Historical Linguistics

A cognitive grammar introduction

| Wayne State University
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027205506 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
Paperback – Available
ISBN 9789027205513 | EUR 36.00 | USD 54.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027261236 | EUR 99.00/36.00*
| USD 149.00/54.00*
 
This textbook serves a dual purpose. It is, first, a comprehensive introduction to historical linguistics, intended for both undergraduate and graduate students who have taken, at the least, an introductory course in linguistics. Secondly, unlike many such textbooks, this one is based in the theoretical framework of Cognitive Linguistics, a semantics-based theory which emphasizes the relationship between cognition and language. Descriptions and explanations touch on cognitive, social, and physiological aspects of language as it changes across time. Examples come principally from Germanic (English, German, Yiddish) and Romance (French and Spanish), but with some exploration of aspects of the history of other languages as well. Each chapter concludes with exercises based on material in the chapter and also with suggestions for extensions of the content to wider issues in diachronic linguistics.
[Not in series, 227]  2020.  xvii, 241 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.227
Table of Contents
List of figures
Preface
Acknowledgments
Chapter 1. What is language change?
1–22
Chapter 2. Studying change
23–45
Chapter 3. Lexical change
47–71
Chapter 4. Phonetic change
73–95
Chapter 5. Phonological change
97–118
Chapter 6. Morphological change
119–141
Chapter 7. Syntactic change
143–167
Chapter 8. Actuation and spread
169–183
Chapter 9. Methodology
185–211
Chapter 10. Causation, prediction, and final remarks
213–230
References
Index
237–241
References

