Local Educational Order
Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action
Editors
| University of Wales
| Manchester Metr. University
The studies in this book take an ethnomethodological approach to educational phenomena. Ethnomethodologys concern is with the locally accomplished and situated character of social order. With reference to
educational phenomena, this means that ethnomethodology investigates how the natural facts of educational life, such as daily activities in school classrooms, are produced as such in the first place, rather than taking for
granted the recognisability of these facts and then theorising their explanation. In this sense, ethnomethodological studies contrast markedly with other approaches to the study of education. Each of the chapters in the book consists of a new and original study. Collectively, they exhibit the continuing vitality of this tradition and demonstrate ethnomethodologys special commitment to the analysis of educational
phenomena as locally ordered and accomplished.
educational phenomena, this means that ethnomethodology investigates how the natural facts of educational life, such as daily activities in school classrooms, are produced as such in the first place, rather than taking for
granted the recognisability of these facts and then theorising their explanation. In this sense, ethnomethodological studies contrast markedly with other approaches to the study of education. Each of the chapters in the book consists of a new and original study. Collectively, they exhibit the continuing vitality of this tradition and demonstrate ethnomethodologys special commitment to the analysis of educational
phenomena as locally ordered and accomplished.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 73] 2000. viii, 326 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Contributors
|
vii
|
|
1
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
Appendix
|
289
|
|
Bibliography
|
291
|
Cited by
Cited by 20 other publications
Birmingham, Peter & Chris Davies
2001. Storyboarding shakespeare: learners' interactions with storyboard software in the process of understanding difficult literary texts.
Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 10:3 ► pp. 241 ff. 
Birmingham, Peter, Chris Davies & Christian Greiffenhagen
2002. Turn to Face the Bard: making sense of three-way interactions between teacher, pupils and technology in the classroom.
Education, Communication & Information 2:2-3 ► pp. 139 ff.
Butler, Carly & Ann Weatherall
2006. "No, We're Not Playing Families": Membership Categorization in Children's Play.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 39:4 ► pp. 441 ff.
Carlin, Andrew P.
2010. The Corpus Status of Literature in Teaching Sociology: Novels as “Sociological Reconstruction”.
The American Sociologist 41:3 ► pp. 211 ff.
Carlin, Andrew P. & Ricardo Moutinho
2020. Teaching and learning moments as subjectively problematic: Foundational assumptions and methodological entailments.
Educational Philosophy and Theory ► pp. 1 ff.
Carlin, Andrew P.
2009. The Temporal Organization of Bibliographies.
The Library Quarterly 79:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Evaldsson, Ann-Carita
2014. Doing being Boys with ADHD: category memberships and differences in SEN classroom practices.
Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 19:3 ► pp. 266 ff.
Evaldsson, Ann-Carita & Yvonne Karlsson
2012.
In Learning, Social Interaction and Diversity – Exploring Identities in School Practices,
► pp. 119 ff.
Harris, Jess
2018. Speaking the culture: understanding the micro-level production of school culture through leaders’ talk.
Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 39:3 ► pp. 323 ff.
Hecht, Michael
2013.
In Grenzobjekte,
► pp. 163 ff.
HELLERMANN, JOHN
2007. The Development of Practices for Action in Classroom Dyadic Interaction: Focus on Task Openings.
The Modern Language Journal 91:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Hester, Stephen
2009.
In Encountering the Everyday,
► pp. 234 ff.
Hjörne, Eva & Ann-Carita Evaldsson
2015. Reconstituting the ADHD girl: accomplishing exclusion and solidifying a biomedical identity in an ADHD class.
International Journal of Inclusive Education 19:6 ► pp. 626 ff.
KUNITZ, SILVIA
2018. Collaborative Attention Work on Gender Agreement in Italian as a Foreign Language.
The Modern Language Journal 102 ► pp. 64 ff.
Kunitz, Silvia & Klara Skogmyr Marian
2017. Tracking Immanent Language Learning Behavior Over Time in Task-Based Classroom Work.
TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 507 ff.
Macbeth, Douglas
2001. On “Reflexivity” in Qualitative Research: Two Readings, and a Third.
Qualitative Inquiry 7:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Shaw, Lorraine, Phil Carey & Michael Mair
2008. Studying interaction in undergraduate tutorials: results from a small-scale evaluation.
Teaching in Higher Education 13:6 ► pp. 703 ff.
Sormani, Philippe
2020. Reflexive Ethnography as “Data Science”? A Sociological Contribution to Praxeology.
Symbolic Interaction
Voilmy, Dimitri
2013. Suivre les actions de l'autre.
Anthropologie et Sociétés 36:3 ► pp. 95 ff.
Wang, Jia & Kathryn J. Roulston
2007. An alternative approach to conceptualizing interviews in HRD research.
Human Resource Development Quarterly 18:2 ► pp. 179 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General