Evidence for Evidentiality
Editors
Statements are always under the threat of the potential counter-question How do you know? To pre-empt this question, language users often indicate what kind of access they had to the communicated content: Their own perception, inference from other information, ‘hearsay’, etc. Such expressions, grammatical or lexical, have been studied in recent years under the cover term of evidentiality research. The present volume contributes 11 new studies to this flourishing field, all exploring evidential phenomena in a range of languages (Dutch, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Khalkha Mongolian, Spanish, Tibetan, Yurakaré), using a variety of methodologies. Evidential meaning is discussed in relation to other semantic dimensions, such as epistemic modality, semantic roles, commitment, quotative meaning, and tense. The volume is of interest to scholars and students who are interested in up-to-date methods and frameworks for studying evidential meaning and the various ways it is expressed in the languages of the world.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 61] 2018. vii, 313 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 6 July 2018
Published online on 6 July 2018
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
-
Editors and contributors
-
Preface
-
Introduction: Evidentiality: How do you know?Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder | pp. 1–16
-
Part I. What do we know? Knowledge and evidence
-
Chapter 1. Evidentiality as stance: Event types and speaker rolesHenrik Bergqvist | pp. 19–43
-
Chapter 2. Factual vs. evidential? The past tense forms of spoken Khalkha MongolianBenjamin Brosig | pp. 45–75
-
Chapter 3. I think and I believe : Evidential expressions in DutchHelen de Hoop, Ad Foolen, Gijs Mulder and Vera van Mulken | pp. 77–97
-
Chapter 4. (Yo) creo que as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality: Evidence from TwitterGijs Mulder | pp. 99–120
-
Chapter 5. Finnish evidential adverbs in argumentative textsMinna Jaakola | pp. 121–141
-
Part II. When do we know? Accessibility of evidence in time
-
Chapter 6. Uralic perspectives on experimental evidence for evidentials: Early interpretation of the Estonian evidential morphemeAnne Tamm, Reili Argus and Kadri Suurmäe | pp. 145–172
-
Chapter 7. Reportive sollen in an exclusively functional view of evidentialityJeroen Vanderbiesen | pp. 173–198
-
Chapter 8. The French future: Evidentiality and incremental informationAlda Mari | pp. 199–226
-
Chapter 9. Evidence for the development of ‘evidentiality’ as a grammatical category in the Tibetic languagesBettina Zeisler | pp. 227–256
-
Chapter 10. From similarity to evidentiality: Uncertain visual/perceptual evidentiality in Yurakaré and other languagesSonja Gipper | pp. 257–280
-
Chapter 11. What do different methods of data collection reveal about evidentiality?Seppo Kittilä, Lotta Javala and Erika Sandman | pp. 281–304
-
Language index | pp. 309–310
-
Subject index | pp. 311–313
-
Author Index | pp. 305–308
“
Evidence for Evidentiality is a welcome contribution to the existing knowledge on evidentiality. The book, which covers theoretical and descriptive issues, succeeds in demonstrating that evidentiality is an identifiable category across languages, albeit a complex and elusive one. The analysis of phenomena pertaining to language acquisition, polysemy or meaning extensions attest to the intricate relationship between evidentiality and related categories such as factuality, knowledge and cognition, epistemic and deontic modality, subjectivity, tense and lexical aspect. The book has a wide coverage of evidential markers (including nine languages: six European, two East-Asian and Yurakaré from South America) and of different methods for the study of evidentiality, such as the use of corpus data, reference grammars, historical sources, native speaker intuitions, and experiments. Evidence for Evidentiality is a must for students and academics undertaking research or interested in deepening knowledge in the domain of evidentiality.”
Marta Carretero, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
“All in all, based on a sound empirical footing, this collection offers a springboard for looking into evidentiality from a wider perspective, especially pragmatics, using diverse approaches and methodologies. By doing this, it contributes significantly to the way of pinning down the genre-specific, context-specific even socio-cultural-specific evidential values across languages and thus obtaining a panoramic picture of the complexity of evidentiality.”
Weiqian Liu, Yi'na Wang, Beihang University, Beijing, China, in Journal of Pragmatics 170 (2020)
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Mélac, Eric
2024. The links between evidentiality, modality, and grammaticalization. Studies in Language 48:3 ► pp. 513 ff.
Cong, Yan
Jaakola, Minna
Grzech, Karolina, Eva Schultze-Berndt & Henrik Bergqvist
Kostadinova, Viktorija, Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Marco Wiemann, Gea Dreschler, Sune Gregersen, Beáta Gyuris, Kathryn Allan, Maggie Scott, Lieselotte Anderwald, Sven Leuckert, Tihana Kraš, Alessia Cogo, Tian Gan, Ida Parise, Shawnea Sum Pok Ting, Juliana Souza Da Silva, Beke Hansen & Ian Cushing
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
Main BISAC Subject
LAN016000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Semantics