References

Allen, Cynthia
1980 Diachronic English Syntax. New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo
1989 Historical and Comparative Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 6), 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Analogy: The Warp and Woof of Cognition. In B. Joseph and R. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 425–440. Maiden (MA), Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arlotto, Anthony
1972 Introduction to Historical Linguistics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bomhard, Allan R.
2008 Reconstructing Proto-Nostratic: Comparative Phonology, Morphology, and Vocabulary, 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2002 Word Frequency and Context of Use in the Lexical Diffusion of Phonetically Conditioned Sound Change. Language Variation and Change 14: 261–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticalization: The Role of Frequency. In B. Joseph and R. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 602–623. Maiden (MA), Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
1990 Syntactic Reconstruction and Finno-Ugric. In H. Andersen and K. Koerner (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1987: Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 51–94. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988 Review of Greenberg (1987). Language 64: 591–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Review of Kari and Potter. International Journal of American Linguistics 77: 445–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Language Isolates and their History, or, What’s Weird, Anyway? Berkeley Linguistic Society 36:16–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chrisomalis, Stephen
2010 Numerical Notation. A Comparative History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
2000 Language Death. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clackson, James
2017 The Comparative Method and Comparative Reconstruction. In A. Ledgeway and I. Roberts (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Marcelle
2018 A Native Origin for Present-Day English they, their, them. Diachronica 35: 165–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
(ed.) 2017 The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2000 Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell,Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph Embley and Jan Terje Faarlund
2014 English: The Language of the Vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar
Fertig, David
2013 Analogy and Morphological Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W., IV
2003 An Approach to Semantic Change. In Joseph and Janda (eds.), 648–666.Google Scholar
Foulet, Alfred and Mary Blakely Spear
1979 On Editing Old French Texts. Lawrence, KS: Regents Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Fox, Anthony
1995 Linguistic Reconstruction: An Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005 The Structure of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Thomas and Ivanov, Vjaceslav
1995 Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A Reconstruction and Historical Analysis of a Proto-Language and a Proto-Culture, 2 Vols. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van
2006 A History of the English Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1971 Historical Syntax and Synchronic Morphology: An Archaeologist’s Field Trip. Chicago Linguistics Society 7: 394–415.Google Scholar
2018 On Understanding Grammar, 2nd edn. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, Jane
1990 Through a Window. Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963 Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language (2nd edition, 1966, 73–113), 58–90. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1987 Language in the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. et al.
1987 Review and Discussion of Greenberg (1987). Current Anthropology 8: 647–667.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell
1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 74). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce
2009 Introductory Phonology. Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics. Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet and Hubert Cuyckens
2010 Finite and Gerundive Complementation in Modern and Present-day English: Semantics, Variation and Change. In M. E. Winters, H. Tissari, and K. Allan (eds.), Historical Cognitive Linguistics, 132–159. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Mikhl
1998 Cross-Linguistic Homonyms. http://​shakti​.trincoll​.edu​/~mendele​/vol08​/vol08​.043.
Hopper, Paul
1973 Glottalized and Murmured Occlusives in Indo-European. Glotta 7: 141–166.Google Scholar
Hurford, James
2003 The Language Mosaic and its Evolution. In M. H. Christiansen and S. Kirby (eds.), Language Evolution: The States of the Art, 38–57. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izzo, Herbert
1972 The Layer-Cake Model in Historical Linguistics. General Linguistics 12: 159–168.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Neil
2005 Yiddish: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian and Kodi Weatherholtz
2016 What the Heck is Salience? How Predictive Language Processing Contributes to Sociolinguistic Perception. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917 Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian and Richard Janda
2003 The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. New York: J. Wiley and Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kari, James and Ben A. Potter
(eds.) 2010 The Dene-Yeniseian Connection. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska, New Series, Vol. 5 (1–2). Fairbanks: Department of Anthropology, University of Alaska.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi
1994 On Language Change. The Invisible Hand in Language, translated by B. Nerlich. London and New York: Routledge; first published 1990, Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuryɬowicz, Jerzy
1945 La nature des procès dits “analogiques”. Acta Linguistica 5: 121–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1981 Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language 57: 267–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Review of P. Eckert. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice in Language in Society 31: 277–284.Google Scholar
2007 Transmission and Diffusion. Language 83: 344–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Principles of Language Change: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
2005 A Course in Phonetics. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter and Ian Maddieson
1996 The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. I Theoretical Prerequisites. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008 Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam and Ian Roberts
(eds.) 2017 The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015 Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd edn. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred
1974 Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Erez, Jean-Baptiste Michel, Joe Jackson, Tina Tang, and Martin A. Nowak
2007 Quantifying the Evolutionary Dynamics of Language. Nature 449 (7163): 713–716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Philip
1975 On the Origins of Language. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1979 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics, Vol. 1 and 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mańczak, Witold
1958 Tendences générales des changements analogiques. Lingua 7: 298–325; 387–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André
1984 De la synchronie dynamique à la diachronie. Diachronica 1: 53–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Geoffrey S.
1989 Preliminaries to a Theory of Phonological Substance: The Substance of Sonority. In R. Corrigan, M. Noonan, and F. Eckman (eds.), Linguistic Categorization (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 61), 55–68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 Steps towards a Cognitive Phonology. In Bernhard Hurch and Richard Rhodes (eds.), Natural Phonology: The State of the Art, 107–120. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Phonology. In Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuykens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistic, 611–631. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008 Phonology: A Cognitive Grammar Introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J.
2006 Phonetics and Historical Phonology. In Joseph and Janda (eds.), 669–686.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
. www​.oed​.com.
Payne, Laura
2006 From Bookworms to Trust Slugs: The Patterns and Productivity of “Animal for X” Metaphoric Compounds. Masters Thesis, Wayne State University.
Premack, David and Ann Premack
1983 The Mind of an Ape. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren
2011 Dene-Yeniseian. Diachronica 28: 255–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Henry
2001 The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921 Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1879 Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Leipzig: Vieweg.Google Scholar
1916 A Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger. Translated with an introduction and notes by Wade Baskin. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990 The languages of Japan (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar
1947 An Introduction to Linguistic Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics – Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tai, James
1985 Temporal Sequence and Chinese Word Order. In J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 49–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trask, Robert L.
1996 Historical Linguistics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1982 From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings; Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization. In W. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, 245–271. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Paul Hopper
2003 Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics), 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Urban, Mattias
2015 Lexical Semantic Change and Semantic Reconstruction. In C. Bowern and B. Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 374–392. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2014 Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wedel, Andrew, Abby Kaplan, and Scott Jackson
2013 High Functional Load Inhibits Phonological Contrast Loss: A Corpus Study. Cognition 28: 179–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin I. Herzog
1968 Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. In L. P. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 97–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret E.
1984 Steps to the Romance Passive Inferable from the Itinerarium Egeriae. Romance Philology 37: 445–54.Google Scholar
1987 Innovations in French Negation: A Cognitive Grammar Account. Diachronica 4: 27–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 Cognitive Grammar and Kuryɬowicz’s Laws of Analogy. In H. Andersen and K. Koerner (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1987, 543–551. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 The Nature of the So-Called Analogical Processes. Translated into English and with an Introduction. Diachronica 12 (1): 113–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 On Reconstructing the Middle Ground. Linguistica Atlantica 18/19: 141–153.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret E. and Geoffrey S. Nathan
1992 First He Called Her a Philologist and then She Insulted Him. In D. Brentari et al., (eds.), The Joy of Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of James D. McCawley, 351–367. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich
1989 Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Zuckermann, Ghil’ad
2006 A New Vision for ‘Israeli Hebrew’: Theoretical and Practical Implications of Analysing Israel’s Main Language as a Semi-Engineered Semito-European Hybrid Language. Journal of Modern Jewish Studies 5 (1): 57–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subjects

Linguistics

Historical linguistics
Cognition and language
Cognitive linguistics
BIC Subject: CFF – Historical & comparative linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009010 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Historical & Comparative
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2020005905