A Linguistic Handbook of French for Translators and Language Students

| Université d'Angers
ISBN 9789027200617 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
ISBN 9789027200624 | EUR 36.00 | USD 54.00
ISBN 9789027264183 | EUR 99.00/36.00*
| USD 149.00/54.00*
A Linguistic Handbook of French for Translators and Language Students offers the reader an in-depth contrastive study of French and English based on recent theories of linguistics and discourse analysis. At the same time it is a practical manual for the advanced language student or the translator with dozens of exercises in analyzing and translating French along with detailed corrections.

Organized in three sections – Structure, Perspective and Coherence – the handbook first explores French word formation and syntax, then moves on to the use of tense and aspect, illocution and speech styles in various text types. Finally, problems concerning textual coherence and cohesion in both languages are discussed: anaphora and ellipsis, relevance and equivalence and information structure.

Each chapter is followed by a list of suggested readings for further discussion and a detailed glossary at the end of the book explains all technical terms used.

The handbook is designed to be used either as a textbook or for individuals working at home.

[Not in series, 216]  2018.  xiv, 297 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Section I. Structure
Chapter 1. The units of language
Chapter 2. Transposition
Chapter 3. Nominal constructions
Chapter 4. Verbal constructions
Section II. Perspective
Chapter 5. Modulation
Chapter 6. Tense and aspect
Chapter 7. Voice and point of view
Chapter 8. Sentence modality and illocution
Section III. Coherence
Chapter 9. Cohesion
Chapter 10. Information structure
Chapter 11. Anaphora and ellipsis
Chapter 12. Textual coherence
Author index
Index Linguistic Handbook of French
“A brilliant contribution to translation studies and to comparative linguistics, Boucher's Linguistic Handbook far surpasses previous work in this area. I was amazed that so much information could be packed into 200 pages.”
“I loved the book. It can be used as a French-English grammar reference book or as a translation manual. To my knowledge, no book is as versatile and up-to-date on research in contrastive French-English linguistics as this one. Having a handbook to help understand these languages is useful not only for linguistics and translation studies, but also for translation training or even language learning.”
“Advanced students of French with fluency in English: This Handbook is for you! Not only is it is very practical, with many exercises and corrections, but it is firmly grounded in linguistic theory. And you’ll learn quite a lot about English too!”
“Cet excellent manuel est manifestement le fruit d’une expérience pédagogique approfondie : les exercices et les textes retenus illustrent de façon convaincante les points étudiés, et les explications proposées sont particulièrement claires et précises. L’ouvrage pourra rendre service non seulement dans tout séminaire de traduction mais aussi dans tout cours avancé d’analyse du discours.”


