Evidence for Evidentiality

Editors
| Radboud University
| Radboud University
| Radboud University
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027200952 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027263919 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
Statements are always under the threat of the potential counter-question How do you know? To pre-empt this question, language users often indicate what kind of access they had to the communicated content: Their own perception, inference from other information, ‘hearsay’, etc. Such expressions, grammatical or lexical, have been studied in recent years under the cover term of evidentiality research. The present volume contributes 11 new studies to this flourishing field, all exploring evidential phenomena in a range of languages (Dutch, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Khalkha Mongolian, Spanish, Tibetan, Yurakaré), using a variety of methodologies. Evidential meaning is discussed in relation to other semantic dimensions, such as epistemic modality, semantic roles, commitment, quotative meaning, and tense. The volume is of interest to scholars and students who are interested in up-to-date methods and frameworks for studying evidential meaning and the various ways it is expressed in the languages of the world.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 61]  2018.  vii, 313 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Preface
vii
Introduction: Evidentiality: How do you know?
Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
1–16
Part I. What do we know? Knowledge and evidence
Chapter 1. Evidentiality as stance: Event types and speaker roles
Henrik Bergqvist
19–43
Chapter 2. Factual vs. evidential? The past tense forms of spoken Khalkha Mongolian
Benjamin Brosig
45–75
Chapter 3. I think and I believe : Evidential expressions in Dutch
Helen de Hoop, Ad Foolen, Gijs Mulder and Vera van Mulken
77–97
Chapter 4. (Yo) creo que as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality: Evidence from Twitter
Gijs Mulder
99–120
Chapter 5. Finnish evidential adverbs in argumentative texts
Minna Jaakola
121–141
Part II. When do we know? Accessibility of evidence in time
Chapter 6. Uralic perspectives on experimental evidence for evidentials: Early interpretation of the Estonian evidential morpheme
Anne Tamm, Reili Argus and Kadri Suurmäe
145–172
Chapter 7. Reportive sollen in an exclusively functional view of evidentiality
Jeroen Vanderbiesen
173–198
Chapter 8. The French future: Evidentiality and incremental information
Alda Mari
199–226
Chapter 9. Evidence for the development of ‘evidentiality’ as a grammatical category in the Tibetic languages
Bettina Zeisler
227–256
Chapter 10. From similarity to evidentiality: Uncertain visual/perceptual evidentiality in Yurakaré and other languages
Sonja Gipper
257–280
Chapter 11. What can different types of linguistic data teach us on evidentiality?
Seppo Kittilä, Lotta Jalava and Erika Sandman
281–304
Author Index
305–308
Language index
309–310
Subject index
311–313
Evidence for Evidentiality is a welcome contribution to the existing knowledge on evidentiality. The book, which covers theoretical and descriptive issues, succeeds in demonstrating that evidentiality is an identifiable category across languages, albeit a complex and elusive one. The analysis of phenomena pertaining to language acquisition, polysemy or meaning extensions attest to the intricate relationship between evidentiality and related categories such as factuality, knowledge and cognition, epistemic and deontic modality, subjectivity, tense and lexical aspect. The book has a wide coverage of evidential markers (including nine languages: six European, two East-Asian and Yurakaré from South America) and of different methods for the study of evidentiality, such as the use of corpus data, reference grammars, historical sources, native speaker intuitions, and experiments. Evidence for Evidentiality is a must for students and academics undertaking research or interested in deepening knowledge in the domain of evidentiality.”
“All in all, based on a sound empirical footing, this collection offers a springboard for looking into evidentiality from a wider perspective, especially pragmatics, using diverse approaches and methodologies. By doing this, it contributes significantly to the way of pinning down the genre-specific, context-specific even socio-cultural-specific evidential values across languages and thus obtaining a panoramic picture of the complexity of evidentiality.”
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Kostadinova, Viktorija, Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Marco Wiemann, Gea Dreschler, Sune Gregersen, Beáta Gyuris, Kathryn Allan, Maggie Scott, Lieselotte Anderwald, Sven Leuckert, Tihana Kraš, Alessia Cogo, Tian Gan, Ida Parise, Shawnea Sum Pok Ting, Juliana Souza Da Silva, Beke Hansen & And Ian Cushing
2020. IEnglish Language. The Year's Work in English Studies Crossref logo
San Roque, Lila
2019. Evidentiality. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1  pp. 353 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN016000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Semantics
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2018014203 | Marc record