Prototypical Argumentative Patterns

Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context

Editor

Frans H. van Eemeren

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027211286 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00

e-Book –

ISBN 9789027265067 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00

Prototypical Argumentative Patterns reports about a research project started at the University of Amsterdam in 2012. In this project distinctive argumentative patterns have been identified in argumentative discourse in the political, the legal and the medical domain. These patterns consist of constellations of argumentative moves in which, in order to deal with a particular kind of difference of opinion, in defence of a particular type of standpoint, a particular argument scheme or combination of argument schemes is used in a particular kind of argumentation structure. The composition of these prototypical argumentative patterns can be explained by referring to the institutional characteristics of the communicative activity types in which they occur. By exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and the institutional context, Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Corina Andone, Eveline Feteris and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans have provided a new and illuminating perspective on the context-dependency of argumentative discourse.

[Argumentation in Context, 11] 2017. ix, 184 pp.

Publishing status:

https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11

Table of Contents

Preface | p. vii

Acknowledgment | p. ix

Chapter 1. Introduction

Frans H. van Eemeren | pp. 1–5

Chapter 2. Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective

Frans H. van Eemeren | pp. 7–29

Chapter 3. The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament

Bart Garssen | pp. 31–51

Chapter 4. The role of pragmatic and majority argumentation in reports of European parliamentary committees of inquiry

Corina Andone | pp. 53–70

Chapter 5. The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisisons

Eveline T. Feteris | pp. 71–91

Chapter 6. The role of pragmatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements

A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans | pp. 93–108

Chapter 7. Argumentative patterns with argumentation by example in legislative debate in the European Parliament

Bart Garssen | pp. 109–124

Chapter 8. Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions

Eveline T. Feteris | pp. 125–138

Chapter 9. Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements

A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans | pp. 139–155

Chapter 10. The dependency of argumentative patterns on the institutional context

Frans H. van Eemeren | pp. 157–180

Authors | pp. 181–182

Index | pp. 183–184

“ Prototypical Argumentative Patterns is strongly recommended to all scholars interested in argumentation. [T]his book makes a compelling argument for the valuable integration of the study of prototypical argumentation in argumentation theory. In this sense, it offers new directions to argumentation analysis and provides the instruments to engage in specific domains that, nowadays, are of core interest to the study of argumentative practice.””

Sara Rubinelli, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research, in Journal of Argumentation in Context, 7:3 (2018).

Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Order by:

De Cock, Barbara, Laetitia Aulit, Sara Cigada, Sara Greco, Ewa Modrzejewska & Rudi Palmieri

2024. The Discourse of Digital Activism: A Linguistic Analysis of Calls for Action Concerning the Fashion Revolution. Applied Linguistics

Tseronis, Assimakis, Ramy Younis & Mehmet Ali Üzelgün

2024. A proposal for the evaluation of multimodal argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 13:2 ► pp. 292 ff.

Greco, Sara

2023. Twitter Activists’ Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion. Argumentation 37:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Andone, Corina

2022. Arguing through quotations. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 ► pp. 69 ff.

Andone, Corina & Bart Garssen

2022. Introduction. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Mohammed, Dima

2022. Negative campaigning. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 ► pp. 88 ff.

Fetzer, Anita & Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka

2021. Argumentative, Political and Legal Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 520 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2021. Review of van Eemeren (2018): Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2 ► pp. 262 ff.

Wang, Bin & Frank Zenker

2021. Slippery Slope Arguments in Legal Contexts: Towards Argumentative Patterns. Argumentation 35:4 ► pp. 581 ff.

Fairclough, Isabela

2019. Deontic power and institutional contexts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1 ► pp. 136 ff.

Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert

2018. Introduction to Discourse Studies,

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. A Model of a Critical Discussion. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 33 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 149 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Wu Peng

2017. Chapter 1. Introduction Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 1 ff.

[no author supplied]

2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects