyuris, Kathryn Allan, Maggie Scott, Lieselotte Anderwald, Alexander Kautzsch, Sven Leuckert, Tihana Kraš, Alessia Cogo, Tian Gan, Ida Parise & Jessica Norledge
2018. IEnglish Language.
The Year's Work in English Studies 97:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Colleman, Timothy
2016. A reflection on constructionalization and constructional borrowing, inspired by an emerging Dutch replica of the ‘time’-away construction.
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 91 ff.
Combettes, Bernard, Mathilde Dargnat, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. Grammaire de constructions et diachronie : Intensivité et concession.
SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 04001 ff.
Coussé, Evie, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson
2018.
In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],
► pp. 3 ff.
Daniels, Don
2021. The issue of arbitrariness in syntactic reconstruction.
Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s2 ► pp. 393 ff.
Dux, Ryan
2018.
In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24],
► pp. 211 ff.
FANEGO, TERESA
2019. A construction of independent means: the history of the Way construction revisited.
English Language and Linguistics 23:3 ► pp. 671 ff.
Fanego, Teresa
2020. On the History of the English Progressive Construction Jane came whistling down the street.
Journal of English Linguistics 48:4 ► pp. 319 ff.
Fischer, Olga
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 75 ff.
Garachana, Mar & María Sol Sansiñena
2020.
Va a ser que no
.
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 87 ff.
Giacalone Ramat, Anna
2017. Passives and Constructions that resemble passives
.
Folia Linguistica 51:s38-s1 ► pp. 149 ff.
Giacalone Ramat, Anna
2019. Degrees of grammaticalization and measure constructions in Italian.
Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 54:2 ► pp. 257 ff.
Goldberg, Adele E.
2020.
In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],
► pp. 59 ff.
Granvik, Anton
2018.
In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],
► pp. 205 ff.
Gregersen, Sune
2018. Some (critical) questions for diachronic construction grammar
.
Folia Linguistica 52:s39-s2 ► pp. 341 ff.
Hartmann, Stefan & Michael Pleyer
2021. Constructing a protolanguage: reconstructing prehistoric languages in a usage-based construction grammar framework.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824
Hieber, Daniel W.
2018.
In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20],
► pp. 15 ff.
Hilpert, Martin
2017.
In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7],
► pp. 217 ff.
Hilpert, Martin
2018.
In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],
► pp. 21 ff.
Hilpert, Martin, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere
2021.
In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32],
► pp. 1 ff.
Ishizaki, Yasuaki
2020.
In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214],
► pp. 144 ff.
KIM, JONG-BOK & MARK DAVIES
2020. English what with absolute constructions: a Construction Grammar perspective.
English Language and Linguistics 24:4 ► pp. 637 ff.
Li, Yi, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Weiwei Zhang
2021. The theme-recipient alternation in Chinese: tracking syntactic variation across seven centuries.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0
Luraghi, Silvia
2020. From verb to New Event Marker.
Studies in Language 44:4 ► pp. 788 ff.
Norde, Muriel & Kristel Van Goethem
2018.
In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4],
► pp. 475 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2016. For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar.
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 39 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2019. The decline of the Deontic nci construction in Late Modern English.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
OHASHI, HIROSHI
2017. <i>Constructionalization and Constructional Changes</i>.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2 ► pp. 604 ff.
Rosemeyer, Malte & Mar Garachana
2019. De la consecución a la contraexpectación: la construccionalización de lograr/conseguir + infinitivo
.
Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 383 ff.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2020. How the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model might enrich Diachronic Construction Grammar.
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 306 ff.
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
2020.
In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],
► pp. 2 ff.
Sommerer, Lotte
2019. Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede (eds.). (2018). Category Change
from a Constructional Perspective
.
Constructions and Frames 11:2 ► pp. 317 ff.
Sommerer, Lotte
2020.
In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],
► pp. 70 ff.
SOMMERER, LOTTE & KLAUS HOFMANN
2021. Constructional competition and network reconfiguration: investigating sum(e) in Old, Middle and Early Modern English.
English Language and Linguistics 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Torrent, Tiago Timponi, Ely Edison da Silva Matos & Natália Sathler Sigiliano
2020. Construction grammar across borders.
Constructions and Frames 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH CLOSS
2017. ‘Insubordination’ in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle.
English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2020. Coussé, E., Andersson, P., & Olofsson, J. (Eds.) 2018. Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar
.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25:1 ► pp. 116 ff.
Trousdale, Graeme
2018.
In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20],
► pp. 291 ff.
Turner, Mark
2018. The Role of Creativity in Multimodal Construction Grammar.
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66:3 ► pp. 357 ff.
von Mengden, Ferdinand & Anneliese Kuhle
2020. Recontextualization and language change.
Folia Linguistica 54:s41-s1 ► pp. 253 ff.
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019.
In Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax,
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2019. The development of the Chinese copula shì construction.
Functions of Language 26:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Zhu, Bing & Kaoru Horie
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 361 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFF – Historical & comparative linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General