Alvarez, Antonia
1993 “On Translating Metaphor.” Meta: journal des traducteurs / Meta: Translators’ Journal, 38, 3: 479–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel
2005Translation, Linguistics, Culture: a French-English Handbook. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Austin, John Lewis
1962How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baggio, Francesca
2006–07 “Authorial voice in scientific writing: Stephen Pinker’s books and their Italian translation as a case study”, in Mots Palabras Words 7: 71–88. http://​www​.ledonline​.it​/mpw.
Baker, Mona
1992 In Other Words: a Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, Anne
1978Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Presentation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bar Hillel, Jehoshua
1954 “Indexical Expressions”. Mind, 63: 359–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baylon, Christian et Paul Fabre
1995Grammaire systématique de la langue française. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1966 and 1974Problèmes de linguistique générale, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Berg, Jonathan
1991 “The relevant relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 5: 411–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Olivier
2008Histoire du vocabulaire français. Paris: Editions du Temps.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1986 “Shifts of cohesion and coherence in translation”. In J. House and S. Blum-Kulka (eds). Interlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bosseaux, Charlotte
2004 “Point of View in Translation: a Corpus Based Study of French Translations of Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse ”. Across Languages and Cultures. 5, 1: 107–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, Paul
1984 “Deixis et discours: une tentative de description formelle de quelques adverbes déictiques anglais dans le discours narratif. Vers une topologie de l’espace discursif.” Recherches anglaises et américaines, 17: 35–59.Google Scholar
2002 “Determiner Phrases in Old and Modern French”, In From NP to DP, Vol.I: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases, ed. by Martine Coene and Yves D’hulst. 47–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2005 “Definite Reference in Old and Modern French: The Rise and Fall of DP”, In Grammaticalization and Parametric Variation. ed. by Montse Ballori et al. 95–108. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Mapping function to form: adjective positions in French.” Linguisticae Investigationes, Special issue: L’ordre des mots en français. 29, 1: 43–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010a “Wh- questions in French and English: Mapping Syntax to Information Structure”, In Comparative and Contrastive Studies of Information Structure. Ed. by Carsten Breul and Edward Göbbel. 101–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, Paul 2010b “L’interrogation partielle en français: l’interface syntaxe/ sémantique.” Syntaxe et Sémantique 11: 55–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Constructions nominales complexes en traduction.” Esprit des Mots et Mots d’Esprit : Cahiers du CIRHILL. 38: 29–52.Google Scholar
Boucher, Paul and Frédéric Ogée
2017Grammaire appliquée de l’anglais, 4th edition. Paris: Armand Collin.Google Scholar
Breul, Carsten and Edward Göbbel
(eds) 2010Comparative and Contrastive Studies of Information Structure, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bronzwaer, W. J. M.
1975 “A Hypothesis Concerning Deictic Time Adverbs in Narrative Structure.” Journal of Literary Semantics. 4: 53–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruneau, Ferdinand. & Brunot Charles
1969Précis de grammaire historique de la langue française. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Charolles, Monique
1998 “Introduction aux problèmes de la cohérence des textes”. Langue française. 38: 7–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chuquet, Hélène. et Paillard, Michel
1987Approche linguistique des problèmes de traduction. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Ciprianová, Elena
2009 “Metaphore in Translation.” Topics in Linguistics. 4: 12–15.Google Scholar
Combettes, Bernard
1983Pour une grammaire textuelle. Gembloux-De Boeck-Duculot.Google Scholar
Corbin, Danielle
1987Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Max Neimeyer.Google Scholar
Corblin, Francis and de Swart, Henriette
eds. 2004Handbook of French Semantics, CSLI Publications. (http://​fcorblin​.free​.fr​/textes​/FrenchSemantics​.pdf)
Dagnac, Anne
2008 “L’Ellipse modale en français: arguments pour une ellipse du TP.” In Jacques Durand, Benôit Habert and Bernard Laks, eds. Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
2001 “What is a Relevant Translation?”. Critical Inquiry. 27: 174–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc
1999Word Order Variation in French Interrogative Structures. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
2003Dire presque la même chose : expériences de traduction. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Eluerd, Roland
2010Grammaire descriptive de la langue française. Paris: A. Colin.Google Scholar
Elsig, Martin
2009Grammatical Variation Across Space and Time: the French Interrogative System. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabeth
2006 “Information Packaging in Questions.” In O. Bonami é P. Cabrero Hofherr, eds, Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 6: 93–111.Google Scholar
2006 “Information Packaging and Information States.” Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics. O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (eds.). 6: 93–111.Google Scholar
Fagyal, Zsuzsanna., Kibbee, Douglas. and Jenkins, Frederic
2006French: a Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, Peter
1997Translation and Language: Linguistic Theories Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Feldman, A. and Acredolo, L.
