Evidence for Evidentiality

Editors
 |  Radboud University
 |  Radboud University
 |  Radboud University
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027200952 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027263919 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
Google Play logo
Statements are always under the threat of the potential counter-question How do you know? To pre-empt this question, language users often indicate what kind of access they had to the communicated content: Their own perception, inference from other information, ‘hearsay’, etc. Such expressions, grammatical or lexical, have been studied in recent years under the cover term of evidentiality research. The present volume contributes 11 new studies to this flourishing field, all exploring evidential phenomena in a range of languages (Dutch, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Khalkha Mongolian, Spanish, Tibetan, Yurakaré), using a variety of methodologies. Evidential meaning is discussed in relation to other semantic dimensions, such as epistemic modality, semantic roles, commitment, quotative meaning, and tense. The volume is of interest to scholars and students who are interested in up-to-date methods and frameworks for studying evidential meaning and the various ways it is expressed in the languages of the world.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 61] 2018.  vii, 313 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 6 July 2018
Table of Contents
Evidence for Evidentiality is a welcome contribution to the existing knowledge on evidentiality. The book, which covers theoretical and descriptive issues, succeeds in demonstrating that evidentiality is an identifiable category across languages, albeit a complex and elusive one. The analysis of phenomena pertaining to language acquisition, polysemy or meaning extensions attest to the intricate relationship between evidentiality and related categories such as factuality, knowledge and cognition, epistemic and deontic modality, subjectivity, tense and lexical aspect. The book has a wide coverage of evidential markers (including nine languages: six European, two East-Asian and Yurakaré from South America) and of different methods for the study of evidentiality, such as the use of corpus data, reference grammars, historical sources, native speaker intuitions, and experiments. Evidence for Evidentiality is a must for students and academics undertaking research or interested in deepening knowledge in the domain of evidentiality.”
“All in all, based on a sound empirical footing, this collection offers a springboard for looking into evidentiality from a wider perspective, especially pragmatics, using diverse approaches and methodologies. By doing this, it contributes significantly to the way of pinning down the genre-specific, context-specific even socio-cultural-specific evidential values across languages and thus obtaining a panoramic picture of the complexity of evidentiality.”
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Mélac, Eric
2024. The links between evidentiality, modality, and grammaticalization. Studies in Language 48:3  pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Cong, Yan
2021. Judge-dependence in quality nouns. Asian Languages and Linguistics 2:2  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Jaakola, Minna
2021. Marking one’s own viewpoint: The Finnish evidential verb+kseni‘as far as I understand’ construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44:3  pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Grzech, Karolina, Eva Schultze-Berndt & Henrik Bergqvist
2020. Knowing in interaction: An introduction. Folia Linguistica 54:2  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Kostadinova, Viktorija, Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Marco Wiemann, Gea Dreschler, Sune Gregersen, Beáta Gyuris, Kathryn Allan, Maggie Scott, Lieselotte Anderwald, Sven Leuckert, Tihana Kraš, Alessia Cogo, Tian Gan, Ida Parise, Shawnea Sum Pok Ting, Juliana Souza Da Silva, Beke Hansen & Ian Cushing
2020. I English Language. The Year's Work in English Studies 99:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
San Roque, Lila
2019. Evidentiality. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis

Main BISAC Subject

LAN016000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Semantics
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2018014203 | Marc record