1979 “The Effect of Active versus Passive Exploration on Memory for Spatial Location in Children.”. Child Development, 50, 3: 698–704, Wiley: http://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/1128935.
Fillmore, Charles
1975The Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomingdale: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Susan
1990Tense and Narrativity. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gadet, Françoise 1989Le français ordinaire. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Gardes-Tamine, Joëlle
2008La grammaire, tome 2, Syntaxe. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Gauthier, André
(ed) 1989Explorations en linguistique anglaise, Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard
1972Figures I, II and III, Paris: Le Seuil. (translated as Narrative Discourse, Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1980).Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel
1997 “Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory”, Journal of Pragmatics, 27: 17–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gledhill, Christopher
1998 “Towards a description of English and French phraseology.” In Chris Beedham, ed., Langue and Parole in Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective, Selected Proceedings of the XXXIst Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. 221–237. St. Andrews, Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Gray, Richard
2011 “A Matter of Fundamental: Sound and Silence in the Radio Drama of Samuel Beckett.” Babilónia Número Especial. 107–121.Google Scholar
Grellet, Françoise
1991Apprendre à Traduire. Presses universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
1975 “Logic and Conversation”, in Peter Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semaintics 3: Speech Acts. 41–58.Google Scholar
Guillemin-Flescher, Jacqueline
1981Syntaxe compare du français et de l’anglais. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
1984 “Énonciation, perception et traduction”. Langages. 73: 74–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gusdorf, Florent
1993Words, Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Lilian and Guéron, Jacqueline
1999English Grammar: a Generative Perspective. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hassan, R.
1976Cohesion in English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanote, Sylvie et Chuquet, Hélène
2004Who’s Speaking Please: le discours rapporté. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Harvey, Malcolm
Beginner’s Course in Legal Translation: the Case of Culture Bound Terms http://​www​.tradulex​.com​/Actes2000​/harvey​.pdf
Hatim, Basil and Mason, Ian
1990Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hervey, Sandor
1998 “Speech Acts and Illocutionary Function in Translation Methodology.” in The Pragmatics of Translation, ed. by Leo Hickey, 10–24. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hervey, Sandor & Higgens, Ian
2002Thinking French Translation: a course in translation method: French to English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hickey, Leo
1998The Pragmatics of Translation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hobbs, J. R.
1979 “Coherence and coreference.” Cognitive Science, 3: 67–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huart, Ruth
1989 “Nouveau regard sur les noms composés” In Explorations en linguistique anglaise. Ed. by André Gauthier. 25–94.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1960 “Linguistics and Poetics”, In Thomas Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1962Negation in English and other Languages, Copenhagen: Munksgaard 1966, reprinted in Selected writings of Otto Jespersen, 3–151 1962 London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Jesperson, Otto
1924 & 1992The Philosophy of Grammar, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, M. H.
1997The Beginning Translator’s Workbook, or the ABC of French to English Translation, University Press of America.Google Scholar
Judge, Anne
1998 “Choix entre le présent narratif et le système multifocal dans le contexte du récit écrit.” In S. Vogeleer et al., eds. Temps et Discours. 215–35. Louvain-La-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1975French Syntax, the Transformational Cycle, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Klitgård, I. 2004 “Dual Voice and Dual Style: Translating Free Indirect Discourse in Ulysses.” Nordic Journal of English Studies. 3, 3: 319–320.Google Scholar
Kurt, S.
2002 “Les traducteurs face au style indirect libre (français-russe, russe-français).” Revue des études slaves. 74, 2–3: 493–504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1987 “On the Status of SVO Sentences in French Discourse”. In Russell Tomlin (ed) Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. 217–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Constraints on subject-focus mapping in French and English: A contrastive analysis”. In Comparative and Contrastive Studies of Information Structure. ed. by Karsten Breul and Edward Göbbels, 77–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lassen, Inger
2003Accessibility and Acceptability in Technical Manuals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
1995L’évolution du français : ordre des mots, démonstratifs, accent tonique. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
1997La langue française aux XIV° et XV° siècles. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Marnette, Sophie
2005Speech and Thought Presentation in French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Ian
1998 “Discourse Connectives, Ellipsis and Markedness.” in The Pragmatics of Translation. Leo Hickey. 170–184. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Matthieu-Colas, Mathieu
1996 “Essai de typologie des noms composés français”. Cahiers de lexicologie. 69: 71–125.Google Scholar
Molendijk, Arie, et al.
2004 “Meaning and Uses of Past Tenses in Discourse”. In Handbook of French Semantics ed. by Francis Corblin and Henriette de Swart, 271–308. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Montalt Ressurreccio, V., Ezpeleta Piorno, P., García Izquierdo, I.
2008 “The Acquisition of Translation Competence through Textual Genre.” Translation Journal. 12, 4: 27–35.Google Scholar
Mossop, Brian
1983 “The Translator as Rapporteur: A Concept for Training and Self-improvement.” Meta : journal des traducteurs / Meta: Translators’ Journal. 28,3: 244–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Lindsey
2007Wh- interrogatives in Spoken French: A Corpus Based Analysis of their Form and Function. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Neel, Jasper
1992 “Dichotomy, consubstantiality, technical writing, literary theory: The double orthodox curse”. Journal of Advanced Composition. JSTOR Online Journal. 305–320.Google Scholar
Neubert, Albrecht. and Gregory Shreve
1992Translation as Text, Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Nølke, Henning and Michel Olsen
2000 “ Donc, pour conclure. Polyphonie et style indirect libre: analyses littéraire et linguistique”. Actes du XIVe Congrès des Romanistes scandinaveshttp://​rudar​.ruc​.dk/​/bitstream​/1800​/13415​/1​/Stockholm​.pdf .
Nølke, Henning et Michel Olsen
2003 “Le passé simple subjectivisé.” Langue française. 138: 75–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Novitz, David
1985 “Metaphor, Derrida, and Davidson.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 44, 2: 101–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pascal, Roy
1977Free Indirect Speech and its Functioning in the 19th Century European Novel. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1997Langage et cognition : Introduction au programme minimaliste de la grammaire générative. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Poncharal, Bruno 2007 “Cohérence discursive en anglais et en français: fonction des conntecteurs dans la traduction.” in Les Connecteurs, jalons du discours ed. by Agnès Celle, Stéphane Gresse and Ruth Huart, 117–136. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1978 “A Comparison of Wh-clefts and IT-clefts in Discourse”. Language. 54, 4: 883–906. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew
2004English Syntax: an Introduction. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reggiani, C.
2010 “Les discours directs libres dans la prose narrative de Stendhal.” Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, Paris, Institut de Linguistique Française: 1205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riemsdijk van, Hendrick
1999Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Saint-Pierre, Madeleine
1991 “Illocutoire et modalisation : les marqueurs d’intensité en français.” Revue québécoise de linguistique. 20, 2: 223–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salles, Monique
2006 “Cohésion-cohérence : accords et désaccords.” CORELA – Numéro thématique : Organisation des textes et cohérence des discours http://​corela​.edel​.univ​-poitiers​.fr​/index​.php​?id​=1426.Crossref
Schegloff, Emanuel
1977 “Identification and recognition in interactional openings.” in The Social Impact of the Telephone ed. By I. D. Pool, 415–450. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1956Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Selting, Marguerite
1992 “Prosody in conversational questions”. Journal of Pragmatics 17: 335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seretan, Violeta. and Wehrli, Eric
2007 “Collocation translation based on sentence alignment and parsing”. Actes de la 14e conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles. TALN, 401–410.Google Scholar
Smadja, Frank, Hatzivassiloglout, Vasileios and McKeown, Katheline
1996 “Translating Collocations for Bilingual Lexicons: A Statistical Approach”. Association for Computational Linguistics. 22: 1–38.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil and Deidre Wilson
1992 “Introduction”, Lingua. 87: 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan. and Deidre Wilson
1986Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jean and Hermine Sinclair
1975 “Comprehension of questions by children between 5 and 9”. Linguistics. 13: 17–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taane, Eric
1997L’Explication de Texte: méthode et pratique. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Tovena, Lucia, Viviane Déprez and Jacques Jayez
2004 “Polarity Sensitive Items”. In Handbook of French Semantics, ed. by Francis Corblin and Henriette de Swart, 391–416. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Vinay, J. P. et Darbelnet, J.
1958 and 1977Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais, Paris: Didier. (English translation: 1995 Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.)Google Scholar
Weinrich, Harold
1973Le Temps : le Récit et le Commentaire. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
1989Grammaire textuelle du français. Paris: Didier/Hatier.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin
1956Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988The Semantics of Grammar, Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1988. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yaguello, Marina
2003Le Grand Livre de la Langue Française, Seuil 2003.Google Scholar
Young, Morag
2008 “Shifting perspectives: innovative narrative tense usage in Marguerite Duras’s Moderato cantabile, Patrick Modiano’s Rue des Boutiques Obscures and Marie Darrieussecq’s Naissance des fantômes  ». Journal of Romance Studies. 8, 2: 59–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lansari, Laure
2020.  In A Contrastive View of Discourse Markers,  pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata


Romance linguistics

Translation & Interpreting Studies

Translation Studies
BIC Subject: CF/2ADF – Linguistics/French
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2017061317 | Marc record